Q.Convert 40∘20′ into radian measure.
Concept understanding — Angle Conversion
Angle Conversion: Why We Need It, and How It Works
Imagine you're measuring the length of a table. You could use centimetres, inches, or feet — all are valid, but the number changes depending on which unit you pick. The same idea applies to angles. An angle is a measure of rotation or opening between two lines, and we have different units to describe that same physical turn.
The two most important units you'll meet are degrees and radians. Degrees are what you likely already know: a full circle is 360∘. Radians are less familiar but far more natural in mathematics — they're based on the geometry of the circle itself.
The Intuition: What Is a Radian?
Take a circle of radius r. Now walk along the circumference a distance equal to r. The angle you've swept out at the centre is 1 radian.
A radian is the angle that subtends an arc length equal to the radius.
If the arc length s=r, then the angle θ=1 radian.
So radians directly connect the angle to the arc length:
θ (in radians)=rs
This is why radians are the "natural" unit — they come from the circle's own geometry, not an arbitrary number like 360.
The Key Relationship
A full circle is 360∘. In radians, a full circle is the circumference divided by the radius:
r2πr=2π radians
So the fundamental conversion is:
360∘=2π radians
From this, you get the two conversion factors you'll use constantly:
1∘=180π radians
1 radian=π180∘
How to Convert: Two Simple Steps
Degrees to radians: Multiply by 180π.
Example: Convert 60∘ to radians.
60∘×180π=18060π=3π radians
Radians to degrees: Multiply by π180∘.
Example: Convert 65π radians to degrees.
65π×π180∘=65×180∘=150∘
Memorise these common conversions — they appear constantly:
0∘=0, 30∘=6π, 45∘=4π, 60∘=3π, 90∘=2π, 180∘=π, 270∘=23π, 360∘=2π
Why Bother With Radians?
Degrees are fine for everyday use (a right angle is 90∘, easy). But in calculus, physics, and advanced trigonometry, radians are essential. Here's why:
- The derivative of sinx is cosx only if x is in radians. In degrees, you'd get an ugly constant factor.
- Arc length and area formulas become simple: s=rθ, A=21r2θ — these only work with radians.
- Many natural phenomena (like oscillations, waves, circular motion) are described cleanly using radians.
When you see trigonometric functions in calculus or physics problems, assume the angle is in radians unless explicitly stated otherwise. Using degrees will give wrong answers.
A Quick Reference Table
| Degrees | Radians (exact) | Radians (approx) |
|---|---|---|
| 0∘ | 0 | 0 |
| 30∘ | 6π | 0.524 |
| 45∘ | 4π | 0.785 |
| 60∘ | 3π | 1.047 |
| 90∘ | 2π | 1.571 |
| 180∘ | π | 3.142 |
| 270∘ | 23π | 4.712 |
| 360∘ | 2π | 6.283 |
The Bottom Line
Angle conversion is just changing units — like converting metres to feet. The key is remembering that 360∘=2π radians. Practice converting a few angles both ways, and it becomes second nature. In exams, always check which unit the problem expects, and if you're using a calculator, make sure it's in the correct mode (DEG or RAD).
Converting between degrees and radians is one of the first skills established in the NCERT Class 11 Mathematics chapter on Trigonometric Functions, and "degree to radian conversion formula and examples" is a heavily searched revision topic for CBSE boards and JEE Main/NEET preparation. Since calculus formulas only hold true in radians, this conversion is a prerequisite that appears repeatedly in "trigonometry important questions" across competitive exams.
The key idea is Angle Conversion: degrees and minutes must first be combined into a pure decimal degree, then multiplied by 180π to get radians.
Step 1: Convert the minutes to degrees.
Since 1′=601∘, we have 20′=6020∘=31∘.
Step 2: Add to the whole degrees.
40∘+31∘=3120∘+31∘=3121∘.
Step 3: Multiply by the conversion factor 180π.
3121×180π=540121π radians.
The radian measure is 540121π.
To convert an angle from degrees and minutes to radians, first express it as a pure decimal degree, then multiply by 180π. For 40∘20′, this gives 540121π radians.
The key idea is simple: radian measure is just another way to describe an angle, based on the radius of a circle. One full revolution (360∘) equals 2π radians, so the conversion factor is 180π radians per degree. But here, the angle isn't given as a clean decimal — it's 40∘ plus 20 minutes. Minutes are a subdivision of a degree: 1′=601∘. So the first step is always to convert the minutes into a decimal part of a degree.
Let's work through it.
-
Convert minutes to degrees.
Since 1′=601∘, we have 20′=20×601∘=6020∘=31∘.
-
Write the total angle in degrees.
40∘20′=40∘+31∘=3120∘+31∘=3121∘.
-
Apply the conversion factor to get radians.
Multiply by 180π:
3121∘×180π=3×180121π=540121π.
- Simplify if possible. Check if 121 and 540 share any common factors. 121=112, and 540=22×33×5. No common factors, so the fraction is already in simplest form.
A common mistake is to forget that minutes are not decimal degrees. 20′ is not 0.20∘ — it's 0.333...∘. Always divide minutes by 60.
If you prefer, you can combine steps: 40∘20′=(40+6020)∘=3121∘, then multiply by 180π. The result is 540121π.
The radian measure is 540121π.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.If ω is the complex cube root of unity, then (−2+2i3−i)20= (A) ω (B) ω−ω2 (C) ω2 (D) −ω
›Reveal solutionSolution
To evaluate the complex expression raised to a power, we first convert the numerator and denominator into polar form. Then, we perform the division and apply De Moivre's Theorem for the power. The final result simplifies to −ω.
The most effective way to handle powers of complex numbers, especially when they are in a fractional form, is to convert them into their polar form. This allows us to use De Moivre's Theorem, which simplifies the process of raising a complex number to a power and also makes division straightforward. We will then relate the final result to the complex cube roots of unity.
Here's how we approach this problem:
- Convert the numerator to polar form: Let z1=3−i. The real part is x1=3 and the imaginary part is y1=−1. The modulus r1 is given by r1=x12+y12.
r1=(3)2+(−1)2=3+1=4=2
The argument $\theta_1$ is found using $\tan\theta_1 = \frac{y_1}{x_1} = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{3}}$. Since $x_1 > 0$ and $y_1 < 0$, $z_1$ lies in the fourth quadrant. The principal argument is $\theta_1 = -\frac{\pi}{6}$. So, $z_1 = 2\left(\cos\left(-\frac{\pi}{6}\right) + i\sin\left(-\frac{\pi}{6}\right)\right)$.2. Convert the denominator to polar form:
Let z2=−2+2i.
The real part is x2=−2 and the imaginary part is y2=2.
The modulus r2 is given by r2=x22+y22.
r2=(−2)2+(2)2=2+2=4=2
The argument $\theta_2$ is found using $\tan\theta_2 = \frac{y_2}{x_2} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{-\sqrt{2}} = -1$. Since $x_2 < 0$ and $y_2 > 0$, $z_2$ lies in the second quadrant. The principal argument is $\theta_2 = \pi - \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{3\pi}{4}$. So, $z_2 = 2\left(\cos\left(\frac{3\pi}{4}\right) + i\sin\left(\frac{3\pi}{4}\right)\right)$.3. Divide the complex numbers in polar form:
Let Z=z2z1. When dividing complex numbers in polar form, we divide their moduli and subtract their arguments.
Z=r2r1(cos(θ1−θ2)+isin(θ1−θ2))
Z=22(cos(−6π−43π)+isin(−6π−43π))
Calculate the argument:−6π−43π=−122π−129π=−1211π
So, $Z = \cos\left(-\frac{11\pi}{12}\right) + i\sin\left(-\frac{11\pi}{12}\right)$.4. Apply De Moivre's Theorem for the power:
We need to calculate Z20.
> [!FORMULA]
> De Moivre's Theorem states that for any complex number z=r(cosθ+isinθ) and any integer n,
> zn=rn(cos(nθ)+isin(nθ)).
In our case, $r=1$ and $n=20$.Z20=(cos(−1211π)+isin(−1211π))20
Z20=cos(20⋅(−1211π))+isin(20⋅(−1211π))
Z20=cos(−12220π)+isin(−12220π)
Simplify the angle:−12220π=−355π
To find the principal argument, we can add multiples of $2\pi$:−355π=−354π−3π=−18π−3π
Since $\cos(\theta + 2k\pi) = \cos\theta$ and $\sin(\theta + 2k\pi) = \sin\theta$ for any integer $k$, we can write:cos(−18π−3π)+isin(−18π−3π)=cos(−3π)+isin(−3π)
Using the identities $\cos(-x) = \cos x$ and $\sin(-x) = -\sin x$:Z20=cos(3π)−isin(3π)
Substitute the values of $\cos(\pi/3)$ and $\sin(\pi/3)$:Z20=21−i23
-
Relate the result to complex cube roots of unity:
The complex cube roots of unity are 1,ω,ω2.
We know that ω=ei2π/3=cos(32π)+isin(32π)=−21+i23.
And ω2=ei4π/3=cos(34π)+isin(34π)=−21−i23.
Our result is 21−i23.
Let's check the options:
- (A) ω=−21+i23
- (B) ω−ω2=(−21+i23)−(−21−i23)=i3
- (C) ω2=−21−i23
- (D) −ω=−(−21+i23)=21−i23
Our calculated value matches −ω.
✓Final answerThe value of the expression is −ω.
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.The approximate value of sec59∘ obtained by taking 1∘=0.0174 and 3=1.732 is (A) 1.9849 (B) 1.8493 (C) 1.9397 (D) 1.9948
›Reveal solutionSolution
We approximate sec59∘ using a linear approximation (differential) of secx near 60∘, because 59∘ is close to 60∘ and we know sec60∘=2. The result is about 1.9397, matching option (C).
The key idea is that when we need the value of a trigonometric function at an angle close to one we know exactly, we can use the linear approximation (or differentials).
Here, 59∘ is just 1∘ less than 60∘, and we know sec60∘=2 exactly.
The derivative of secx tells us how fast secx changes near 60∘, so we can estimate the small drop from 2 to sec59∘.
- Convert the angle difference to radians Since calculus formulas require radians, we convert 1∘ to radians using the given approximation:
1∘=0.0174 radians.
So the change in angle is Δx=−0.0174 (negative because 59∘ is smaller than 60∘).
- Recall the derivative of secx
dxd(secx)=secxtanx.
This tells us the instantaneous rate of change of secx at any x.
- Evaluate the derivative at x=60∘ (in radians) First, 60∘=3π radians. We know:
sec60∘=cos60∘1=1/21=2,
tan60∘=3≈1.732.
Hence,
dxd(secx)x=60∘=2×1.732=3.464.
- Apply the linear approximation formula For a small change Δx,
sec(60∘+Δx)≈sec60∘+(dxdsecx)Δx.
Here Δx=−0.0174, so
sec59∘≈2+(3.464)(−0.0174).
- Compute the correction
3.464×0.0174=3.464×(1.74×10−2)=(3.464×1.74)×10−2.
First, 3.464×1.74:
- 3.464×1.7=5.8888
- 3.464×0.04=0.13856
- Sum = 6.02736 So 3.464×0.0174≈0.06027. Thus the correction is −0.06027.
- Final approximation
sec59∘≈2−0.06027=1.93973.
Rounded to four decimal places, this is 1.9397.
TipA common mistake is forgetting to convert degrees to radians before using the derivative. If you used Δx=−1 (in degrees), you'd get a wildly wrong answer. Always use radians for calculus.
Watch outAnother pitfall: using secx=1/cosx and approximating cos59∘ separately can introduce more error. The direct derivative method is cleaner and more accurate for small angles.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.