The following table shows distribution of workforce in India for the year 1972-73. Analyse it and give reasons for the nature of workforce distribution. You will notice that the data is pertaining to the situation in India about 50 years ago!
| Place of Residence | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | 125 | 69 | 195 |
| Urban | 32 | 7 | 39 |
(Workforce in millions)
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Fifty years ago India's workforce was concentrated in rural areas (about 195 of 234 million workers) and dominated by men (about 157 million versus 76 million women). This mirrors an agrarian economy where farm work absorbed rural labour, while low female participation reflected poverty, poor education and social norms, especially in towns.
Reading the table
| Place of Residence | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | 125 | 69 | 195 |
| Urban | 32 | 7 | 39 |
| Total | 157 | 76 | 234 |
(Workforce in millions)
What the numbers show
- Rural dominance: Rural workers (195 million) were about 83 per cent of the total workforce of 234 million; urban workers were only 39 million (about 17 per cent).
- Male dominance: Men (157 million) far outnumbered women (76 million) overall.
- Very low urban female work: Only 7 million urban women were workers, against 69 million rural women.
Reasons for this distribution
- Agrarian economy: In the early 1970s India was largely agricultural, and villages were where most people lived and worked, so the bulk of the workforce was rural.
- Farm work absorbs rural women: Agriculture and allied family activities readily took in rural women (often as unpaid family workers), so rural female numbers were high. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.