Rationalizing the denominator means rewriting a fraction so that no radical (square root, cube root, …) is left on the bottom. It is algebraic housekeeping — the fraction's value never changes, because you only ever multiply by a cleverly disguised form of 1.
Why bother? A quotient like 21 is awkward to estimate (1÷1.414), but the equal form 22 is easy (1.414÷2≈0.707). Cleaner denominators are also easier to add, compare and simplify, and most answer keys expect this final form.
Case 1 — a single square root
Multiply top and bottom by that root:
53×55=535,
because 5×5=5 is rational. In general ba=bab.
Case 2 — a sum or difference with a root
Here multiplying by the root alone fails; use the conjugate, which turns the denominator into a difference of squares:
3+72×3−73−7=32−(7)22(3−7)=22(3−7)=3−7.
For b+ca, multiply by b−cb−c; the denominator becomes b2−c, a rational number.
Watch out
Multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the same expression. Changing only the bottom changes the value of the fraction.
The single principle behind every case: choose the multiplier that clears the radical from the bottom while keeping the fraction equal to itself. This same trick returns later in limits, complex numbers and integration.
Rationalizing the denominator is taught as early as the NCERT Class 9 Number Systems chapter and remains a useful algebraic tool throughout Class 11 and 12 whenever a surd-based limit, complex number, or integration problem needs a radical cleared from the bottom of a fraction. Students searching 'rationalize the denominator examples class 9' or 'rationalizing denominator with conjugate' will find this multiply-by-a-clever-form-of-1 technique is exactly the method CBSE board solutions use across every grade.
Concept: Rationalizing Denominator — multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate to simplify the integrand.
Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by x+a−x+b:
The key idea is to rationalize the denominator by multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate x+a−x+b. This simplifies the integrand to a−bx+a−x+b, which integrates directly to 3(a−b)2[(x+a)3/2−(x+b)3/2]+C.
When you see a sum of square roots in the denominator, your first instinct should be to rationalize. The reason is simple: square roots are messy to integrate directly, but after rationalization, the denominator becomes a simple difference of the terms inside the roots — which is a constant. That turns a complicated-looking fraction into a clean difference of two power functions.
Let’s walk through it.
Rationalize the denominator.
Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate x+a−x+b:
Simplify the denominator.
The product (x+a+x+b)(x+a−x+b) is of the form (p+q)(p−q)=p2−q2. Here p=x+a and q=x+b, so:
(x+a)2−(x+b)2=(x+a)−(x+b)=a−b
This is a constant — that’s the whole point. The integral becomes:
∫a−bx+a−x+bdx=a−b1∫(x+a−x+b)dx
Watch out
A common mistake is to forget that a−b is a constant and try to integrate it as a function of x. It’s just a number — pull it out of the integral immediately.
Integrate each square root.
Each term is of the form x+c=(x+c)1/2. The power rule for integration gives:
Notice that the order matters: we have x+a−x+b in the numerator after rationalization, so the first term in the difference is (x+a)3/2. If you accidentally swap them, you’ll get a sign error.
✓Final answer
The integral is 3(a−b)2[(x+a)3/2−(x+b)3/2]+C.
Method: Rationalising a sum of surds in the denominator
Use this whenever the denominator is P±Q: multiply by the conjugate so the denominator collapses to P−Q.
Steps
Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate.
For P+Q1 multiply by P−QP−Q. Using (u+v)(u−v)=u2−v2, the denominator becomes P−Q.
Step 2: Recognise the new denominator is a constant (or simpler).
When P−Q is a constant (as with (x+a)−(x+b)=a−b), pull it straight out of the integral — it does not depend on x.
Step 3: Integrate the leftover power functions.
You are left with a difference of terms like x+c=(x+c)1/2; apply the power rule
∫(x+c)1/2dx=32(x+c)3/2.
Preserve the order of the two terms from the numerator so the final signs stay correct.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Treating a−b as a function of x.
Why it's wrong: after rationalising, the denominator is the constant (x+a)−(x+b)=a−b; trying to "integrate" it is meaningless. Correct approach: pull the constant a−b1 outside the integral.
Mistake 2: Wrong power-rule antiderivative for x+c.
Why it's wrong: ∫(x+c)1/2dx=32(x+c)3/2, but students often write (x+c)3/2 without the 32. Correct approach: divide by the new exponent 23, i.e. multiply by 32.
Mistake 3: Swapping the order of the two roots.
Why it's wrong: the numerator after rationalising is x+a−x+b, so the first term must be (x+a)3/2; reversing them flips the sign. Correct approach: keep the conjugate's order.
The key is to simplify the integrand by rationalizing the denominator using the conjugate x−1+x, which collapses the messy fraction into a simple polynomial-like expression that integrates directly. The result is 32(1+x)3/2+C, so the correct option is (C).
The problem looks intimidating at first: a fraction with sums of square roots in both numerator and denominator. But the classic trick for expressions like x+1+x is to multiply by the conjugate x−1+x. Why? Because (a+b)(a−b)=a−b, which here becomes x−(1+x)=−1, a constant. That instantly eliminates the radicals in the denominator, leaving a much simpler expression to integrate.
Let’s work through it step by step.
Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate
We have
I=∫x+1+x1+x+x+x2dx.
Multiply top and bottom by x−1+x:
I=∫(x+1+x)(x−1+x)(1+x+x+x2)(x−1+x)dx.
Simplify the denominator
The denominator becomes
(x)2−(1+x)2=x−(1+x)=−1.
So the integral is
I=∫−(1+x+x+x2)(x−1+x)dx.
Expand the product
Distribute the minus sign and expand:
I=∫[−(1+x)(x−1+x)−x+x2(x−1+x)]dx.
Notice that x+x2=x(1+x)=x1+x. So the second term becomes
So the entire integrand simplifies beautifully to just 1+x.
Integrate
I=∫1+xdx.
Let u=1+x, then du=dx, and
I=∫udu=32u3/2+C=32(1+x)3/2+C.
Tip
The cancellation of the x terms is not a coincidence — it happens because the original numerator was cleverly chosen to make the conjugate multiplication collapse into a single term. Always check for such hidden simplifications when you see sums of square roots.
Watch out
A common mistake is to forget the minus sign from the denominator (−1) or to mishandle the expansion of x+x2. Double-check that x+x2=x1+x only for x≥0, but the problem likely assumes the domain where the expression is defined.