Q.Diatomic molecules like hydrogen have energies due to both translational as well as rotational motion. From the equation in kinetic theory , is (Note: more than one of the given options may be correct.)
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →In the kinetic-theory relation , the quantity is the total translational kinetic energy of the gas molecules -- it comes purely from the change in linear momentum of molecules striking the container wall. Only option (C) gives the correct physical reason; option (D) is wrong (rotational KE is never negative) and option (B), though it names the right quantity, gives a false reason (rotational energy is not negligible compared to translational). The correct answer is (C) only.
Where comes from
Picture a cubical box of gas molecules, each with velocity components . When a molecule collides elastically with a wall perpendicular to the -axis, only its -component of momentum reverses: from to , a change of . The pressure on that wall is built entirely from this linear-momentum transfer -- nothing about the molecule's rotation enters, because rotation about the molecule's own centre of mass does not change the centre-of-mass (linear) momentum that actually strikes the wall.
Summing over all molecules and directions, the standard kinetic-theory result is
Multiplying both sides by :
The bracketed term is exactly the total translational kinetic energy of all molecules. So by definition, , giving .
Checking each option
(A) "the total energy per unit volume" -- Wrong. is the total translational kinetic energy of all molecules in the box, not an energy density, and it excludes rotational/vibrational energy.
(B) "only the translational part... because rotational energy is very small compared to translational energy" -- The conclusion happens to be correct, but the reason is false. For a diatomic gas like hydrogen, equipartition gives average translational KE per molecule and average rotational KE per molecule -- so rotational energy is of translational, not negligible at all. Since the statement must be judged on its full reasoning, (B) is not an acceptable justification. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.