Q.(a) Write reasons for the following :
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a)Concept understanding — Ortho Para Directing
The Intuition: Why Some Groups "Point" the Next Attack
Imagine you're trying to add a second substituent to a benzene ring that already has one group attached. The ring already has six hydrogens, but they aren't all equal anymore — the first group has changed the electron density at different positions. Some positions become more "attractive" to an incoming electrophile (a positive or electron-seeking species), while others become less attractive.
Ortho-para directing groups are substituents that make the next electrophile prefer to attack the positions next to the group (ortho, positions 2 and 6) or directly opposite it (para, position 4), rather than the meta position (position 3 and 5).
The terms come from Greek: ortho = straight/correct (adjacent), meta = after (one carbon away), para = beside/opposite (two carbons away, directly across).
The Precise Statement
Ortho-para directing groups are substituents that, when present on a benzene ring, cause the next electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) reaction to occur predominantly at the ortho and para positions relative to themselves. These groups are typically electron-donating (activating) or weakly deactivating (like halogens).
The Mechanism: How They Work
The key lies in the stability of the intermediate carbocation (the arenium ion / sigma complex) formed during the attack.
When an electrophile attacks benzene, the ring temporarily loses its aromaticity and becomes a positively charged carbocation. This intermediate is stabilised if the positive charge can be delocalised onto the substituent. Ortho-para directing groups are able to donate electron density into the ring, either through:
- Resonance effect (most important): The group has lone pairs or pi electrons that can be pushed into the ring, creating extra resonance structures where the positive charge is on the substituent (which is more stable).
- Inductive effect: The group is electron-donating through sigma bonds (e.g., alkyl groups like methyl).
Let's see what happens when an electrophile attacks the ortho position of aniline (NH₂ group):
›Proof
Resonance stabilisation for ortho attack (aniline)
The NH₂ group donates its lone pair into the ring. When the electrophile attacks ortho, the positive charge can be delocalised onto the nitrogen atom (which is very happy to carry a positive charge because it's electronegative and has a lone pair). This gives an extra, highly stable resonance structure that is not available for meta attack.
For meta attack, the positive charge stays on the ring carbons — no extra stabilisation from the substituent. Hence ortho/para attack is favoured.
The Two Categories of Ortho-Para Directors
| Type | Examples | Effect | Why? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly activating | -OH, -NH₂, -OCH₃, -NHR | Strong ortho-para directing | Strong resonance donation (lone pairs) |
| Moderately activating | -CH₃, -C₂H₅, -R (alkyl) | Ortho-para directing | Inductive electron donation (no lone pairs, but pushes electrons through sigma bonds) |
| Weakly deactivating | -F, -Cl, -Br, -I | Ortho-para directing (surprisingly!) | Halogens are electron-withdrawing inductively but electron-donating by resonance (lone pairs). The resonance effect wins for directing, but the inductive withdrawal makes the ring less reactive overall. |
Common mistake: Students think "deactivating" means "meta directing". Halogens are the exception — they deactivate the ring (slower reaction) but still direct ortho/para. The resonance donation of lone pairs is strong enough to stabilise the ortho/para intermediate, but the inductive withdrawal makes the ring less electron-rich overall. …
Why this formula?
Ortho-Para Directing: The Why Behind the Rule
Let’s build this from first principles. The question is: Why do certain groups on a benzene ring direct new substituents to the ortho and para positions, while others direct to the meta position?
The answer lies in resonance stabilization of the intermediate carbocation (the arenium ion / σ-complex) during electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS).
1. The Core Mechanism: EAS Forms a Carbocation Intermediate
In EAS, the electrophile (E+) attacks the benzene ring. The ring temporarily loses aromaticity, forming a resonance-stabilized carbocation:
benzene+EX+[arenium ion]product
The arenium ion has three resonance forms. The stability of this intermediate determines how fast the reaction proceeds and where the electrophile attacks.
2. What Makes a Group Ortho-Para Directing?
A group is ortho-para directing if it donates electron density into the ring, especially at the ortho and para positions. This donation stabilizes the carbocation when the electrophile attacks those positions.
The Key: Resonance Structures of the Intermediate
Consider an activating group like −OH (phenol). When the electrophile attacks the ortho position, one resonance form places the positive charge directly on the carbon bearing the −OH group. The oxygen’s lone pair can then donate into that empty p-orbital, creating an extra, highly stable resonance structure:
ortho attack: ...[resonance form with C+-OH][resonance form with O+=C]
This extra resonance contributor (with a positive charge on the electronegative oxygen) is not possible for meta attack. For meta attack, the positive charge never lands on the carbon attached to the −OH group — so no extra stabilization.
The donation itself, drawn for phenol:
Result: The ortho/para intermediates are more stable (lower energy) than the meta intermediate. Hence, the reaction is faster at ortho/para positions.
3. The Formula: Why Ortho and Para Specifically?
The resonance structures of the arenium ion reveal the pattern:
- For ortho attack: The positive charge can be delocalized to the carbon bearing the substituent (position 1).
- For para attack: The positive charge can also be delocalized to the carbon bearing the substituent (position 1).
- For meta attack: The positive charge never reaches the carbon with the substituent.
Mathematically, if the substituent is at position 1, the positions that can stabilize the positive charge via resonance are positions 2, 4, and 6 (ortho and para). Positions 3 and 5 (meta) cannot.
4. The Deactivating Ortho-Para Directors: The Halogen Exception
Halogens (−F,−Cl,−Br,−I) are deactivating (they withdraw electron density inductively) but ortho-para directing. Why?
- Inductive effect: Halogens are electronegative → pull electron density away from the ring → deactivate (slow down EAS).
- Resonance effect: Halogens have lone pairs → can donate into the ring via resonance → stabilize the ortho/para intermediates (just like −OH).
Drawn out for chlorobenzene: …
Part (b)Concept understanding — Hofmann Bromamide Reaction
Hofmann Bromamide Degradation
Imagine you have an amide — a molecule with a carbonyl group (−CO−) attached to a nitrogen. You want to turn it into a primary amine, but you also want to chop off one carbon from the chain. That is exactly what the Hofmann bromamide reaction does: it shortens the carbon skeleton by one carbon and gives you an amine.
The Intuition
The reaction uses bromine (BrX2) in the presence of a strong alkali (like NaOH or KOH). The alkali first deprotonates the amide nitrogen, making it a strong nucleophile. This nucleophile attacks bromine, forming an N-bromoamide. Under the strongly basic conditions, this intermediate loses a bromide ion and undergoes a rearrangement — the alkyl group attached to the carbonyl carbon migrates from carbon to nitrogen. The result is an isocyanate intermediate (R−N=C=O). Finally, the isocyanate is hydrolysed by the aqueous alkali to give a primary amine and carbon dioxide.
The net effect: the carbonyl carbon is lost as COX2, and the alkyl group ends up attached to the nitrogen.
The product amine has one fewer carbon than the starting amide. The lost carbon is the carbonyl carbon.
The Precise Statement
Hofmann bromamide degradation (also called Hofmann rearrangement) is the conversion of a primary amide to a primary amine with one fewer carbon atom, using bromine and an aqueous alkali (usually NaOH or KOH).
The general reaction is:
R−CONHX2+BrX2+4NaOHR−NHX2+2NaBr+NaX2COX3+2HX2O
Or, in a more compact form:
R−CONHX2BrX2,NaOHR−NHX2+COX2
Step-by-Step Mechanism
- Deprotonation: The amide nitrogen is deprotonated by the strong base, forming an amide anion.
R−CONHX2+OHX−R−CONHX−+HX2O
- Bromination: The amide anion attacks bromine, forming an N-bromoamide.
R−CONHX−+BrX2R−CONHBr+BrX−
- Second deprotonation: The N-bromoamide is deprotonated again by the base.
R−CONHBr+OHX−R−CONBrX−+HX2O
- Rearrangement: The alkyl group migrates from the carbonyl carbon to the nitrogen, with simultaneous loss of bromide ion. This forms an isocyanate.
R−CONBrX−R−N=C=O+BrX−
- Hydrolysis: The isocyanate reacts with water to form a carbamic acid, which spontaneously decarboxylates (loses COX2) to give the primary amine.
R−N=C=O+HX2OR−NH−COOHR−NHX2+COX2
The rearrangement step (step 4) is the key. The alkyl group migrates with its bonding electrons — it is a 1,2-shift from carbon to the electron-deficient nitrogen. This is why the carbon skeleton shortens by one carbon.
Key Points for Exams
- Starting material: Primary amide (R−CONHX2) only. Secondary or tertiary amides do not undergo this reaction.
- Reagents: BrX2 and NaOH (or KOH). Sometimes ClX2 can be used instead of BrX2, but bromine is more common.
- Product: Primary amine with one fewer carbon.
- By-products: NaBr, NaX2COX3, HX2O (or COX2 if written in the simplified form). …
Part (a)
(i) Ethylamine's small –NH₂ H-bonds strongly with water and its ethyl group is small, so it dissolves; aniline's large hydrophobic benzene ring dominates (and its N lone pair is partly delocalised into the ring), so it is water-insoluble.
(ii) –NH₂ is o/p-directing by resonance, but nitration uses acidic HNO3/H2SO4 which protonates it to −N+H3 — a meta-directing, deactivating group — so a substantial amount of m-nitroaniline forms. …
Part (a): ethylamine is water-soluble (effective H-bonding, small chain) while aniline is not (bulky hydrophobic ring); in acidic nitration aniline is protonated to the meta-directing −NHX3X+, giving substantial m-nitroaniline; amines are nucleophilic because of the N lone pair. Part (b): nitrobenzene → aniline (Sn/HCl then NaOH); ethanamide → methanamine (Hofmann bromamide, one C less); ethanenitrile → ethanamine (LiAlH₄).
Part (a)
- Ethylamine soluble, aniline insoluble. Ethylamine's small –NH₂ group hydrogen-bonds strongly with water, and its short ethyl chain barely disrupts the water structure — so it is very soluble. In aniline the same –NH₂ can H-bond, but the large hydrophobic benzene ring dominates and its lone pair is partly delocalised into the ring (less available for H-bonding), so aniline is only sparingly soluble.
- o/p-directing but gives m-nitroaniline. Free –NH₂ donates its lone pair by resonance and is strongly activating, o/p-directing. Nitration, however, is done in a strongly acidic HNOX3/HX2SOX4 mixture that protonates the amine:
The −NHX3X+ group is electron-withdrawing, deactivating and meta-directing, so a substantial fraction of the product is m-nitroaniline (the o/p isomers come from the small amount of free aniline present). …
CX6HX5NHX2+HX+CX6HX5NHX3X+
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following gives propanamine product by Hoffmann Bromamide reaction?(a) HCONH2(b) CH3CH2CONH2(c) CH3CONH2(d) CH3CH2CH2CONH2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Hoffmann bromamide degradation converts an amide R-CONH2 into an amine R-NH2 with ONE FEWER carbon, so to obtain propan-1-amine (3 carbons) the starting amide must have 4 carbons.
In the Hoffmann bromamide degradation reaction, an amide loses its carbonyl carbon (as CO2, via an isocyanate intermediate) to give a primary amine with one carbon less than the starting amide:
R-CONH2 --[Br2, NaOH]--> R-NH2
To obtain propan-1-amine, CH3CH2CH2-NH2 (3 carbons), the group R must be propyl (CH3CH2CH2-), meaning the starting amide must be R-CONH2 with R = propyl - i.e., butanamide, CH3CH2CH2-CONH2 (4 carbons total).
…
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which amide gives propanamine by Hoffmann bromamide reaction?(a) Butanamide(b) Ethenamide(c) Propanamide(d) Pentanamide
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Hoffmann bromamide degradation converts RCONH2 to RNH2, losing one carbon (the carbonyl carbon leaves as CO2/carbonate), so to get propan-1-amine (C3H9N) you need the 4-carbon amide.
CH3CH2CH2CONH2 (Butanamide) + Br2 + 4NaOH -> CH3CH2CH2NH2 (Propan-1-amine) + 2NaBr + Na2CO3 + 2H2O
…
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2022Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.[The exact wording of the stem is degraded in the source scan; it concerns the amides listed in the options - possibly about relative reactivity/rate in the Hofmann bromamide degradation reaction. See transcriber note.](a) HCONH2(b) CH3CH2CONH2(c) CH3CONH2(d) CH3CH2CH2CONH2
›Reveal solutionSolution
In the Hofmann bromamide degradation (RCONH2 + Br2 + 4NaOH -> RNH2 + 2NaBr + Na2CO3 + 2H2O), the reaction proceeds through nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl carbon, so LESS steric hindrance and HIGHER electrophilicity at that carbon favour a faster reaction.
Among the amides listed (formamide HCONH2, propanamide CH3CH2CONH2, acetamide CH3CONH2, butanamide CH3CH2CH2CONH2), the alkyl group's +I effect reduces the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon and increasing chain length/branching adds steric hindrance to the initial nucleophilic attack by OBr-. Formamide, having the smallest substituent (just H), presents the least steric hindrance and the most electrophilic carbonyl carbon, so it is generally the most reactive of the …
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2020Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.______ compound gives Hoffmann bromamide reaction.(a) Ethenamide(b) Ethenoic acid(c) Ethyl cyanide(d) Ethenamine
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Hoffmann bromamide reaction converts a primary amide (RCONH2) into a primary amine (RNH2) with one fewer carbon, using bromine and concentrated alkali.
Hoffmann's bromamide degradation reaction takes a primary AMIDE, R-CO-NH2, and treats it with Br2/KOH (or NaOH) to give a primary amine with one carbon less, via an isocyanate intermediate: R-CO-NH2 + Br2 + 4KOH -> R-NH2 + K2CO3 + 2KBr + 2H2O. Ethanamide (acetamide, CH3CONH2) is exactly …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.