Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q10

Q.Diatomic molecules like hydrogen have energies due to both translational as well as rotational motion. From the equation in kinetic theory pV=23EpV = \dfrac{2}{3}E, EE is (Note: more than one of the given options may be correct.)

(a) the total energy per unit volume.
(b) only the translational part of energy because rotational energy is very small compared to the translational energy.
(c) only the translational part of the energy because during collisions with the wall pressure relates to change in linear momentum.
(d) the translational part of the energy because rotational energies of molecules can be of either sign and its average over all the molecules is zero.
Punjab PsebMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★est
58% · 29/50 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

In the kinetic-theory relation pV=23EpV = \dfrac{2}{3}E, the quantity EE is the total translational kinetic energy of the gas molecules -- it comes purely from the change in linear momentum of molecules striking the container wall. Only option (C) gives the correct physical reason; option (D) is wrong (rotational KE is never negative) and option (B), though it names the right quantity, gives a false reason (rotational energy is not negligible compared to translational). The correct answer is (C) only.

Where pV=23EpV = \dfrac{2}{3}E comes from

Picture a cubical box of gas molecules, each with velocity components vx,vy,vzv_x, v_y, v_z. When a molecule collides elastically with a wall perpendicular to the xx-axis, only its xx-component of momentum reverses: from mvxmv_x to −mvx-mv_x, a change of 2mvx2mv_x. The pressure on that wall is built entirely from this linear-momentum transfer -- nothing about the molecule's rotation enters, because rotation about the molecule's own centre of mass does not change the centre-of-mass (linear) momentum that actually strikes the wall.

Summing over all molecules and directions, the standard kinetic-theory result is

p=13NVm⟨v2⟩p = \frac{1}{3}\frac{N}{V}m\langle v^2\rangle

Multiplying both sides by VV:

pV=13Nm⟨v2⟩=23(12Nm⟨v2⟩)pV = \frac{1}{3}Nm\langle v^2\rangle = \frac{2}{3}\left(\frac{1}{2}Nm\langle v^2\rangle\right)

The bracketed term is exactly the total translational kinetic energy of all NN molecules. So by definition, E≡12Nm⟨v2⟩E \equiv \frac{1}{2}Nm\langle v^2\rangle, giving pV=23EpV = \frac{2}{3}E.

Checking each option

(A) "the total energy per unit volume" -- Wrong. EE is the total translational kinetic energy of all molecules in the box, not an energy density, and it excludes rotational/vibrational energy.

(B) "only the translational part... because rotational energy is very small compared to translational energy" -- The conclusion happens to be correct, but the reason is false. For a diatomic gas like hydrogen, equipartition gives average translational KE =32kBT=\tfrac32 k_BT per molecule and average rotational KE =kBT=k_BT per molecule -- so rotational energy is 23\tfrac23 of translational, not negligible at all. Since the statement must be judged on its full reasoning, (B) is not an acceptable justification. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.