Q.Calculate Λm0 for CaCl2 and MgSO4 from the data given in Table 3.4.
(The relevant limiting molar conductivities are: λ0(Ca2+)=119.0, λ0(Cl−)=76.3, λ0(Mg2+)=106.0 and λ0(SO42−)=160.0 S cm2 mol−1.)
Concept understanding — Molar Conductivity
From Resistance to Conductance: Flipping the Idea
You already know resistance (R) — it tells you how much a material opposes the flow of current. A high resistance means the wire fights the current; a low resistance means it lets current through easily.
Now flip that thought. Instead of asking "how much does it resist?", ask "how easily does it let current flow?" That's exactly what conductance measures.
Conductance (G) is the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
Unit: siemens (S) — named after Werner von Siemens. 1 S = 1 A/V (ampere per volt).
If a wire has R=10 Ω, its conductance is G=0.1 S. If R=0.5 Ω, G=2 S — it conducts twice as well.
Ohm's Law in Conductance Form
You know V=IR. Rearranging:
I=RV=GV
So current = conductance × voltage. A high-conductance material draws a large current for the same voltage — it's a "good conductor."
Now, Conductivity: The Material's Intrinsic Property
Resistance depends on two things: the material itself (its "resistivity" ρ) and the geometry (length L, cross-sectional area A):
R=ρAL
Conductance also depends on geometry. A thicker wire (larger A) or a shorter wire (smaller L) has higher conductance. To isolate the material's inherent ability to conduct, we define conductivity (σ):
σ=ρ1
And for a uniform wire:
G=σLA
Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It tells you how well the material itself conducts, independent of shape and size.
- Unit: siemens per metre (S/m).
- High σ → good conductor (copper: ≈5.8×107 S/m).
- Low σ → poor conductor / insulator (glass: ≈10−12 S/m).
Don't confuse conductance (property of a specific object, depends on geometry) with conductivity (property of the material, independent of geometry). A short thick copper wire has high conductance; a long thin copper wire has lower conductance — but both have the same conductivity.
The Big Picture in One Table
| Quantity | Symbol | Definition | Depends on | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance | R | V/I | Material + geometry | Ω |
| Resistivity | ρ | RA/L | Material only | Ω⋅m |
| Conductance | G | 1/R | Material + geometry | S |
| Conductivity | σ | 1/ρ | Material only | S/m |
Intuitive Analogy
Think of a water pipe:
- Resistance = how hard it is to push water through (narrow, long pipe).
- Conductance = how easily water flows (wide, short pipe).
- Resistivity = the "roughness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
- Conductivity = the "smoothness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
A copper pipe is smooth (high conductivity). A rubber hose is rough (low conductivity). But a short, fat rubber hose might still have decent conductance — because geometry can compensate for poor material.
Key Takeaway for Exams
- G=R1 and σ=ρ1.
- G=σLA for a uniform conductor.
- Conductivity is an intrinsic material property; conductance is an extrinsic property of a specific object.
- In circuits, you'll often use conductance when dealing with parallel resistors (total conductance = sum of individual conductances).
You now have the complete picture: from resistance to conductance, from resistivity to conductivity — and the clean relationship between them.
Molar conductivity is a quantitative cornerstone of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry Electrochemistry chapter, and ‘molar conductivity formula’ or ‘molar conductivity vs concentration’ are recurring important-question types in board exams as well as JEE Main and NEET chemistry. This concept also sets up Kohlrausch's law, a common follow-on topic in the same unit.
Why this formula?
Conductance and Conductivity: Why the Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.
1. The Core Idea: How Easily Does Current Flow?
Think of a conductor (like a copper wire). When you apply a voltage across it, electrons drift through the material. Two questions arise:
- How much current flows for a given voltage? → This is conductance (G).
- How well does the material itself allow current? → This is conductivity (σ).
The key distinction: Conductance depends on the size and shape of the object. Conductivity is an intrinsic property of the material.
2. Ohm's Law in Terms of Conductance
You know Ohm's law:
V=IR
But we can rewrite it as:
I=RV
Define conductance G as the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
So:
I=GV
Why this makes sense:
- A larger G means more current for the same voltage — the conductor "conducts" better.
- G has units of siemens (S) = A/V.
3. From Resistance to Conductivity: The Geometry Factor
Resistance of a uniform conductor depends on:
- Length L (longer → more resistance)
- Cross-sectional area A (thicker → less resistance)
- Material property ρ (resistivity)
The formula:
R=ρAL
Now, conductivity σ is the reciprocal of resistivity:
σ=ρ1
So:
R=σ1⋅AL
Why this form?
- If you double the length, electrons have to travel twice as far, colliding more → resistance doubles.
- If you double the area, there's twice as many "lanes" for electrons → resistance halves.
4. The Key Formula: Conductance in Terms of Conductivity
Since G=1/R, we get:
G=σLA
This is the central relationship. Let's see why it holds:
- σ tells you how well the material conducts (intrinsic).
- A/L tells you how the geometry amplifies or reduces that.
Intuition:
- A fat, short wire (A large, L small) has high conductance.
- A thin, long wire (A small, L large) has low conductance.
- A material with high σ (like copper) gives higher G than one with low σ (like iron), for the same shape.
5. Microscopic Derivation (Why σ Exists)
At the microscopic level, conductivity arises from electron motion:
σ=neμ
Where:
- n = number of free electrons per unit volume
- e = electron charge
- μ = electron mobility (how fast they drift per unit electric field)
Why this works:
- More free electrons (n large) → more charge carriers → higher conductivity.
- Higher mobility (μ large) → electrons move faster for the same push → higher conductivity.
This explains why metals (high n) are good conductors, and why heating reduces σ (more collisions → lower μ).
6. Summary: The Logical Chain
| Step | Concept | Formula | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohm's law | V=IR | Voltage drives current against resistance |
| 2 | Conductance | G=1/R | Measures ease of flow |
| 3 | Resistivity | R=ρL/A | Geometry + material |
| 4 | Conductivity | σ=1/ρ | Material's intrinsic ability |
| 5 | Key result | G=σLA | Combines material + geometry |
Final takeaway:
Conductance G is not just a number — it's the product of how good the material is (σ) and how the shape helps (A/L). This is why a thick copper wire conducts far better than a thin iron wire of the same length.
Concept: Molar Conductivity — Kohlrausch’s law of independent migration of ions states that the limiting molar conductivity of an electrolyte is the sum of the limiting molar conductivities of its constituent ions, each multiplied by its stoichiometric coefficient.
Step 1: For CaCl2
CaCl2 dissociates as Ca2++2Cl−.
Using Kohlrausch’s law:
Λm0(CaCl2)=λ0(Ca2+)+2λ0(Cl−)
Step 2: Substitute values
Λm0(CaCl2)=119.0+2(76.3)=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
Step 3: For MgSO4
MgSO4 dissociates as Mg2++SO42−.
Λm0(MgSO4)=λ0(Mg2+)+λ0(SO42−)=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
The limiting molar conductivity is 271.6 S cm2 mol−1 for CaCl2 and 266.0 S cm2 mol−1 for MgSO4.
Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions lets us add the limiting molar conductivities of the individual ions, weighted by their stoichiometric coefficients, to get the limiting molar conductivity of the whole salt. For CaCl2: Λm0=119.0+2(76.3)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1. For MgSO4: Λm0=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1.
The printed question cites "Table 3.4" — a leftover from NCERT's pre-rationalization numbering, when Electrochemistry was Unit 3; it refers to the same ionic limiting molar conductivities as today's Table 2.4 in the current textbook, which the values below are taken from.
The key idea is that at infinite dilution, ions behave completely independently — they don't interact with each other. So the total conductivity of a salt solution is simply the sum of the contributions from each type of ion, each multiplied by how many of that ion appear in the formula unit.
This is Kohlrausch's law of independent migration. It's a powerful shortcut: you don't need to measure every salt directly. Once you know the limiting molar conductivity of a few key ions, you can predict Λm0 for any salt made from them.
Let's apply it.
- For CaCl2 One formula unit gives one Ca2+ ion and two Cl− ions. So:
Λm0(CaCl2)=λ0(Ca2+)+2⋅λ0(Cl−)
Plug in the numbers:
Λm0=119.0+2(76.3)=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
- For MgSO4 One formula unit gives one Mg2+ and one SO42− ion. So:
Λm0(MgSO4)=λ0(Mg2+)+λ0(SO42−)
Substituting:
Λm0=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
A common mistake is to forget the stoichiometric coefficient. For CaCl2, students sometimes add only one Cl− contribution. Always check the formula: CaCl2 means two chlorides per calcium.
Notice that MgSO4 has a lower Λm0 than CaCl2 even though SO42− has a much higher λ0 than Cl−. Why? Because CaCl2 has three ions per formula unit, while MgSO4 has only two. The number of charge carriers matters.
The limiting molar conductivities are Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1 and Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1.
Method: Kohlrausch’s Law of Independent Migration of Ions
This law states that at infinite dilution, each ion contributes a fixed amount to the total molar conductivity of an electrolyte, independent of the other ion present.
Steps
- Recall the formula For any electrolyte AxBy:
Λm0=x⋅λ0(Ay+)+y⋅λ0(Bx−)
where x and y are the number of cations and anions per formula unit.
- For CaCl2
- CaCl2 dissociates as: Ca2++2Cl−
- So x=1, y=2
- Using given values:
Λm0(CaCl2)=1×λ0(Ca2+)+2×λ0(Cl−)
=1(119.0)+2(76.3)
=119.0+152.6
271.6 S cm2 mol−1
- For MgSO4
- MgSO4 dissociates as: Mg2++SO42−
- So x=1, y=1
- Using given values:
Λm0(MgSO4)=1×λ0(Mg2+)+1×λ0(SO42−)
=106.0+160.0
266.0 S cm2 mol−1
Key Concept Check
- Why does this work? At infinite dilution, ions are so far apart that they don’t interact — each ion’s conductivity is purely its own property.
- Units note: All values are in S cm2 mol−1 — always include units in your final answer for exams.
Common Mistakes Students Make with Molar Conductivity (and How to Avoid Them)
Mistake 1: Forgetting to Multiply by Stoichiometric Coefficients
The error:
Students often directly add the given ionic conductivities without considering the number of ions in the formula unit. For example, for CaCl2, they write:
Λm0=λ0(Ca2+)+λ0(Cl−)
This is wrong because CaCl2 has two chloride ions.
How to avoid:
Always write the dissociation equation first:
CaCl2→Ca2++2Cl−
Then apply Kohlrausch’s law correctly:
Λm0=ν+λ+0+ν−λ−0
where ν is the number of ions of each type.
Correct calculation:
Λm0(CaCl2)=1×119.0+2×76.3=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
Mistake 2: Confusing the Formula for 1:1 vs 2:2 Electrolytes
The error:
For MgSO4, students sometimes incorrectly multiply both ions by 2, thinking "both are divalent so double everything."
How to avoid:
Remember: stoichiometry matters, not just charge. MgSO4 dissociates as:
MgSO4→Mg2++SO42−
There is one magnesium ion and one sulfate ion. So:
Λm0(MgSO4)=1×106.0+1×160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
Key insight: Charge tells you the mobility (given in the table), but the count of ions tells you the multiplier.
Mistake 3: Mixing Up Units or Omitting Them
The error:
Students write numbers without units, or confuse S cm2 mol−1 with S m2 mol−1.
How to avoid:
- Always attach units to your final answer.
- In NCERT/board exams, the standard unit is S cm2 mol−1.
- If conversion is needed: 1 S cm2 mol−1=10−4 S m2 mol−1.
Correct final answers with units:
- Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
- Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
Mistake 4: Using the Wrong Table Values
The error:
Students accidentally swap values (e.g., using λ0(Mg2+) for Ca2+) or misread the table.
How to avoid:
- Label each value as you copy it from the table.
- Double-check: Ca2+=119.0, Cl−=76.3, Mg2+=106.0, SO42−=160.0.
- Cross-check with periodic trends: Ca2+ has higher conductivity than Mg2+ (larger ion, less hydration), so 119>106 makes sense.
Quick Checklist to Avoid All Mistakes
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Write the dissociation equation |
| 2 | Count the number of each ion (ν+ and ν−) |
| 3 | Apply: Λm0=ν+λ+0+ν−λ−0 |
| 4 | Use correct values from the table |
| 5 | Attach units: S cm2 mol−1 |
Final correct answers for reference:
Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
- KEAM 2026Set eng-2026-04214 marksMCQQ.The molar conductivity of a weak mono basic acid, HA at 298 K is 70 Scm2mol−1. What is the percentage ionisation of HA at 298 K? [At infinite dilution λH+=340 Scm2mol−1 and λA−=80 Scm2mol−1] (A) 8.35 % (B) 16.7 % (C) 20 % (D) 32.5 % (E) 15.3 %
›Reveal solutionSolution
α=Λm/Λm∘=70/420=16.7.
Limiting molar conductivity of HA:
Λm∘=λH+∘+λA−∘=340+80=420,Scm2mol−1.
Degree of ionisation:
α=Λm∘Λm=42070=0.167=16.7
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
- KEAM 2026Set pha-2026-0418F4 marksMCQQ.The limiting molar conductance for aqueous solution of CaCl2 at 298K is 271.6 S cm2 mol−1. If the limiting ionic conductance of Ca2+ ion at the same temperature is 119 S cm2 mol−1 what is the limiting ionic conductance of Cl− ion? (A) 152.6 S cm2 mol−1 (B) 76.3 S cm2 mol−1 (C) 135.8 S cm2 mol−1 (D) 228.7 S cm2 mol−1 (E) 114.35 S cm2 mol−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Kohlrausch: Λm∘(CaCl2)=λ∘(Ca2+)+2λ∘(Cl−).
271.6=119+2λ∘(Cl−)
2λ∘(Cl−)=152.6⇒λ∘(Cl−)=76.3 S cm2mol−1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B). Subtract the Ca2+ contribution and halve for two Cl−.
- KEAM 2025Set eng-2025-04254 marksMCQQ.The molar conductivity (Λm) acetic acid is 78.1 S cm2 mol−1. Its degree of dissociation (α) is (Λm0) for acetic acid = 390.5 S cm2 mol−1 (A) 0.12 (B) 0.40 (C) 0.02 (D) 0.20 (E) 0.04
›Reveal solutionSolution
Degree of dissociation of a weak electrolyte α=Λm0Λm=390.578.1=0.20.
For a weak electrolyte such as acetic acid, the degree of dissociation is the ratio of the molar conductivity at the given concentration to the molar conductivity at infinite dilution:
α=Λm0Λm
Substituting Λm=78.1 S cm2 mol−1 and Λm0=390.5 S cm2 mol−1:
α=390.578.1=0.20
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
- KEAM 2025Set pha-2025-0424F4 marksMCQQ.The ion with the highest limiting molar conductance at 298 K is (A) H+ (B) Na+ (C) K+ (D) Ca2+ (E) Mg2+
›Reveal solutionSolution
The proton conducts by the Grotthuss (hopping) mechanism, giving H+ by far the largest limiting molar conductivity (≈350 S cm2 mol−1).
Limiting molar conductivities at 298 K (in S cm2 mol−1) are roughly:
- H+≈349.8
- K+≈73.5
- Ca2+≈119 (but per mole of charge ≈59.5)
- Na+≈50.1
- Mg2+≈106 (per mole of charge ≈53)
The proton is anomalously mobile because it moves through water by the Grotthuss mechanism — successive H+ transfers along hydrogen-bonded water molecules rather than bodily migration of a hydrated ion. Hence H+ has the highest limiting molar conductance.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
- KEAM 2024Set eng-2024-06074 marksMCQQ.The conductivity of 0.02 mol L−1 KCl solution is 0.248 S m−1. Its molar conductivity is (A) 20 S m2 mol−1 (B) 1.24×10−3 S m2 mol−1 (C) 1.24×10−4 S m2 mol−1 (D) 2.48×10−2 S m2 mol−1 (E) 1.24×10−2 S m2 mol−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity Λm=κ/c. With κ=0.248 S m−1 and c=0.02 mol L−1=20 mol m−3, Λm=1.24×10−2 S m2 mol−1.
Molar conductivity is related to conductivity by
Λm=cκ.
Using SI units, the concentration must be in mol m−3:
c=0.02 mol L−1=0.02×1000=20 mol m−3.
Therefore
Λm=20 mol m−30.248 S m−1=0.0124=1.24×10−2 S m2mol−1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (E).
- KEAM 2024Set eng-2024-06084 marksMCQQ.The limiting molar conductances of NaCl, HCl and CH3COONa at 300 K are 126.4, 425.9 and 91.0 S cm2 mol−1 respectively. The limiting molar conductance of acetic acid at 300 K is (A) 266 S cm2 mol−1 (B) 390.5 S cm2 mol−1 (C) 461.3 S cm2 mol−1 (D) 208 S cm2 mol−1 (E) 108 S cm2 mol−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Kohlrausch's law of independent ion migration lets the limiting molar conductance of acetic acid be built from those of sodium acetate, HCl and NaCl: 91.0+425.9−126.4=390.5 S cm2 mol−1.
Acetic acid dissociates into CH3COO− and H+. Combining known limiting conductances:
Λm∘(CH3COOH)=Λm∘(CH3COONa)+Λm∘(HCl)−Λm∘(NaCl).
The Na+ and Cl− contributions cancel, leaving the ions CH3COO− and H+. Substituting:
Λm∘=91.0+425.9−126.4=390.5 S cm2mol−1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
- KEAM 2021Set eng-2021-P1-A14 marksMCQQ.The SI unit of molar conductivity is (A) S m3 mol−1 (B) S m mol−1 (C) S m mol−2 (D) S m2 mol−1 (E) S m2 mol−2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The SI unit of molar conductivity is S m2 mol−1.
Concept and Intuition
Molar conductivity is the conductivity per unit molar concentration, defined as Λm=κ/c. Its unit follows directly from the units of conductivity and concentration in SI.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Conductivity κ has SI unit S m−1.
- Concentration c in SI is mol m−3.
- Λm=κ/c= (S m−1)/(mol m−3) = S m2 mol−1.
Common Mistakes
- Using concentration in mol dm−3 (giving S cm2 mol−1) instead of the SI mol m−3.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — S m2 mol−1.
ANSWER: D
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.