Q.How many mL of 0.1 M HCl are required to react completely with 1 g mixture of Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 containing equimolar amounts of both?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Reaction Rate Stoichiometry
Reaction Rate Stoichiometry – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you are watching a simple reaction:
2NO2→2NO+O2
As NO₂ disappears, NO appears twice as fast as O₂ appears. Why? Because the balanced equation says: for every 2 molecules of NO₂ that break apart, you get 2 molecules of NO and 1 molecule of O₂. The numbers in front of the species — the stoichiometric coefficients — tell you the relative speeds at which reactants vanish and products appear.
That is the core idea: reaction rate stoichiometry is the relationship between the rates of change of different species in a chemical reaction, dictated by their coefficients in the balanced equation.
The Intuitive Picture
Think of a factory assembly line. The balanced equation is like a recipe:
- 2 units of raw material A → 2 units of product B + 1 unit of byproduct C
If the line runs steadily, every time 2 units of A are consumed, 2 units of B are produced and 1 unit of C is produced. So the rate at which A disappears must be twice the rate at which C appears. The rate at which B appears equals the rate at which A disappears (both have coefficient 2).
The stoichiometric coefficients are not speeds themselves — they are scaling factors that connect the speeds of different species.
The Precise Statement
For a general reaction:
aA+bB→cC+dD
The rate of reaction (often called the rate of the process, r) is defined as:
r=−a1dtd[A]=−b1dtd[B]=c1dtd[C]=d1dtd[D]
Here:
- dtd[X] is the instantaneous rate of change of concentration of species X (in mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹).
- The minus sign is used for reactants (their concentration decreases with time).
- The plus sign is used for products (their concentration increases with time).
- Dividing by the coefficient normalises the rate — so r is the same number for every species.
r=−a1dtd[A]=c1dtd[C]
This single value r is the intrinsic rate of the reaction, independent of which species you measure.
How to Use It (Step by Step)
Suppose you are given:
2H2+O2→2H2O
And you measure that dtd[H2]=−0.040 M/s (negative because H₂ is being consumed).
Step 1: Write the rate relation:
r=−21dtd[H2]=−11dtd[O2]=21dtd[H2O]
Step 2: Plug in the known value:
r=−21(−0.040)=+0.020 M/s
Step 3: Find the rate for O₂:
−dtd[O2]=r⇒dtd[O2]=−0.020 M/s
Step 4: Find the rate for H₂O:
21dtd[H2O]=r⇒dtd[H2O]=2r=0.040 M/s …
Why this formula?
Reaction Rate Stoichiometry: Why the Formula Holds
Let’s start with the core idea: In a chemical reaction, the rate at which reactants disappear and products appear is not arbitrary — it is tied directly to the stoichiometric coefficients in the balanced equation.
The Key Formula
For a general reaction:
aA+bB→cC+dD
The rate of reaction (R) is defined as:
R=−a1dtd[A]=−b1dtd[B]=c1dtd[C]=d1dtd[D]
Where:
- [A],[B],[C],[D] are concentrations (in mol/L)
- t is time
- a,b,c,d are stoichiometric coefficients
Why This Formula Holds: The Reasoning
1. The Physical Meaning of Stoichiometric Coefficients
The coefficients tell us the mole ratio in which substances react or are produced. For example:
2H2+O2→2H2O
- 2 moles of H2 react with 1 mole of O2 to produce 2 moles of H2O.
- This means: for every 2 molecules of H2 that disappear, only 1 molecule of O2 disappears, and 2 molecules of H2O appear.
Key insight: The number of moles changing per unit time is different for each substance, but the reaction event is the same.
2. The Problem with Raw Rates
If we simply wrote:
Rate=−dtd[H2]
This would be twice the rate of disappearance of O2 (since H2 disappears twice as fast). That’s inconsistent — the same reaction shouldn’t have two different numerical rates.
We need a single, unique rate that describes the reaction itself, not just one substance.
3. The Solution: Normalize by Stoichiometric Coefficients
To get a reaction rate that is the same regardless of which substance we track, we divide each substance’s rate of change by its stoichiometric coefficient.
Why division works:
- If A disappears at rate −dtd[A], and a moles of A are consumed per reaction event, then the number of reaction events per unit time is:
Reaction events per second=a−dtd[A]
- Similarly, for product C appearing at rate +dtd[C], with c moles produced per event:
Reaction events per second=c+dtd[C]
Since the same reaction is happening, these must be equal. Hence:
−a1dtd[A]=c1dtd[C]
4. The Sign Convention
- Reactants decrease over time → dtd[reactant]<0 → we add a negative sign to make the rate positive.
- Products increase over time → dtd[product]>0 → we use a positive sign. …
The key idea is reaction rate stoichiometry: each mole of base consumes a fixed number of moles of HCl, determined by the balanced equations.
Step 1 – Write the reactions
Na2CO3+2HCl→2NaCl+H2O+CO2
NaHCO3+HCl→NaCl+H2O+CO2
Step 2 – Find moles of each in 1 g mixture
Let moles of each = x. Molar masses: Na2CO3=106, NaHCO3=84.
Total mass: 106x+84x=190x=1⟹x=1901 mol.
Step 3 – Total moles of HCl needed …
The key is to treat the two reactions separately — HCl reacts with Na2CO3 in a 2:1 mole ratio and with NaHCO3 in a 1:1 ratio. For an equimolar mixture of 1 g total, the required volume of 0.1 M HCl is 157.9 mL.
Why this approach works
When you mix a strong acid like HCl with a carbonate/bicarbonate mixture, two distinct neutralisation reactions occur. The stoichiometry is not the same for both — each mole of Na2CO3 consumes 2 moles of HCl (because it first forms HCO3−, then H2CO3), while each mole of NaHCO3 consumes only 1 mole of HCl. If you miss this difference, you'll get the wrong volume.
The problem gives a total mass of 1 g, but the two compounds are present in equimolar amounts — equal number of moles, not equal mass. That's the crucial starting point.
Step-by-step solution
1. Write the balanced reactions
For Na2CO3:
Na2CO3+2HCl→2NaCl+H2O+CO2
For NaHCO3:
NaHCO3+HCl→NaCl+H2O+CO2
A common mistake is to use a 1:1 ratio for Na2CO3 as well. Remember: carbonate is dibasic — it takes two protons to fully neutralise it.
2. Define the unknown
Let the number of moles of Na2CO3 = number of moles of NaHCO3 = x (since equimolar).
Molar masses:
- Na2CO3: 2(23)+12+3(16)=106 g/mol
- NaHCO3: 23+1+12+3(16)=84 g/mol
Total mass of mixture:
106x+84x=190x=1 g
So:
x=1901 mol
3. Calculate moles of HCl required
From Na2CO3: 2x moles of HCl
From NaHCO3: x moles of HCl
Total HCl needed:
2x+x=3x=3×1901=1903 mol …
Method: Acid-Base Stoichiometry for a Carbonate/Bicarbonate Mixture
This is a titration stoichiometry problem -- HCl reacts with Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 in different mole ratios, so each component's contribution must be tracked separately before adding up the total HCl required.
Step 1 -- Write the balanced reactions
Na2CO3+2HCl→2NaCl+H2O+CO2
NaHCO3+HCl→NaCl+H2O+CO2
Notice Na2CO3 needs 2 mol HCl per mole (it is dibasic), while NaHCO3 needs only 1 mol HCl per mole.
Step 2 -- Set up the equimolar mixture
Let moles of Na2CO3 = moles of NaHCO3 = x (given: equimolar).
Molar masses: Na2CO3=106 g/mol, NaHCO3=84 g/mol.
Total mass of the 1 g mixture:
106x+84x=190x=1⟹x=1901 mol
Step 3 -- Total moles of HCl required …
Here are the most common mistakes students make on this stoichiometry problem, along with the conceptual fix for each.
1. Writing the Wrong Balanced Chemical Equations
The Mistake: Students often write only one generic reaction (e.g., “Na2CO3+HCl→NaCl+CO2+H2O”) and forget that NaHCO3 reacts differently. They also frequently forget to balance the equations correctly.
Why it happens: Rushing through the problem without checking the acid-base nature of each salt.
How to Avoid:
- Write two separate, balanced reactions.
- For Na2CO3 (a carbonate), the reaction with HCl is:
Na2CO3+2HCl→2NaCl+CO2+H2O
Note: 1 mole of Na2CO3 requires 2 moles of HCl.
- For NaHCO3 (a bicarbonate), the reaction is:
NaHCO3+HCl→NaCl+CO2+H2O
Note: 1 mole of NaHCO3 requires 1 mole of HCl.
2. Misinterpreting “Equimolar Amounts”
The Mistake: Students assume “equimolar” means equal mass (e.g., 0.5 g each). This leads to incorrect mole calculations.
Why it happens: Confusing “molar” (moles) with “mass” (grams).
How to Avoid:
- “Equimolar” means equal number of moles, not equal mass.
- Let the number of moles of Na2CO3 = number of moles of NaHCO3 = x.
- Total mass of mixture = x×MNa2CO3+x×MNaHCO3=1 g.
- Molar masses:
- MNa2CO3=106 g/mol
- MNaHCO3=84 g/mol
- So: 106x+84x=190x=1⟹x=1901 mol.
3. Forgetting to Multiply Moles by the Stoichiometric Coefficient
The Mistake: After finding x, students directly use x as the total moles of HCl needed, ignoring that Na2CO3 consumes 2 moles of HCl per mole.
Why it happens: Not checking the balanced equation for each reactant.
How to Avoid:
- Moles of HCl for Na2CO3 = 2×x=2×1901=1902 mol.
- Moles of HCl for NaHCO3 = 1×x=1901 mol.
- Total moles of HCl required = 1902+1901=1903 mol.
4. Incorrect Volume Calculation from Molarity
The Mistake: Using the formula M=Vn but plugging in volume in mL without converting, or using V=n×M instead of V=Mn. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.In the synthesis of NH3 from H2 and N2, if 6×10−2 mole of hydrogen disappears in 10 minutes, the number of moles of NH3 formed in 0.3 minutes is: (A) 4.0×10−3 moles (B) 6.0×10−3 moles (C) 1.2×10−3 moles (D) 1.5×10−3 moles
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to use the stoichiometric ratio from the balanced reaction N2+3H2→2NH3 and the given rate of hydrogen disappearance to find the rate of ammonia formation, then scale to the requested time. The answer is 1.2×10−3 moles, option (C).
The problem gives a rate of disappearance of hydrogen and asks for the amount of ammonia formed in a different time interval. The central concept is stoichiometric proportionality in chemical kinetics: for a balanced reaction, the rates of consumption and production of species are related by their coefficients. Once we know how fast hydrogen is used up, we can directly find how fast ammonia appears, then multiply by the new time.
- Write the balanced equation The synthesis of ammonia is:
N2+3H2→2NH3
This tells us: for every 3 moles of H2 consumed, 2 moles of NH3 are produced.
- Find the rate of hydrogen disappearance Given: 6×10−2 moles of H2 disappear in 10 minutes. So the rate of disappearance of H2 is:
RateH2=10 min6×10−2 mol=6×10−3 mol/min
- Use stoichiometry to find the rate of ammonia formation From the balanced equation:
Rate of disappearance of H2Rate of formation of NH3=32
Therefore:
RateNH3=32×(6×10−3)=4×10−3 mol/min
- Calculate moles of ammonia formed in 0.3 minutes
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Half-life of a first order reaction is 20 seconds and initial concentration of reactant is 0.2 M. The concentration of reactant left after 80 seconds is (A) 0.1 M (B) 0.05 M (C) 0.0125 M (D) 0.2 M
›Reveal solutionSolution
Count how many half-lives fit into the elapsed time and halve the concentration that many times: 80s=4×20s, so [A]=0.2/24.
Step 1 — Why the half-life shortcut is legitimate here.
For a first-order reaction the integrated rate law is
[A]t=[A]0e−kt
and the half-life
t1/2=kln2=k0.693
is independent of the initial concentration. That is the special feature of first order: every successive 20s window halves whatever is present at the start of that window.
Step 2 — Count the half-lives.
n=t1/2t=20 s80 s=4
Step 3 — Halve four times.
[A]t=2n[A]0=240.2=160.2=0.0125 M
Tracking it explicitly:
Time (s) Half-lives elapsed [A] (M) 0 0 0.2 20 1 0.1 40 2 0.05 60 3 0.025 80 4 0.0125 - COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.For a given reaction of the type 53X(aq)→21Y(aq)+Z(g), the correct expression for the rate of disappearance of X with reference to Y is ___________ (A) −ddt[X]=+56ddt[Y] (B) −ddt[X]=+65ddt[Y] (C) −ddt[X]=+103ddt[Y] (D) −ddt[X]=ddt[Y]1/2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the standard rate definition with fractional stoichiometric coefficients gives −dtd[X]=+56dtd[Y], matching option (A).
Concept & Intuition
For a reaction aA→bB, the rate is defined consistently for every species:
Rate=−a1dtd[A]=+b1dtd[B]
This holds even when the coefficients are fractions, as here: 53X→21Y+Z.
Step-by-step
-
Define the common rate r.
For X (coefficient 3/5): r=−3/51dtd[X]=−35dtd[X].
For Y (coefficient 1/2): r=+1/21dtd[Y]=+2dtd[Y].
-
Equate.
−35dtd[X]=2dtd[Y]
- Solve for −d[X]/dt. …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.A given chemical reaction is represented by the following stoichiometric equation. 3X+2Y+25Z→P1+P2+P3 The rate of reaction can be expressed as _________. (A) 32(dtd[X])=(dtd[Y])=54(dtd[Z]) (B) 23(dtd[X])=41(dtd[Y])=58(dtd[Z]) (C) 154(dtd[X])=54(dtd[Y])=158(dtd[Z]) (D) (dtd[X])=23(dtd[Y])=415(dtd[Z])
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate of a reaction is defined as the common value obtained by dividing the rate of change of each reactant’s concentration by its stoichiometric coefficient (with a negative sign for reactants). Matching this definition to the given options shows that option (C) is correct.
The key idea is that for a reaction
aA+bB→products,
the rate of reaction r is defined as
r=−a1dtd[A]=−b1dtd[B].
The negative sign is used because reactant concentrations decrease over time, making their derivatives negative, so the rate comes out positive. For products, the sign is positive.
Here, the reactants are X, Y, and Z with coefficients 3, 2, and 25 respectively. So the rate must satisfy:
r=−31dtd[X]=−21dtd[Y]=−5/21dtd[Z].
We then rewrite these equalities in the form given in the options.
- Write the rate equalities from definition
−31dtd[X]=−21dtd[Y]=−52dtd[Z]
(since 1/(5/2)=2/5). The negatives cancel, so we have:
31dtd[X]=21dtd[Y]=52dtd[Z].
- Convert to the form in the options Options express relationships like k1dtd[X]=k2dtd[Y]=k3dtd[Z]. From 31dtd[X]=21dtd[Y], multiply both sides by 6:
2dtd[X]=3dtd[Y].
From 31dtd[X]=52dtd[Z], multiply both sides by 15:
5dtd[X]=6dtd[Z].
So one valid set is:
2dtd[X]=3dtd[Y]=56dtd[Z](not directly in options).
- Match to the given options We need to find which option’s equalities are equivalent to 31dtd[X]=21dtd[Y]=52dtd[Z]. Check option (C):
154dtd[X]=54dtd[Y]=158dtd[Z].
Divide each term by its coefficient to see the common rate:
- From first equality: 154dtd[X]=54dtd[Y] → multiply by 15/4: dtd[X]=3dtd[Y]? Wait, let’s do carefully:
154dtd[X]=54dtd[Y]⟹dtd[X]=3dtd[Y].
But from our definition, $\frac{1}{3}\frac{d[X]}{dt} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{d[Y]}{dt}$ gives $\frac{d[X]}{dt} = \frac{3}{2}\frac{d[Y]}{dt}$, not $3$. So this seems off? Let’s re-check systematically.Actually, the correct method: For option (C), set the common value as k. Then:
154dtd[X]=k⟹dtd[X]=415k,
54dtd[Y]=k⟹dtd[Y]=45k,
158dtd[Z]=k⟹dtd[Z]=815k.
Now compute −31dtd[X]=−31⋅415k=−45k.
−21dtd[Y]=−21⋅45k=−85k. These are not equal — so (C) fails? That suggests I made a sign error: Actually, the rate definition uses negative of reactant derivatives. Let’s re-derive carefully.
Watch outA common mistake is forgetting the negative sign when relating derivatives of reactants. The rate r is positive, so for reactants we must have r=−coeff1dtd[reactant]. If you drop the minus, you get the wrong proportionality.
- Correct derivation with signs
r=−31dtd[X]=−21dtd[Y]=−52dtd[Z].
Multiply each equality by the denominators to eliminate fractions:
From −31dtd[X]=−21dtd[Y], multiply by −6:
2dtd[X]=3dtd[Y].
From −31dtd[X]=−52dtd[Z], multiply by −15:
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.aMnO4−+bS2O32−+2H2O→xMnO2+ySO42−+zOH− a and y respectively are (A) 8; 3 (B) 8; 6 (C) 3; 6 (D) 8; 8
›Reveal solutionSolution
Balance the electrons: each Mn gains 3 e− and each thiosulphate loses 8 e−, giving a=8, b=3, x=8, y=6.
Step 1 — Oxidation half-reaction (reduction of permanganate in basic medium).
In MnO4−, Mn is +7; in MnO2, Mn is +4.
Mn+7+3e−→Mn+4(3 electrons gained per Mn)
Step 2 — Oxidation of thiosulphate.
In S2O32− the average oxidation state of S is +2 (since 2x+3(−2)=−2). In SO42−, S is +6. Each S2O32− produces two sulphate ions:
S2O32−→2SO42−+8e−(2×(6−2)=8 electrons lost)
Step 3 — Equalise the electrons.
LCM of 3 and 8 is 24, so multiply the reduction by 8 and the oxidation by 3:
8MnO4−+3S2O32−→8MnO2+6SO42−
Step 4 — Complete with water/hydroxide (charge and atom balance). …
- KCET 2021Set B-21 markMCQQ.The number of angular and radial nodes in 3p orbital respectively are (A) 3, 1 (B) 1, 1 (C) 2, 1 (D) 2, 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Angular nodes =l; radial nodes =n−l−1. For 3p (n=3, l=1) both come out as 1.
Step 1 — Identify the quantum numbers.
For a 3p orbital:
- principal quantum number n=3 (from the digit),
- azimuthal quantum number l=1 (since p⇒l=1; s=0, p=1, d=2, f=3).
Step 2 — Angular (nodal-plane) nodes.
These come from the angular part Yl,m(θ,ϕ) of the wavefunction, and their count is exactly
angular nodes=l=1
Physically: a p orbital is dumbbell-shaped with one nodal plane through the nucleus (e.g. the xy-plane for pz). Note this is independent of n — 2p, 3p, 4p all have exactly 1 angular node.
Step 3 — Radial (spherical) nodes.
These come from the radial part Rn,l(r), and
radial nodes=n−l−1=3−1−1=1 …
- KCET 2021Set B-21 markMCQQ.If the rate constant for a first order reaction is k, the time (t) required for the completion of 99% of the reaction is given by (A) t=k4.606 (B) t=k2.303 (C) t=k0.693 (D) t=k6.909
›Reveal solutionSolution
Substitute "99% reacted ⇒ 1% left" into the integrated first-order rate law t=k2.303log[A][A]0.
Step 1 — The integrated first-order rate law.
Starting from −dtd[A]=k[A] and integrating,
ln[A][A]0=kt⟹t=k2.303log[A][A]0.
(The factor 2.303 converts ln to log10.)
Step 2 — Translate "99% completion".
If 99% of A has reacted, the fraction remaining is 1%:
[A]=0.01[A]0⟹[A][A]0=0.011=100.
This is the step candidates most often get wrong — the ratio uses what is left, not what has gone.
Step 3 — Substitute.
t=k2.303log(100)=k2.303×2=k4.606.
Step 4 — Cross-check with half-lives. …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The time required for 60% completion of a first order reaction is 50 min. The time required for 93.6% completion of the same reaction will be (A) 150 min (B) 100 min (C) 83.8 min (D) 50 min
›Reveal solutionSolution
First-order kinetics: equal fractional decays take equal times, and 0.064=(0.4)3 — so 93.6% completion takes exactly three times as long as 60% completion.
Step 1 — The first-order integrated rate law.
k=t2.303log[A][A]0=t2.303loga−xa
where a is the initial amount and x the amount reacted. The key property of first order: k depends only on the ratio a/(a−x), not on the absolute concentration.
Step 2 — Use the given data to get k.
60% complete ⇒ 40% remains ⇒ a−xa=40100=2.5, with t=50 min:
k=502.303log2.5=502.303×0.3979=500.9163=0.01833 min−1.
Step 3 — Set up the second condition.
93.6% complete ⇒ remaining =100−93.6=6.4% ⇒
a−xa=6.4100=15.625.
Step 4 — Spot the elegant relation (no calculator needed).
15.625=(2.5)3since 2.53=15.625.
Equivalently the surviving fraction 0.064=(0.4)3. Taking logs:
log15.625=3log2.5.
Step 5 — Get the time. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.