Q.Mrs. Mathur sent a jacket to a laundry shop in January 2018. The jacket was purchased at a price of ₹4,500. She had previously sent the jacket for dry cleaning with Shine Dry Cleaners and the jacket was cleaned well. However, she noticed that her jacket had white discoloration marks when she collected the jacket this time. On informing the dry cleaner, Mrs. Mathur received a letter confirming that discolouration indeed appeared after the jacket was dry cleaned. She contacted the dry cleaner multiple times and requested for compensation for discoloured jacket but to no avail. Upon Consumer court's intervention, Shine Dry Cleaners agreed to compensate ₹2,500 to Mrs. Mathur for the discoloured jacket.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Mrs. Mathur's case shows a consumer first getting her complaint heard by the service provider, and then — when that failed — using the Right to Seek Redressal through a Consumer Court to obtain compensation for a deficient service, while discharging her own responsibility to pursue a genuine grievance.
The story of Mrs. Mathur and her discoloured jacket is a clear example of how consumer rights work in practice. When she sent her jacket to Shine Dry Cleaners in January 2018, she expected the same good service she had received earlier. This time, however, the jacket came back with white discolouration marks — a clear case of deficiency in service. The dry cleaner even admitted the fault in writing. Yet when Mrs. Mathur asked for compensation, they refused. She then took the matter to the Consumer Court, which persuaded the dry cleaner to pay ₹2,500.
Each part of the question can be answered from the six consumer rights and the consumer responsibilities explained in this chapter.
- Which right was exercised by Mrs. Mathur at the first instance? At the very first instance — when she noticed the discolouration, informed the dry cleaner and took up the matter with them repeatedly — Mrs. Mathur was exercising her Right to be Heard. This right gives a consumer the right to file a complaint and to be heard in case of dissatisfaction with a good or a service. Her complaint was in fact heard, as the dry cleaner responded with a letter confirming that the discolouration had appeared after dry cleaning.
- Name and explain the right which helped Mrs. Mathur to avail the compensation.
The right that ultimately helped Mrs. Mathur obtain the ₹2,500 compensation is the Right to Seek Redressal. This right entitles a consumer to relief where a good or service falls short of expectations or where there is an unfair trade practice — including replacement of the product, removal of the defect, or compensation for any loss or injury suffered. The dry cleaning was clearly deficient, and when the dry cleaner refused to compensate her, she approached the Consumer Court, which is the proper redressal forum. The court's intervention ensured she received compensation for the loss she suffered.
Important
The Right to Seek Redressal is not only about getting money back. It covers any relief that makes good the consumer's loss — repair, replacement or compensation — and the Consumer Protection Act provides the legal machinery through which this right is enforced.
- State which consumer responsibility has been fulfilled by Mrs. Mathur in the above case. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.