Building an equation from given roots, directly. One way to write a degree-n equation with roots α1,…,αn is to just multiply out the factors: (x−α1)(x−α2)⋯(x−αn)=0. But using Vieta's relations (§3.3.2.2) in reverse is far more efficient — it lets us write down the equation's coefficients directly from the sums/products of the roots, without expanding a product of n linear factors, and even lets us read off one particular coefficient without finding the rest.
A cubic with roots α,β,γ is
x3−(α+β+γ)x2+(αβ+βγ+γα)x−αβγ=0.
A degree-n equation with roots α1,…,αn is
xn−(∑α1)xn−1+(∑α1α2)xn−2−⋯+(−1)n(∑α1α2⋯αn)=0.
Worked illustration. A cubic with roots 1,−2,3: sum =2, pairwise-sum =(1)(−2)+(−2)(3)+(3)(1)=−2−6+3=−5, product =−6. So x3−2x2−5x−(−6)=0, i.e. x3−2x2−5x+6=0 — matching what direct expansion of (x−1)(x+2)(x−3) gives.
Building an equation whose roots are a function of a known equation's roots (Transformation of Equations). This same reverse-Vieta idea is the workhorse for constructing an equation whose roots are related to those of a given equation, without ever solving that given equation — only its Vieta sums are needed.
Squares of the roots (Example 3.6 pattern). If α,β,γ are the roots of x3+ax2+bx+c=0, so ∑α=−a, ∑αβ=b, αβγ=−c, then the equation with roots α2,β2,γ2 has
∑α2=(∑α)2−2∑αβ=a2−2b,∑α2β2=(∑αβ)2−2(αβγ)(∑α)=b2−2ac,α2β2γ2=(αβγ)2=c2,
giving x3−(a2−2b)x2+(b2−2ac)x−c2=0.
Sum of squares of the roots (Example 3.4 pattern). For a quartic ax4+bx3+cx2+dx+e=0 with roots α,β,γ,δ: using (∑α)2=∑α2+2∑αβ,
α2+β2+γ2+δ2=(−ab)2−2⋅ac=a2b2−2ac.
Roots in a given ratio (Example 3.5 pattern). If the roots of x3+ax2+bx+c=0 are in the ratio p:q:r, write them as pλ,qλ,rλ for an unknown scale factor λ. Vieta's relations give three equations in λ (and p,q,r,a,b,c); eliminating λ between the sum-relation and the product-relation produces a pure condition on a,b,c,p,q,r — e.g. pqra3=c(p+q+r)3. …