Q.Give the structures of A, B and C in the following reactions:
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions
Nucleophilic Addition – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you have a molecule with a carbon–oxygen double bond — a carbonyl group (C=O). That oxygen is greedy for electrons; it pulls them away from carbon, leaving the carbon slightly positive (δ+) and the oxygen slightly negative (δ−). Now, if you bring a species that is rich in electrons (a nucleophile, meaning "nucleus-loving"), it will naturally be attracted to that electron-deficient carbon. The nucleophile attacks the carbon, the π bond breaks, and the oxygen picks up a proton (or some other electrophile) to become stable. That, in a nutshell, is nucleophilic addition.
The key idea: a nucleophile adds across a polar multiple bond (usually C=O or C≡N), breaking the π bond and forming two new sigma bonds.
The Precise Statement
Nucleophilic addition is a reaction in which a nucleophile (an electron-rich species) forms a sigma bond with an electrophilic carbon atom of a polar multiple bond (typically a carbonyl group, C=O, or a nitrile, C≡N), while the π bond breaks. The resulting intermediate then captures a proton (or another electrophile) to give a neutral product.
In general form:
RX2C=O+NuX−HX+RX2C(OH)Nu
The nucleophile (NuX−) attacks the carbonyl carbon; the oxygen becomes negatively charged; then a proton (HX+) from the medium attaches to the oxygen, yielding an alcohol.
Why It Happens – The Driving Force
The carbonyl carbon is electrophilic because:
- Oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, so the C=O bond is polarised: CXδ+=OXδ−.
- The π bond is weaker than a σ bond, so it can break relatively easily.
A nucleophile (like OHX−, CNX−, or NHX3) has a lone pair or a negative charge. It seeks positive centres. The attack forms a new σ bond, and the π electrons move entirely to oxygen, creating an alkoxide ion (RX2C−OX−). This intermediate is then quenched by a proton.
A common mistake: thinking the nucleophile attacks the oxygen. No — oxygen is already electron-rich; the nucleophile goes to the carbon because it is electron-deficient.
A Concrete Example – Addition of HCN to a Ketone
Take acetone (CHX3COCHX3) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN). In the presence of a base, CNX− (the nucleophile) attacks the carbonyl carbon:
CHX3COCHX3+CNX−CHX3C(OX−)(CN)CHX3
The alkoxide intermediate then picks up a proton from HCN (or from water) to give a cyanohydrin:
CHX3C(OX−)(CN)CHX3+HX+CHX3C(OH)(CN)CHX3
The product is acetone cyanohydrin. Notice: two new sigma bonds formed (C−CN and O−H), and the π bond is gone.
What Makes a Good Nucleophile?
Strong nucleophiles are usually negatively charged or have lone pairs:
- OHX−, CNX−, NHX2X−, CHX3OX−, HX− (from hydride reagents like NaBHX4 or LiAlHX4)
- Neutral but polarisable: NHX3, HX2O (weaker, but can add under acidic conditions) …
Why this formula?
Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Nucleophilic substitution reactions are a cornerstone of organic chemistry. Instead of just memorizing the rate laws, let's understand why they arise from the molecular events.
1. The Two Main Mechanisms: A Tale of Timing
The key formulas (rate laws) for nucleophilic substitution come directly from how many molecules are involved in the rate-determining step (RDS) — the slowest step that controls the overall reaction speed.
SN1: Unimolecular — The Leaving Group Goes First
The Rate Law:
Rate=k[RX]
Why?
The reaction happens in two steps:
- Slow step (RDS): The C–X bond breaks spontaneously, forming a carbocation intermediate. Only the substrate (RX) is involved.
RXslowR++X−
- Fast step: The nucleophile (Nu−) attacks the carbocation.
R++Nu−fastRNu
Since the slow step depends only on the concentration of RX, the rate law has no dependence on [Nu−]. The nucleophile arrives after the carbocation is formed — it cannot affect the speed of the first step.
Key insight: The rate is determined by how easily the leaving group leaves, not by how fast the nucleophile attacks.
SN2: Bimolecular — Simultaneous Attack and Departure
The Rate Law:
Rate=k[RX][Nu−]
Why?
The reaction occurs in one concerted step:
- The nucleophile attacks the carbon from one side at the same time as the leaving group departs from the opposite side.
- Both RX and Nu− must collide with the correct orientation and sufficient energy.
The rate depends on the frequency of productive collisions between the two molecules. This is directly proportional to the product of their concentrations:
Rate∝[RX]×[Nu−]
Key insight: Both partners are involved in the transition state simultaneously — if either is missing, the reaction cannot proceed.
2. The Transition State: Why the Formulas Are Not Just "Given"
For SN2, the transition state has a pentavalent carbon (five bonds partially formed/broken). The energy barrier depends on steric hindrance — bulkier groups around carbon make it harder for the nucleophile to approach, which is why SN2 is favored at primary carbons. …
Here are the structures for each sequence, with the key reaction type noted.
(i) Concept: Nucleophilic substitution (SN2) followed by Hofmann rearrangement.
- CH3CH2INaCNCH3CH2CN (A, propanenitrile)
- Partial hydrolysis gives CH3CH2CONH2 (B, propanamide) …
Each sequence is a classic organic conversion driven by nucleophilic substitution, reduction, diazotisation, or the Hofmann rearrangement. The final structures are: (i) A = CH3CH2CN, B = CH3CH2CONH2, C = CH3CH2NH2;
(ii) A = C6H5CN, B = C6H5COOH, C = C6H5CONH2;
(iii) A = CH3CH2CN, B = CH3CH2CH2NH2, C = CH3CH2CH2OH;
(iv) A = C6H5NH2, B = C6H5N2+Cl−, C = C6H5OH;
(v) A = CH3CONH2, B = CH3NH2, C = CH3OH;
(vi) A = C6H5NH2, B = C6H5N2+Cl−, C = C6H5N=NC6H4OH(p).
(i) CH3CH2INaCNApartial hydrolysisBNaOH, Br2C
Concept: This is a classic chain-extension via cyanide, followed by controlled hydrolysis to an amide, then the Hofmann rearrangement to an amine.
-
Step 1: SN2 substitution. Iodide is a good leaving group. Cyanide ion (−CN) is a strong nucleophile and attacks the primary carbon.
CH3CH2I+NaCN→CH3CH2CN+NaI
A = ethyl cyanide (propanenitrile).
-
Step 2: Partial hydrolysis. A nitrile can be fully hydrolysed to a carboxylic acid, but partial hydrolysis (using controlled conditions, e.g., dilute acid or base at moderate temperature) stops at the amide.
CH3CH2CN+H2OpartialCH3CH2CONH2
B = propanamide.
-
Step 3: Hofmann rearrangement. Treating an amide with bromine in aqueous NaOH converts it to a primary amine with one fewer carbon. The mechanism: bromination of the amide nitrogen, then rearrangement to an isocyanate, which hydrolyses to the amine.
CH3CH2CONH2+Br2+4NaOH→CH3CH2NH2+2NaBr+Na2CO3+2H2O
C = ethylamine.
Partial hydrolysis of a nitrile does not give the aldehyde — that requires special reagents (e.g., DIBAL-H). Here, it gives the amide.
(ii) C6H5N2+Cl−CuCNAH2O/H+BNH3, ΔC
Concept: The diazonium group is replaced by cyanide (Sandmeyer reaction), then the nitrile is hydrolysed to a carboxylic acid, which is then converted to an amide.
-
Step 1: Sandmeyer reaction. Diazonium salts undergo substitution with cuprous cyanide to give aryl cyanides.
C6H5N2+Cl−+CuCN→C6H5CN+N2+CuCl
A = benzonitrile.
-
Step 2: Acid hydrolysis. The nitrile is fully hydrolysed under acidic conditions to benzoic acid.
C6H5CN+2H2OH+C6H5COOH+NH4+
B = benzoic acid.
-
Step 3: Amide formation. Heating a carboxylic acid with ammonia gives the ammonium salt, which on further heating dehydrates to the amide.
C6H5COOH+NH3ΔC6H5COONH4− H2OC6H5CONH2
C = benzamide.
The Sandmeyer reaction is the go-to method for replacing a diazonium group with −CN, −Cl, −Br, etc. It works because Cu(I) catalyses the radical or organocopper intermediate.
(iii) CH3CH2BrKCNALiAlH4BHNO2, 0∘CC
Concept: Cyanide substitution, then reduction to a primary amine, then diazotisation and replacement by hydroxyl.
-
Step 1: SN2 substitution. Ethyl bromide reacts with KCN to give propanenitrile.
CH3CH2Br+KCN→CH3CH2CN+KBr
A = propanenitrile.
-
Step 2: Reduction with LiAlH4. Lithium aluminium hydride reduces nitriles to primary amines.
CH3CH2CNLiAlH4CH3CH2CH2NH2
B = propylamine (1-aminopropane).
-
Step 3: Diazotisation and replacement. At 0∘C, nitrous acid (HNO2) converts a primary aliphatic amine to a diazonium salt, which is unstable and immediately decomposes to a carbocation, then to an alcohol (via SN1 with water).
CH3CH2CH2NH2+HNO2→CH3CH2CH2N2+→CH3CH2CH2OH+N2
C = propan-1-ol.
Aliphatic diazonium salts are not stable like aromatic ones. They decompose instantly, so the isolated product is the alcohol. At this level, the simple substitution product propan-1-ol is taken as the main product — in practice, rearranged (propan-2-ol, via a hydride shift) and elimination side-products also form.
(iv) C6H5NO2Fe/HClANaNO2+HCl, 273KBH2O/H+, ΔC
Concept: Reduction of nitrobenzene to aniline, diazotisation, then hydrolysis of the diazonium salt to phenol.
-
Step 1: Reduction. Nitrobenzene is reduced to aniline using Fe/HCl (or Sn/HCl).
C6H5NO2+6[H]Fe/HClC6H5NH2+2H2O
A = aniline.
-
Step 2: Diazotisation. At 273K, aniline reacts with NaNO2/HCl to form the diazonium salt.
C6H5NH2+NaNO2+2HCl→C6H5N2+Cl−+NaCl+2H2O
B = benzenediazonium chloride.
-
Step 3: Hydrolysis. Heating the diazonium salt with water replaces the −N2+ group with −OH, giving phenol.
C6H5N2+Cl−+H2OΔC6H5OH+N2+HCl
C = phenol.
Diazonium hydrolysis: ArN2++H2O→ArOH+N2+H+
(v) CH3COOHNH3, ΔANaOBrBNaNO2/HClC …
Method: Retrosynthetic Analysis with Reaction Mapping
This method works backwards from known reagents and conditions to identify each intermediate and final product. For each sequence, we identify the type of reaction at each step, then deduce the structure.
(i) CH3CH2INaCNApartial hydrolysisBNaOH, Br2C
Step 1: CH3CH2I+NaCN→ Nucleophilic substitution (SN2)
- CN⁻ replaces I⁻
- A = CH3CH2CN (ethyl cyanide / propanenitrile)
Step 2: Partial hydrolysis of nitrile
- RCNH2O/OH−RCONH2 (amide)
- B = CH3CH2CONH2 (propanamide)
Step 3: RCONH2NaOH, Br2 Hoffmann bromamide degradation
- Amide loses CO₂, gives primary amine with one less carbon
- C = CH3CH2NH2 (ethylamine)
Final: A = CH3CH2CN, B = CH3CH2CONH2, C = CH3CH2NH2
(ii) C6H5N2+Cl−CuCNAH2O/H+BNH3, ΔC
Step 1: Diazonium salt + CuCN → Sandmeyer reaction
- CN⁻ replaces N₂⁺
- A = C6H5CN (benzonitrile)
Step 2: Acid hydrolysis of nitrile
- C6H5CNH2O/H+C6H5COOH
- B = C6H5COOH (benzoic acid)
Step 3: Benzoic acid + NH3 (heat) → Ammonium salt → amide
- C6H5COOHNH3, ΔC6H5CONH2
- C = C6H5CONH2 (benzamide)
Final: A = C6H5CN, B = C6H5COOH, C = C6H5CONH2
(iii) CH3CH2BrKCNALiAlH4BHNO2, 0∘CC
Step 1: CH3CH2Br+KCN→ SN2
- A = CH3CH2CN (propanenitrile)
Step 2: LiAlH4 reduces nitrile to primary amine
- RCNLiAlH4RCH2NH2
- B = CH3CH2CH2NH2 (propan-1-amine)
Step 3: Primary aliphatic amine + HNO2 at 0∘C → diazotisation, but the aliphatic diazonium ion is unstable — it decomposes at once, losing N2, and water traps the resulting carbocation to give the alcohol
- CH3CH2CH2NH2HNO2[CH3CH2CH2N2+]H2O, −N2CH3CH2CH2OH
- C = CH3CH2CH2OH (propan-1-ol)
Final: A = CH3CH2CN, B = CH3CH2CH2NH2, C = CH3CH2CH2OH
(iv) C6H5NO2Fe/HClANaNO2+HCl, 273KBH2O/H+, ΔC
Step 1: Nitrobenzene reduction → aniline
- C6H5NO2Fe/HClC6H5NH2
- A = C6H5NH2 (aniline)
Step 2: Aniline + NaNO2/HCl at 273K → diazotisation
- B = C6H5N2+Cl− (benzenediazonium chloride — aromatic, so stable at this temperature)
Step 3: Diazonium salt + H2O/H+ (heat) → hydrolysis
- C6H5N2+H2OC6H5OH+N2
- C = C6H5OH (phenol)
Final: A = C6H5NH2, B = C6H5N2+Cl−, C = C6H5OH
(v) CH3COOHNH3, ΔANaOBrBNaNO2/HClC
Step 1: Acetic acid + NH3 (heat) → ammonium acetate → acetamide
- CH3COOHNH3CH3COONH4ΔCH3CONH2
- A = CH3CONH2 (acetamide) …
Here are the common mistakes students make in Nucleophilic Substitution reaction sequences, organized by the specific reaction step, along with how to avoid each.
1. Confusing Cyanide as a Nucleophile vs. a Reducing Agent
Mistake: Treating NaCN or KCN as a reducing agent (like NaBH₄).
Reality: Cyanide ion (:CN⁻) is a strong nucleophile and a weak base. It attacks the electrophilic carbon (in SN² or SN¹ fashion) to form a nitrile (–C≡N).
How to avoid:
- Always check the substrate:
- Alkyl halide +
NaCN→ alkyl cyanide (nitrile). - Aryl diazonium salt +
CuCN→ aryl cyanide (Sandmeyer reaction).
- Alkyl halide +
- Never write
–CNas–NC(isocyanide) unless specified (e.g.,AgCNgives isocyanide).
Example (i):
CH₃CH₂I + NaCN → CH₃CH₂CN (A = propanenitrile), not CH₃CH₂NC.
2. Forgetting Partial Hydrolysis of Nitrile Stops at Amide
Mistake: Writing complete hydrolysis to carboxylic acid when the question says partial hydrolysis.
Reality: Partial hydrolysis (controlled H₂O, mild conditions) stops at the amide (–CONH₂), not the acid.
How to avoid:
- Remember the sequence:
R–CN→ (partial)R–CONH₂→ (full)R–COOH. - If the reagent is
H₂O/H⁺(without “partial”), assume full hydrolysis to acid. - If it says “partial hydrolysis” or “
H₂O(limited)”, write amide.
Example (i):
CH₃CH₂CN → partial hydrolysis → CH₃CH₂CONH₂ (B = propanamide).
3. Misapplying the Hoffmann Bromamide Degradation
Mistake: Thinking NaOH/Br₂ on an amide gives a bromo compound or an amine directly without rearrangement.
Reality: This is the Hoffmann bromamide reaction:
R–CONH₂ + Br₂ + NaOH → R–NH₂ (primary amine with one less carbon).
How to avoid:
- Count carbons: the product amine has n–1 carbons relative to the amide.
- The mechanism involves rearrangement (migration of R from C=O to N), so the alkyl group stays intact but the carbonyl carbon is lost as
CO₂.
Example (i):
CH₃CH₂CONH₂ → CH₃CH₂NH₂ (C = ethylamine), not CH₃CH₂CONHBr.
4. Forgetting the Sandmeyer Reaction Uses CuCN, Not NaCN
Mistake: Using NaCN directly on a diazonium salt (which would give a different product or no reaction).
Reality: Aryl diazonium salts require CuCN (Sandmeyer) to replace N₂⁺ with –CN. NaCN alone gives a diazo coupling product or tar.
How to avoid:
- Memorize:
ArN₂⁺X⁻ + CuCN→Ar–CN(Sandmeyer).ArN₂⁺X⁻ + H₂O→Ar–OH(phenol).
- The copper salt is essential for the radical/redox mechanism.
Example (ii):
C₆H₅N₂⁺Cl⁻ + CuCN → C₆H₅CN (A = benzonitrile).
5. Writing the Wrong Product for Nitrile Reduction
Mistake: Reducing a nitrile with LiAlH₄ and writing an aldehyde or a secondary amine.
Reality: LiAlH₄ reduces –C≡N to primary amine (–CH₂NH₂), not aldehyde (that’s DIBAL-H).
How to avoid:
LiAlH₄on nitrile → 1° amine (adds 2 H atoms to the triple bond).NaBH₄does not reduce nitriles effectively.DIBAL-Hat low temperature gives aldehyde.
Example (iii):
CH₃CH₂CN → LiAlH₄ → CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂ (B = propylamine).
6. Forgetting That HNO₂ at 0°C Converts 1° Amine to Diazonium Salt
Mistake: Writing a nitroso compound or an alcohol directly from a primary amine with HNO₂.
Reality:
- 1° aliphatic amine +
HNO₂(0°C) → diazonium salt (unstable, decomposes to carbocation → mixture of alkene, alcohol, etc.). - 1° aromatic amine +
HNO₂(0°C) → stable diazonium salt.
How to avoid:
- For aliphatic: the diazonium salt is transient; the final product is often an alcohol (from
H₂Oattack) or alkene (elimination). - For aromatic: the diazonium salt is stable and can be used for coupling or substitution.
Example (iii):
CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂ → HNO₂ → unstable diazonium → CH₃CH₂CH₂OH (C = propanol, major).
Example (vi):
C₆H₅NH₂ → HNO₂ → C₆H₅N₂⁺ (stable, B).
7. Mixing Up Diazonium Coupling vs. Substitution
Mistake: When a diazonium salt reacts with a phenol, writing a substitution product (like chlorobenzene) instead of an azo compound.
Reality: Diazonium salts couple with activated aromatic rings (phenols, anilines) at the para position (or ortho if para blocked) to form azo dyes (–N=N–).
How to avoid:
- Coupling requires an electron-rich aromatic (phenol, aniline) in basic/neutral medium.
- The product has a –N=N– bridge between two aromatic rings.
- Substitution (like replacing
N₂⁺withCl,Br,CN) requires CuX (Sandmeyer) or HX (without Cu, gives Ar–X but with side products).
Example (vi):
C₆H₅N₂⁺ + C₆H₅OH → HO–C₆H₄–N=N–C₆H₅ (C = p-hydroxyazobenzene).
8. Forgetting That NaOBr (or Br₂/NaOH) on Amide Is Hoffmann, Not Oxidation
Mistake: Thinking NaOBr oxidizes the amide to a nitro compound or a carboxylic acid.
Reality: NaOBr (sodium hypobromite) is the reagent for Hoffmann rearrangement of amides to amines (same as Br₂/NaOH).
How to avoid: …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ. A compound [X] undergoes reactions as given. Identify compounds [C] and [D] formed in these reactions. [A]Cr2O72−/H+[C] $$ [\text { B }] \xrightarrow[\text {(ii) } \mathrm{Na}2 \mathrm{CO}{3(\text { aq })}+\mathrm{I}_2]{\text { (i)aq. } \mathrm{KOH}} [\mathrm{D}] \quad+\mathrm{CH}_3 \mathrm{COONa}(A) \text { [C]: Benzoquinone [D]: lodoform } (B)[C]:Benzene[D]:2−iodo−propane(C)[C]:Benzoicacid[D]:lodoform(D) \text { [C]: 4-lodophenol [D]: 1-iodo-propane } $$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The compound [X] is isopropyl phenyl ether (C₆H₅–O–CH(CH₃)₂). Cleavage with concentrated HI gives phenol ([A]) and isopropyl iodide ([B]). Oxidation of phenol yields benzoquinone ([C]), and the iodoform reaction on isopropyl iodide gives iodoform ([D]) and sodium acetate. Thus the correct option is (A).
Concept & Intuition
This problem tests two classic organic reactions: ether cleavage by HI and the iodoform reaction. The key is to recognize that the ether [X] is an aryl alkyl ether (phenol derivative). When treated with concentrated HI, the C–O bond breaks selectively at the alkyl side (since the aryl–O bond is stronger due to resonance), producing phenol and an alkyl iodide. Then, phenol can be oxidized to benzoquinone, and the alkyl iodide (if it has a methyl group adjacent to the carbonyl or a secondary alcohol that can be oxidized to a methyl ketone) will undergo the iodoform test.
Let’s walk through each step.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify [X] and its cleavage products
The figure shows a benzene ring with an –O–CH(CH₃)₂ group. That is isopropyl phenyl ether (C₆H₅–O–CH(CH₃)₂).
With concentrated HI, the ether bond breaks. The mechanism: HI protonates the oxygen, then iodide attacks the less hindered carbon (the isopropyl carbon, since it’s primary-like in the sense of being less sterically hindered than the aromatic ring). This gives phenol (C₆H₅OH) as the aromatic product [A] and isopropyl iodide (CH₃–CHI–CH₃) as [B].
Watch outA common mistake is to think the aromatic ring gets iodinated. But under these conditions, the C–O bond on the alkyl side breaks, not the aryl–O bond. The aromatic ring remains intact as phenol.
-
Reaction of [A] (phenol) with Cr₂O₇²⁻/H⁺ → [C]
Phenol is easily oxidized. Chromic acid (Cr₂O₇²⁻/H⁺) is a strong oxidizing agent. It oxidizes phenol to 1,4-benzoquinone (often just called benzoquinone). The reaction involves two-electron oxidation: the –OH group becomes a carbonyl, and the ring is rearranged to a quinoid structure.
So [C] = Benzoquinone.
-
Reaction of [B] (isopropyl iodide) with (i) aq. KOH, then (ii) Na₂CO₃(aq) + I₂ → [D] + CH₃COONa
- Step (i): Aqueous KOH will hydrolyze the alkyl iodide to an alcohol. Isopropyl iodide gives isopropyl alcohol (propan-2-ol, CH₃–CHOH–CH₃). …
-
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Match the compounds given in List – I with the items given in List – II. List – I (I) Benzenesulphonyl Chloride (II) Sulphanilic acid (III) Alkyl Diazonium salts (IV) Aryl Diazonium salts List – II(a) Zwitterion(b) Hinsberg reagent(c) Dyes(d) Conversion to alcohols (A) 1 – c, II – b, III – a, IV – d (B) 1 – a, II – c, III – b, IV – d (C) 1 – c, II – a, III – d, IV – b (D) 1 – b, II – a, III – d, IV – c
›Reveal solutionSolution
Benzenesulphonyl chloride = Hinsberg reagent, sulphanilic acid = zwitterion, alkyl diazonium salts → alcohols, aryl diazonium salts → azo dyes.
Step 1 — (I) Benzenesulphonyl chloride → (b) Hinsberg reagent.
C6H5SO2Cl is known as Hinsberg's reagent. It reacts with 1° amines to give a sulphonamide with an acidic N–H (soluble in alkali), with 2° amines to give a sulphonamide with no N–H (insoluble in alkali), and does not react with 3° amines — the classical test for distinguishing the three classes.
Step 2 — (II) Sulphanilic acid → (a) Zwitterion.
The −SO3H group is strongly acidic and the −NH2 group is basic, so an internal proton transfer occurs:
H2N−C6H4−SO3H⇌+H3N−C6H4−SO3−
This dipolar internal salt is a zwitterion (which is why sulphanilic acid has a high melting point and low solubility in organic solvents).
Step 3 — (III) Alkyl diazonium salts → (d) Conversion to alcohols.
Alkyl diazonium ions (R−N2+) are extremely unstable because N2 is an excellent leaving group and there is no resonance stabilisation. They decompose at once, and water traps the resulting carbocation: …
- KCET 2024Set B-21 markMCQQ.In the reaction Aniline NaNO2/dil.HCl P Phenol/NaOH Q, ‘Q’ is: (A) C6H5N2Cl (B) ortho-hydroxyazobenzene (C) para-hydroxyazobenzene (D) meta-hydroxyazobenzene
›Reveal solutionSolution
Diazotisation of aniline gives the benzenediazonium salt (P); azo-coupling of that weak electrophile with phenoxide occurs at the para position, so Q is para-hydroxyazobenzene.
1. Step 1 — Diazotisation gives P
A primary aromatic amine treated with nitrous acid (generated in situ from NaNO2+dil. HCl) at 273–278 K gives an arenediazonium salt:
C6H5NH2NaNO2/dil. HCl273−278 KC6H5N+≡N Cl−
So P= benzenediazonium chloride. (The aryl diazonium ion is stabilised by delocalisation into the ring — this is why it survives, unlike an alkyl diazonium ion.) Note that option (A) is P, not Q — a classic distractor.
2. Step 2 — Azo coupling gives Q
The diazonium ion is only a weak electrophile, so it can attack a ring only if that ring is strongly activated. Phenol in NaOH is deprotonated to the phenoxide ion, C6H5O−, whose −O− is a very powerful electron-releasing group (strong +M), pumping electron density onto the ortho and para carbons.
Electrophilic substitution therefore occurs at those positions, but coupling takes place essentially exclusively at the para position because:
- the para carbon is sterically unhindered, whereas an ortho attack would place the bulky −N=N−C6H5 group right next to the −OH;
- the para-coupled azo product is the thermodynamically favoured, fully conjugated dye. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQQ.Identify A, B and C. (A) (B) (C) (D)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The reaction scheme shows a neopentyl bromide undergoing SN1 (to B), SN2 (to A), and elimination (to C). The correct products are: A = neopentyl ethyl ether, B = 2-ethoxy-2-methylbutane (rearranged), C = 2-methyl-2-butene. Only option (A) matches all three.
Concept & Intuition
Neopentyl bromide (1-bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane) is a classic case where the substrate’s structure dictates reaction pathways. The carbon bearing bromine is primary, but it’s attached to a quaternary carbon (three methyl groups). For SN2, the backside attack is severely hindered by the bulky neopentyl group, making it very slow. For SN1, the primary carbocation would normally be unstable, but under solvolytic conditions (ethanol), the reaction proceeds via a rearranged tertiary carbocation (a methyl shift), giving a more stable intermediate. Elimination also favors the more substituted alkene (Zaitsev product). The question tests recognition of these rearrangements and the correct structures.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the substrate The central structure is neopentyl bromide:
CH3–C(CH3)2–CH2Br
The bromine is on a primary carbon, but the carbon is neopentyl (tert-butylmethyl). This is crucial.
- SN2 pathway (→ A) SN2 requires a clean backside attack. The neopentyl group is extremely bulky, so SN2 is very slow. However, in ethanol (C₂H₅OH) as solvent, the ethoxide ion (from ethanol) can act as a nucleophile. The product is the unrearranged ethyl ether:
CH3–C(CH3)2–CH2–O–C2H5
This is neopentyl ethyl ether. No rearrangement occurs because SN2 is concerted.
Check options: Only option (A) shows this exact structure for A.
- SN1 pathway (→ B) SN1 proceeds via carbocation formation. The primary carbocation (CH₃–C(CH₃)₂–CH₂⁺) is very unstable. It immediately undergoes a 1,2-methyl shift to form the more stable tertiary carbocation:
CH3–C+(CH3)–CH2CH3
This tertiary carbocation is then trapped by ethanol (solvent) to give the ethyl ether:
CH3–C(OC2H5)(CH3)–CH2CH3
This is 2-ethoxy-2-methylbutane.
Check options: Only option (A) shows B as exactly this structure (with OC₂H₅ on the quaternary carbon and an ethyl group on the adjacent carbon).
- Elimination pathway (→ C) …
- KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQQ.A secondary amine is (A) a compound with an NH2 group on the carbon atom in number 2 position (B) a compound in which 2 of the hydrogen of NH3 have been replaced by organic groups (C) an organic compound with two NH2 group (D) a compound with two carbon atom and an NH2 group
›Reveal solutionSolution
A secondary amine is defined by the number of alkyl/aryl groups attached to nitrogen — specifically, two organic groups replace two hydrogens of ammonia. The correct answer is (B).
The key to this question is understanding how amines are classified. Amines are derivatives of ammonia (NH3), and the classification — primary, secondary, or tertiary — depends entirely on how many of the three hydrogen atoms on nitrogen have been replaced by carbon-containing groups (alkyl or aryl). It has nothing to do with the position of a carbon atom, the number of carbon atoms in the molecule, or the count of NH2 groups.
Let’s examine each option carefully.
-
Option (A) says “a compound with an NH2 group on the carbon atom in number 2 position.” This describes a structural detail about where an amino group is attached on a carbon chain (like on C-2 of propane). That is a matter of positional isomerism, not amine classification. A primary amine can have its NH2 on carbon-2, and so can a secondary or tertiary amine if they also have other groups. This definition misses the point entirely.
-
Option (B) says “a compound in which 2 of the hydrogen of NH3 have been replaced by organic groups.” This is exactly the definition. Ammonia has three hydrogens. Replace one → primary amine (RNH2). Replace two → secondary amine (R2NH). Replace three → tertiary amine (R3N). So a secondary amine has two alkyl/aryl groups attached to nitrogen, with one hydrogen remaining. …
-
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.What are the products formed when Anisole is reacted with Hydroiodic acid and heated? (A) Iodobenzene + Methane (B) Phenol + Methanol (C) Phenol + Iodomethane (D) Iodobenzene + Methanol
›Reveal solutionSolution
Anisole C6H5−O−CH3+HI→C6H5OH (phenol) +CH3I (iodomethane).
In cleavage of aryl alkyl ethers by HI, the bond broken is the O−alkyl bond, not the O−aryl bond, because forming an aryl cation/attack at the aromatic carbon is very unfavourable. I− attacks the methyl carbon (SN2), …
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.The metal nitrate that liberates NO2 on heating (A) NaNO3 (B) KNO3 (C) LiNO3 (D) RbNO3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Li+ is tiny and highly polarising, so it distorts the nitrate ion enough to break it right down to the oxide + NO2; the bigger alkali cations only take it as far as the nitrite.
Step 1 — The two possible decomposition routes
Alkali-metal nitrates decompose on heating by one of two paths:
Path 1 — to the nitrite (Na, K, Rb, Cs):
2MNO3Δ2MNO2+O2↑
Only oxygen is evolved — no brown fumes.
Path 2 — to the oxide (Li):
4LiNO3Δ2Li2O+4NO2↑+O2↑
Here the nitrate ion is destroyed completely, giving the characteristic brown NO2 gas.
Step 2 — Why lithium is the odd one out (Fajans' rules)
The polarising power of a cation scales as (radius)2charge. Among the alkali metals:
Li+(76 pm)<Na+(102)<K+(138)<Rb+(152 pm)
So Li+ is by far the smallest and therefore the most polarising. It pulls electron density out of the large, soft NO3− anion, weakening the N–O bonds so much that the anion breaks apart entirely into O2− (which stays with Li as Li2O) and NO2.
The larger cations Na+,K+,Rb+ cannot distort the nitrate that strongly. Their nitrates only shed one oxygen atom, stopping at the stable nitrite.
Step 3 — The wider pattern (worth remembering) …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.