Q.Give one chemical test to distinguish between the following pairs of compounds.
Concept understanding — Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions
Nucleophilic Addition – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you have a molecule with a carbon–oxygen double bond — a carbonyl group (C=O). That oxygen is greedy for electrons; it pulls them away from carbon, leaving the carbon slightly positive (δ+) and the oxygen slightly negative (δ−). Now, if you bring a species that is rich in electrons (a nucleophile, meaning "nucleus-loving"), it will naturally be attracted to that electron-deficient carbon. The nucleophile attacks the carbon, the π bond breaks, and the oxygen picks up a proton (or some other electrophile) to become stable. That, in a nutshell, is nucleophilic addition.
The key idea: a nucleophile adds across a polar multiple bond (usually C=O or C≡N), breaking the π bond and forming two new sigma bonds.
The Precise Statement
Nucleophilic addition is a reaction in which a nucleophile (an electron-rich species) forms a sigma bond with an electrophilic carbon atom of a polar multiple bond (typically a carbonyl group, C=O, or a nitrile, C≡N), while the π bond breaks. The resulting intermediate then captures a proton (or another electrophile) to give a neutral product.
In general form:
RX2C=O+NuX−HX+RX2C(OH)Nu
The nucleophile (NuX−) attacks the carbonyl carbon; the oxygen becomes negatively charged; then a proton (HX+) from the medium attaches to the oxygen, yielding an alcohol.
Why It Happens – The Driving Force
The carbonyl carbon is electrophilic because:
- Oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, so the C=O bond is polarised: CXδ+=OXδ−.
- The π bond is weaker than a σ bond, so it can break relatively easily.
A nucleophile (like OHX−, CNX−, or NHX3) has a lone pair or a negative charge. It seeks positive centres. The attack forms a new σ bond, and the π electrons move entirely to oxygen, creating an alkoxide ion (RX2C−OX−). This intermediate is then quenched by a proton.
A common mistake: thinking the nucleophile attacks the oxygen. No — oxygen is already electron-rich; the nucleophile goes to the carbon because it is electron-deficient.
A Concrete Example – Addition of HCN to a Ketone
Take acetone (CHX3COCHX3) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN). In the presence of a base, CNX− (the nucleophile) attacks the carbonyl carbon:
CHX3COCHX3+CNX−CHX3C(OX−)(CN)CHX3
The alkoxide intermediate then picks up a proton from HCN (or from water) to give a cyanohydrin:
CHX3C(OX−)(CN)CHX3+HX+CHX3C(OH)(CN)CHX3
The product is acetone cyanohydrin. Notice: two new sigma bonds formed (C−CN and O−H), and the π bond is gone.
What Makes a Good Nucleophile?
Strong nucleophiles are usually negatively charged or have lone pairs:
- OHX−, CNX−, NHX2X−, CHX3OX−, HX− (from hydride reagents like NaBHX4 or LiAlHX4)
- Neutral but polarisable: NHX3, HX2O (weaker, but can add under acidic conditions)
In exams, remember: hydride ion (HX−) is a nucleophile in reductions (e.g., NaBHX4 reduces aldehydes/ketones to alcohols via nucleophilic addition).
The Big Picture – Why This Matters
Nucleophilic addition is the fundamental reaction of carbonyl compounds. It is how:
- Aldehydes and ketones form alcohols (with NaBHX4 or LiAlHX4)
- Cyanohydrins are made (important in organic synthesis)
- Grignard reagents (RMgX) add to carbonyls to form new carbon–carbon bonds
- Hemiacetals and acetals form (key in carbohydrate chemistry)
Every time you see a C=O group, think: this carbon is a target for nucleophiles.
Final Answer
Nucleophilic addition is a reaction where an electron-rich nucleophile attacks the electrophilic carbon of a polar multiple bond (typically C=O or C≡N), breaking the π bond and forming two new sigma bonds — one to the nucleophile and one to a proton (or other electrophile). The driving force is the polarity of the C=O bond and the stability gained by forming stronger sigma bonds.
Nucleophilic addition reactions of carbonyl compounds form a central part of the NCERT Class 12 Chemistry chapter on aldehydes and ketones, and questions on cyanohydrin formation or the role of hydride nucleophiles like NaBH4 are common in CBSE boards and JEE Main. Students searching "nucleophilic addition mechanism class 12 chemistry important questions" will find this carbonyl-carbon-attack explanation is the standard NCERT approach.
Why this formula?
Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Nucleophilic substitution reactions are a cornerstone of organic chemistry. Instead of just memorizing the rate laws, let's understand why they arise from the molecular events.
1. The Two Main Mechanisms: A Tale of Timing
The key formulas (rate laws) for nucleophilic substitution come directly from how many molecules are involved in the rate-determining step (RDS) — the slowest step that controls the overall reaction speed.
SN1: Unimolecular — The Leaving Group Goes First
The Rate Law:
Rate=k[RX]
Why?
The reaction happens in two steps:
- Slow step (RDS): The C–X bond breaks spontaneously, forming a carbocation intermediate. Only the substrate (RX) is involved.
RXslowR++X−
- Fast step: The nucleophile (Nu−) attacks the carbocation.
R++Nu−fastRNu
Since the slow step depends only on the concentration of RX, the rate law has no dependence on [Nu−]. The nucleophile arrives after the carbocation is formed — it cannot affect the speed of the first step.
Key insight: The rate is determined by how easily the leaving group leaves, not by how fast the nucleophile attacks.
SN2: Bimolecular — Simultaneous Attack and Departure
The Rate Law:
Rate=k[RX][Nu−]
Why?
The reaction occurs in one concerted step:
- The nucleophile attacks the carbon from one side at the same time as the leaving group departs from the opposite side.
- Both RX and Nu− must collide with the correct orientation and sufficient energy.
The rate depends on the frequency of productive collisions between the two molecules. This is directly proportional to the product of their concentrations:
Rate∝[RX]×[Nu−]
Key insight: Both partners are involved in the transition state simultaneously — if either is missing, the reaction cannot proceed.
2. The Transition State: Why the Formulas Are Not Just "Given"
For SN2, the transition state has a pentavalent carbon (five bonds partially formed/broken). The energy barrier depends on steric hindrance — bulkier groups around carbon make it harder for the nucleophile to approach, which is why SN2 is favored at primary carbons.
For SN1, the transition state of the slow step involves only bond breaking (no bond formation yet). The carbocation stability (tertiary > secondary > primary) determines the activation energy — this is why SN1 is favored at tertiary carbons.
3. The Temperature Dependence: The Arrhenius Equation
Both rate constants k follow the Arrhenius equation:
k=Ae−Ea/RT
- A = frequency factor (how often collisions occur with correct orientation)
- Ea = activation energy (the energy barrier for the RDS)
- R = gas constant
- T = temperature
This is not a separate formula — it explains why the rate constants change with temperature. Higher T increases the fraction of molecules with energy ≥Ea, speeding up the reaction.
4. Summary: The "Why" in One Table
| Mechanism | Rate Law | Why? (Molecular Reason) |
|---|---|---|
| SN1 | Rate=k[RX] | Slow step involves only the substrate breaking apart. Nucleophile waits. |
| SN2 | Rate=k[RX][Nu−] | Both molecules must collide in the single, concerted step. |
Final takeaway: The formulas are not arbitrary — they are direct consequences of which molecules are present in the slowest step. Always ask: "What is happening in the rate-determining step?" The answer gives you the rate law.
Concept: Hinsberg test, the azo-dye (diazotisation/coupling) test, and the bromine-water test distinguish amines by degree and by ring activation.
Reasoning:
- Methylamine vs. dimethylamine - Hinsberg test: treat with benzenesulfonyl chloride + KOH. Methylamine (1 degree) forms a sulfonamide with an acidic N-H that dissolves in excess KOH (clear solution); dimethylamine (2 degree) forms a sulfonamide with no N-H, which remains as an insoluble oil/solid.
- Secondary vs. tertiary amines - Hinsberg test: the secondary amine gives an alkali-insoluble sulfonamide; the tertiary amine does not react with benzenesulfonyl chloride at all (it stays unreacted, but dissolves on acidification since the free amine itself is basic).
- Ethylamine vs. aniline - Azo dye test: diazotise with NaNO2/HCl at 0-5 degC, then couple with alkaline beta-naphthol. Aniline's diazonium salt is stable and couples to give a bright orange-red dye; ethylamine's aliphatic diazonium salt decomposes immediately (no coupling, no dye).
- Aniline vs. benzylamine - the carbylamine test cannot distinguish this pair (both are primary amines, so both give a positive isocyanide test). Use the bromine-water test instead: aniline's -NH2 is directly conjugated with the ring, so it reacts instantly with bromine water (no catalyst needed) to give a white precipitate of 2,4,6-tribromoaniline; benzylamine's -NH2 sits on a side-chain -CH2- group, not conjugated with the ring, so its ring behaves like an ordinary alkylbenzene and gives no such precipitate under the same conditions.
- Aniline vs. N-methylaniline - Hinsberg test: aniline (1 degree) gives a sulfonamide that dissolves in KOH (clear solution); N-methylaniline (2 degree) gives a sulfonamide insoluble in KOH.
- Hinsberg test: methylamine's sulfonamide dissolves in KOH; dimethylamine's does not.
- Hinsberg test: the secondary amine's sulfonamide is insoluble in alkali; the tertiary amine does not react with benzenesulfonyl chloride.
- Azo dye test: aniline gives an orange-red dye on coupling with beta-naphthol; ethylamine gives none.
- Bromine-water test: aniline gives an instant white precipitate (2,4,6-tribromoaniline); benzylamine does not.
- Hinsberg test: aniline's sulfonamide dissolves in KOH; N-methylaniline's does not.
The key idea is that primary, secondary, and tertiary amines react differently with Hinsberg's reagent (benzenesulfonyl chloride) and with nitrous acid - these differences form the basis of simple chemical tests. For each pair, a single reagent gives a distinct observable change (like solubility, gas evolution, or colour) that identifies one compound from the other.
1. Methylamine and dimethylamine
Both are aliphatic amines, but methylamine is primary (1∘) and dimethylamine is secondary (2∘). The classic test uses Hinsberg's reagent (benzenesulfonyl chloride, CX6HX5SOX2Cl) in the presence of aqueous KOH.
- Methylamine (1∘): reacts to form a sulfonamide that has one acidic hydrogen on the N-atom. This dissolves in excess KOH to give a clear solution.
- Dimethylamine (2∘): forms a sulfonamide with no N-H hydrogen. It remains as an insoluble oil or solid (no dissolution in alkali).
A common mistake is to think that the 2∘ amine also dissolves - it does not, because its sulfonamide lacks the acidic proton needed to form a water-soluble salt.
Test: Add benzenesulfonyl chloride and a few drops of KOH solution. Shake well.
- If the mixture becomes clear (sulfonamide dissolves) -> methylamine.
- If an oily layer or precipitate remains -> dimethylamine.
2. Secondary and tertiary amines
Again, Hinsberg's test works beautifully. But here we also have the nitrous acid test as an alternative.
Using Hinsberg's reagent:
- Secondary amine (2∘): forms an insoluble sulfonamide (no N-H to dissolve in alkali).
- Tertiary amine (3∘): does not react with benzenesulfonyl chloride at all (no N-H to replace). It remains as an insoluble oil, but on acidification it dissolves (because the tertiary amine itself is basic and forms a salt).
The key distinction: the 2∘ amine's sulfonamide is insoluble in both alkali and acid, while the 3∘ amine itself is insoluble in alkali but dissolves in dilute HCl.
Using nitrous acid (NaNOX2+HCl):
- 2∘ aliphatic amine -> forms a yellow oily N-nitrosamine (nitrosamine).
- 3∘ aliphatic amine -> forms a water-soluble nitrite salt (no oil).
So either test separates them cleanly.
3. Ethylamine and aniline
Ethylamine is an aliphatic primary amine; aniline is an aromatic primary amine. The simplest test is the azo dye test (diazotisation followed by coupling).
- Aniline: on treatment with NaNOX2+HCl at 0-5°C gives a diazonium salt. This, when coupled with β-naphthol in alkaline medium, yields a brilliant orange-red azo dye.
- Ethylamine: forms a diazonium salt that is unstable and decomposes immediately at that temperature - no coupling, no dye.
CX6HX5NHX2NaNOX2/HCl0−5°CCX6HX5NX2X+ClX−β-naphthol/OHX−Orange−red azo dye
Test: Diazotise at 0-5°C, then add alkaline β-naphthol.
- Orange-red precipitate -> aniline.
- No colour (or only nitrogen gas evolution) -> ethylamine.
4. Aniline and benzylamine
Both are primary amines, but aniline is aromatic (amino group directly on benzene ring) while benzylamine has the amino group on a side chain (CX6HX5CHX2NHX2). The carbylamine test (isocyanide test) does not distinguish them, because it is positive for all primary amines, aliphatic and aromatic alike.
The carbylamine test is positive for all primary amines, both aliphatic and aromatic. So it cannot separate aniline from benzylamine.
Correct test: Use the bromine water test instead - nitrous-acid/azo coupling isn't useful here either, since benzylamine's amino group is aliphatic (benzylic) and its diazonium salt just decomposes rather than giving a clean, comparable result.
- Aniline: reacts instantly with bromine water to give a white precipitate of 2,4,6-tribromoaniline (even without a catalyst), because the −NH2 group is directly conjugated with the ring and strongly activates it.
- Benzylamine: does not give a precipitate with bromine water under the same conditions - its −CH2NH2 group is not conjugated with the ring, so the ring behaves like an ordinary (much less activated) alkylbenzene and bromination requires a catalyst.
Test: Add bromine water dropwise to the compound.
- White precipitate -> aniline.
- No precipitate (bromine colour persists or decolourises only slowly) -> benzylamine.
5. Aniline and N-methylaniline
Aniline is a primary aromatic amine; N-methylaniline is a secondary aromatic amine. The Hinsberg test works perfectly here.
- Aniline (1∘ aromatic): forms a sulfonamide that dissolves in KOH (clear solution).
- N-methylaniline (2∘ aromatic): forms a sulfonamide that is insoluble in KOH (remains as an oil or solid).
Alternatively, the nitrous acid test also works:
- Aniline -> diazonium salt (stable at 0-5°C) -> coupling gives azo dye.
- N-methylaniline -> forms a yellow oily N-nitrosoamine (no coupling possible).
For aromatic amines, the Hinsberg test is often quicker and more dramatic - the difference in solubility is immediately visible.
Test: Add benzenesulfonyl chloride and KOH.
- Clear solution -> aniline.
- Insoluble oil/precipitate -> N-methylaniline.
- Hinsberg test: methylamine gives a clear solution; dimethylamine gives an insoluble oil.
- Hinsberg test: secondary amine gives an insoluble sulfonamide; tertiary amine does not react (dissolves in acid).
- Azo dye test: aniline gives an orange-red dye; ethylamine gives no dye.
- Bromine water test: aniline gives a white precipitate; benzylamine does not.
- Hinsberg test: aniline gives a clear solution; N-methylaniline gives an insoluble oil.
Here is a clear, concept-first solution for distinguishing the given pairs of compounds using chemical tests.
Core Concepts: Sulfonylation, Diazotisation and Ring Activation
The tests below rely on three key ideas:
- Hinsberg Test: Benzenesulfonyl chloride (C6H5SO2Cl) reacts with primary and secondary amines. The product’s solubility in alkali (NaOH/KOH) depends on the presence of a free N–H hydrogen, so it separates 1°, 2° and 3° amines.
- Azo Dye Test: Only aromatic primary amines form a diazonium salt stable at 0–5°C, which then couples with β-naphthol to give a bright dye. Aliphatic primary amines give unstable diazonium salts that decompose at once.
- Bromine Water Test: An −NH2 group attached directly to a benzene ring strongly activates it, so bromination happens instantly without any catalyst.
Note: The carbylamine reaction (CHCl₃ + alc. KOH) is positive for all primary amines — aliphatic and aromatic alike — so it confirms a 1° amine but cannot separate two primary amines from each other.
(i) Methylamine vs. Dimethylamine
Method: Hinsberg Test
Steps:
- Take a small sample of each amine in separate test tubes.
- Add benzenesulfonyl chloride (C6H5SO2Cl) and a few drops of aqueous KOH (or NaOH).
- Shake the mixture and observe.
Observation & Inference:
- Methylamine (1° amine): Forms a clear solution (sulfonamide salt is soluble in alkali).
C6H5SO2Cl+CH3NH2KOHC6H5SO2NHCH3 (soluble)
- Dimethylamine (2° amine): Forms a precipitate (sulfonamide has no free N–H, so it is insoluble in alkali).
C6H5SO2Cl+(CH3)2NHKOHC6H5SO2N(CH3)2 (precipitate)
Result: Methylamine gives a clear solution; dimethylamine gives a precipitate.
(ii) Secondary vs. Tertiary Amines
Method: Hinsberg Test (same as above)
Steps:
- Treat each amine with C6H5SO2Cl and aqueous KOH.
- Observe solubility.
Observation & Inference:
- Secondary amine: Forms a precipitate (insoluble sulfonamide).
- Tertiary amine: Does not react (no N–H bond). It remains as an oily layer or dissolves in acid, but no precipitate forms.
Result: Secondary amine gives a precipitate; tertiary amine gives no reaction.
(iii) Ethylamine vs. Aniline
Method: Azo Dye Test (diazotisation followed by coupling)
Steps:
- Dissolve each compound in dilute HCl and cool to 0–5°C.
- Add a cold solution of sodium nitrite (NaNO2) to form a diazonium salt.
- Add an alkaline solution of β-naphthol.
Observation & Inference:
- Aniline (aromatic 1° amine): Forms a diazonium salt that is stable at 0–5°C and couples to give a bright orange-red azo dye.
C6H5NH2NaNO2/HClC6H5N2+Cl−β-naphtholOrange-red dye
- Ethylamine (aliphatic 1° amine): Its diazonium salt is unstable even at 0–5°C — it decomposes at once with brisk evolution of N2; no dye is formed.
Result: Aniline gives an orange-red dye; ethylamine gives no dye.
⚠️ Do not use the carbylamine test for this pair — both ethylamine and aniline are primary amines, so both give a positive (foul-smelling isocyanide) result. It cannot distinguish them.
(iv) Aniline vs. Benzylamine
Method: Bromine Water Test
Steps:
- Take each compound in a separate test tube.
- Add bromine water dropwise at room temperature.
Observation & Inference:
- Aniline (aromatic 1° amine): The −NH2 group is directly conjugated with the ring and strongly activates it, so bromine water reacts instantly (no catalyst) to give a white precipitate of 2,4,6-tribromoaniline.
C6H5NH2+3Br2→2,4,6-Br3C6H2NH2↓+3HBr
- Benzylamine (C6H5CH2NH2): The −NH2 sits on a side-chain −CH2− group, not on the ring, so the ring behaves like an ordinary alkylbenzene — no precipitate under the same conditions.
Result: Aniline gives an instant white precipitate; benzylamine gives none.
(v) Aniline vs. N-Methylaniline
Method: Hinsberg Test
Steps:
- Treat each compound with C6H5SO2Cl and aqueous KOH.
- Observe solubility.
Observation & Inference:
- Aniline (1° amine): Forms a clear solution (soluble sulfonamide salt).
- N-Methylaniline (2° amine): Forms a precipitate (insoluble sulfonamide).
Result: Aniline gives a clear solution; N-methylaniline gives a precipitate.
Quick Summary Table
| Pair | Test | Observation for First | Observation for Second |
|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Methylamine vs. Dimethylamine | Hinsberg | Clear solution | Precipitate |
| (ii) Secondary vs. Tertiary | Hinsberg | Precipitate | No reaction |
| (iii) Ethylamine vs. Aniline | Azo dye test | No dye | Orange-red dye |
| (iv) Aniline vs. Benzylamine | Bromine water | White precipitate | No precipitate |
| (v) Aniline vs. N-Methylaniline | Hinsberg | Clear solution | Precipitate |
Key takeaway: Match the amine class (1°, 2°, 3°) and aromatic vs. aliphatic nature to the correct test. The Hinsberg test separates 1°/2°/3° amines; the azo dye test picks out aromatic 1° amines; bromine water picks out a ring-activated (aryl) amine. Remember the carbylamine test is positive for all primary amines — aliphatic and aromatic — so it can never separate two primary amines from each other.
Here are the common mistakes students make when choosing distinction tests for amines, along with precise corrections.
General Mistake: Confusing the Test Reagent
Mistake: Using the wrong reagent (e.g., using AgNO₃ for all tests, or using Hinsberg reagent incorrectly).
Why it happens: Students memorize tests without understanding the chemical basis (basicity, solubility, or reaction type).
How to avoid: Always link the test to a specific property:
- Hinsberg test → distinguishes 1°, 2°, 3° amines based on sulfonamide solubility.
- Carbylamine test → positive for all primary amines (1°) — aliphatic and aromatic — so it identifies a 1° amine but cannot separate two primary amines from each other.
- Azo dye test → only for primary aromatic amines (like aniline).
- Bromine water test → only for amines whose −NH2 is directly on the ring (instant white precipitate).
(i) Methylamine vs. Dimethylamine
Common Mistake: Misreading the Hinsberg test observations — expecting both sulfonamides to dissolve in alkali.
- Why wrong: Only the primary amine's sulfonamide has an acidic N–H left, so only it dissolves in KOH. The secondary amine's sulfonamide has no N–H and stays insoluble.
- Correct approach: Perform the Hinsberg test (C6H5SO2Cl + aqueous KOH):
- Methylamine (1°) → sulfonamide dissolves in alkali → clear solution.
- Dimethylamine (2°) → sulfonamide insoluble → precipitate/oily layer.
- Note: The carbylamine test also works for this particular pair (1° positive, 2° negative) — but the Hinsberg test is the standard choice because it cleanly separates all three classes.
How to avoid: Remember: “Free N–H on the sulfonamide = soluble in alkali.”
(ii) Secondary vs. Tertiary Amines
Common Mistake: Using the Hinsberg test but forgetting the solubility difference.
- Why wrong: Students often think both react, but:
- Secondary amine (e.g., diethylamine) reacts with benzenesulfonyl chloride to form a solid sulfonamide that is insoluble in alkali.
- Tertiary amine (e.g., triethylamine) does not react (no H on N) — it remains as an oily layer or dissolves in acid.
- Correct approach: Add benzenesulfonyl chloride (C₆H₅SO₂Cl) in presence of NaOH:
- 2° amine → precipitate (sulfonamide) that does not dissolve in NaOH.
- 3° amine → no precipitate; amine layer remains.
How to avoid: Draw the reaction mechanism: 2° amine has one H to lose, 3° has none.
(iii) Ethylamine vs. Aniline
Common Mistake: Using the Carbylamine test to separate them.
- Why wrong: Both are primary amines, so both give a positive carbylamine test (a foul-smelling isocyanide). The test confirms “primary” but does not distinguish this pair.
- Correct approach: Use the Azo dye test (diazotisation + coupling):
- Aniline (aromatic 1°) → forms a diazonium salt stable at 0–5°C, then couples with β-naphthol to give a bright orange-red dye.
- Ethylamine (aliphatic 1°) → its diazonium salt decomposes immediately (with N2 evolution); no dye.
How to avoid: Remember: “Only aromatic primary amines give azo dyes.”
(iv) Aniline vs. Benzylamine
Common Mistake: Assuming both are aromatic amines and behave identically.
- Why wrong: Benzylamine has an aliphatic NH₂ attached to the ring via a CH₂ group. Aniline has NH₂ directly on the ring — only aniline's ring is strongly activated.
- Correct approach: Use the Bromine water test:
- Aniline → instant white precipitate of 2,4,6-tribromoaniline (no catalyst needed).
- Benzylamine → no precipitate; its ring behaves like an ordinary alkylbenzene.
Alternative to avoid: the Carbylamine test — both are 1°, so both are positive; it cannot separate them.
How to avoid: Check the nature of the amino group: directly attached to ring = aromatic (aryl) amine; on a side chain = aliphatic amine.
(v) Aniline vs. N-Methylaniline
Common Mistake: Forgetting that N-methylaniline is a secondary amine and treating both compounds as “aniline-like” primary amines.
- Why wrong: The two belong to different classes — aniline is 1°, N-methylaniline is 2° — and every class-based test hinges on exactly that difference.
- Correct approach: Use the Hinsberg test:
- Aniline (1°) → sulfonamide soluble in NaOH → clear solution.
- N-Methylaniline (2°) → sulfonamide insoluble in NaOH → precipitate.
- Note: The carbylamine test would also distinguish this pair (1° positive, 2° negative), but the Hinsberg test is the standard, cleaner choice.
How to avoid: Identify the degree of substitution on nitrogen before choosing the test.
Quick Reference Table
| Pair | Best Test | Key Observation |
|---|---|---|
| Methylamine vs. Dimethylamine | Hinsberg test | 1° → clear solution; 2° → insoluble sulfonamide |
| 2° vs. 3° amine | Hinsberg test | 2° → insoluble sulfonamide; 3° → no reaction |
| Ethylamine vs. Aniline | Azo dye test | Aniline → orange dye; Ethylamine → no dye |
| Aniline vs. Benzylamine | Bromine water | Aniline → white precipitate; Benzylamine → none |
| Aniline vs. N-Methylaniline | Hinsberg test | Aniline → soluble; N-Methylaniline → insoluble |
Final Tip for Exams
Always write the reaction equation (even a short one) to show the chemical change — examiners award marks for understanding, not just naming the test. For example:
“Aniline on diazotisation followed by coupling with β-naphthol gives an orange dye, while ethylamine does not.”
This proves you know the why behind the test.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ. A compound [X] undergoes reactions as given. Identify compounds [C] and [D] formed in these reactions. [A]Cr2O72−/H+[C] $$ [\text { B }] \xrightarrow[\text {(ii) } \mathrm{Na}2 \mathrm{CO}{3(\text { aq })}+\mathrm{I}_2]{\text { (i)aq. } \mathrm{KOH}} [\mathrm{D}] \quad+\mathrm{CH}_3 \mathrm{COONa}(A) \text { [C]: Benzoquinone [D]: lodoform } (B)[C]:Benzene[D]:2−iodo−propane(C)[C]:Benzoicacid[D]:lodoform(D) \text { [C]: 4-lodophenol [D]: 1-iodo-propane } $$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The compound [X] is isopropyl phenyl ether (C₆H₅–O–CH(CH₃)₂). Cleavage with concentrated HI gives phenol ([A]) and isopropyl iodide ([B]). Oxidation of phenol yields benzoquinone ([C]), and the iodoform reaction on isopropyl iodide gives iodoform ([D]) and sodium acetate. Thus the correct option is (A).
Concept & Intuition
This problem tests two classic organic reactions: ether cleavage by HI and the iodoform reaction. The key is to recognize that the ether [X] is an aryl alkyl ether (phenol derivative). When treated with concentrated HI, the C–O bond breaks selectively at the alkyl side (since the aryl–O bond is stronger due to resonance), producing phenol and an alkyl iodide. Then, phenol can be oxidized to benzoquinone, and the alkyl iodide (if it has a methyl group adjacent to the carbonyl or a secondary alcohol that can be oxidized to a methyl ketone) will undergo the iodoform test.
Let’s walk through each step.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify [X] and its cleavage products
The figure shows a benzene ring with an –O–CH(CH₃)₂ group. That is isopropyl phenyl ether (C₆H₅–O–CH(CH₃)₂).
With concentrated HI, the ether bond breaks. The mechanism: HI protonates the oxygen, then iodide attacks the less hindered carbon (the isopropyl carbon, since it’s primary-like in the sense of being less sterically hindered than the aromatic ring). This gives phenol (C₆H₅OH) as the aromatic product [A] and isopropyl iodide (CH₃–CHI–CH₃) as [B].
Watch outA common mistake is to think the aromatic ring gets iodinated. But under these conditions, the C–O bond on the alkyl side breaks, not the aryl–O bond. The aromatic ring remains intact as phenol.
-
Reaction of [A] (phenol) with Cr₂O₇²⁻/H⁺ → [C]
Phenol is easily oxidized. Chromic acid (Cr₂O₇²⁻/H⁺) is a strong oxidizing agent. It oxidizes phenol to 1,4-benzoquinone (often just called benzoquinone). The reaction involves two-electron oxidation: the –OH group becomes a carbonyl, and the ring is rearranged to a quinoid structure.
So [C] = Benzoquinone.
-
Reaction of [B] (isopropyl iodide) with (i) aq. KOH, then (ii) Na₂CO₃(aq) + I₂ → [D] + CH₃COONa
- Step (i): Aqueous KOH will hydrolyze the alkyl iodide to an alcohol. Isopropyl iodide gives isopropyl alcohol (propan-2-ol, CH₃–CHOH–CH₃).
- Step (ii): The mixture of Na₂CO₃ and I₂ is the classic iodoform test reagent. It works on compounds that have a CH₃–C(=O)– group or a CH₃–CHOH– group (which gets oxidized to a methyl ketone under the basic conditions). Isopropyl alcohol (CH₃–CHOH–CH₃) is a secondary alcohol with a methyl group on the carbon bearing the –OH. Under basic I₂, it is first oxidized to acetone (CH₃–CO–CH₃). Then acetone undergoes the iodoform reaction:
CH3COCH3+3I2+4NaOH→CHI3+CH3COONa+3NaI+3H2O
The products are **iodoform** (CHI₃, a yellow precipitate) and **sodium acetate** (CH₃COONa).So [D] = Iodoform.
- Match with options
- [C] = Benzoquinone
- [D] = Iodoform This corresponds exactly to option (A).
TipThe iodoform reaction is specific to methyl ketones and secondary alcohols with a methyl group on the carbinol carbon. Isopropyl alcohol fits perfectly. If [B] had been a primary alkyl iodide (like n-propyl iodide), the product would be a carboxylic acid, not iodoform.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
-
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Match the compounds given in List – I with the items given in List – II. List – I (I) Benzenesulphonyl Chloride (II) Sulphanilic acid (III) Alkyl Diazonium salts (IV) Aryl Diazonium salts List – II(a) Zwitterion(b) Hinsberg reagent(c) Dyes(d) Conversion to alcohols (A) 1 – c, II – b, III – a, IV – d (B) 1 – a, II – c, III – b, IV – d (C) 1 – c, II – a, III – d, IV – b (D) 1 – b, II – a, III – d, IV – c
›Reveal solutionSolution
Benzenesulphonyl chloride = Hinsberg reagent, sulphanilic acid = zwitterion, alkyl diazonium salts → alcohols, aryl diazonium salts → azo dyes.
Step 1 — (I) Benzenesulphonyl chloride → (b) Hinsberg reagent.
C6H5SO2Cl is known as Hinsberg's reagent. It reacts with 1° amines to give a sulphonamide with an acidic N–H (soluble in alkali), with 2° amines to give a sulphonamide with no N–H (insoluble in alkali), and does not react with 3° amines — the classical test for distinguishing the three classes.
Step 2 — (II) Sulphanilic acid → (a) Zwitterion.
The −SO3H group is strongly acidic and the −NH2 group is basic, so an internal proton transfer occurs:
H2N−C6H4−SO3H⇌+H3N−C6H4−SO3−
This dipolar internal salt is a zwitterion (which is why sulphanilic acid has a high melting point and low solubility in organic solvents).
Step 3 — (III) Alkyl diazonium salts → (d) Conversion to alcohols.
Alkyl diazonium ions (R−N2+) are extremely unstable because N2 is an excellent leaving group and there is no resonance stabilisation. They decompose at once, and water traps the resulting carbocation:
R−N2+−N2R+H2OR−OH
This is why treating a 1° aliphatic amine with HNO2 gives an alcohol (plus brisk N2 evolution).
Step 4 — (IV) Aryl diazonium salts → (c) Dyes.
C6H5N2+Cl− is resonance-stabilised by the ring and is stable at 0–5 °C. It undergoes coupling with phenol or aniline to give brightly coloured azo compounds (−N=N− chromophore) — the basis of azo dyes.
Step 5 — Assemble. I–b, II–a, III–d, IV–c.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 1 – b, II – a, III – d, IV – c.
ANSWER: D
- KCET 2024Set B-21 markMCQQ.In the reaction Aniline NaNO2/dil.HCl P Phenol/NaOH Q, ‘Q’ is: (A) C6H5N2Cl (B) ortho-hydroxyazobenzene (C) para-hydroxyazobenzene (D) meta-hydroxyazobenzene
›Reveal solutionSolution
Diazotisation of aniline gives the benzenediazonium salt (P); azo-coupling of that weak electrophile with phenoxide occurs at the para position, so Q is para-hydroxyazobenzene.
1. Step 1 — Diazotisation gives P
A primary aromatic amine treated with nitrous acid (generated in situ from NaNO2+dil. HCl) at 273–278 K gives an arenediazonium salt:
C6H5NH2NaNO2/dil. HCl273−278 KC6H5N+≡N Cl−
So P= benzenediazonium chloride. (The aryl diazonium ion is stabilised by delocalisation into the ring — this is why it survives, unlike an alkyl diazonium ion.) Note that option (A) is P, not Q — a classic distractor.
2. Step 2 — Azo coupling gives Q
The diazonium ion is only a weak electrophile, so it can attack a ring only if that ring is strongly activated. Phenol in NaOH is deprotonated to the phenoxide ion, C6H5O−, whose −O− is a very powerful electron-releasing group (strong +M), pumping electron density onto the ortho and para carbons.
Electrophilic substitution therefore occurs at those positions, but coupling takes place essentially exclusively at the para position because:
- the para carbon is sterically unhindered, whereas an ortho attack would place the bulky −N=N−C6H5 group right next to the −OH;
- the para-coupled azo product is the thermodynamically favoured, fully conjugated dye.
C6H5N+≡N+C6H5O−NaOHC6H5−N=N−(p)C6H4−OH
Q=p-hydroxyazobenzene — an orange dye. (With aniline instead of phenol, the analogous product would be p-aminoazobenzene.)
3. Rejecting the others
- (A) C6H5N2Cl is the intermediate P, not the final product Q.
- (B) ortho-coupling is sterically disfavoured and is at best a minor product.
- (D) meta-coupling is impossible: −O− is an o/p-director; the meta carbons carry no extra electron density.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — para-hydroxyazobenzene.
ANSWER: C
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQQ.Identify A, B and C. (A) (B) (C) (D)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The reaction scheme shows a neopentyl bromide undergoing SN1 (to B), SN2 (to A), and elimination (to C). The correct products are: A = neopentyl ethyl ether, B = 2-ethoxy-2-methylbutane (rearranged), C = 2-methyl-2-butene. Only option (A) matches all three.
Concept & Intuition
Neopentyl bromide (1-bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane) is a classic case where the substrate’s structure dictates reaction pathways. The carbon bearing bromine is primary, but it’s attached to a quaternary carbon (three methyl groups). For SN2, the backside attack is severely hindered by the bulky neopentyl group, making it very slow. For SN1, the primary carbocation would normally be unstable, but under solvolytic conditions (ethanol), the reaction proceeds via a rearranged tertiary carbocation (a methyl shift), giving a more stable intermediate. Elimination also favors the more substituted alkene (Zaitsev product). The question tests recognition of these rearrangements and the correct structures.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the substrate The central structure is neopentyl bromide:
CH3–C(CH3)2–CH2Br
The bromine is on a primary carbon, but the carbon is neopentyl (tert-butylmethyl). This is crucial.
- SN2 pathway (→ A) SN2 requires a clean backside attack. The neopentyl group is extremely bulky, so SN2 is very slow. However, in ethanol (C₂H₅OH) as solvent, the ethoxide ion (from ethanol) can act as a nucleophile. The product is the unrearranged ethyl ether:
CH3–C(CH3)2–CH2–O–C2H5
This is neopentyl ethyl ether. No rearrangement occurs because SN2 is concerted.
Check options: Only option (A) shows this exact structure for A.
- SN1 pathway (→ B) SN1 proceeds via carbocation formation. The primary carbocation (CH₃–C(CH₃)₂–CH₂⁺) is very unstable. It immediately undergoes a 1,2-methyl shift to form the more stable tertiary carbocation:
CH3–C+(CH3)–CH2CH3
This tertiary carbocation is then trapped by ethanol (solvent) to give the ethyl ether:
CH3–C(OC2H5)(CH3)–CH2CH3
This is 2-ethoxy-2-methylbutane.
Check options: Only option (A) shows B as exactly this structure (with OC₂H₅ on the quaternary carbon and an ethyl group on the adjacent carbon).
- Elimination pathway (→ C) Under elimination conditions (often with a strong base, but here simply labelled “Elimination” in ethanol), the neopentyl system can undergo E2 or E1. The most stable alkene is the trisubstituted one: 2-methyl-2-butene. The carbocation rearrangement (as in SN1) leads to the tertiary carbocation, which then loses a proton to give:
CH3–C(CH3)=CH–CH3
This is 2-methyl-2-butene.
Check options: Only option (A) shows C as this alkene.
- Eliminate other options
- Option (B): Shows A as an ether on the quaternary carbon (wrong, no rearrangement in SN2) and B as a simple ether without ethyl group (missing the shift). No C given.
- Option (C): Shows C as a chloroalkene (impossible, no chlorine source). No A or B.
- Option (D): Shows A as a methyl ether (wrong nucleophile), B as an ether on a secondary carbon (wrong), and C as an unbranched alkene (wrong).
Watch outA common mistake is to assume SN1 gives the unrearranged primary ether. But neopentyl systems always rearrange under SN1 conditions because the primary carbocation is too unstable.
TipRemember: For neopentyl halides, SN2 gives unrearranged product (slow), SN1 gives rearranged product (via methyl shift), and elimination gives the most substituted alkene.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
- KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQQ.A secondary amine is (A) a compound with an NH2 group on the carbon atom in number 2 position (B) a compound in which 2 of the hydrogen of NH3 have been replaced by organic groups (C) an organic compound with two NH2 group (D) a compound with two carbon atom and an NH2 group
›Reveal solutionSolution
A secondary amine is defined by the number of alkyl/aryl groups attached to nitrogen — specifically, two organic groups replace two hydrogens of ammonia. The correct answer is (B).
The key to this question is understanding how amines are classified. Amines are derivatives of ammonia (NH3), and the classification — primary, secondary, or tertiary — depends entirely on how many of the three hydrogen atoms on nitrogen have been replaced by carbon-containing groups (alkyl or aryl). It has nothing to do with the position of a carbon atom, the number of carbon atoms in the molecule, or the count of NH2 groups.
Let’s examine each option carefully.
-
Option (A) says “a compound with an NH2 group on the carbon atom in number 2 position.” This describes a structural detail about where an amino group is attached on a carbon chain (like on C-2 of propane). That is a matter of positional isomerism, not amine classification. A primary amine can have its NH2 on carbon-2, and so can a secondary or tertiary amine if they also have other groups. This definition misses the point entirely.
-
Option (B) says “a compound in which 2 of the hydrogen of NH3 have been replaced by organic groups.” This is exactly the definition. Ammonia has three hydrogens. Replace one → primary amine (RNH2). Replace two → secondary amine (R2NH). Replace three → tertiary amine (R3N). So a secondary amine has two alkyl/aryl groups attached to nitrogen, with one hydrogen remaining.
-
Option (C) says “an organic compound with two NH2 groups.” That describes a diamine — a molecule with two amino groups, like ethylenediamine (H2NCH2CH2NH2). Each NH2 is a primary amino group, so the compound as a whole is a primary diamine, not a secondary amine. The classification is about substitution on a single nitrogen atom, not the count of amino groups in the molecule.
-
Option (D) says “a compound with two carbon atoms and an NH2 group.” That is just a specific example — ethylamine (CH3CH2NH2) has two carbons and one NH2, but it is a primary amine, not secondary. The number of carbons in the molecule is irrelevant to the classification.
Watch outA common mistake is to confuse “secondary” with “two NH2 groups” or with “two carbons.” Remember: the word “secondary” refers to the nitrogen atom’s substitution level — two organic groups on the same nitrogen — not to the count of amino groups or carbon atoms.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
-
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.What are the products formed when Anisole is reacted with Hydroiodic acid and heated? (A) Iodobenzene + Methane (B) Phenol + Methanol (C) Phenol + Iodomethane (D) Iodobenzene + Methanol
›Reveal solutionSolution
Anisole C6H5−O−CH3+HI→C6H5OH (phenol) +CH3I (iodomethane).
In cleavage of aryl alkyl ethers by HI, the bond broken is the O−alkyl bond, not the O−aryl bond, because forming an aryl cation/attack at the aromatic carbon is very unfavourable. I− attacks the methyl carbon (SN2), giving iodomethane, and the aromatic ring retains oxygen as phenol.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — Phenol + Iodomethane
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.The metal nitrate that liberates NO2 on heating (A) NaNO3 (B) KNO3 (C) LiNO3 (D) RbNO3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Li+ is tiny and highly polarising, so it distorts the nitrate ion enough to break it right down to the oxide + NO2; the bigger alkali cations only take it as far as the nitrite.
Step 1 — The two possible decomposition routes
Alkali-metal nitrates decompose on heating by one of two paths:
Path 1 — to the nitrite (Na, K, Rb, Cs):
2MNO3Δ2MNO2+O2↑
Only oxygen is evolved — no brown fumes.
Path 2 — to the oxide (Li):
4LiNO3Δ2Li2O+4NO2↑+O2↑
Here the nitrate ion is destroyed completely, giving the characteristic brown NO2 gas.
Step 2 — Why lithium is the odd one out (Fajans' rules)
The polarising power of a cation scales as (radius)2charge. Among the alkali metals:
Li+(76 pm)<Na+(102)<K+(138)<Rb+(152 pm)
So Li+ is by far the smallest and therefore the most polarising. It pulls electron density out of the large, soft NO3− anion, weakening the N–O bonds so much that the anion breaks apart entirely into O2− (which stays with Li as Li2O) and NO2.
The larger cations Na+,K+,Rb+ cannot distort the nitrate that strongly. Their nitrates only shed one oxygen atom, stopping at the stable nitrite.
Step 3 — The wider pattern (worth remembering)
This is the same reason lithium shows a diagonal relationship with magnesium: like Mg(NO3)2 (an alkaline-earth nitrate), LiNO3 gives the oxide + NO2 + O2. The identical logic explains why Li2CO3 decomposes on heating while Na2CO3 and K2CO3 do not.
Step 4 — Screen the options
- (A) NaNO3 → NaNO2+O2 ✗
- (B) KNO3 → KNO2+O2 ✗
- (C) LiNO3 → Li2O+NO2+O2 ✓
- (D) RbNO3 → RbNO2+O2 ✗
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) LiNO3 — the only alkali-metal nitrate that decomposes to the oxide and liberates NO2.
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.