Imagine hiking in a mountain range. You reach a point where, for a few steps in any direction, the ground drops away. You may not be the highest peak in the whole range, but right here every step goes downhill. That's a local maximum: a point higher than all nearby points.
The Intuition First
On a smooth, wavy curve, a local maximum is a "hilltop" — a point where the function peaks, then falls on both sides. Zoom in and the values just to the left and right are both lower.
"Local" means "in a small neighbourhood." The function might have higher values elsewhere (a global maximum), but that doesn't matter — a local maximum is king of its own tiny kingdom.
The Precise Mathematical Statement
Let f be a real-valued function on a domain D⊆R. A point c∈D is a local maximum if there exists some δ>0 such that for every x in the domain within distance δ of c:
f(x)≤f(c)
That is, on some open interval (c−δ,c+δ), f(c) is the largest value.
Note
The inequality is f(x)≤f(c), not f(x)<f(c). If equality holds for some x=c (a flat plateau), it's still a local maximum — just not a strict one.
The First Derivative Test
If f is differentiable at c and c is a local maximum, then:
f′(c)=0
This is the critical point condition — the tangent is horizontal. But f′(c)=0 is necessary, not sufficient: a horizontal tangent could also be a local minimum or a saddle point (like f(x)=x3 at x=0).
Watch out
A common mistake: assuming f′(c)=0 guarantees a local extremum. It does not. Check the sign change of the derivative around c, or use the second derivative test.
The Second Derivative Test
If f′(c)=0 and f′′(c)<0, then c is a local maximum: a negative second derivative means f is concave down at c — curving down like an upside-down bowl. If f′′(c)>0, it's a local minimum. If f′′(c)=0, the test is inconclusive.
For a function to attain its maximum at an interior point of a closed interval, the derivative must be zero there (Fermat’s theorem). Setting f′(1)=0 gives a=120, and checking the second derivative confirms it’s a local maximum.
We have a quartic polynomial
f(x)=x4−62x2+ax+9
and we are told that on the interval [0,2], the maximum value occurs at x=1. Since 1 lies strictly inside (0,2), this is an interior maximum.
Why the derivative must be zero
If a differentiable function has a local maximum at an interior point of an interval, the tangent line there must be horizontal — that is, the first derivative is zero. This is Fermat’s theorem (the interior critical point condition). It does not guarantee a maximum (it could be a minimum or a saddle), but it is a necessary condition.
So the first step is always: set f′(1)=0.
Watch out
A common mistake is to forget that the maximum is given to be at x=1, so you don’t need to compare endpoints yet. The condition f′(1)=0 is forced by the problem statement — you are not finding the maximum, you are using the fact that it occurs at 1.
Step-by-step
Differentiate
f′(x)=4x3−124x+a
Apply the condition
Since x=1 is a point of maximum, f′(1)=0:
4(1)3−124(1)+a=0⇒4−124+a=0
a=120
So a=120 is forced.
Verify it’s actually a maximum (second derivative test)
f′′(x)=12x2−124
At x=1:
f′′(1)=12−124=−112<0
A negative second derivative means the curve is concave down at x=1, confirming a local maximum.
Check that this local maximum is indeed the global maximum on [0,2]
Since the interval is small and the polynomial is continuous, the global maximum on a closed interval occurs either at a critical point or at an endpoint. …
Method: Interior Extremum ⇒ First Derivative Vanishes (Fermat's Condition)
This method solves problems where you're told a function attains a maximum (or minimum) at a specific interior point of an interval, and asked to find an unknown constant in the function.
Steps
Step 1: Confirm the given point is interior, not an endpoint
Fermat's theorem says that if a differentiable function has a local extremum at an interior point c of its domain, then f′(c)=0. This only holds for interior points — if the stated extremum were at an endpoint of a closed interval, the derivative there need not vanish. So the first check is always: is the point strictly between the interval's endpoints?
Step 2: Differentiate the function in general form
Differentiate f(x) term by term, keeping any unknown constant (here a) as a symbol — do not substitute numbers yet.
Step 3: Substitute the given point and set the derivative to zero …
Mistake 1: Treating f′(c)=0 as optional or skipping straight to guessing a
Why it's wrong: the entire problem hinges on Fermat's necessary condition for an interior extremum — without recognizing x=1 is interior to (0,2) and setting f′(1)=0, there's no way to pin down a algebraically. Correct approach: always differentiate first, then substitute the given point into f′(x)=0.
Mistake 2: Sign or power-rule slip while differentiating −62x2
Why it's wrong: a rushed differentiation can turn −62x2 into −62x (dropping the power rule) or −124x into +124x (sign slip), both of which silently change the value of a. Correct approach: differentiate term by term carefully — dxd(−62x2)=−124x — and double-check by re-differentiating.
Mistake 3: Forgetting the maximum could also need endpoint comparison …
Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.
TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQ
Q.α,β,γ are the roots of the equation 8x3−42x2+63x−27=0. If β<γ<α and β,γ,α are in geometric progression, then the extreme value of the expression γx2+4βx+α is
(A) 43
(B) 3
(C) 23
(D) 421
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the given cubic and the condition that the roots are in geometric progression, we find the specific roots, then compute the extreme (minimum) value of the quadratic γx2+4βx+α, which turns out to be 23.
Concept & Intuition
We have a cubic whose roots are α,β,γ with β<γ<α and they form a geometric progression. That means there is a common ratio r such that β=a, γ=ar, α=ar2 (or any cyclic ordering). The cubic’s coefficients give us symmetric sums of the roots, so we can solve for a and r. Once we know the actual numbers, the quadratic γx2+4βx+α becomes a concrete expression whose extreme value (since the coefficient of x2 is positive, it’s a minimum) can be found by completing the square or using the vertex formula.
Step-by-step solution
Set up the geometric progression
Let the three roots be β=t, γ=tr, α=tr2, where t>0 (since β<γ<α and all are real). The cubic is 8x3−42x2+63x−27=0.
Use Vieta’s formulas
For a cubic ax3+bx2+cx+d=0, the sum of roots =−b/a, sum of pairwise products =c/a, product =−d/a. Here:
Q.f(x)=x2−2(4K−1)x+g(K)>0∀x∈R and for K∈(a,b). If
g(K)=15K2−2K−7, then
f(x)=x2−2(4K−1)x+g(K)>0∀x∈R and K∈(a,b). g(K)=15K2−2K−7
(A) g(K) attains its maximum at the midpoint of (a,b)
(B) g(K) attains its minimum at two points in (a,b)
(C) g(K) attains its both maximum and minimum in (a,b)
(D) g(K) attains no maximum and no minimum in (a,b)
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a quadratic to be positive for all real x, its discriminant must be negative. This forces K into an interval (a,b). On that interval, g(K)=15K2−2K−7 is a convex parabola, so it attains a minimum at its vertex (which lies inside the interval) but no maximum — the correct option is (D).
The key idea: f(x)>0 for all real x means the quadratic opens upward (which it does, since the coefficient of x2 is 1>0) and never touches the x-axis. That happens exactly when its discriminant is negative.
Write the discriminant condition
For f(x)=x2−2(4K−1)x+g(K), the discriminant is
Δ=[−2(4K−1)]2−4⋅1⋅g(K)=4(4K−1)2−4g(K).
Factor the 4:
Δ=4[(4K−1)2−g(K)].
We need Δ<0, so
(4K−1)2−g(K)<0.
Substitute g(K)
Given g(K)=15K2−2K−7, we have
(4K−1)2−(15K2−2K−7)<0.
Expand (4K−1)2=16K2−8K+1, so
16K2−8K+1−15K2+2K+7<0.
Simplify:
(16K2−15K2)+(−8K+2K)+(1+7)=K2−6K+8<0.
Solve the inequality for K
Factor:
K2−6K+8=(K−2)(K−4)<0.
This quadratic in K opens upward and is negative between its roots. Hence
2<K<4.
So the interval (a,b)=(2,4).
Analyze g(K) on (2,4)g(K)=15K2−2K−7 is a quadratic with leading coefficient 15>0, so it is convex (opens upward).
Its vertex occurs at
K=2⋅15−(−2)=302=151≈0.0667.
This vertex lies far left of the interval (2,4).
On (2,4), the function is strictly increasing (since the vertex is to the left). Therefore:
The minimum on the open interval is approached as K→2+ (but not attained, since K=2 is not included).
The maximum is approached as K→4− (also not attained). …
Q.If x and y are two positive integers such that x+2y=10 and x2y3 is maximum then x2+2y3=
(A) 34
(B) 137
(C) 43
(D) 70
›Reveal solutionSolution
We treat x2y3 as a function of a single variable using the constraint x+2y=10, maximise it with calculus, then compute x2+2y3 for the optimal pair. The answer is 43.
The problem asks for the value of x2+2y3 when x2y3 is maximised, given x and y are positive integers satisfying x+2y=10. The constraint is linear, so we can express x in terms of y (or vice versa) and turn the product into a function of one variable. Then we maximise that function — but because x and y are integers, we must check integer points near the continuous maximum.
Express x in terms of y.
From x+2y=10, we get x=10−2y. Since x>0, we need 10−2y>0⇒y<5. Also y>0, so y can be 1,2,3,4.
Write the function to maximise.
Let f(y)=x2y3=(10−2y)2y3.
We want the integer y in {1,2,3,4} that makes f(y) largest.
Find the continuous maximum (to guide us).
Differentiate f(y) with respect to y (treating y as a real variable).
f(y)=(10−2y)2y3=(100−40y+4y2)y3=100y3−40y4+4y5.
f′(y)=300y2−160y3+20y4=20y2(15−8y+y2).
Set f′(y)=0: y=0 (not positive) or y2−8y+15=0.
Solve: y=28±64−60=28±2, so y=5 or y=3.
y=5 gives x=0, not positive. So the only positive critical point is y=3.
Check the sign of f′(y) around y=3: for y<3 (say y=2), f′(2)=20⋅4(15−16+4)=80⋅3>0; for y>3 (say y=4), f′(4)=20⋅16(15−32+16)=320⋅(−1)<0. So y=3 gives a local maximum for the continuous function.
Q.x and y are two positive integers such that 2x+3y=50. If x2y3 is maximum for x=α and y=β, then 2α+5β=
(A) 10
(B) 310
(C) 5
(D) 7
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the maximum of x2y3 under the linear constraint 2x+3y=50 with positive integers x,y. Using the AM–GM inequality, the maximum occurs when x/2 and y/3 are in proportion to the exponents, giving x=10, y=10, so α/2+β/5=5+2=7. The correct option is (D).
Concept & Intuition
We want to maximize x2y3 given 2x+3y=50, with x,y>0 (integers, but we can first treat them as reals and then check integer feasibility). The exponents (2 and 3) suggest using the weighted AM–GM inequality: for positive numbers, the product is maximized when terms are proportional to their weights. Here, rewrite the constraint as a sum of five terms: two copies of x and three copies of y, each with coefficients that match the exponents. Then AM–GM gives the condition for maximum directly.
Step-by-step solution
Set up the weighted AM–GM
We want to maximize x2y3. Notice that 2x+3y=50 can be seen as the sum of five numbers: x,x,y,y,y. The AM–GM inequality says:
Q.The number of values of θ lying in [0,2π] for which sin3θ attains its maximum when
[!FORMULA]
sinθsin(3π−θ)sin(3π+θ)≤81
is
(A) 4
(B) 2
(C) 6
(D) 8
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to simplify the product sinθsin(π/3−θ)sin(π/3+θ) to 41sin3θ.
The inequality then becomes ∣sin3θ∣≤21, and the maximum of sin3θ is 1.
Counting solutions in [0,2π] where sin3θ=1 and ∣sin3θ∣≤21 gives 2 values.
The correct option is (B).
We start with the inequality
sinθsin(3π−θ)sin(3π+θ)≤81.
Concept & Intuition
The product of three sines with angles spaced by 60∘ is a classic identity: it simplifies to 41sin3θ. Why? Because sin3θ=3sinθ−4sin3θ, but the triple-angle identity also emerges from combining these three factors. Once we rewrite the product, the inequality becomes a condition on sin3θ. The problem then asks: for which θ does sin3θ reach its maximum value of 1while also satisfying that inequality? So we find all θ where sin3θ=1 and check if they meet ∣sin3θ∣≤21 — but wait, that seems contradictory. Let’s work carefully.
This identity is a special case of sinxsin(60∘−x)sin(60∘+x)=41sin3x. Memorizing it saves time.
Step 2: Rewrite the inequality
The given inequality becomes
41sin3θ≤81⟹∣sin3θ∣≤21.
Step 3: Interpret “attains its maximum”
The function sin3θ has maximum value 1. The problem asks for the number of θ in [0,2π] such that sin3θ=1and the inequality holds.
But if sin3θ=1, then ∣sin3θ∣=1, which is not≤21. So no θ with sin3θ=1 satisfies the inequality? That would give 0 values, which isn’t among the options. …