Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q43

Q.Identify the most stable species in the following set of ions giving reasons:

(i) CH3^+, CH2Br^+, CHBr2^+, CBr3^+
(ii) CH3^-, CH2Cl^-, CHCl2^-, CCl3^-
Sikkim CbseShort· 3mImportance★★★★★
82% · 107/130 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The stability of carbocations and carbanions is governed by the inductive effect of substituents. For carbocations, electron-donating groups (like alkyl) stabilise, while electron-withdrawing groups (like halogens) destabilise. For carbanions, the reverse is true. The most stable species are: (i) CH₃⁺ and (ii) CCl₃⁻.

The Concept: Inductive Effect and Charge Stability

The key to this problem lies in understanding how substituents influence the stability of a charged carbon atom through the inductive effect. This is the permanent polarisation of a sigma bond due to electronegativity differences. A substituent can either push electron density toward the charged carbon (electron-donating) or pull it away (electron-withdrawing).

For a carbocation (positively charged carbon), stability increases when electron density is donated to it. This neutralises the positive charge, making the ion less reactive and more stable. Electron-donating groups (EDGs) like alkyl groups (−CH3-CH_3) are stabilising. Electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) like halogens (−Br-Br, −Cl-Cl) are destabilising because they pull electron density away, intensifying the positive charge.

For a carbanion (negatively charged carbon), the opposite is true. Stability increases when electron density is withdrawn from it. This disperses the negative charge, making the ion less reactive. Electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) are stabilising, while electron-donating groups (EDGs) are destabilising because they concentrate the negative charge.

Watch out

A common mistake is to apply the same logic to both carbocations and carbanions. Remember: a positive charge wants electrons, a negative charge wants to get rid of them. The effect of a substituent is exactly opposite in the two cases.

Now, let's apply this to each series.


(i) Carbocations: CHX3X+\ce{CH3+}, CHX2BrX+\ce{CH2Br+}, CHBrX2X+\ce{CHBr2+}, CBrX3X+\ce{CBr3+}

  1. Identify the substituent effect. Bromine is more electronegative than carbon. Therefore, each −Br-Br group acts as an electron-withdrawing group via the inductive effect. It pulls electron density away from the positively charged carbon.

  2. Analyze the series. As we replace hydrogen atoms (which have a negligible inductive effect) with bromine atoms, we are adding more electron-withdrawing groups to the carbocation centre.

    • CHX3X+\ce{CH3+}: No Br atoms. The positive charge is only stabilised by the three H atoms (weak +I effect).
    • CHX2BrX+\ce{CH2Br+}: One Br atom pulls electron density away, making the positive charge more intense and less stable.
    • CHBrX2X+\ce{CHBr2+}: Two Br atoms pull even more electron density away, further destabilising the ion.
    • CBrX3X+\ce{CBr3+}: Three Br atoms exert the strongest electron-withdrawing pull, making this the most unstable carbocation in the series.
  3. Conclusion. The stability decreases as the number of bromine atoms increases. The most stable species is the one with the fewest electron-withdrawing groups. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.