Q.The depression in freezing point of water observed for the same amount of acetic acid, trichloroacetic acid and trifluoroacetic acid increases in the order given above. Explain briefly.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Colligative Properties Association
Colligative Properties: The Intuition First
Imagine you're at a party. The room is full of people dancing — that's your solvent molecules, moving freely. Now, someone brings in a few heavy, slow-moving guests who just stand in one spot — those are your solute particles. They don't dance, they don't interact much, they just take up space.
What happens? The dancers now have less room to move. They bump into the standing guests more often. The whole atmosphere changes — the dancers can't move as freely, they can't escape the room as easily, and the overall "energy" of the party shifts.
That's the core idea of colligative properties. When you add a non-volatile solute (like salt) to a solvent (like water), the solute particles don't do anything special — they just exist in the solution. But their mere presence changes four measurable properties of the solvent:
- Vapour pressure decreases
- Boiling point increases
- Freezing point decreases
- Osmotic pressure increases
The key insight: these changes depend only on the number of solute particles, not on what kind of particles they are. One molecule of sugar and one ion of salt (if they don't dissociate) affect these properties identically — provided they're the same number of particles.
This is why "colligative" comes from the Latin colligatus meaning "bound together" — the properties are bound to the quantity of solute, not its identity.
The Precise Statement
Colligative properties are properties of a solution that depend solely on the ratio of the number of solute particles to the number of solvent molecules in a given solution, and not on the chemical nature of the solute.
Mathematically, for a dilute solution of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute:
ΔP=P0⋅x2
ΔTb=Kb⋅m
ΔTf=Kf⋅m
Π=i⋅MRT
Where:
- ΔP = lowering of vapour pressure
- P0 = vapour pressure of pure solvent
- x2 = mole fraction of solute
- ΔTb = elevation in boiling point
- Kb = ebullioscopic constant (depends only on solvent)
- m = molality of solution
- ΔTf = depression in freezing point
- Kf = cryoscopic constant (depends only on solvent)
- Π = osmotic pressure
- i = van't Hoff factor (accounts for dissociation/association)
- M = molarity
- R = gas constant
- T = absolute temperature
The Crucial Distinction: Association vs. Dissociation
Now, here's where the association part comes in — and it's the twist that catches most students.
The formulas above assume the solute particles remain as individual, independent particles. But in reality:
- Dissociation: Some solutes break apart into smaller particles (e.g., NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻). This increases the number of particles, so the colligative effect is larger than expected.
- Association: Some solutes clump together into larger particles (e.g., acetic acid in benzene forms dimers: 2 CH₃COOH → (CH₃COOH)₂). This decreases the number of particles, so the colligative effect is smaller than expected.
A common mistake: students think "association" means the solute interacts with the solvent. No — association means solute particles bind to each other, reducing the effective particle count. Solvent-solute interactions affect non-colligative properties like solubility.
The van't Hoff Factor i
To account for these real-world effects, we introduce the van't Hoff factor:
i=Number of formula units dissolvedActual number of particles in solution
For a non-electrolyte that doesn't associate or dissociate: i=1
For dissociation (e.g., NaCl): i>1 (ideally 2 for NaCl)
For association (e.g., acetic acid dimerizing): i<1
The corrected formulas become:
ΔTb=i⋅Kb⋅m
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
Π=i⋅MRT
A Concrete Example
Consider acetic acid (CH₃COOH) dissolved in benzene. In benzene, acetic acid molecules form hydrogen-bonded dimers:
2CH3COOH⇌(CH3COOH)2
If you dissolve 1 mole of acetic acid, you might end up with only 0.6 moles of particles (0.4 moles of dimers + 0.2 moles of monomers). So i=0.6. …
Why this formula?
Colligative Properties & Association: Why the Formula Holds
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why association changes colligative properties, not just memorizing the formula.
The Core Idea: What Are Colligative Properties?
Colligative properties depend only on the number of solute particles in solution, not on their chemical identity. The four key ones are:
- Vapor pressure lowering
- Boiling point elevation
- Freezing point depression
- Osmotic pressure
When a solute associates (e.g., two molecules dimerize), the effective number of particles decreases. This is the entire reason the formula changes.
The van't Hoff Factor: The Bridge
We define the van't Hoff factor i as:
i=number of formula units dissolvedactual number of particles in solution
For a non-electrolyte that does not associate, i=1.
For association, i<1.
Example: Dimerization of Benzoic Acid in Benzene
Benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) forms dimers in benzene:
2C6H5COOH⇌(C6H5COOH)2
If we dissolve n moles of monomer, but only n/2 moles of dimer exist, then:
i=nn/2=0.5
Deriving the Modified Formula
Step 1: Start with the Normal Colligative Formula
For freezing point depression (the most common exam case):
ΔTf=Kf⋅m
where m is the molality of the solute (moles per kg solvent).
Step 2: Replace m with Effective Molality
Because only the number of particles matters, we replace m with i⋅m:
ΔTf=Kf⋅(i⋅m)
This is the general formula for any colligative property when association or dissociation occurs.
Step 3: Express i in Terms of Degree of Association
Let:
- α = degree of association (fraction of molecules that associate)
- n = number of molecules that combine to form one associated particle (e.g., n=2 for dimerization)
For a dimerization (n=2):
- Initially: 1 mole of monomer
- After association: (1−α) moles remain as monomer, and α/2 moles of dimer form
- Total particles = (1−α)+2α=1−2α
Thus:
i=11−2α=1−2α
General formula for association of n molecules:
i=1−α+nα=1−α(1−n1)
Why This Makes Physical Sense …
The depression in freezing point is a colligative property, directly proportional to the effective number of solute particles in the solution.
- Concept: Colligative Properties (Freezing Point Depression) and Acid Dissociation.
- Reasoning:
- The depression in freezing point (ΔTf) is given by ΔTf=iKfm, where i is the van't Hoff factor, Kf is the cryoscopic constant, and m is the molality. For the same amount of acid and solvent, ΔTf is directly proportional to i.
- The van't Hoff factor i for a weak acid is 1+α, where α is the degree of dissociation. A higher α means more particles in solution.
- The acid strength increases in the order: Acetic acid < Trichloroacetic acid < Trifluoroacetic acid. This is because the electron-withdrawing inductive effect of the substituents stabilizes the conjugate base, enhancing acid strength. The −CF3 group is more electron-withdrawing than −CCl3, which is more electron-withdrawing than −CH3. …
The depression in freezing point is a colligative property that depends on the number of solute particles. Stronger acids dissociate more, producing a greater number of particles, which leads to a larger depression in freezing point. The electron-withdrawing effect of halogens increases acid strength in the order CH3COOH<CCl3COOH<CF3COOH, explaining the observed trend in freezing point depression.
The depression in freezing point is a colligative property, meaning it depends solely on the number of solute particles present in a given amount of solvent, not on the chemical nature of those particles. When we dissolve an acid in water, it dissociates to some extent, producing more than one particle per molecule initially added. The greater the extent of dissociation, the more particles are formed, and consequently, the greater the observed freezing point depression.
Let's break down the explanation:
-
Understanding Freezing Point Depression:
The depression in freezing point (ΔTf) is given by the formula:
ΔTf=iKfm
Here,
- ΔTf is the depression in freezing point.
- Kf is the cryoscopic constant of the solvent (for water, Kf=1.86 K kg mol−1).
- m is the molality of the solute.
- i is the van't Hoff factor, which accounts for the number of particles a solute produces in solution.
-
Identifying Constant Factors:
In this problem, we are comparing the depression for the "same amount" of each acid in water. This implies that the molality (m) would be the same if the acids did not dissociate. Also, the solvent is water, so Kf is constant. Therefore, the variation in ΔTf must be due to differences in the van't Hoff factor (i).
-
The van't Hoff Factor (i) and Dissociation:
For a weak acid (HA) that dissociates in water:
HA⇌H++A−
If α is the degree of dissociation (the fraction of acid molecules that dissociate), then for every 1 mole of HA initially dissolved, we will have:
- (1−α) moles of undissociated HA
- α moles of H+ ions
- α moles of A− ions The total number of moles of particles in solution will be (1−α)+α+α=1+α. Thus, the van't Hoff factor i=1+α. A higher degree of dissociation (α) leads to a higher van't Hoff factor (i).
-
Relating Dissociation to Acid Strength:
The degree of dissociation (α) is directly related to the strength of the acid. A stronger acid dissociates to a greater extent in water, meaning it has a higher α. Consequently, a stronger acid will have a higher i value.
-
Comparing Acid Strengths:
Now, let's compare the strengths of the three acids:
- Acetic acid (CH3COOH): The methyl (CH3) group is slightly electron-donating. This destabilizes the conjugate base (CH3COO−) by increasing electron density on the carboxylate oxygen, making it less stable. Thus, acetic acid is a relatively weak acid. …
Method: Van't Hoff Factor and Degree of Dissociation (Weak-Acid Trend)
This problem is explained using the van't Hoff factor (i), which accounts for the dissociation of each weak acid into ions -- not association.
Step-by-step reasoning
Step 1 - Recall the freezing point depression formula
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
where i = van't Hoff factor, Kf = cryoscopic constant (solvent property), m = molality.
For the same amount (same molality m) of each acid in the same solvent (water), ΔTf depends only on i.
Step 2 - Understand where i comes from for a weak acid
Each of these is a carboxylic acid that partially ionises (dissociates) in water:
HA⇌H++A−
If α is the degree of dissociation, then for every 1 mole of HA dissolved, the total particle count becomes (1−α)+α+α=1+α, so:
i=1+α
A stronger acid dissociates more (larger α), giving a larger i -- this is the opposite of association, which would give i<1. Nothing in this problem involves molecules combining into dimers; the effect here is purely ionisation.
Step 3 - Compare the three acids' strength
The order given is: acetic acid < trichloroacetic acid < trifluoroacetic acid (increasing ΔTf).
This is explained by the electron-withdrawing inductive effect of the halogen substituents:
- −CH3 (acetic acid) is weakly electron-donating -> destabilises the conjugate base -> weakest acid, smallest α, smallest i.
- −CCl3 (trichloroacetic acid): the three electronegative Cl atoms withdraw electron density, stabilising the conjugate base (CCl3COO−) -> stronger acid, larger α, larger i. …
Here’s a breakdown of the common mistakes students make on this specific colligative properties question, and how to avoid each.
The Core Concept (Why this happens)
The depression in freezing point (ΔTf) is a colligative property, meaning it depends on the number of solute particles in solution, not their identity.
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
- i = van't Hoff factor (number of particles per formula unit)
- Kf = cryoscopic constant (for water, it's fixed)
- m = molality (same amount of acid, so same m)
Since Kf and m are constant here, ΔTf depends only on i. The order of ΔTf is:
Acetic acid < Trichloroacetic acid < Trifluoroacetic acid
This happens because the acid strength increases as more electronegative chlorine/fluorine atoms are added. A stronger acid dissociates more in water, giving more particles (i is larger).
Common Mistake #1: Forgetting the "Same Amount" Condition
The Mistake: Students compare the molar masses of the acids and conclude that the heaviest acid (trifluoroacetic) has the lowest ΔTf because it has fewer moles for the same mass.
Why it's wrong: The question explicitly says "same amount" — this means same number of moles (or same mass, but the key is equimolar). Since ΔTf depends on molality (m), if the number of moles is the same, m is the same. The difference comes from i, not m.
How to avoid: Always check the wording. If the problem says "same amount" or "equimolar", molality is constant. Focus on the van't Hoff factor (i).
Common Mistake #2: Ignoring the Role of Acid Strength
The Mistake: Students treat all three acids as equally strong (or equally weak) and assume i=1 for all, leading to the wrong conclusion that ΔTf is the same.
Why it's wrong: Acetic acid is a weak acid (Ka≈1.8×10−5). Trichloroacetic acid is much stronger (Ka≈0.23). Trifluoroacetic acid is even stronger (Ka≈0.59). The degree of dissociation (α) increases in this order.
i=1+α
So i increases: Acetic < Trichloroacetic < Trifluoroacetic.
How to avoid: Memorize the trend: Electronegative substituents (Cl, F) increase acid strength by inductive effect. More dissociation → more particles → higher ΔTf.
Common Mistake #3: Confusing "Depression in Freezing Point" with "Freezing Point"
The Mistake: Students say "trifluoroacetic acid has the highest freezing point" or mix up the direction of change.
Why it's wrong: Depression means the freezing point lowers. A higher ΔTf means a lower freezing point. So trifluoroacetic acid gives the lowest freezing point (most depression). …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.A 5% solution (by mass) of cane sugar in water has a freezing point of 271 K . The freezing point of a 5% solution (by mass) of glucose in water is: [freezing point of pure water: 273.15 K ] (A) 271 K (B) 259 K (C) 269 K (D) 273 K
›Reveal solutionSolution
Freezing-point depression depends on molality, not mass percent — since glucose has a smaller molar mass than sucrose, a 5% glucose solution has more solute particles per kg of water, giving a larger depression. Using the given sugar-solution data as a reference (without needing water's real Kf), the glucose solution's freezing point works out to about 269 K, option (C).
Concept and Intuition
For a non-electrolyte, ΔTf=Kf⋅m, where m is molality. Both solutions here are 5% by mass (5 g solute per 100 g solution, so 95 g water), but sucrose (C12H22O11, M≈342) is much heavier per mole than glucose (C6H12O6, M≈180), so the same mass of glucose gives more moles — and a bigger depression. Since Kf is the same for both solutions (same solvent), we can find the glucose depression as a ratio of the sugar depression, without needing water's textbook Kf value.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Depression for the sugar solution.
ΔTf(sugar)=273.15−271=2.15 K
- Ratio of molalities. For the same mass of solute (5 g) in the same mass of water (95 g), molality is inversely proportional to molar mass: …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Identify the correct statement (A) A hypotonic solution is more concentrated with respect to the other solution separated from it by a semi permeable membrane (B) At the freezing point of a solution containing a non-volatile solute, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent becomes less than that of the solid solvent (C) In case of dissociation of solute particles in a solution, the van't Hoff factor is more than unity because the observed molar mass has a lesser value (D) The molal boiling point elevation constant for a solvent is directly proportional to its enthalpy of vaporisation
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to test each statement against fundamental solution chemistry: osmosis, freezing-point depression, van’t Hoff factor, and boiling-point elevation. Only statement (C) is correct.
Concept and Intuition
This question checks your understanding of four distinct topics in physical chemistry:
- Hypotonic vs. hypertonic solutions (osmosis)
- Freezing point depression (vapour pressure of solid vs. liquid solvent)
- Van’t Hoff factor (effect of dissociation on colligative properties)
- Molal boiling point elevation constant (its relation to enthalpy of vaporisation)
Each statement must be evaluated carefully — common pitfalls arise from mixing up definitions or misremembering proportionalities.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Statement (A):
“A hypotonic solution is more concentrated with respect to the other solution separated from it by a semipermeable membrane.”
- A hypotonic solution has a lower solute concentration than the solution on the other side of the membrane.
- Water moves from the hypotonic (less concentrated) side to the hypertonic (more concentrated) side.
- Therefore, a hypotonic solution is less concentrated, not more. ➜ False.
-
Statement (B):
“At the freezing point of a solution containing a non-volatile solute, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent becomes less than that of the solid solvent.”
- At the freezing point of a pure solvent, the vapour pressures of solid and liquid are equal.
- For a solution, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent is lowered by the solute (Raoult’s law).
- At the new freezing point, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent equals that of the solid solvent (both are lower than the pure solvent’s freezing point).
- So the vapour pressure of the liquid is not less than that of the solid — they are equal at equilibrium. ➜ False.
-
Statement (C):
“In case of dissociation of solute particles in a solution, the van't Hoff factor is more than unity because the observed molar mass has a lesser value.”
- Van’t Hoff factor i=number of formula units dissolvedactual number of particles in solution.
- For dissociation, i>1 (e.g., NaCl → 2 ions, so i≈2).
- Colligative properties depend on particle count. Observed molar mass Mobs=iMtheoretical. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.When 0.4 gCH3COOH is added to 40 g of Benzene to form a solution, the freezing point is depressed by 0.45∘C. If Acetic acid undergoes dimerisation in Benzene ( Kf=5.12 K kg/mol ) what is the percentage association of the acid in Benzene? (A) 50.12 (B) 47.2 (C) 94.54 (D) 20.10
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem uses freezing-point depression to find the van’t Hoff factor for acetic acid in benzene, then relates that factor to the degree of dimerisation. The percentage association is about 94.54%, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
Freezing-point depression is a colligative property: it depends on the number of solute particles in solution, not their identity. When acetic acid dimerises in benzene, two molecules join to form one dimer, reducing the total particle count. The observed depression is smaller than expected for monomeric acid. By comparing the experimental van’t Hoff factor i (actual particles per formula unit) with the ideal value of 1, we can calculate the fraction of acid that has dimerised.
Step-by-step solution
-
Calculate the expected freezing-point depression if no dimerisation occurred
Mass of acetic acid = 0.4 g
Molar mass of CH3COOH = 60 g/mol
Moles of acid = 600.4=0.006667 mol
Mass of benzene = 40 g=0.040 kg
Molality (if monomeric) = 0.0400.006667=0.1667 mol/kg
Using ΔTf=Kf⋅m:
ΔTf(ideal)=5.12×0.1667=0.8533 ∘C
-
Find the van’t Hoff factor i from the observed depression
Observed ΔTf=0.45 ∘C
The van’t Hoff factor is defined as:
i=ideal ΔTfobserved ΔTf=0.85330.45=0.5274
This i<1 confirms association (dimerisation).
- Relate i to the degree of dimerisation
Let α be the fraction of acetic acid molecules that dimerise.
For every 2 monomers that react, we get 1 dimer.
Start with 1 mole of monomer:
- Moles that dimerise = α → these form α/2 moles of dimer
- Moles that remain monomer = 1−α …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.A solute X is found to exist as a dimer in water. A 4 molal solution of X shows a boiling point of 101.04∘C. What is the percentage association of X ? (Kb for water =0.52 K/m). (A) 75 (B) 100 (C) 80 (D) 40
›Reveal solutionSolution
ΔTb gives van't Hoff factor i=0.5; for dimerisation i=1−α/2, so α=1=100%.
ΔTb=101.04−100=1.04 ∘C
Using ΔTb=iKbm:
i=KbmΔTb=0.52×41.04=0.5
For association of n monomers into one particle, i=1−α(1−n1). For a dimer n=2: …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.What is the amount of ice that separates out on cooling a solution containing 60 g of Ethylene glycol in 250 g of water to −9.3∘C ? Kf of H2O=1.86 K/m; MM of ethylene glycol= 62 amu (A) 90.2 g (B) 56.45 g (C) 195 g (D) 193.55 g
›Reveal solutionSolution
A freezing-point depression of 9.3∘C needs a 5 m solution, which requires only 193.55 g of water to stay liquid, so 250−193.55=56.45 g of ice separates out — option (B).
Concept
As the solution is cooled, pure ice crystallises out. Ice keeps forming until the remaining liquid water is concentrated enough that its freezing point equals the bath temperature. So we find how much liquid water is needed to give a freezing-point depression of 9.3∘C; the rest of the original water has frozen.
Step 1 — Molality required for ΔTf=9.3 K
ΔTf=Kf⋅m⇒m=KfΔTf=1.869.3=5 mol kg−1
Step 2 — Moles of ethylene glycol (non-volatile solute, does not freeze) …
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.A sample of water is found to contain 5.85%(ww) of AB (molecular mass 58.5) and 9.50%(ww) XY2 (molecular mass 95). Assuming 80% ionisation of AB and 60% ionisation of XY2, the freezing point of water sample is [Given: Kf for water 1.86 K kg mol−1, Freezing point of pure water is 273 K and A, B and Y are monovalent ions] (A) 264.25 K (B) 265.56 K (C) 280.44 K (D) 281.75 K
›Reveal solutionSolution
Work with 100 g of solution, get the moles of each solute, apply the van't Hoff factor for partial ionisation, compute the molality in the water only, and use ΔTf=iKfm.
1. Take a 100 g basis of the solution
Because the strengths are given as % (w/w):
- mass of AB =5.85 g
- mass of XY2=9.50 g
- mass of water (solvent) =100−5.85−9.50=84.65 g =0.08465 kg
2. Moles of each solute
nAB=58.55.85=0.1 mol,nXY2=959.50=0.1 mol
3. van't Hoff factors (partial ionisation)
For a solute giving n particles with degree of ionisation α:
i=1+(n−1)α
AB →A++B−, so n=2, α=0.80:
iAB=1+(2−1)(0.80)=1.8
XY2 →X2++2Y− (Y is monovalent, so X must be divalent), n=3, α=0.60:
iXY2=1+(3−1)(0.60)=1+1.2=2.2
4. Total effective (particle) moles
neff=iABnAB+iXY2nXY2=(1.8)(0.1)+(2.2)(0.1)=0.18+0.22=0.40 mol
5. Effective molality
meff=0.08465 kg0.40 mol=4.725 mol kg−1
6. Depression of freezing point …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQQ.Abnormal colligative properties are observed only when the dissolved non-volatile solute in a given dilute solution (A) is a non-electrolyte (B) offers an intense colour (C) associates and dissociates (D) offers no colour
›Reveal solutionSolution
Abnormal colligative properties occur because association or dissociation changes the actual number of solute particles relative to the number of formula units dissolved.
Colligative properties (relative lowering of vapour pressure, boiling-point elevation, freezing-point depression, osmotic pressure) depend only on the number of solute particles, not their nature.
When a solute dissociates (e.g. NaCl→Na++Cl−), the particle count increases, so the observed colligative property is larger than expected (van't Hoff factor i>1). …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.The mole fraction of the solute in a dilute aqueous solution of glucose with a vapour pressure of 750 mm at 373 K is : (A) 1/35 (B) 1/76 (C) 1/25 (D) 1/80
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Raoult's law, xsolute=(P0−P)/P0=10/760=1/76.
At 373 K (100 °C) the vapour pressure of pure water P0=760 mm.
Relative lowering of vapour pressure = mole fraction of solute: …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.A metal exists as an oxide with formula M0.96O. Metal M can exist as M+2 and M+3 in its oxide M0.96O. The percentage of M+3 in the oxide is, nearly (A) 9.6% (B) 8.3% (C) 4.6% (D) 5%
›Reveal solutionSolution
Impose electrical neutrality on the non-stoichiometric oxide and solve for the number of M3+ ions.
Step 1 — The concept: metal-deficiency defect. In an oxide written M0.96O the metal sites are deficient (a cation vacancy defect, as in FeO / wüstite). The crystal must still be electrically neutral, so some cations are oxidised from M2+ to M3+ to make up the missing positive charge.
Step 2 — Set up the balance. Take 1 mol of the oxide: it contains 0.96 mol of metal and 1 mol of O2− (total negative charge =2).
Let
- a = mol of M2+,
- b = mol of M3+.
Then
a+b=0.96(total metal)
2a+3b=2(charge neutrality: total + charge=2) …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.Solute 'X' dimerises in water to the extent of 80%. 2.5g of 'X' in 100g of water increases the boiling point by 0.3 °C. The molar mass of 'X' is [Kb=0.52 K kgmol−1] (A) 26 (B) 13 (C) 52 (D) 65
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar mass of X=26 g mol−1 — option (A).
X dimerises: 2X⇌X2, degree of association α=0.80. The van't Hoff factor is
i=1−2α=1−20.80=0.60.
Elevation of boiling point: ΔTb=iKbm, with molality m=0.1002.5/M=M25 mol kg−1. …
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A non-volatile solute, 'A' tetramerises in water to the extent of 80%. 2.5 g of 'A' in 100 g of water, lowers the freezing point by 0.3 °C. The molar mass of A in mol L−1 is (Kf for water = 1.86 K kg mol−1) (A) 62 (B) 155 (C) 221 (D) 354
›Reveal solutionSolution
The solute tetramerises, so the van’t Hoff factor is less than 1. Using the observed freezing point depression and the formula ΔTf=iKfm, we find the apparent molar mass, then correct for association to get the true molar mass. The answer is 62 g/mol.
The key idea: when a solute associates (forms larger molecules), the number of particles in solution is less than the number of formula units dissolved. The freezing point depression depends on the actual number of particles, so we first find the apparent molar mass from the given ΔTf, then use the degree of association to find the true molar mass.
For tetramerisation, 4 molecules of A combine to form one tetramer. If the degree of association is α, the van’t Hoff factor i is given by:
i=1−α+nα
where n=4 here. With α=0.80 (80% association), we can compute i directly.
-
Calculate the van’t Hoff factor i
For tetramerisation: n=4, α=0.80.
i=1−α+4α=1−0.80+0.20=0.40
So only 40% of the original number of particles remain, on average.
-
Find the apparent molar mass from the observed depression
The freezing point depression is:
ΔTf=iKfm
where m is the molality of the solution if no association occurred (i.e., using the formula mass of A). Let the true molar mass of A be M g/mol.
Molality (if no association) = 0.1002.5/M=M25 mol/kg.
Plug into the equation:
0.3=0.40×1.86×M25
- Solve for M
0.3=0.40×1.86×M25
First compute 0.40×1.86=0.744.
Then 0.744×25=18.6.
So: …
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.