Skip to content

Chemistry · Ch 2 — Quantum Mechanical Model of Atom

Energies of orbitals

2.5.2

Energies of orbitals

The hydrogen atom: one electron, energy depends only on nn. For hydrogen, since only a single electron is present, its energy in the nnth orbit is fixed entirely by the formula En=−(1312.8 Z2/n2)E_n=-\left(1312.8\,Z^2/n^2\right) kJ mol−1^{-1} (with Z=1Z=1) - and notice that this expression contains no dependence on ll or mm at all. That means every orbital sharing the same nn has exactly the same energy in hydrogen, regardless of its subshell: the energy ordering runs

1s<2s=2p<3s=3p=3d<4s=4p=4d=4f<5s=5p=5d=5f<6s=6p=6d=6f<7s1s<2s=2p<3s=3p=3d<4s=4p=4d=4f<5s=5p=5d=5f<6s=6p=6d=6f<7s

The 1s orbital, being lowest in energy, is the one the electron occupies in hydrogen's normal, unexcited state - the ground state. If the electron absorbs energy and jumps up to 2s, 2p or any higher orbital, the atom is said to be in an excited state.

Multi-electron atoms: the (n + l) rule. This tidy picture only holds because hydrogen has exactly one electron. In every other atom, the Schrödinger equation must account for electron-electron repulsion as well as nuclear attraction, which makes it far too complicated to solve exactly - so orbital energies in multi-electron atoms are instead ranked using an empirical guideline called the (n + l) rule: the lower the value of (n+l)(n+l) for a given orbital, the lower its energy; and if two orbitals happen to share the same (n+l)(n+l) value, the one with the smaller nn has the lower energy. Table 2.2 lists (n+l)(n+l) for every orbital from 1s up to 7s, and working through the table systematically in order of increasing (n+l)(n+l) (breaking ties by smaller nn) reproduces the real filling order for multi-electron atoms:

1s<2s<2p<3s<3p<4s<3d<4p<5s<4d<5p<6s<4f<5d<6p<7s<5f<6d1s<2s<2p<3s<3p<4s<3d<4p<5s<4d<5p<6s<4f<5d<6p<7s<5f<6d

Notice the famous case buried in this list: 4s4s (with n+l=4n+l=4) comes out lower in energy than 3d3d (with n+l=5n+l=5), even though 3d3d has the smaller principal quantum number - which is exactly why, as later sections show, the 4s orbital fills before the 3d orbital despite "3" being smaller than "4."

Degenerate orbitals. The three p orbitals of any given subshell - pxp_x, pyp_y and pzp_z - all have exactly the same energy as one another; orbitals that share identical energy like this are called degenerate. That degeneracy is a consequence of empty space having no preferred direction; switching on an external magnetic or electric field breaks that directional symmetry and lifts the degeneracy, splitting the previously identical energies apart (this is, again, the physical origin of the Zeeman and Stark effects).

Effective nuclear charge and the s < p < d < f ordering. Inside a multi-electron atom, an electron feels two competing electrostatic forces at once: the attractive pull of the positively charged nucleus, and the repulsive push of every other electron around it. The net pull actually experienced, after accounting for this partial cancellation, is called the effective nuclear charge. How much "shielding" an electron experiences from the other electrons depends on the shape of its own orbital, and it turns out that shielding grows steadily weaker (so effective nuclear charge grows steadily stronger) in the order s>p>d>fs>p>d>f within one given principal shell. Since a larger effective nuclear charge always means a more tightly bound, lower-energy, more stable orbital, this directly implies the energy ordering

s<p<d<f(within a given value of n)s<p<d<f\qquad\text{(within a given value of }n\text{)} …

Table 2.2(n + l) values of different orbitals
Orbitalnln + l
1s101
2s202
2p213
3s303
3p314
3d325
4s404
4p415
4d426
4f437
5s505
5p516
5d527
5f538
Figure 2.11Energy levels of atomic orbitals (multi-electron atom)

What this figure shows. A vertical energy-level ladder with orbital labels placed at increasing height for increasing energy: 1s lowest, then 2s, then 2p at essentially the same height as each other but above 1s, then 3s, 3p close together, then 4s placed BELOW 3d (illustrating the famous 4s-before-3d filling anomaly), then 4p, 5s, 4d close together, then 6s placed below 4f and 5d, then 6p, and 7s and 5f, 6d shown crowded together near the top. The staggered, overlapping placement of the bands - rather than a tidy shell-by-shell staircase - is the single picture that visually justifies why the (n+l) rule, and not simple increasing n, is needed to get the real …