Skip to content

Physics · Ch 4 — Electromagnetic Induction and Alternating Current

Mutual Inductance Between Two Long Co-axial Solenoids

4.3.4

Mutual Inductance Between Two Long Co-axial Solenoids

Working through the specific geometry of two long, co-axial solenoids of the same length l, with cross-sectional areas A1>A2A_1>A_2 (solenoid 1 the larger, outer one; solenoid 2 the smaller, inner one) and turn densities n1n_1 and n2n_2, gives an explicit formula for their mutual inductance and confirms M12=M21M_{12}=M_{21} for this concrete case. Current i1i_1 in solenoid 1 produces field B1=μ0n1i1B_1=\mu_0 n_1 i_1; because solenoid 2 sits INSIDE solenoid 1, the full field B1B_1 threads solenoid 2's own (smaller) cross-sectional area A2A_2, giving flux per turn Φ21=B1A2=μ0n1i1A2\Phi_{21}=B_1A_2=\mu_0n_1i_1A_2 and total flux linkage N2Φ21=(n2l)(μ0n1i1A2)=μ0n1n2A2l i1N_2\Phi_{21}=(n_2l)(\mu_0n_1i_1A_2)=\mu_0n_1n_2A_2l\,i_1. Comparing with N2Φ21=M21i1N_2\Phi_{21}=M_{21}i_1 gives

M21=μ0n1n2A2l(4.13)M_{21} = \mu_0 n_1 n_2 A_2 l \qquad (4.13)

Working the reverse direction: current i2i_2 in solenoid 2 produces field B2=μ0n2i2B_2=\mu_0n_2i_2, uniform inside solenoid 2 but essentially zero outside it, so for solenoid 1 the EFFECTIVE overlap area is still the smaller area A2A_2 (not A1A_1), even though solenoid 1's own physical cross-section is larger. This gives flux per turn of solenoid 1, Φ12=B2A2=μ0n2i2A2\Phi_{12}=B_2A_2=\mu_0n_2i_2A_2, and total flux linkage N1Φ12=(n1l)(μ0n2i2A2)=μ0n1n2A2l i2N_1\Phi_{12}=(n_1l)(\mu_0n_2i_2A_2)=\mu_0n_1n_2A_2l\,i_2, giving

M12=μ0n1n2A2l(4.14)M_{12} = \mu_0 n_1 n_2 A_2 l \qquad (4.14)

Comparing equations (4.13) and (4.14) directly confirms

M12=M21=M(4.15)M_{12}=M_{21}=M \qquad (4.15)

so the general mutual inductance of two long coaxial solenoids is

M=μ0n1n2A2l(4.16)M = \mu_0 n_1 n_2 A_2 l \qquad (4.16) …

Figure 4.22Mutual inductance of two long co-axial solenoids

What this figure shows. Two solenoids of the same length l share a common axis, with 'Solenoid 1 of N1N_1 turns' shown as the larger-diameter outer winding (cross-sectional area A1A_1) and 'Solenoid 2 of N2N_2 turns' shown as the smaller-diameter inner winding (cross-sectional area A2<A1A_2 < A_1), nested coaxially one inside the other. The figure sets up the key geometric fact the derivation relies on: because solenoid 2's field is essentially confined to its own (smaller) cross-section, only the smaller area A2A_2 is the EFFECTIVE overlap area for flux linkage between the two solenoids in either direction, regardless of how much larger A1A_1 is -- this is exactly why the final mutual inductance formula …

Misc Example 4.13Mutual inductance of two coplanar coaxial circular coils

Worked out. Two coplanar, coaxial circular coils A (radius 20 cm, 200 turns) and B (radius 2 cm, 1000 turns) are placed with a common axis, and the mutual inductance, along with the induced emf in B and the rate of change of flux through B, are required when the current in A changes from 2 A to 6 A in 0.04 s. Because coil B is much smaller and sits at the centre of coil A, the field of A at that centre, BA=μ0NAiA/(2rA)B_A=\mu_0 N_A i_A/(2r_A), can be treated as uniform over B's small area; the flux linkage of B due to A works out to NBΦBA≈7.89×10−4 iAN_B\Phi_{BA}\approx7.89\times10^{-4}\,i_A Wb-turns, giving mutual inductance M≈7.89×10−4M\approx7.89\times10^{-4} H. With diA=4di_A=4 A over dt=0.04dt=0.04 s, the induced emf is εB=M diA/dt=(7.89×10−4)(4/0.04)≈78.9\varepsilon_B = M\,di_A/dt = (7.89\times10^{-4})(4/0.04) \approx 78.9 mV, and since εB\varepsilon_B IS d(NBΦB)/dtd(N_B\Phi_B)/dt by definition, the rate of change of flux linkage through B is likewise 78.9 mWb/s. The problem shows the same c …