Q.On the basis of crystal field theory explain why Co(III) forms paramagnetic octahedral complex with weak field ligands whereas it forms diamagnetic octahedral complex with strong field ligands.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Crystal Field Splitting
Crystal Field Splitting: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you are a negatively charged electron sitting on a metal ion. All around you, the space is perfectly spherical — every direction feels the same. Your energy depends only on how far you are from the nucleus, not on which way you face.
Now imagine that six negative ions (or the negative ends of polar molecules) march in from the x, y, and z axes and stop close to you. Suddenly, the space around you is no longer uniform. If you try to move straight toward one of these approaching ions, you feel a strong repulsion — that path costs extra energy. If you move between the axes (say, along a diagonal), you feel less repulsion because you are farther from the incoming charges.
This is the core intuition: when ligands approach a metal ion, they break the spherical symmetry of the space around the metal. Different directions in space are no longer equivalent. Electrons in orbitals that point directly at the ligands get pushed up in energy; electrons in orbitals that point between the ligands stay lower.
The Precise Statement
Crystal Field Splitting is the splitting of degenerate d orbitals of a transition metal ion into two or more sets of different energies, caused by the electrostatic repulsion between the metal's d electrons and the negative charge (or dipole) of surrounding ligands.
For the most common geometry — octahedral — here is what happens:
- Six ligands sit at the corners of an octahedron, along the +x, −x, +y, −y, +z, −z axes.
- The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point their lobes directly along these axes. These are the eg set. They feel maximum repulsion → higher energy.
- The dxy, dxz, and dyz orbitals point their lobes between the axes (into the octahedral faces). These are the t2g set. They feel less repulsion → lower energy.
The energy gap between these two sets is denoted by Δo (or 10Dq). The t2g set drops by 0.4Δo and the eg set rises by 0.6Δo, keeping the average energy unchanged (the "barycentre" rule).
The labels eg and t2g come from group theory — they describe how the orbitals transform under the symmetry operations of an octahedron. You do not need to memorise the derivation, but the notation is standard in every exam.
Why This Matters
Crystal field splitting explains three things you will see repeatedly:
- Colour — electrons can jump from t2g to eg by absorbing visible light. The gap Δo determines the colour you see.
- Magnetism — if Δo is large, electrons pair up in the lower t2g set (low spin). If Δo is small, electrons spread out (high spin). This changes the number of unpaired electrons. …
Why this formula?
Crystal Field Splitting: Why the Energy Splitting Occurs
Crystal Field Theory (CFT) explains how the d-orbitals of a transition metal ion split in energy when placed in an electrostatic field created by surrounding ligands (anions or polar molecules). The key result is that five degenerate d-orbitals split into two or more sets with different energies. Let's understand why this happens.
1. The Starting Point: Degenerate d-Orbitals
In a free transition metal ion (no ligands), all five d-orbitals have the same energy (degenerate). Their shapes are:
- dxy, dxz, dyz — lobes lie between the x, y, z axes (called t2g set in octahedral symmetry)
- dx2−y2, dz2 — lobes point directly along the x, y, z axes (called eg set)
Key idea: The spatial orientation of each orbital determines how it interacts with approaching ligands.
2. The Octahedral Case: Why eg Orbitals Are Higher in Energy
Imagine six ligands approaching along the +x, –x, +y, –y, +z, –z axes (octahedral geometry).
What happens to dx2−y2 and dz2?
- Their lobes point directly at the ligands.
- The negatively charged ligands repel the electron density in these orbitals.
- This repulsion raises the energy of these orbitals — they become less stable (higher energy).
What happens to dxy, dxz, dyz?
- Their lobes point between the axes (e.g., dxy lobes lie in the xy-plane but at 45° to x and y).
- They avoid the ligands — less repulsion.
- Their energy is lower than the eg set.
The Splitting Pattern
Δoct=E(eg)−E(t2g)
Where:
- E(eg) = energy of dx2−y2 and dz2 (higher)
- E(t2g) = energy of dxy, dxz, dyz (lower)
- Δoct is called the crystal field splitting energy (CFSE)
Why the name? The eg orbitals are "doubly degenerate" (2 orbitals), t2g are "triply degenerate" (3 orbitals). The letters come from group theory symmetry labels.
3. The Energy Conservation Rule
The total energy of all five d-orbitals must remain constant (no energy is created or destroyed). So:
- The center of gravity (average energy) of the split set equals the original degenerate energy.
- For octahedral splitting:
- 2 eg orbitals go up by +0.6Δoct each
- 3 t2g orbitals go down by −0.4Δoct each
Check:
2×(+0.6Δ)+3×(−0.4Δ)=1.2Δ−1.2Δ=0
This conservation of energy is a fundamental constraint — the splitting is not arbitrary.
4. The Tetrahedral Case: Why It's Opposite and Smaller
In a tetrahedral complex, four ligands approach from alternate corners of a cube. The axes are different:
- The dxy, dxz, dyz orbitals now point closer to the ligands (more repulsion).
- The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point away from ligands (less repulsion).
Result:
- e set ( dx2−y2, dz2 ) — lower energy
- t2 set ( dxy, dxz, dyz ) — higher energy
The splitting is inverted compared to octahedral.
Magnitude:
Δtet≈94Δoct
Why smaller?
- Only 4 ligands (vs. 6) → less total repulsion.
- Ligands are not directly along axes → weaker interaction. …
The key idea is Crystal Field Splitting: in an octahedral field, the d orbitals split into lower-energy t2g and higher-energy eg sets. The magnitude of the splitting (Δo) depends on the ligand — weak field ligands give a small Δo, strong field ligands give a large Δo.
For Co3+, the electronic configuration is 3d6.
- Weak field (small Δo): The pairing energy (P) is larger than Δo. Electrons occupy all five d orbitals singly first (Hund's rule) before pairing. This gives the configuration t2g4eg2 — four unpaired electrons. …
Crystal field theory explains that the splitting of d-orbitals in an octahedral field (Δo) relative to the pairing energy (P) determines the electron configuration. For Co(III), weak field ligands give a high-spin, paramagnetic t2g4eg2 configuration, while strong field ligands give a low-spin, diamagnetic t2g6eg0 configuration.
The Core Idea: Crystal Field Splitting and Electron Configuration
Crystal field theory (CFT) is a model that explains the electronic structure of transition metal complexes. In an octahedral complex, the five d-orbitals are no longer degenerate. The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (the eg set) point directly at the ligands and experience strong repulsion, raising their energy. The dxy, dxz, and dyz orbitals (the t2g set) point between the ligands and experience less repulsion, lowering their energy. The energy gap between these two sets is called the crystal field splitting energy, denoted by Δo (or 10Dq).
The key to understanding the magnetic behaviour of a d6 ion like Co(III) lies in a simple competition: the energy cost of pairing electrons (P) versus the energy gain from occupying the lower-energy t2g orbitals (Δo).
-
Identify the metal ion and its d-electron count. Cobalt in the +3 oxidation state, Co(III), has an electronic configuration of [Ar]3d6. This means we have six electrons to place in the d-orbitals of the octahedral complex.
-
Understand the two competing factors. When placing electrons into the split d-orbitals, two rules apply:
- Hund's rule: Electrons prefer to occupy different orbitals with parallel spins to minimise electron-electron repulsion.
- Aufbau principle: Electrons will first fill the lower-energy t2g orbitals. The conflict arises because placing an electron in a higher-energy eg orbital (following Hund's rule) costs energy Δo, while pairing two electrons in the same t2g orbital costs the pairing energy, P.
-
The decisive factor: Δo vs. P. The actual configuration adopted is the one that minimises the total energy of the system.
- If Δo<P (weak field): The energy cost of promoting an electron to the eg level is less than the cost of pairing. The system will maximise the number of unpaired electrons.
- If Δo>P (strong field): The energy cost of promoting an electron is greater than the cost of pairing. The system will minimise the number of unpaired electrons by pairing them in the t2g orbitals.
A common mistake is to think that the t2g set can hold a maximum of 6 electrons. This is true, but the order in which they are filled depends entirely on the ligand field strength. Don't just fill the t2g set first; always check if it's energetically favourable to promote an electron to eg instead.
- Apply to the weak field case (paramagnetic). With a weak field ligand (e.g., H2O, F−), Δo is small. The first three electrons go into the three t2g orbitals with parallel spins (t2g3). The fourth electron has a choice: pair in a t2g orbital (cost P) or go into an eg orbital (cost Δo). Since Δo<P, it is cheaper to promote the electron. So, the fourth electron goes into an eg orbital. The fifth and sixth electrons also follow Hund's rule, each occupying a separate orbital before pairing occurs. The final configuration is t2g3eg3. However, this is not the most stable arrangement. A more accurate filling is t2g4eg2, where the fourth electron pairs in the t2g set, and the fifth and sixth go to the eg set. This gives four unpaired electrons (two in t2g and two in eg). A substance with unpaired electrons is paramagnetic. …
Crystal Field Splitting — Method: Crystal Field Theory (CFT) for Octahedral Complexes
Why This Happens — The Core Idea
The difference arises because weak field ligands cause a small crystal field splitting (Δo), while strong field ligands cause a large splitting. This determines whether electrons pair up or remain unpaired in the t2g and eg orbitals.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Step 1: Identify the metal ion and its electron configuration
- Co(III) means Co3+ (atomic number 27, loses 3 electrons).
- Electronic configuration of Co: [Ar]3d74s2
- For Co3+: remove 3 electrons → [Ar]3d6
So, Co3+ has 6 d-electrons.
Step 2: Recall the octahedral splitting diagram
- In an octahedral field, the 5 d-orbitals split into:
- Lower energy: t2g (3 orbitals: dxy,dxz,dyz)
- Higher energy: eg (2 orbitals: dx2−y2,dz2)
- The energy gap between them is Δo (or 10Dq).
Step 3: Apply Hund's rule and pairing energy (P)
- Pairing energy (P) is the energy cost to put two electrons in the same orbital.
- The filling pattern depends on whether Δo>P or Δo<P.
Case 1: Weak Field Ligands (e.g., F−, H2O)
- Δo is small → Δo<P
- Electrons prefer to occupy all five orbitals singly before pairing (Hund's rule).
Filling for 6 electrons:
- Fill t2g: 3 electrons (one each) → 3 unpaired
- Next 3 electrons go into eg (one each) → 3 more unpaired
Result:
- Configuration: t2g3eg3
- 4 unpaired electrons → Paramagnetic
Case 2: Strong Field Ligands (e.g., CN−, CO)
- Δo is large → Δo>P …
Here is a breakdown of the common mistakes students make on this exact Crystal Field Theory (CFT) question, along with how to avoid them.
The Core Concept (The "Why")
Before listing mistakes, let's lock in the correct logic. This question tests your understanding of pairing energy (P) vs. crystal field splitting energy (Δo) .
- Identify the metal ion: Co(III) is d6 (Cobalt atomic number 27, Co3+ = 27 - 3 = 24 electrons, configuration [Ar]3d6).
- Weak field ligands (e.g., F−,H2O): Δo is small. Δo<P. Electrons follow Hund's rule (maximum multiplicity). They occupy all five d-orbitals singly before pairing. This gives 4 unpaired electrons → Paramagnetic.
- Strong field ligands (e.g., CN−,NH3): Δo is large. Δo>P. Electrons pair up in the lower energy t2g orbitals first. This gives 0 unpaired electrons → Diamagnetic.
Common Mistake #1: Confusing the Electron Count (d6 vs. d5)
- The Error: Students often treat Co(III) as d5 or d7, or forget that Co is in the +3 oxidation state. They might draw the diagram for Fe(III) or Co(II) instead.
- Why it happens: Rushing the electronic configuration. Co (atomic number 27) is tricky because it's near Fe (26) and Ni (28).
- How to Avoid:
- Write it down step-by-step:
- Co (atom) = [Ar]4s23d7
- Co3+ = Remove 3 electrons (2 from 4s, 1 from 3d) = [Ar]3d6
- Memorize the common dn configurations for 3d series: Cr3+ (d3), Mn2+ (d5), Fe3+ (d5), Co3+ (d6), Ni2+ (d8), Cu2+ (d9).
- Write it down step-by-step:
Common Mistake #2: Forgetting the "Pairing Energy" Condition
- The Error: Students simply state "weak field = high spin, strong field = low spin" without mentioning the comparison between Δo and P. They might say "strong field ligands cause pairing" but don't explain why.
- Why it happens: Memorizing the result without the reasoning. The exam specifically asks "on the basis of crystal field theory".
- How to Avoid:
- Always state the rule: "The electronic configuration depends on whether the crystal field splitting energy (Δo) is greater than or less than the pairing energy (P) ."
- Write the inequality:
- Weak field: Δo<P → High spin.
- Strong field: Δo>P → Low spin.
Common Mistake #3: Drawing the t2g and eg Orbitals Incorrectly
- The Error: Drawing the wrong number of electrons in the orbitals, or placing electrons in the eg set before filling the t2g set in the weak field case.
- Why it happens: Misunderstanding the order of filling. In an octahedral field, the t2g set (dxy,dxz,dyz) is always lower in energy than the eg set (dx2−y2,dz2).
- How to Avoid:
- Draw the energy level diagram carefully.
- For d6 weak field:
- Fill t2g with 3 electrons (one each, all parallel spins).
- Next electron goes to eg (Hund's rule).
- Next two electrons go to t2g and eg (one each, parallel spins).
- Result: t2g3eg3 (4 unpaired electrons).
- For d6 strong field:
- Fill t2g with 3 electrons (one each, parallel).
- Next 3 electrons pair up in t2g.
- Result: t2g6eg0 (0 unpaired electrons).
Common Mistake #4: Confusing "Paramagnetic" and "Diamagnetic" …
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 on this concept.
- KCET 2026Set D31 markMCQQ.Match List-I with List-IIChoose the correct answer from the options given below. (A) a - ii, b – iii, c – iv, d - i (B) a - ii, b - i, c - iii, d – iv (C) a – iii, b – ii, c – iv, d - i (D) a – i, b – iii, c – iv, d – ii
List-I (Complex) List-II (Geometry) a. [Co(NH3)6]3+ i. Trigonal bipyramidal b. [NiCl4]2− ii. Octahedral c. [Ni(CN)4]2− iii. Tetrahedral d. [Fe(CO)5] iv. Square planar ›Reveal solutionSolution
Each complex's geometry is fixed by its coordination number together with the metal's oxidation state/d-electron count and the field strength of its ligands.
Step 1 — [Co(NH3)6]3+
Cobalt here is Co3+ (d6), six-coordinate with NH3, a moderately strong-field ligand. Six-coordinate complexes of this type adopt octahedral geometry, matching item ii.
Step 2 — [NiCl4]2−
Nickel here is Ni2+ (d8), four-coordinate with Cl−, a weak-field ligand. A weak field is unable to pair up the d8 electrons into a low-spin arrangement, so the complex uses sp3 hybridization and adopts tetrahedral geometry, matching item iii.
Step 3 — [Ni(CN)4]2− …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.In the following pairs, the one in which both transition metal ions are colourless is (A) ScX3+,ZnX2+ (B) VX2+,TiX3+ (C) ZnX2+,MnX2+ (D) TiX4+,CuX2+
›Reveal solutionSolution
Colour in transition-metal ions comes from d–d transitions, which require a partially filled d-subshell; so find the pair where both ions are d0 or d10.
Step 1 — The concept: why transition-metal ions are coloured
In a complex (or in aqueous solution, where water acts as the ligand), the five degenerate d-orbitals are split by the ligand field into a lower set and an upper set, separated by the crystal-field splitting energy Δ.
ΔE=Δ=hν=λhc
For most first-row transition-metal complexes Δ happens to correspond to a photon in the visible range. An electron in the lower set absorbs that photon and jumps to the upper set — a d–d transition — and the complementary colour of the absorbed light is what we see.
The essential requirement: the d-subshell must be partially filled, i.e. d1 to d9.
- If the ion is d0 — there is no electron to promote.
- If the ion is d10 — the upper set is completely full, so there is no vacancy to promote into.
Either way, no d–d transition ⇒ colourless.
Step 2 — Work out the d-configuration of every ion offered
Recall that for a transition metal we remove the ns electrons first, then the (n−1)d electrons.
Ion Atomic no. Neutral atom d-config of ion Coloured? ScX3+ 21 [Ar]3d14s2 3d0 Colourless ZnX2+ 30 [Ar]3d104s2 3d10 Colourless VX2+ 23 [Ar]3d34s2 3d3 Coloured (violet) TiX3+ 22 [Ar]3d24s2 3d1 Coloured (purple) MnX2+ 25 [Ar]3d54s2 3d5 Coloured (pale pink) TiX4+ 22 [Ar]3d24s2 3d0 Colourless - COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.A transition metal M forms 4 homoleptic octahedral coordination compounds, A,B,C and D of the type [MX6]z− with monodentate ligands a, b, c and d respectively. These compounds absorb red. blue. yellow and blue-green light respectively. Which one of the options shows the correct order of decreasing ligand strength? (A) B>D>C>A (B) D>C>B>A (C) A>C>D>B (D) A>B>C>D
›Reveal solutionSolution
The colour absorbed by a complex is complementary to the colour we see; the energy of absorbed light (and thus the crystal field splitting Δₒ) increases from red to blue, so the ligand that causes the largest Δₒ is the strongest. The correct order of decreasing ligand strength is B > D > C > A, which corresponds to option (A).
The key idea is the spectrochemical series: ligands are ranked by how strongly they split the d‑orbitals in an octahedral field. The stronger the ligand, the larger the crystal field splitting energy Δₒ. The colour we see is the complement of the colour absorbed — so the absorbed colour tells us the energy of the transition, and hence the relative Δₒ.
Here, the complexes absorb:
- A: red light
- B: blue light
- C: yellow light
- D: blue‑green light
We need to rank the ligands a, b, c, d from strongest to weakest.
- Recall the relationship between absorbed colour and energy. In the visible spectrum, red light has the longest wavelength (lowest energy), and blue/violet light has the shortest wavelength (highest energy). The order of increasing energy for the absorbed colours is:
red<yellow<blue‑green<blue
(Blue‑green is intermediate between green and blue, so it is higher in energy than yellow but lower than pure blue.)
-
Connect absorbed energy to Δₒ.
For an octahedral d‑complex, the energy of the d‑d transition (typically from t2g to eg) is approximately equal to Δₒ. So a complex that absorbs higher‑energy light has a larger Δₒ, meaning its ligand is stronger in the spectrochemical series.
-
Rank the complexes by Δₒ from largest to smallest.
- B absorbs blue → highest energy → largest Δₒ → strongest ligand (b).
- D absorbs blue‑green → next highest energy → next largest Δₒ.
- C absorbs yellow → lower energy than blue‑green → smaller Δₒ. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Which of the following compounds has electrons symmetrically distributed in both t2 g and eg orbitals? (A) [CoF6]3− (B) [Mn(CN)6]4− (C) [Cr(NH3)6]3+ (D) [FeCl6]3−
›Reveal solutionSolution
"Symmetric distribution in both t2g and eg" requires each set to be half-filled (or full). Among the options only high-spin d5, i.e. [FeCl6]3− with t2g3eg2, satisfies this. The correct option is (D).
Concept
In an octahedral field the five d orbitals split into the lower t2g (dxy,dxz,dyz) and the higher eg (dz2,dx2−y2). Electrons are symmetrically distributed in a set when every orbital of that set holds the same number of electrons — one each (half-filled) or two each (full). For both sets to be symmetric with electrons present, the classic case is high-spin d5: t2g3eg2, one electron in each of the five orbitals.
Solution
- Oxidation states and dn.
- (A) [CoF6]3−: Co3+=d6.
- (B) [Mn(CN)6]4−: Mn2+=d5.
- (C) [Cr(NH3)6]3+: Cr3+=d3.
- (D) [FeCl6]3−: Fe3+=d5.
- Field strength and filling.
- F− weak ⇒ Co3+ high-spin t2g4eg2 — t2g uneven. …
- Oxidation states and dn.
- KCET 2024Set B-21 markMCQQ.Which of the following statements are true about [CoF6]3− ion? I. The complex has octahedral geometry. II. Coordination number of Co is 3 and oxidation state is +6. III. The complex is sp3d2 hybridised. IV. It is a high spin complex. (A) I, II and IV (B) I, III and IV (C) II and IV (D) II, III and IV
›Reveal solutionSolution
F− is a weak-field ligand, so [CoF6]3− is an outer-orbital, high-spin, octahedral sp3d2 complex — statements I, III and IV are true; only statement II (about CN and oxidation state) is false.
1. Oxidation state and coordination number
Let the oxidation state of Co be x. Each fluoride ligand is F−, and the overall charge is −3:
x+6(−1)=−3⟹x=+3
There are six ligands directly bonded to the metal, so the coordination number is 6.
Co: oxidation state =+3,coordination number =6
Statement II says "coordination number of Co is 3 and oxidation state is +6" — this has the two numbers exactly swapped. II is FALSE. ✗
This single deduction is enough to eliminate options (A) [I, II, IV], (C) [II and IV] and (D) [II, III, IV] — all of them include statement II. Only (B) survives. Let us confirm each of I, III, IV independently.
2. Statement I — geometry
A coordination number of 6 in Werner-type complexes means an octahedral arrangement (the six ligands at the vertices of a regular octahedron, minimising repulsion). I is TRUE. ✓
3. The electronic configuration of Co3+
Co (Z=27):[Ar]3d74s2⟹Co3+:[Ar]3d6
4. Statement IV — high spin or low spin?
The deciding factor is the crystal-field splitting energy Δo versus the pairing energy P:
- If Δo>P (strong-field ligand, e.g. CN−, NH3, CO) ⇒ electrons pair up in t2g ⇒ low spin.
- If Δo<P (weak-field ligand) ⇒ electrons spread out and stay unpaired ⇒ high spin.
In the spectrochemical series,
I−<Br−<Cl−<F−<H2O<NH3<en<CN−<CO
F− sits firmly on the weak-field end. Hence Δo<P and the d6 electrons occupy the orbitals with maximum multiplicity:
t2g4 eg2⇒4 unpaired electrons — HIGH SPIN (paramagnetic)
μ=n(n+2)=4×6=24≈4.9 BM …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.On the basis of crystal field theory, electronic configuration of a low spin d4 complex is: (A) t2g1eg3 (B) t2g4eg (C) t2g3eg1 (D) t2g2eg2
›Reveal solutionSolution
A low-spin d4 octahedral complex places all four electrons in t2g: t2g4eg0.
In crystal field theory for an octahedral complex, the d orbitals split into lower t2g (three orbitals) and higher eg (two orbitals). In a low-spin (strong-field) case the pairing energy is less than Δo, so electrons pair up in t2g before occupying eg. For d4 …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Based on Crystal Field theory, match the Complex ions listed in Column I with the electronic configuration in the d orbitals of the central metal ion listed in Column II. .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} No. Complexion No. d orbital configuration of central metal ion. (A) [Mn(CN)6]4− (P) eg2t2g3 (B) [Co(H2O)6]2+ (Q) t2g4eg2 (C) [Fe(H2O)6]2+ (R) t2g5 (D) [MnCl4]2− (S) t2g5eg2 (A) A=SB=RC=PD=Q (B) A=RB=SC=QD=P (C) A=QB=SC=PD=R (D) A=RB=SC=PD=Q
›Reveal solutionSolution
A=R, B=S, C=Q, D=P.
Work out each central-ion d-configuration:
- A [Mn(CN)6]4−: Mn2+ is d5; CN− is strong-field ⇒ low spin octahedral ⇒t2g5eg0=t2g5 = R.
- B [Co(H2O)6]2+: Co2+ is d7; H2O weak-field ⇒ high spin ⇒t2g5eg2 = S.
- C [Fe(H2O)6]2+: Fe2+ is d6; high spin ⇒t2g4eg2 = Q. …
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.Match the column A (type of crystalline solid) with the column B (example for each type): A P. Molecular Solid Q. Ionic Solid R. Metallic Solid S. Network Solid B i. SiC ii. Mg iii. H2O iv. MgO (A) P-iii, Q-i, R-ii, S-iv (B) P-iv, Q-iii, R-ii, S-i (C) P-ii, Q-iv, R-iii, S-i (D) P-iii, Q-iv, R-ii, S-i
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks you to match each type of crystalline solid (molecular, ionic, metallic, network) with its correct example. The key is to identify the bonding and structure of each substance: HX2O is a molecular solid, MgO is ionic, Mg is metallic, and SiC is a network covalent solid. The correct match is P-iii, Q-iv, R-ii, S-i, which corresponds to option (D).
The concept here is classification of crystalline solids based on the nature of the bonding forces between their constituent particles. Each type has a distinct set of properties that you can use to identify examples.
-
Molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular forces (van der Waals, hydrogen bonding). They consist of discrete molecules. Water (HX2O) is a classic example — it forms ice crystals where individual HX2O molecules are linked by hydrogen bonds. So P matches with iii.
-
Ionic solids are composed of positive and negative ions held together by strong electrostatic (ionic) bonds. Magnesium oxide (MgO) is an ionic compound: MgX2+ and OX2− ions arranged in a lattice. So Q matches with iv.
-
Metallic solids consist of metal atoms held together by metallic bonding — a "sea" of delocalized electrons around positive ions. Magnesium (Mg) is a metal, so R matches with ii.
-
Network solids (also called covalent network solids) are giant molecules where atoms are bonded together by a continuous network of covalent bonds. Silicon carbide (SiC) has a structure similar to diamond, with each Si atom covalently bonded to four C atoms. So S matches with i. …
-
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.Which of the following system in an octahedral complex has maximum unpaired electrons? (A) d9 (high spin) (B) d6 (low spin) (C) d4 (low spin) (D) d7 (high spin)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Fill the t2g/eg levels for each configuration using the correct spin state and simply count the unpaired electrons.
Step 1 — The concept: high spin vs low spin
In an octahedral complex the five d orbitals split into a lower t2g set (3 orbitals) and an upper eg set (2 orbitals), separated by the crystal-field splitting energy Δo.
- High spin (Δo<P, the pairing energy): electrons obey Hund's rule as far as possible — they occupy eg singly before pairing in t2g. Maximum unpaired electrons.
- Low spin (Δo>P): electrons pair up in t2g before entering eg. Minimum unpaired electrons.
Step 2 — Fill each configuration
(A) d9 (high spin): t2g6eg3. Six paired in t2g; in eg one orbital is doubled and one is singly filled.
unpaired=1
(Note that d9 has only one unpaired electron in either spin state — hence the Jahn–Teller distortion of Cu2+.)
(B) d6 (low spin): all six electrons pair into the three t2g orbitals: t2g6eg0.
unpaired=0(diamagnetic, e.g. [Co(NH3)6]3+) …
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.If a didentate ligand ethane-1,2-diamine is progressively added in the molar ratio en : Ni :: 1 : 1, 2 : 1, 3 : 1 to [Ni(H2O)6]2+ aq solution, following co-ordination entities are formed. I. [Ni(H2O)4en](aq)2+ – pale blue II. [Ni(H2O)2(en)2](aq)2+ – blue/purple III. [Ni(en)3](aq)2+ – violet The wavelength in nm of light absorbed in case of I and III are respectively (A) 475 nm and 310 nm (B) 300 nm and 475 nm (C) 310 nm and 500 nm (D) 600 nm and 535 nm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The colour of a coordination complex is the complement of the colour it absorbs. As the ligand field strength increases (en replaces H₂O), the crystal field splitting Δ₀ increases, so the absorbed light shifts to shorter wavelengths (blue-shift). For [Ni(H₂O)₆]²⁺ (green), the absorbed wavelength is around 600–650 nm; replacing water with the stronger-field en shifts absorption to shorter wavelengths. The pale blue complex I absorbs in the orange-red (~600 nm), and the violet complex III absorbs in the yellow-green (~535 nm). The correct option is (D).
The question is about the relationship between the colour we see and the wavelength of light absorbed. A complex appears coloured because it absorbs a specific portion of visible light; the colour we see is the complement of the absorbed colour. The key variable here is the crystal field splitting energy Δo, which determines which wavelength gets absorbed.
Ethane-1,2-diamine (en) is a stronger field ligand than water. As you replace H₂O with en, Δo increases. A larger Δo means the energy gap between the t2g and eg orbitals is bigger, so the absorbed photon must have higher energy — that is, a shorter wavelength. So the sequence from I to III should show a progressive shift of the absorption band toward shorter wavelengths.
Now, what do the observed colours tell us?
-
Complex I — pale blue.
Pale blue is the complementary colour of orange/red. A pale blue complex absorbs light in the orange-red region, roughly 600–650 nm. Since en is a stronger ligand than water, the absorption for I should be at a slightly shorter wavelength than for the original [Ni(H₂O)₆]²⁺ (which is green and absorbs around 650–700 nm). So ~600 nm is reasonable.
-
Complex III — violet.
Violet is the complementary colour of yellow-green. A violet complex absorbs light in the yellow-green region, roughly 530–560 nm. With three en ligands, the field is strongest, so the absorption is at the shortest wavelength among the three — around 535 nm fits perfectly.
-
Complex II — blue/purple (intermediate).
This falls between I and III, absorbing at an intermediate wavelength (~570–580 nm), consistent with two en ligands. …
-
- KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQQ.Crystal Field Splitting Energy (CFSE) for [CoCl_4]^{2-} is 18000 cm^{-1}. The Crystal Field Splitting Energy (CFSE) for [CoCl_4]^{2-} will be (A) 8000 cm^{-1} (B) 10,000 cm^{-1} (C) 18,000 cm^{-1} (D) 16,000 cm^{-1}
›Reveal solutionSolution
Apply the standard crystal-field relation Δt=94Δo for the same metal ion and the same ligands.
Step 1 — Read the question correctly.
The two complexes are [CoCl6]4− (octahedral, six chloride ligands, Δo=18000 cm−1) and [CoCl4]2− (tetrahedral, four chloride ligands). Both contain Co2+ with the same ligand, Cl− — only the geometry changes. (The stem as reproduced repeats the formula, but the accompanying data statement makes the intent explicit: the 18000 cm−1 value belongs to the octahedral hexachloro complex.)
Step 2 — Why tetrahedral splitting is smaller.
In crystal field theory the d-orbitals split because the ligand lone pairs repel the d-electrons. Two things weaken that repulsion in a tetrahedral field:
- Fewer ligands — only 4 instead of 6, so about 64=32 of the repulsive interaction;
- Poorer orbital alignment — in an octahedron the ligands point straight at the eg orbitals (dz2, dx2−y2); in a tetrahedron no ligand points directly at any d-orbital. The t2 set is merely the less badly oriented one, giving a further factor of about 32.
Multiplying the two effects:
Δt≈32×32Δo=94Δo≈0.45Δo. …
- KCET 2021Set B-21 markMCQQ.Which of the following does not represent property stated against it? (A) CO+2 < Fe+2 < Mn+2 – Ionic size (B) Ti < V < Mn – Number of oxidation states (C) Cr+2 < Mn+2 < Fe+2 – Paramagnetic behaviour (D) Sc > Cr > Fe – Density
›Reveal solutionSolution
Mn²⁺ (3d⁵, half-filled) has the maximum unpaired electrons in this part of the series — Cr²⁺ and Fe²⁺ both have 4, so a strictly increasing order across all three is wrong.
Electron configurations (3d series, +2 ions):
- Cr2+: [Ar] 3d⁴ → 4 unpaired electrons
- Mn2+: [Ar] 3d⁵ → 5 unpaired electrons (half-filled — the classic maximum-stability, maximum-paramagnetism case)
- Fe2+: [Ar] 3d⁶ → 4 unpaired electrons (one pair forms once past the half-filled point) …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.