Skip to content
Question of 87

Q.(a) Which of the following acids is more stronger? Why? (1 mark) F3C−C6H4−COOHF_3C-C_6H_4-COOH (4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid) Or H3C−C6H4−COOHH_3C-C_6H_4-COOH (4-methylbenzoic acid)

(b) What is Clemmensen reaction? Give relevant equation involved. (1 mark)
(c) Formic acid reduces Tollens' reagent whereas acetic acid does not. Why? (1 mark)
(d) Why are aldehydes more reactive than ketones towards nucleophilic addition reaction? (2 marks) OR
(e) What types of aldehyde undergo Cannizzaro reaction? (1 mark)
(f) Carboxylic acid is a stronger acid than phenol. Explain why. (2 marks)
(g) Identify the products A, B, C and D from the following reactions (1×2=2):
(i) acetone ((CH3)2C=O(CH_3)_2C=O) →NH2NH2A→heatKOH/ethylene glycolB\xrightarrow{NH_2NH_2} A \xrightarrow[\text{heat}]{KOH/\text{ethylene glycol}} B (Wolff-Kishner reduction);
(ii) benzoic acid →PCl5C→H2/Pd/BaSO4/SD\xrightarrow{PCl_5} C \xrightarrow{H_2/Pd/BaSO_4/S} D
Meghalaya MboseMBOSE Meghalaya Intermediate Board 2025Subjective· 5mImportance★★★★★
0% · 0/87 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Electron-withdrawing –CF3_3 makes the trifluoromethyl acid stronger than the methyl (electron-donating) acid; Clemmensen reduction converts a carbonyl fully to –CH2_2–; formic acid, uniquely among carboxylic acids, still has an aldehydic H and so reduces Tollens' reagent while acetic acid cannot; and aldehydes out-react ketones in nucleophilic addition for combined steric and electronic reasons.

  1. Which acid is stronger: 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid or 4-methylbenzoic acid? F3C−C6H4−COOHF_3C-C_6H_4-COOH (4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid) is the stronger acid. Acid strength depends on how well the carboxylate anion (conjugate base) is stabilised after loss of H+^+. The –CF3_3 group is strongly electron-withdrawing by induction (–I effect); through the ring it pulls electron density away from the –COO−^- formed, spreading out (stabilising) the negative charge, and so favours ionisation — increasing acid strength. The –CH3_3 group, in contrast, is electron-donating (+I effect); it pushes electron density towards –COO−^-, intensifying (destabilising) the negative charge and making the compound a weaker acid than even unsubstituted benzoic acid.
  2. Clemmensen reaction The Clemmensen reaction reduces the carbonyl group of an aldehyde or ketone completely to a methylene (−CH2−-CH_2-) group, using zinc amalgam [Zn(Hg)] and concentrated hydrochloric acid: R2C=O→conc. HClZn(Hg)R2CH2+H2OR_2C=O \xrightarrow[conc.\ HCl]{Zn(Hg)} R_2CH_2 + H_2O Example: acetophenone is reduced to ethylbenzene: C6H5−CO−CH3→conc. HClZn(Hg)C6H5−CH2−CH3+H2OC_6H_5-CO-CH_3 \xrightarrow[conc.\ HCl]{Zn(Hg)} C_6H_5-CH_2-CH_3 + H_2O
  3. Why formic acid reduces Tollens' reagent but acetic acid does not Formic acid, HCOOHHCOOH, is structurally unique among carboxylic acids: it can be written as H−COOHH-COOH, meaning it contains an aldehydic-type C–H bond directly on the carboxyl carbon — it is simultaneously a carboxylic acid and (formally) an aldehyde/reducing agent. This H is oxidisable (formic acid is readily oxidised further to carbonic acid/CO2_2 + H2_2O), so it can reduce Tollens' reagent ([Ag(NH3)2]+[Ag(NH_3)_2]^+) to metallic silver (a silver mirror): HCOOH+2[Ag(NH3)2]++3OH−→CO32−+2Ag↓+4NH3+2H2OHCOOH + 2[Ag(NH_3)_2]^+ + 3OH^- \rightarrow CO_3^{2-} + 2Ag\downarrow + 4NH_3 + 2H_2O Acetic acid, CH3COOHCH_3COOH, has a methyl group (–CH3_3) in place of that reactive hydrogen — there is no aldehydic C–H to oxidise — so it cannot reduce Tollens' reagent.
  4. Why aldehydes are more reactive than ketones towards nucleophilic addition Two factors, both favouring aldehydes:
  • Steric factor: an aldehyde, R−CHOR-CHO, has only one bulky group (R) and one small H atom attached to the carbonyl carbon, leaving it relatively open to attack by an incoming nucleophile. A ketone, R−CO−R′R-CO-R', has two bulky alkyl/aryl groups, which hinder the approach of the nucleophile to the carbonyl carbon and also crowd the tetrahedral product.
  • Electronic factor: alkyl groups are electron-donating (+I effect). In a ketone, two alkyl groups donate electron density into the carbonyl carbon (from both sides), reducing its partial positive charge/electrophilicity more than the single alkyl group of an aldehyde does. A less electrophilic carbonyl carbon is less attractive to a nucleophile.

Together, less steric hindrance and a more electrophilic (less electron-rich) carbonyl carbon make aldehydes react faster and more completely with nucleophiles than ketones.

Alternative (Or):

Only aldehydes lacking an α-hydrogen can undergo the Cannizzaro disproportionation; carboxylic acids are more acidic than phenols because the carboxylate ion's negative charge is delocalised equally over two oxygens, a much more effective resonance stabilisation than phenoxide's ring delocalisation; and the two named reaction sequences give, respectively, propane (via Wolff–Kishner) and benzaldehyde (via Rosenmund reduction).

(e) Which aldehydes undergo the Cannizzaro reaction

Only aldehydes that have no α\alpha-hydrogen atom (so they cannot undergo aldol condensation) undergo the Cannizzaro reaction — a base-induced self oxidation–reduction (disproportionation) in concentrated alkali, giving one molecule of the corresponding alcohol and one molecule of the carboxylate salt. Examples: formaldehyde (HCHOHCHO), benzaldehyde (C6H5CHOC_6H_5CHO), and trimethylacetaldehyde/pivaldehyde ((CH3)3C−CHO(CH_3)_3C-CHO).

(f) Why carboxylic acids are stronger acids than phenols

Both ionise to give an anion stabilised by resonance, but the quality of that resonance differs greatly:

  • In the carboxylate ion, RCOO−RCOO^-, the negative charge is delocalised equally over two identical, highly electronegative oxygen atoms (two exactly equivalent resonance structures), giving a symmetric, strongly stabilised anion (confirmed experimentally: both C–O bonds in the carboxylate are of equal, intermediate length). …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.