Q.Two point charges q1 and q2, of magnitude +10−8C and −10−8C, respectively, are placed 0.1m apart. Calculate the electric fields at points A, B and C shown in Fig. 1.11.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Coulomb Force Superposition
Coulomb Force Superposition – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're in a room with three friends. Each friend can push or pull you. If two friends push you from the same side, you feel a stronger push — the combined effect. If one pushes from the left and another from the right, you feel the net effect, which might be smaller or even zero if they push equally hard.
This is exactly how electric forces work. When multiple charged particles are present, each one exerts its own force on a given charge. The total force that charge feels is simply the vector sum of all the individual forces — as if each other charge were acting alone, completely ignoring the presence of the rest.
That's the core idea: forces add like arrows, not like numbers.
The Precise Statement
Fnet on q0=∑i=1nFi→0=4πε01∑i=1nri02q0qir^i0
Where:
- q0 is the charge you're calculating the force on
- qi are all other charges (excluding q0 itself)
- ri0 is the distance between qi and q0
- r^i0 is a unit vector pointing from qi to q0 (or away, depending on sign convention — be consistent)
The key point: Each pair of charges interacts independently. The presence of a third charge does not alter the force between the first two. This is what "superposition" means — the forces simply layer on top of each other.
Why This Matters (and a Common Trap)
Never add the magnitudes of forces directly unless all forces are along the same line and in the same direction. Force is a vector — direction matters.
If two forces point in opposite directions, they partially cancel. If they're at right angles, the net force is found using the Pythagorean theorem, not simple addition.
Example: Three charges on a line:
- q1=+2μC at x=0
- q2=−1μC at x=3cm
- q0=+1μC at x=1cm
Step 1: Force from q1 on q0 — both positive, so repulsive. q0 is pushed to the right.
Step 2: Force from q2 on q0 — opposite signs, so attractive. q0 is pulled to the right (toward q2).
Step 3: Both forces point right. Now you add magnitudes: Fnet=F1→0+F2→0.
If q2 were also positive, the force from q2 would push q0 left, and you'd subtract.
The Deeper Reason
Coulomb's law is a linear law — the force is proportional to each charge individually. If you double q1, the force from q1 doubles, but the force from q2 stays the same. This linearity is what makes superposition possible. It's not a coincidence — it's a fundamental property of electromagnetic interactions at the classical level.
Superposition works because electric forces obey a linear inverse-square law. If the force depended on products of three charges (like q0q1q2), superposition would fail. It doesn't — and that's why we can break down any multi-charge problem into a series of two-charge calculations.
--- …
Why this formula?
Coulomb Force Superposition — Why the Formula Holds
The principle of superposition for Coulomb forces states that the net electrostatic force on a given charge due to a collection of other charges is the vector sum of the individual forces from each charge, as if the others were absent.
The Key Formula
If we have a charge q0 at position r0, and N other point charges q1,q2,…,qN at positions r1,r2,…,rN, the net force on q0 is:
Fnet=4πε01∑i=1N∣r0−ri∣2q0qir^0i
where r^0i is the unit vector pointing from qi to q0.
Why This Works — The Physical Reasoning
1. Coulomb's Law is a Two-Body Interaction
Coulomb's law describes the force between exactly two point charges. It depends only on:
- The product of their charges (q0qi)
- The inverse square of the distance between them
- The direction along the line joining them
Crucially, the force between q0 and qi does not depend on the presence of any other charges qj.
2. Forces Add as Vectors (Newton's Third Law + Linearity)
Electrostatic forces are real physical forces — they obey Newton's laws. If multiple forces act on the same charge, the net effect is the vector sum of each individual force. This is a fundamental property of forces in classical mechanics.
3. The Electric Field is Linear
A deeper reason: the electric field E obeys superposition. Since F=q0E, and E from multiple sources adds linearly, the force automatically adds linearly.
The electric field at r0 due to qi is:
Ei(r0)=4πε01∣r0−ri∣2qir^0i
Then:
Fnet=q0∑iEi=∑iFi
The Crucial Assumption (Why It's Not Trivial)
Superposition holds because Maxwell's equations are linear in the electric field. If the equations were nonlinear (e.g., if the field depended on E2), then the force from two charges together would not be the sum of the individual forces.
In electrostatics, the electric field satisfies:
∇⋅E=ε0ρ,∇×E=0
Both equations are linear — if E1 and E2 are solutions, then E1+E2 is also a solution. This linearity is the mathematical reason superposition works.
--- …
Use E=r2k∣q∣ with k=9×109 and ∣q∣=10−8C (so k∣q∣=90N⋅m2/C); add the fields as vectors. Let q1(+) be on the left and q2(−) on the right, 0.1m apart.
Point A (midpoint, 0.05m from each).
E1=E2=(0.05)290=3.6×104N/C. E1 points away from q1 (rightward) and E2 toward q2 (rightward), so they add:
EA=7.2×104N/C, from q1 toward q2.
Point B (0.05m left of q1; 0.15m from q2).
E1=3.6×104N/C (away from q1, leftward); E2=(0.15)290=4.0×103N/C (toward q2, rightward). They oppose:
EB=3.6×104−0.4×104=3.2×104N/C, pointing away from q1.
Point C (apex of the equilateral triangle, 0.1m from each). …
By superposition, EA=7.2×104N/C (from q1 to q2), EB=3.2×104N/C (directed away from q1), and at C the vertical components cancel to give EC=9.0×103N/C parallel to the axis.
Each charge produces E=r2k∣q∣; the net field is the vector sum. A positive charge's field points away from it, a negative charge's field points toward it. Take q1=+10−8C on the left, q2=−10−8C on the right, separated by 0.1m, with k=9×109N⋅m2/C2 so that k∣q∣=90N⋅m2/C.
Point A — midpoint. r=0.05m from each:
E1=E2=(0.05)290=3.6×104N/C.
E1 points away from q1 (to the right); E2 points toward q2 (also to the right). Same direction, so they add:
EA=3.6×104+3.6×104=7.2×104N/C,
directed from q1 toward q2.
Point B — 0.05m to the left of q1. Then r1=0.05m and r2=0.15m:
E1=(0.05)290=3.6×104N/C (away from q1, leftward),
E2=(0.15)290=4.0×103N/C (toward q2, rightward).
These are opposite, so they subtract:
EB=3.6×104−0.4×104=3.2×104N/C,
directed leftward, i.e. away from q1.
At B the two fields oppose each other — the closer positive charge wins. Do not add their magnitudes. …
Method: Superposition of Electric Fields (Vector Addition)
This problem uses the Principle of Superposition — the net electric field at any point is the vector sum of the fields due to each individual charge.
Step-by-step approach
Step 1: Identify the field contributions
- Each point charge q produces an electric field at a distance r given by:
E=4πε01r2∣q∣
- Direction: away from positive charge, toward negative charge.
Step 2: For each point (A, B, C):
- Draw the individual field vectors from q1 and q2 at that point.
- Calculate the magnitude of each field using the formula above.
- Resolve vectors into components (if needed).
- Add components vectorially to get the net field.
Step 3: Apply to each point
Let k=4πε01=9×109N m2/C2
- At point A (midpoint between charges):
- Both fields point right (away from +q1, toward −q2)
- r=0.05m for both
- E1=E2=k(0.05)210−8=3.6×104N/C
- Net field = E1+E2=7.2×104N/C (right) …
Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
Mistake 1: Forgetting that Electric Field is a Vector
Students often compute the magnitude of the field from each charge and then simply add the numbers — ignoring direction.
Example of the error:
At point B, a student might compute:
E1=r2kq1 and E2=r2kq2, then write EB=E1+E2 (wrong!).
Why it's wrong:
Electric field is a vector. Fields from q1 and q2 point in different directions at most points. You must add them using vector addition (head-to-tail or component method).
How to avoid:
- Always draw arrows showing the direction of the field from each charge at the point of interest.
- Remember:
- Field from a positive charge points away from it.
- Field from a negative charge points toward it.
- Use a coordinate system and add components: Ex=E1x+E2x, Ey=E1y+E2y.
Mistake 2: Using the Wrong Distance
Students sometimes use the distance between the two charges (0.1m) instead of the distance from each charge to the point.
Example of the error:
For point C (midpoint), a student might write r=0.05m for both charges — that part is correct. But for point A or B, they might mistakenly use 0.1m for both.
Why it's wrong:
Each charge contributes a field based on its own distance to the point. These distances are generally different.
How to avoid:
- Label all distances clearly on the diagram before calculating.
- For each point, write:
- r1=distance from q1 to the point
- r2=distance from q2 to the point
- Use geometry (Pythagoras theorem) if the point is not on the line joining the charges.
Mistake 3: Ignoring the Sign of the Charge in the Direction
Students correctly compute the magnitude E=r2k∣q∣, but then assign direction based on the sign incorrectly.
Example of the error:
At point A (to the left of q1), a student might say:
"q1 is positive, so its field points away — that means to the right."
Then for q2 (negative): "Field points toward q2 — that also means to the right."
They then add the magnitudes. This is correct for point A — but the same reasoning applied blindly at point B leads to error.
Why it's wrong:
The direction depends on where the point is relative to the charge, not just the sign of the charge.
How to avoid:
- For each charge, ask: "If I place a positive test charge at this point, which way will it be pushed by this charge?"
- Positive charge → repels the test charge (away from itself).
- Negative charge → attracts the test charge (toward itself).
- Draw the force arrow on the test charge — that's the direction of E.
Mistake 4: Forgetting to Use k=9×109 Correctly
Students sometimes use k=9×109 but forget to square the distance or misplace decimal points.
Example of the error:
E=0.19×109×10−8 instead of (0.1)29×109×10−8.
Why it's wrong:
Coulomb's law for field is E=r2kq, not rkq.
How to avoid:
- Write the formula explicitly before plugging numbers:
E=r2k∣q∣
- Check units: r is in metres, so r2 is in m². …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.