Q.On the basis of crystal field theory explain why Co(III) forms paramagnetic octahedral complex with weak field ligands whereas it forms diamagnetic octahedral complex with strong field ligands.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Crystal Field Splitting
Crystal Field Splitting: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you are a negatively charged electron sitting on a metal ion. All around you, the space is perfectly spherical — every direction feels the same. Your energy depends only on how far you are from the nucleus, not on which way you face.
Now imagine that six negative ions (or the negative ends of polar molecules) march in from the x, y, and z axes and stop close to you. Suddenly, the space around you is no longer uniform. If you try to move straight toward one of these approaching ions, you feel a strong repulsion — that path costs extra energy. If you move between the axes (say, along a diagonal), you feel less repulsion because you are farther from the incoming charges.
This is the core intuition: when ligands approach a metal ion, they break the spherical symmetry of the space around the metal. Different directions in space are no longer equivalent. Electrons in orbitals that point directly at the ligands get pushed up in energy; electrons in orbitals that point between the ligands stay lower.
The Precise Statement
Crystal Field Splitting is the splitting of degenerate d orbitals of a transition metal ion into two or more sets of different energies, caused by the electrostatic repulsion between the metal's d electrons and the negative charge (or dipole) of surrounding ligands.
For the most common geometry — octahedral — here is what happens:
- Six ligands sit at the corners of an octahedron, along the +x, −x, +y, −y, +z, −z axes.
- The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point their lobes directly along these axes. These are the eg set. They feel maximum repulsion → higher energy.
- The dxy, dxz, and dyz orbitals point their lobes between the axes (into the octahedral faces). These are the t2g set. They feel less repulsion → lower energy.
The energy gap between these two sets is denoted by Δo (or 10Dq). The t2g set drops by 0.4Δo and the eg set rises by 0.6Δo, keeping the average energy unchanged (the "barycentre" rule).
The labels eg and t2g come from group theory — they describe how the orbitals transform under the symmetry operations of an octahedron. You do not need to memorise the derivation, but the notation is standard in every exam.
Why This Matters
Crystal field splitting explains three things you will see repeatedly:
- Colour — electrons can jump from t2g to eg by absorbing visible light. The gap Δo determines the colour you see.
- Magnetism — if Δo is large, electrons pair up in the lower t2g set (low spin). If Δo is small, electrons spread out (high spin). This changes the number of unpaired electrons. …
Why this formula?
Crystal Field Splitting: Why the Energy Splitting Occurs
Crystal Field Theory (CFT) explains how the d-orbitals of a transition metal ion split in energy when placed in an electrostatic field created by surrounding ligands (anions or polar molecules). The key result is that five degenerate d-orbitals split into two or more sets with different energies. Let's understand why this happens.
1. The Starting Point: Degenerate d-Orbitals
In a free transition metal ion (no ligands), all five d-orbitals have the same energy (degenerate). Their shapes are:
- dxy, dxz, dyz — lobes lie between the x, y, z axes (called t2g set in octahedral symmetry)
- dx2−y2, dz2 — lobes point directly along the x, y, z axes (called eg set)
Key idea: The spatial orientation of each orbital determines how it interacts with approaching ligands.
2. The Octahedral Case: Why eg Orbitals Are Higher in Energy
Imagine six ligands approaching along the +x, –x, +y, –y, +z, –z axes (octahedral geometry).
What happens to dx2−y2 and dz2?
- Their lobes point directly at the ligands.
- The negatively charged ligands repel the electron density in these orbitals.
- This repulsion raises the energy of these orbitals — they become less stable (higher energy).
What happens to dxy, dxz, dyz?
- Their lobes point between the axes (e.g., dxy lobes lie in the xy-plane but at 45° to x and y).
- They avoid the ligands — less repulsion.
- Their energy is lower than the eg set.
The Splitting Pattern
Δoct=E(eg)−E(t2g)
Where:
- E(eg) = energy of dx2−y2 and dz2 (higher)
- E(t2g) = energy of dxy, dxz, dyz (lower)
- Δoct is called the crystal field splitting energy (CFSE)
Why the name? The eg orbitals are "doubly degenerate" (2 orbitals), t2g are "triply degenerate" (3 orbitals). The letters come from group theory symmetry labels.
3. The Energy Conservation Rule
The total energy of all five d-orbitals must remain constant (no energy is created or destroyed). So:
- The center of gravity (average energy) of the split set equals the original degenerate energy.
- For octahedral splitting:
- 2 eg orbitals go up by +0.6Δoct each
- 3 t2g orbitals go down by −0.4Δoct each
Check:
2×(+0.6Δ)+3×(−0.4Δ)=1.2Δ−1.2Δ=0
This conservation of energy is a fundamental constraint — the splitting is not arbitrary.
4. The Tetrahedral Case: Why It's Opposite and Smaller
In a tetrahedral complex, four ligands approach from alternate corners of a cube. The axes are different:
- The dxy, dxz, dyz orbitals now point closer to the ligands (more repulsion).
- The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point away from ligands (less repulsion).
Result:
- e set ( dx2−y2, dz2 ) — lower energy
- t2 set ( dxy, dxz, dyz ) — higher energy
The splitting is inverted compared to octahedral.
Magnitude:
Δtet≈94Δoct
Why smaller?
- Only 4 ligands (vs. 6) → less total repulsion.
- Ligands are not directly along axes → weaker interaction. …
The key idea is Crystal Field Splitting: in an octahedral field, the d orbitals split into lower-energy t2g and higher-energy eg sets. The magnitude of the splitting (Δo) depends on the ligand — weak field ligands give a small Δo, strong field ligands give a large Δo.
For Co3+, the electronic configuration is 3d6.
- Weak field (small Δo): The pairing energy (P) is larger than Δo. Electrons occupy all five d orbitals singly first (Hund's rule) before pairing. This gives the configuration t2g4eg2 — four unpaired electrons. …
Crystal field theory explains that the splitting of d-orbitals in an octahedral field (Δo) relative to the pairing energy (P) determines the electron configuration. For Co(III), weak field ligands give a high-spin, paramagnetic t2g4eg2 configuration, while strong field ligands give a low-spin, diamagnetic t2g6eg0 configuration.
The Core Idea: Crystal Field Splitting and Electron Configuration
Crystal field theory (CFT) is a model that explains the electronic structure of transition metal complexes. In an octahedral complex, the five d-orbitals are no longer degenerate. The dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (the eg set) point directly at the ligands and experience strong repulsion, raising their energy. The dxy, dxz, and dyz orbitals (the t2g set) point between the ligands and experience less repulsion, lowering their energy. The energy gap between these two sets is called the crystal field splitting energy, denoted by Δo (or 10Dq).
The key to understanding the magnetic behaviour of a d6 ion like Co(III) lies in a simple competition: the energy cost of pairing electrons (P) versus the energy gain from occupying the lower-energy t2g orbitals (Δo).
-
Identify the metal ion and its d-electron count. Cobalt in the +3 oxidation state, Co(III), has an electronic configuration of [Ar]3d6. This means we have six electrons to place in the d-orbitals of the octahedral complex.
-
Understand the two competing factors. When placing electrons into the split d-orbitals, two rules apply:
- Hund's rule: Electrons prefer to occupy different orbitals with parallel spins to minimise electron-electron repulsion.
- Aufbau principle: Electrons will first fill the lower-energy t2g orbitals. The conflict arises because placing an electron in a higher-energy eg orbital (following Hund's rule) costs energy Δo, while pairing two electrons in the same t2g orbital costs the pairing energy, P.
-
The decisive factor: Δo vs. P. The actual configuration adopted is the one that minimises the total energy of the system.
- If Δo<P (weak field): The energy cost of promoting an electron to the eg level is less than the cost of pairing. The system will maximise the number of unpaired electrons.
- If Δo>P (strong field): The energy cost of promoting an electron is greater than the cost of pairing. The system will minimise the number of unpaired electrons by pairing them in the t2g orbitals.
A common mistake is to think that the t2g set can hold a maximum of 6 electrons. This is true, but the order in which they are filled depends entirely on the ligand field strength. Don't just fill the t2g set first; always check if it's energetically favourable to promote an electron to eg instead.
- Apply to the weak field case (paramagnetic). With a weak field ligand (e.g., H2O, F−), Δo is small. The first three electrons go into the three t2g orbitals with parallel spins (t2g3). The fourth electron has a choice: pair in a t2g orbital (cost P) or go into an eg orbital (cost Δo). Since Δo<P, it is cheaper to promote the electron. So, the fourth electron goes into an eg orbital. The fifth and sixth electrons also follow Hund's rule, each occupying a separate orbital before pairing occurs. The final configuration is t2g3eg3. However, this is not the most stable arrangement. A more accurate filling is t2g4eg2, where the fourth electron pairs in the t2g set, and the fifth and sixth go to the eg set. This gives four unpaired electrons (two in t2g and two in eg). A substance with unpaired electrons is paramagnetic. …
Crystal Field Splitting — Method: Crystal Field Theory (CFT) for Octahedral Complexes
Why This Happens — The Core Idea
The difference arises because weak field ligands cause a small crystal field splitting (Δo), while strong field ligands cause a large splitting. This determines whether electrons pair up or remain unpaired in the t2g and eg orbitals.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Step 1: Identify the metal ion and its electron configuration
- Co(III) means Co3+ (atomic number 27, loses 3 electrons).
- Electronic configuration of Co: [Ar]3d74s2
- For Co3+: remove 3 electrons → [Ar]3d6
So, Co3+ has 6 d-electrons.
Step 2: Recall the octahedral splitting diagram
- In an octahedral field, the 5 d-orbitals split into:
- Lower energy: t2g (3 orbitals: dxy,dxz,dyz)
- Higher energy: eg (2 orbitals: dx2−y2,dz2)
- The energy gap between them is Δo (or 10Dq).
Step 3: Apply Hund's rule and pairing energy (P)
- Pairing energy (P) is the energy cost to put two electrons in the same orbital.
- The filling pattern depends on whether Δo>P or Δo<P.
Case 1: Weak Field Ligands (e.g., F−, H2O)
- Δo is small → Δo<P
- Electrons prefer to occupy all five orbitals singly before pairing (Hund's rule).
Filling for 6 electrons:
- Fill t2g: 3 electrons (one each) → 3 unpaired
- Next 3 electrons go into eg (one each) → 3 more unpaired
Result:
- Configuration: t2g3eg3
- 4 unpaired electrons → Paramagnetic
Case 2: Strong Field Ligands (e.g., CN−, CO)
- Δo is large → Δo>P …
Here is a breakdown of the common mistakes students make on this exact Crystal Field Theory (CFT) question, along with how to avoid them.
The Core Concept (The "Why")
Before listing mistakes, let's lock in the correct logic. This question tests your understanding of pairing energy (P) vs. crystal field splitting energy (Δo) .
- Identify the metal ion: Co(III) is d6 (Cobalt atomic number 27, Co3+ = 27 - 3 = 24 electrons, configuration [Ar]3d6).
- Weak field ligands (e.g., F−,H2O): Δo is small. Δo<P. Electrons follow Hund's rule (maximum multiplicity). They occupy all five d-orbitals singly before pairing. This gives 4 unpaired electrons → Paramagnetic.
- Strong field ligands (e.g., CN−,NH3): Δo is large. Δo>P. Electrons pair up in the lower energy t2g orbitals first. This gives 0 unpaired electrons → Diamagnetic.
Common Mistake #1: Confusing the Electron Count (d6 vs. d5)
- The Error: Students often treat Co(III) as d5 or d7, or forget that Co is in the +3 oxidation state. They might draw the diagram for Fe(III) or Co(II) instead.
- Why it happens: Rushing the electronic configuration. Co (atomic number 27) is tricky because it's near Fe (26) and Ni (28).
- How to Avoid:
- Write it down step-by-step:
- Co (atom) = [Ar]4s23d7
- Co3+ = Remove 3 electrons (2 from 4s, 1 from 3d) = [Ar]3d6
- Memorize the common dn configurations for 3d series: Cr3+ (d3), Mn2+ (d5), Fe3+ (d5), Co3+ (d6), Ni2+ (d8), Cu2+ (d9).
- Write it down step-by-step:
Common Mistake #2: Forgetting the "Pairing Energy" Condition
- The Error: Students simply state "weak field = high spin, strong field = low spin" without mentioning the comparison between Δo and P. They might say "strong field ligands cause pairing" but don't explain why.
- Why it happens: Memorizing the result without the reasoning. The exam specifically asks "on the basis of crystal field theory".
- How to Avoid:
- Always state the rule: "The electronic configuration depends on whether the crystal field splitting energy (Δo) is greater than or less than the pairing energy (P) ."
- Write the inequality:
- Weak field: Δo<P → High spin.
- Strong field: Δo>P → Low spin.
Common Mistake #3: Drawing the t2g and eg Orbitals Incorrectly
- The Error: Drawing the wrong number of electrons in the orbitals, or placing electrons in the eg set before filling the t2g set in the weak field case.
- Why it happens: Misunderstanding the order of filling. In an octahedral field, the t2g set (dxy,dxz,dyz) is always lower in energy than the eg set (dx2−y2,dz2).
- How to Avoid:
- Draw the energy level diagram carefully.
- For d6 weak field:
- Fill t2g with 3 electrons (one each, all parallel spins).
- Next electron goes to eg (Hund's rule).
- Next two electrons go to t2g and eg (one each, parallel spins).
- Result: t2g3eg3 (4 unpaired electrons).
- For d6 strong field:
- Fill t2g with 3 electrons (one each, parallel).
- Next 3 electrons pair up in t2g.
- Result: t2g6eg0 (0 unpaired electrons).
Common Mistake #4: Confusing "Paramagnetic" and "Diamagnetic" …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.Given below are two statements Statement-I: In the conversion of O2+ to O22+ bond length increases Statement-II: In the conversion of O2+ to O22+ magnetic property changes (A) Both statements I and II are correct (B) Statement I is correct, but statement II is not correct (C) Statement I is not correct, but statement II is correct (D) Both statements I and II are not correct
›Reveal solutionSolution
O2+ (bond order 2.5) → O22+ (bond order 3.0): bond order rises, so bond length decreases — Statement I is wrong. The species go from paramagnetic (1 unpaired e−) to diamagnetic (0 unpaired), so the magnetic property does change — Statement II is correct. Option (C).
Concept
Using MO theory, bond order=21(bonding−antibonding electrons). Neutral O2 has 16 electrons with the two highest in π∗ orbitals (singly occupied, hence paramagnetic). Removing electrons comes off these π∗ antibonding orbitals, which raises the bond order and shortens the bond.
Solution
- O2+ (15 e−): antibonding π∗ holds 1 electron.
B.O.=28−3=2.5,one unpaired e−⇒paramagnetic.
- O22+ (14 e−): both π∗ electrons removed. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.Given below are two statements Statement-I: The percent compositions of Ni2+ and Ni3+ in Ni0.98O is 96% and 4% respectively Statement-II: The fraction of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in 1 mole of Fe0.93O is 0.14 and 0.79 respectively (A) Both statements I and II are correct (B) Statement I is correct, but statement II is not correct (C) Statement I is not correct, but statement II is correct (D) Both statements I and II are not correct
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem tests the ability to compute the fraction of different oxidation states in a non-stoichiometric oxide using charge balance. For Ni₀.₉₈O, the given percentages (96% Ni²⁺, 4% Ni³⁺) are correct; for Fe₀.₉₃O, the given fractions (0.14 Fe³⁺, 0.79 Fe²⁺) are also correct. Hence both statements are true, and the correct option is (A).
Concept and Intuition
In a perfect ionic oxide like NiO or FeO, the metal ion is in the +2 state and the oxide ion is O²⁻, so the formula is exactly 1:1. But real crystals often have non-stoichiometry — missing some metal ions (cation vacancies). To keep the overall crystal electrically neutral, some of the remaining metal ions must adopt a higher oxidation state (+3 instead of +2) to compensate for the missing positive charge.
The key idea:
- Let the formula be M1−xO.
- There are 1−x metal ions per O²⁻.
- If a fraction f of those metal ions are M³⁺ and the rest (1−f) are M²⁺, then the total positive charge must exactly balance the −2 charge from O²⁻.
That gives one equation, which we solve for the fraction of M³⁺ (and hence M²⁺). This is a classic solid-state chemistry charge-balance problem.
Step-by-step solution
1. Set up the charge balance for Ni₀.₉₈O
The formula means: per oxide ion O²⁻, there are 0.98 nickel ions.
Let x = fraction of Ni ions that are Ni³⁺. Then the fraction that are Ni²⁺ is 1−x.
Total positive charge from nickel ions =
0.98×[3x+2(1−x)]=0.98×(2+x)
This must equal the negative charge from one O²⁻, which is 2.
So:
0.98(2+x)=2
2+x=0.982≈2.040816
x≈0.040816
Thus fraction of Ni³⁺ ≈ 0.0408 → 4.08%, and fraction of Ni²⁺ ≈ 0.9592 → 95.92%.
Statement-I says 96% and 4% — these are rounded values, perfectly acceptable. So Statement-I is correct.
2. Set up the charge balance for Fe₀.₉₃O
Per O²⁻, there are 0.93 iron ions.
Let y = fraction of Fe ions that are Fe³⁺. Then fraction Fe²⁺ = 1−y.
Total positive charge:
0.93×[3y+2(1−y)]=0.93×(2+y)
Set equal to 2:
0.93(2+y)=2
2+y=0.932≈2.150538
y≈0.150538
So fraction Fe³⁺ ≈ 0.1505, fraction Fe²⁺ ≈ 0.8495. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.The colour and magnetic nature of the compound formed, when MnO2 is fused with a mixture of KOH and KNO3 are respectively (A) Green, paramagnetic (B) Blue, paramagnetic (C) Green, diamagnetic (D) Violet, diamagnetic
›Reveal solutionSolution
Fusing MnO₂ with KOH and KNO₃ oxidises Mn(IV) to Mn(VI), forming the green manganate ion MnO₄²⁻, which has one unpaired electron and is paramagnetic — so the answer is (A).
The key here is recognising that the reaction is an oxidation in a strongly alkaline melt. MnO₂ (manganese in +4 oxidation state) is fused with KOH (base) and KNO₃ (a powerful oxidising agent). Under these conditions, Mn(IV) is oxidised further — not to Mn(VII) (purple permanganate), but to Mn(VI), because the alkaline melt stabilises the manganate ion, MnO₄²⁻. This ion is famously green in colour. Its electronic configuration (d¹) means it has one unpaired electron, making it paramagnetic.
Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.
- Identify the reaction type. Fusing MnO₂ with KOH and KNO₃ is a classic laboratory preparation of potassium manganate. The KNO₃ acts as the oxidising agent, converting Mn(IV) to Mn(VI). The balanced equation is:
MnO2+2KOH+KNO3→K2MnO4+KNO2+H2O
The product is potassium manganate, which contains the manganate ion, MnO42−.
-
Determine the colour.
The manganate ion MnO42− is well-known to be green in solution (and in the solid state). This is a distinctive property — permanganate (MnO4−) is purple, while manganate is green. So the colour is green.
-
Determine the magnetic nature.
In MnO42−, manganese is in the +6 oxidation state. The electronic configuration of Mn is [Ar]3d54s2. Removing six electrons (to get Mn⁶⁺) leaves a 3d1 configuration.
- A d¹ ion has one unpaired electron in the d-orbital.
- Any species with unpaired electrons is paramagnetic (attracted to a magnetic field). Therefore, the compound is paramagnetic.
-
Eliminate other options. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.In Lassaigne’s test, violet colour is formed when sodium fusion extract of an organic compound is treated with solution of X. What is X? (A) Pb(CH3COO)2 (B) Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO] (C) Na4[Fe(CN)6] (D) (NH4)2MoO4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The violet colour in Lassaigne’s test for nitrogen comes from the formation of Prussian blue when the sodium fusion extract is treated with sodium nitroprusside — the correct reagent is Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO], option (B).
The Lassaigne’s test is a classic qualitative analysis method used to detect elements like nitrogen, sulphur, and halogens in organic compounds. The key idea is that when an organic compound is fused with sodium metal, the elements present are converted into water-soluble ionic salts. For nitrogen, the fusion produces sodium cyanide (NaCN). The test then relies on a specific chemical reaction that gives a distinctive coloured product — in this case, a deep violet or blue colour.
The violet colour is not the final Prussian blue itself but an intermediate complex that forms when the cyanide ion reacts with a particular iron-containing reagent. The reagent must supply iron in a form that can combine with cyanide to produce the coloured complex. Among the options, only sodium nitroprusside (Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO]) contains iron in a suitable oxidation state and ligand environment to react with CN− from the fusion extract, yielding the characteristic violet colour.
Let’s go through the reasoning step by step.
- What happens in the sodium fusion? The organic compound is heated with sodium metal. If nitrogen is present, it forms sodium cyanide:
Na+C+N→NaCN
This NaCN dissolves in water when the fusion product is extracted, giving a solution containing cyanide ions.
-
The test for cyanide using sodium nitroprusside:
When the sodium fusion extract (containing CN−) is treated with sodium nitroprusside (Na2[Fe(CN)5 NO]), a reaction occurs that produces a violet-coloured complex. The exact complex formed is Na3[Fe(CN)5 NO CN] — a substitution product where the nitroso group (NO) is replaced by cyanide. This is the characteristic positive test for nitrogen.
-
Why the other options are wrong:
- (A) Pb(CH3COO)2: This is lead acetate, used to test for sulphur (black precipitate of PbS), not nitrogen. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The pairs of ions which exhibit same colour in aquated state are I. Fe2+, Ni2+ II. V2+, Cr2+ III. Cr2+, Cu2+ The correct answer is Options : (A) I, II only (B) II, III only (C) I, II, III (D) I, III only
›Reveal solutionSolution
The colour of an aquated transition-metal ion depends on the number of d-electrons and the crystal-field splitting. Ions with the same d-electron count often show similar colours. Here, Fe²⁺ (d⁶) and Ni²⁺ (d⁸) differ; V²⁺ (d³) and Cr²⁺ (d⁴) differ; Cr²⁺ (d⁴) and Cu²⁺ (d⁹) are both Jahn–Teller active and appear blue-green. Only pair III matches.
Concept & Intuition
In aqueous solution, transition-metal ions are surrounded by water ligands, creating an octahedral crystal field. The d-orbitals split into two sets: lower-energy t2g and higher-energy eg. When visible light is absorbed, electrons jump from t2g to eg, and the complementary colour is observed. The energy gap Δo depends on the metal ion’s charge and its position in the periodic table, but a key factor is the number of d-electrons. Ions with the same d-count often have similar absorption spectra and thus similar colours — but exceptions occur due to Jahn–Teller distortions or different oxidation states.
Let’s examine each pair.
-
Pair I: Fe²⁺ and Ni²⁺
- Fe²⁺ has the electron configuration [Ar]3d6. In an octahedral field, it is high-spin: t2g4eg2.
- Ni²⁺ has [Ar]3d8, giving t2g6eg2.
- These have different d-electron counts (d⁶ vs d⁸), so the crystal-field splitting and the number of d–d transitions differ. Fe²⁺ solutions are pale green, while Ni²⁺ solutions are bright green. They are not the same colour. → Pair I is incorrect.
-
Pair II: V²⁺ and Cr²⁺
- V²⁺ is d³: t2g3.
- Cr²⁺ is d⁴: in water it is high-spin, t2g3eg1.
- Different d-counts again. V²⁺ solutions are violet, Cr²⁺ solutions are blue. They are not the same colour. → Pair II is incorrect.
-
Pair III: Cr²⁺ and Cu²⁺
- Cr²⁺ is d⁴ (high-spin, t2g3eg1). …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.Identify the incorrect statement from the following? (A) ml designates the orientation of the orbital (B) The probability density of electron is expressed by ∣ψ∣3 (C) The total information about electron in atom is stored in its ψ (D) Total number of orbitals in a sub level is equal to (2l+1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks to identify the incorrect statement among four options about quantum numbers and orbitals. The wrong one is (B) because probability density is ∣ψ∣2, not ∣ψ∣3.
The key concept here is the Born interpretation of the wavefunction in quantum mechanics. The wavefunction ψ itself is not directly observable; it is a mathematical object that contains all information about the electron's state. However, the physical meaning comes from ∣ψ∣2, which gives the probability density of finding the electron at a given point in space. Any statement that misstates this exponent is automatically false.
Let’s examine each option step by step.
-
Option (A): "ml designates the orientation of the orbital."
This is correct. The magnetic quantum number ml can take integer values from −l to +l, and each value corresponds to a specific orientation of the orbital in space (e.g., px, py, pz for l=1).
-
Option (B): "The probability density of electron is expressed by ∣ψ∣3."
This is incorrect. According to Max Born’s statistical interpretation, the probability density is ∣ψ∣2 (the square of the magnitude of the wavefunction). The cube has no physical meaning in standard quantum mechanics. This is the classic trap — students sometimes misremember the exponent.
-
Option (C): "The total information about electron in atom is stored in its ψ." …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.The incorrect statement about crystals with Schottky defect is (A) It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points (B) On the whole crystal is electrically neutral (C) It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size (D) Density of the crystal increases
›Reveal solutionSolution
Schottky defect involves missing equal numbers of cations and anions, preserving neutrality and decreasing density; the incorrect statement is that density increases — so the answer is (D).
Concept and Intuition
Schottky defect is a type of point defect in ionic crystals. Imagine a perfect crystal lattice where every cation and anion sits in its assigned spot. In a Schottky defect, a pair of ions — one cation and one anion — simply vanish from their lattice sites, leaving behind vacancies. Because the numbers of missing positive and negative ions are equal, the crystal remains electrically neutral overall. This defect is common in ionic compounds where the cation and anion are similar in size (like NaCl), because the lattice can “afford” to lose both without collapsing. A key consequence: the crystal loses mass but its volume stays roughly the same, so its density decreases — not increases. That’s the trap in option (D).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
-
What is Schottky defect?
It is a vacancy defect where an equal number of cations and anions are missing from their lattice sites. This preserves the stoichiometry and electrical neutrality of the crystal.
Example: In NaCl, one Na⁺ and one Cl⁻ leave, creating two vacancies.
-
Check option (A):
“It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points.”
This is exactly the definition. So (A) is correct.
-
Check option (B):
“On the whole crystal is electrically neutral.”
Since equal numbers of positive and negative ions are removed, the net charge remains zero. So (B) is correct.
-
Check option (C):
“It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size.” …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.Noble gas ‘X’ is used as a diluent for oxygen in modern diving apparatus and noble gas ‘Y’ is used mainly to provide an inert atmosphere in high temperature metallurgical processes. ‘Y’ and ‘X’ are respectively? (A) Ar, Kr (B) He, Kr (C) He, Ar (D) Ar, He
›Reveal solutionSolution
Helium (He) is the diluent mixed with oxygen in diving apparatus, and argon (Ar) provides the inert atmosphere in high-temperature metallurgy. Since the question asks for 'Y and X' in that order — metallurgy gas first, then diving gas — the answer is Ar, He, option (D).
Concept & Intuition
Noble gases are prized for their chemical inertness, but each has distinct physical properties suited to particular applications.
- Helium (He) is extremely light and has very low solubility in blood, making it ideal for mixing with oxygen in deep-sea diving — it reduces the risk of decompression sickness ("the bends") and avoids nitrogen narcosis.
- Argon (Ar) is denser than air, cheap, and abundant (about 0.93% of the atmosphere). It forms a stable, non-reactive blanket that protects hot metals from oxidation during welding, casting, and other high-temperature metallurgical processes.
The question asks for "Y and X respectively" — so Y is the metallurgy gas and X is the diving diluent.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the diving diluent (X)
Modern diving apparatus mixes oxygen with a diluent to prevent oxygen toxicity and nitrogen narcosis. Helium is the standard choice — it is far less soluble in blood than nitrogen and does not cause narcosis. Argon and krypton are unsuitable (argon itself causes narcosis at depth; krypton is far too costly).
→ X = He
-
Identify the metallurgy gas (Y)
High-temperature metallurgical processes need an inert blanket to prevent oxidation. Argon is the standard choice for its low cost, abundance, and complete inertness. Krypton is far too expensive for this bulk use.
→ Y = Ar
-
Match to the options
"Y and X" means Y first, then X — so we need (Ar, He).
- (A) Ar, Kr → wrong (Kr is not the diving diluent) …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.The incorrect statement about crystals with Schottky defect is (A) On the whole crystal is electrically neutral (B) It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points (C) It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size (D) Density of the crystal increases
›Reveal solutionSolution
Schottky defect involves missing equal numbers of cations and anions, keeping the crystal neutral but decreasing its density. The incorrect statement is the one claiming density increases.
The key concept here is Schottky defect — a type of point defect in ionic crystals where a pair of one cation and one anion is missing from their lattice sites, creating vacancies. This defect preserves electrical neutrality because the missing ions are equal in number and opposite in charge. However, because atoms are removed, the mass of the crystal decreases while its volume remains nearly the same, so the density decreases — not increases. The question asks for the incorrect statement, so we need to spot the one that contradicts this behavior.
Let’s examine each option step by step:
-
Option (A): "On the whole crystal is electrically neutral"
This is correct. In Schottky defect, equal numbers of cations and anions are missing, so the net charge remains zero. The crystal as a whole stays electrically neutral.
-
Option (B): "It is due to missing of equal number of cations and anions from lattice points"
This is the very definition of Schottky defect. It is correct.
-
Option (C): "It is shown by ionic compounds in which cation and anion are of almost same size"
This is also correct. Schottky defect is common in compounds like NaCl, KCl, CsCl, where the cation and anion have similar ionic radii. This similarity allows the lattice to tolerate vacancies without collapsing. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.A metal (M), crystallizes in fcc lattice with edge length of 4.242 Å. What is the radius of M atom (in Å)? (A) 1.25 (B) 1.75 (C) 1.5 (D) 1.0
›Reveal solutionSolution
For an fcc lattice, the face diagonal equals four atomic radii; using the given edge length, the atomic radius is calculated as r=22a≈1.5A˚, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
In a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice, atoms touch along the face diagonal — not along the edge. The face diagonal spans from one corner atom to the opposite corner atom on the same square face. Along that diagonal, there are two half-atoms at the corners and one full atom at the face center, making a total of two full atomic diameters. So the face diagonal length equals 4r (where r is the atomic radius). Since the face diagonal of a cube of edge a is a2, we get the key relation:
a2=4r⇒r=22a.
Step-by-step solution
-
Identify the geometry
The metal crystallizes in an fcc lattice. In fcc, atoms are located at each corner and at the center of each face. The closest contact occurs between a corner atom and a face-centered atom — this distance is half the face diagonal.
-
Write the relation between edge length and radius
For fcc:
Face diagonal=a2=4r.
Therefore,
r=4a2=22a.
- Plug in the given edge length Edge length a=4.242A˚. r=224.242. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.The pair of ions with paramagnetic nature and same number of electrons is (A) Lu3+, Yb2+ (B) Eu3+, Pm2+ (C) Eu2+, Gd3+ (D) La3+, Ce4+
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to compare the electron configurations of lanthanide ions: paramagnetic ions have unpaired electrons, and the pair must also have the same number of electrons (be isoelectronic). Only one option satisfies both conditions.
Concept & Intuition
Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electrons. In lanthanides, the 4f subshell is being filled. When ions form, they typically lose the two 6s electrons and sometimes one 4f electron. To check paramagnetism, we count unpaired 4f electrons. To check “same number of electrons,” we compare total electron count (atomic number minus charge). The trick: many lanthanide ions have the same number of electrons but different configurations — only some are paramagnetic.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Determine electron counts for each ion
- Lu³⁺: Lu (Z=71) → 71 – 3 = 68 electrons.
- Yb²⁺: Yb (Z=70) → 70 – 2 = 68 electrons.
- Eu³⁺: Eu (Z=63) → 63 – 3 = 60 electrons.
- Pm²⁺: Pm (Z=61) → 61 – 2 = 59 electrons.
- Eu²⁺: Eu (Z=63) → 63 – 2 = 61 electrons.
- Gd³⁺: Gd (Z=64) → 64 – 3 = 61 electrons.
- La³⁺: La (Z=57) → 57 – 3 = 54 electrons.
- Ce⁴⁺: Ce (Z=58) → 58 – 4 = 54 electrons.
-
Identify which pairs are isoelectronic (same electron count)
- (A) Lu³⁺ (68) and Yb²⁺ (68) → same
- (B) Eu³⁺ (60) and Pm²⁺ (59) → different
- (C) Eu²⁺ (61) and Gd³⁺ (61) → same
- (D) La³⁺ (54) and Ce⁴⁺ (54) → same
So (B) is out.
-
Check paramagnetism (unpaired 4f electrons)
-
Lu³⁺: Lu is [Xe]4f¹⁴6s² → Lu³⁺ loses 6s² and one 4f? No, it loses 6s² and one 4f? Actually Lu³⁺ = [Xe]4f¹⁴ (full 4f, all paired) → diamagnetic.
-
Yb²⁺: Yb is [Xe]4f¹⁴6s² → Yb²⁺ loses 6s² → [Xe]4f¹⁴ → diamagnetic.
→ Pair (A) is diamagnetic-diamagnetic → not paramagnetic.
-
Eu²⁺: Eu is [Xe]4f⁷6s² → Eu²⁺ loses 6s² → [Xe]4f⁷ (half-filled, 7 unpaired) → paramagnetic.
-
Gd³⁺: Gd is [Xe]4f⁷5d¹6s² → Gd³⁺ loses 6s² and 5d¹ → [Xe]4f⁷ → paramagnetic.
→ Pair (C) is paramagnetic-paramagnetic ✓ …
-
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.The pair of ions with paramagnetic nature and same number of electrons is (A) La3+, Ce4+ (B) Eu2+, Gd3+ (C) Eu3+, Pm2+ (D) Lu3+, Yb2+
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to compare the electron configurations of the lanthanide ions, checking for unpaired electrons (paramagnetism) and equal total electron count. The pair that satisfies both is Eu²⁺ and Gd³⁺, option (B).
Concept & Intuition
Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electrons. In lanthanide ions, the 4f subshell is gradually filled. To find a pair that is both paramagnetic and has the same number of electrons, we need to:
- Determine the atomic number of each element.
- Subtract the charge to get the number of electrons in the ion.
- Write the electron configuration (focus on the 4f subshell).
- Check for unpaired electrons (Hund’s rule: half-filled or partially filled f-orbitals are paramagnetic; empty, full, or exactly half-filled f⁷ are special cases).
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify atomic numbers
La (57), Ce (58), Eu (63), Gd (64), Pm (61), Lu (71), Yb (70).
-
Calculate electron counts for each ion
- La³⁺: 57 − 3 = 54 electrons
- Ce⁴⁺: 58 − 4 = 54 electrons
- Eu²⁺: 63 − 2 = 61 electrons
- Gd³⁺: 64 − 3 = 61 electrons
- Eu³⁺: 63 − 3 = 60 electrons
- Pm²⁺: 61 − 2 = 59 electrons
- Lu³⁺: 71 − 3 = 68 electrons
- Yb²⁺: 70 − 2 = 68 electrons
-
Write the 4f configurations (the core is [Xe] 4fⁿ)
- La³⁺: [Xe] → 4f⁰ (no unpaired electrons, diamagnetic)
- Ce⁴⁺: [Xe] → 4f⁰ (diamagnetic)
- Eu²⁺: [Xe] 4f⁷ (half-filled, all 7 electrons unpaired → paramagnetic)
- Gd³⁺: [Xe] 4f⁷ (half-filled, paramagnetic)
- Eu³⁺: [Xe] 4f⁶ (4 unpaired electrons, paramagnetic)
- Pm²⁺: [Xe] 4f⁵ (5 unpaired electrons, paramagnetic)
- Lu³⁺: [Xe] 4f¹⁴ (full, diamagnetic)
- Yb²⁺: [Xe] 4f¹⁴ (full, diamagnetic)
-
Check each option
- (A) La³⁺ (diamagnetic) and Ce⁴⁺ (diamagnetic) → both diamagnetic, so not paramagnetic.
- (B) Eu²⁺ (paramagnetic, 61 e⁻) and Gd³⁺ (paramagnetic, 61 e⁻) → both paramagnetic and same electron count. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.