Skip to content

Chemistry · Ch 3 — Thermodynamics

Is Decrease in Enthalpy a Criterion for Spontaneity?

3.6(a)

Is Decrease in Enthalpy a Criterion for Spontaneity?

Is Decrease in Enthalpy a Criterion for Spontaneity?

When we observe phenomena like water flowing downhill or a stone falling to the ground, we see a net decrease in potential energy in the direction of change. By analogy, we might be tempted to conclude that a chemical reaction is spontaneous in a given direction because there is a decrease in energy — as in exothermic reactions.

Consider these examples:

12N2(g)+32H2(g)→NH3(g);ΔrH∘=−46.1 kJ mol−1\frac{1}{2} \text{N}_2(g) + \frac{3}{2} \text{H}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{NH}_3(g); \quad \Delta_r H^\circ = -46.1 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}

12H2(g)+12Cl2(g)→HCl(g);ΔrH∘=−92.32 kJ mol−1\frac{1}{2} \text{H}_2(g) + \frac{1}{2} \text{Cl}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{HCl}(g); \quad \Delta_r H^\circ = -92.32 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}

H2(g)+12O2(g)→H2O(l);ΔrH∘=−285.8 kJ mol−1\text{H}_2(g) + \frac{1}{2} \text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{H}_2\text{O}(l); \quad \Delta_r H^\circ = -285.8 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}

In each case, the enthalpy of the products is lower than that of the reactants. The postulate that a decrease in enthalpy drives spontaneous change seems reasonable based on this evidence.

But now examine these reactions:

12N2(g)+O2(g)→NO2(g);ΔrH∘=+33.2 kJ mol−1\frac{1}{2} \text{N}_2(g) + \text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{NO}_2(g); \quad \Delta_r H^\circ = +33.2 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}

C(graphite, s)+2S(l)→CS2(l);ΔrH∘=+128.5 kJ mol−1\text{C(graphite, s)} + 2\text{S}(l) \rightarrow \text{CS}_2(l); \quad \Delta_r H^\circ = +128.5 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1} …

Figure 5.10(a)Enthalpy diagram for an exothermic reaction.
Fig. 5.10(a) — Enthalpy diagram for an exothermic reaction.

Drawn by us to help you understand the concept clearly, and verified to make sure it's accurate. For exams, practice from your textbook's own diagram.

What Fig. 5.10 Actually Shows

The diagram is a simple enthalpy profile: a plot with Enthalpy (HH) on the vertical axis and Reaction coordinate (a measure of progress from reactants to products) on the horizontal axis. Two horizontal lines appear — one labelled Reactants at a higher enthalpy level, another labelled Products at a lower level. A vertical downward arrow connects the two levels, annotated with ΔrH=negative\Delta_r H = \text{negative} (or simply ΔrH<0\Delta_r H < 0), indicating that heat is released to the surroundings.

There is no curve or hump representing activation energy — this is not an energy barrier diagram. The figure is deliberately simple: it shows only the net enthalpy change between the start and end of a reaction at constant pressure.

Note

The reaction coordinate axis has no numerical scale. It merely indicates direction: left-to-right means the reaction proceeds from reactants to products. The slope or shape of any connecting line is irrelevant here — only the vertical drop matters.

The Physical Idea

The figure teaches one core concept: for an exothermic reaction, the enthalpy of the products is lower than the enthalpy of the reactants. The difference appears as heat given off to the surroundings. This is why exothermic reactions feel hot — energy flows out of the system.

The downward arrow represents ΔrH\Delta_r H, the enthalpy change of reaction. Because the arrow points down (products have less enthalpy), ΔrH\Delta_r H is negative. The textbook defines this quantity as:

ΔrH=∑aiHm(products)−∑biHm(reactants)\Delta_r H = \sum a_i H_m(\text{products}) - \sum b_i H_m(\text{reactants})

where aia_i and bib_i are the stoichiometric coefficients of products and reactants respectively, and HmH_m is the molar enthalpy of each substance.

Watch out

A common mistake is to think the arrow shows the direction of heat flow. It does not — it shows the magnitude and sign of the enthalpy change. Heat flows out of the system (to surroundings) when ΔrH\Delta_r H is negative.

The Key Formula This Figure Supports

The figure is the visual foundation for the standard enthalpy of reaction:

ΔrH∘=∑aiΔfH∘(products)−∑biΔfH∘(reactants)\Delta_r H^\circ = \sum a_i \Delta_f H^\circ(\text{products}) - \sum b_i \Delta_f H^\circ(\text{reactants})

Here:

  • ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^\circ = standard enthalpy change for the reaction (kJ mol⁻¹)
  • ΔfH∘\Delta_f H^\circ = standard enthalpy of formation of a compound (kJ mol⁻¹)
  • ai,bia_i, b_i = stoichiometric coefficients from the balanced equation
  • The superscript ∘^\circ denotes standard state conditions (1 bar pressure, specified temperature, usually 298 K)

The diagram makes this formula intuitive: if you know the enthalpy levels of reactants and products (via their ΔfH∘\Delta_f H^\circ values), the vertical drop (or rise) gives you ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^\circ directly.

ΔrH∘=∑ΔfH∘(products)−∑ΔfH∘(reactants)\Delta_r H^\circ = \sum \Delta_f H^\circ(\text{products}) - \sum \Delta_f H^\circ(\text{reactants})

For an exothermic reaction, the sum on the right (products) is smaller than the sum on the left (reactants), so ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^\circ comes out negative — exactly as the downward arrow in Fig. 5.10 shows.

Why This Matters for Problem-Solving

When you encounter a thermochemical equation like: …

Figure 5.10(b)Enthalpy diagram for an endothermic reaction: total enthalpy of the products lies ABOVE that of the reactants on the reaction-coordinate plot, and the gap between the two levels is delta_r H, the net heat absorbed from the surroundings.
Fig. 5.10(b) — Enthalpy diagram for an endothermic reaction: total enthalpy of the products lies ABOVE that of the reactants on the reaction-coordinate plot, and the gap between the two levels is delta_r H, the net heat absorbed from the surroundings.

Drawn by us to help you understand the concept clearly, and verified to make sure it's accurate. For exams, practice from your textbook's own diagram.

Fig. 5.10(b) is the mirror image of the exothermic diagram in Fig. 5.10(a). The axes are the same — enthalpy HH vertically, reaction progress horizontally — but now the Products level sits higher than the Reactants level. Climbing from the lower reactant level to the higher product level costs energy, so ΔrH>0\Delta_r H > 0: the reaction absorbs net heat from the surroundings.

The textbook pairs this with reactions like 12N2(g)+O2(g)→NO2(g)\tfrac{1}{2}\mathrm{N_2(g)} + \mathrm{O_2(g)} \rightarrow \mathrm{NO_2(g)} (ΔrH⊖=+33.2 kJ mol−1\Delta_r H^\ominus = +33.2\ \mathrm{kJ\ mol^{-1}}) — endothermic, yet spontaneous. …