Q.Which of the following is an example of vic-dihalide?

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 on this concept.

1. TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-FN1 markMCQ
   Q.Identify the reactions which give orthoboric acid from the following I. Acidification of an aqueous solution of borax II. Hydrolysis of diborane III. Hydrolysis of boron trichloride The correct answer is (A) I, II only (B) II, III only (C) I, III only (D) I, II, III

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Orthoboric acid ($\ce{H3BO3}$) is produced from all three listed reactions: acidification of borax, hydrolysis of diborane, and hydrolysis of boron trichloride. The correct answer is (D).

   Concept & Intuition

   Orthoboric acid is a weak, monobasic Lewis acid that forms whenever boron compounds are treated with water or aqueous acid. Borax is a sodium salt of boric acid; adding a strong acid simply reverses its formation. Diborane and boron trichloride are both electron-deficient boron compounds that react violently with water, each yielding boric acid as the final hydrolysis product. The key is recognizing that all three starting materials contain boron in the +3 oxidation state, which ends up as $\ce{B(OH)3}$ in aqueous solution.

   Step-by-step reasoning

   1. Reaction I: Acidification of borax Borax is $\ce{Na2B4O7·10H2O}$. In water it hydrolyzes to give a basic solution containing tetraborate ions. Adding a strong acid (e.g., $\ce{HCl}$) shifts the equilibrium to produce orthoboric acid:

   $\ce{Na2B4O7 + 2HCl + 5H2O -> 4H3BO3 + 2NaCl}$

   This is a standard laboratory preparation of boric acid. So I works.

   2. Reaction II: Hydrolysis of diborane Diborane ($\ce{B2H6}$) is highly reactive toward water. The hydrolysis proceeds in two stages: first, each B–H bond reacts with water to give hydrogen gas and boric acid:

   $\ce{B2H6 + 6H2O -> 2H3BO3 + 6H2}$

   The reaction is vigorous and quantitative. Hence II works.

   3. Reaction III: Hydrolysis of boron trichloride …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
2. TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQ
   Q.In Dettol, chloroxylenol is one component. The IUPAC name of it is (A) 4-Chloro – 3,5-dimethylphenol (B) 3-Chloro – 4,5-dimethylphenol (C) 4-Chloro – 2,5-dimethylphenol (D) 5-Chloro – 2,3-dimethylphenol

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Chloroxylenol is a phenol derivative with chlorine and two methyl groups; its systematic IUPAC name is 4-Chloro-3,5-dimethylphenol, which corresponds to option (A).

   The key here is to recall the structure of chloroxylenol, the active antiseptic in Dettol. It is a substituted phenol, meaning the parent compound is benzene with an –OH group. The IUPAC rules require us to number the ring so that the –OH gets the lowest possible number (position 1), then name the substituents in alphabetical order with their locants.

   Let’s work through the reasoning step by step.

   1. Identify the parent compound.

      The core is phenol — a benzene ring with a hydroxyl (–OH) group. In IUPAC naming, the –OH carbon is always numbered as position 1.

   2. Recall the known structure of chloroxylenol.

      Chloroxylenol has the molecular formula $\ce{C8H9ClO}$. Its common structure has:

      • A chlorine atom (chloro) at position 4,
      • Two methyl groups at positions 3 and 5,
      • The –OH at position 1. This gives the systematic name: 4-chloro-3,5-dimethylphenol.

   3. Check the numbering logic.

      If we number the ring starting from the –OH carbon as 1, the substituents fall at:

      • Carbon 2: hydrogen (no substituent),
      • Carbon 3: methyl,
      • Carbon 4: chloro,
      • Carbon 5: methyl,
      • Carbon 6: hydrogen. So the locants are 4 for chloro, and 3 and 5 for the two methyl groups. Alphabetically, “chloro” comes before “dimethyl”, so the name is “4-chloro-3,5-dimethylphenol”.

   4. Eliminate the other options.

      • (B) 3-Chloro-4,5-dimethylphenol would place chlorine next to the –OH, which is not the actual structure. …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
3. TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQ
   Q.The major product in Reimer – Tiemann reaction is X. The reactants are Y and Z. X, Y and Z are respectively. (Aq = aqueous) (A) 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (p-$\ce{HO-C6H4-CHO}$), $\ce{CHCl3}$, Aq. NaOH (B) Salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid), $\ce{CCl4}$, Aq. $\ce{Ba(OH)2}$ (C) Salicylaldehyde (2-hydroxybenzaldehyde), $\ce{CHCl3}$, Aq. NaOH (D) Benzoic acid ($\ce{C6H5-COOH}$), $\ce{CCl4}$, Aq. KOH

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   The Reimer–Tiemann reaction treats phenol with chloroform and aqueous NaOH; dichlorocarbene attacks the phenoxide ring ortho, giving salicylaldehyde as the major product — option (C).

   The concept first

   The Reimer–Tiemann reaction is an electrophilic aromatic substitution in which the electrophile is a carbene.

   1. Alkali removes the proton from chloroform:

   $\ce{CHCl3 + OH- -> CCl3- + H2O}$

   2. The trichloromethyl anion ejects a chloride to give the electron-deficient dichlorocarbene:

   $\ce{CCl3- -> :CCl2 + Cl-}$

   3. Meanwhile the same alkali converts phenol into phenoxide, in which the negative charge is delocalised onto the ortho and para ring carbons — a far more activated ring than phenol itself.

   Step 1 — Attack and hydrolysis

   The carbene is captured predominantly at the ortho carbon (the neighbouring $\ce{-O-}$ effectively hands it over), giving an o-dichloromethyl phenol. The alkaline medium then hydrolyses that $\ce{-CHCl2}$ group:

   $\ce{Ar-CHCl2 ->[2 OH-][-2Cl-] Ar-CH(OH)2 ->[-H2O] Ar-CHO}$

   Step 2 — Name the products and reactants

   Overall:

   $\ce{C6H5OH ->[(i) CHCl3,\ aq.\ NaOH][(ii) H3O+] 2-HO-C6H4-CHO}$ …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
4. TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQ
   Q.Composition of siderite ore is (A) $\mathrm{FeCO}_3$ (B) $\mathrm{ZnCO}_3$ (C) $\mathrm{CuCO}_3.\mathrm{Cu(OH)}_2$ (D) $\mathrm{CuFeS}_2$

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Siderite is an iron carbonate mineral; its chemical formula is $\mathrm{FeCO}_3$, so the correct option is (A).

   The question asks for the composition of siderite ore. This is a straightforward recall from mineralogy and chemistry of ores. The key is to know the common names and formulas of important carbonate ores: siderite (iron), smithsonite (zinc), malachite (copper), and chalcopyrite (copper‑iron sulfide). Let’s match each option to its mineral name.

   1. Option (A): $\mathrm{FeCO}_3$

      This is iron(II) carbonate. Its mineral name is siderite. Siderite is an important ore of iron, though less common than hematite or magnetite. The name “siderite” comes from the Greek sideros meaning iron.

   2. Option (B): $\mathrm{ZnCO}_3$

      This is zinc carbonate, known as smithsonite. It is a zinc ore, not siderite.

   3. Option (C): $\mathrm{CuCO}_3\cdot\mathrm{Cu(OH)}_2$

      This is basic copper carbonate, the mineral malachite. It is a copper ore, not siderite.

   4. Option (D): $\mathrm{CuFeS}_2$ …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
5. TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQ
   Q.What are X and Y in the following reaction sequence? $\mathrm{C_5H_{12}O} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{Cu}\ 573\ \mathrm{K}} \mathrm{C_5H_{10}} \xrightarrow{\text{(i) } \mathrm{O_3}} \xrightarrow{\text{(ii) } \mathrm{Zn} + \mathrm{H_2O}} X + Y$ (A) $\begin{array}{c} \mathrm{O} \\ \vert \\ \mathrm{CH_3CH_2CH_2C} \\ \vert \\ \mathrm{H} \end{array} + \mathrm{HCO_2H}$ (B) $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_3} + \mathrm{CH_3CHO}$ (C) $\begin{array}{c} \mathrm{O} \\ \vert \\ \mathrm{CH_3CH_2CO} \\ \vert \\ \mathrm{H} \end{array} + \mathrm{CH_3CHO}$ (D) $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO} + \mathrm{HCHO}$

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   The alcohol $\mathrm{C_5H_{12}O}$ is 3-methylbutan-1-ol, which on dehydrogenation gives 3-methylbut-1-ene; ozonolysis then yields propanal and formaldehyde, matching option (D).

   The key to this problem is working backwards from the molecular formula and the reaction conditions. $\mathrm{C_5H_{12}O}$ is a saturated alcohol (since it fits $\mathrm{C_nH_{2n+2}O}$). The first step — passing it over hot copper at 573 K — is classic dehydrogenation of a primary or secondary alcohol to an aldehyde or ketone, but here the product is $\mathrm{C_5H_{10}}$, an alkene. That means the alcohol must have lost not just two hydrogens but also a water molecule — i.e., it underwent dehydration, not simple dehydrogenation. Copper at high temperature can catalyse both, but the formation of an alkene tells us the alcohol is actually being dehydrated. So $\mathrm{C_5H_{12}O}$ is an alcohol that, on dehydration, gives a pentene ($\mathrm{C_5H_{10}}$). The ozonolysis of that pentene then cleaves the double bond, producing two carbonyl compounds X and Y.

   Let’s trace the logic step by step.

   1. Identify the alcohol structure.

      The formula $\mathrm{C_5H_{12}O}$ could be any pentanol. Dehydration of an alcohol follows Zaitsev’s rule (the more substituted alkene is favoured). But we also need the alkene to give, upon ozonolysis, products that match one of the given options. The options all involve small carbonyls: propanal, acetone, formaldehyde, formic acid, etc. That suggests the alkene is not a straight-chain pentene but a branched one, because ozonolysis of a straight-chain pent-1-ene would give butanal and formaldehyde, while pent-2-ene would give two molecules of propanal — neither of which appears in the options exactly.

      The only alcohol that dehydrates to an alkene whose ozonolysis yields the combination in option (D) — $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO}$ (a diketone? Actually that’s 4-oxopentanal) plus $\mathrm{HCHO}$ — is unlikely. Wait, let’s check option (D) carefully: it says $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO} + \mathrm{HCHO}$. That’s a 5-carbon dialdehyde plus formaldehyde. That would come from a pentene with a terminal double bond and a methyl branch at the 3-position: 3-methylbut-1-ene.

      Indeed, 3-methylbutan-1-ol (isoamyl alcohol) on dehydration gives mainly 3-methylbut-1-ene (the less substituted alkene, but possible under certain conditions) or 2-methylbut-2-ene. But the ozonolysis of 3-methylbut-1-ene gives propanal ($\mathrm{CH_3CH_2CHO}$) and formaldehyde ($\mathrm{HCHO}$) — that’s not option (D). Option (D) has $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO}$ (which is 4-oxopentanal) and $\mathrm{HCHO}$. That’s a mismatch.

      Let’s re-evaluate: Option (D) is written as $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO} + \mathrm{HCHO}$. That’s a 5-carbon compound — it would come from a pentene with a double bond between C2 and C3 and a methyl branch? Actually, 2-methylbut-1-ene on ozonolysis gives acetone ($\mathrm{CH_3COCH_3}$) and formaldehyde — that’s option (B) plus something? No, option (B) is $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_3} + \mathrm{CH_3CHO}$.

      Let’s systematically check each option by working out what alkene would give those ozonolysis products.

   2. Ozonolysis logic.

      Ozonolysis of an alkene cleaves the double bond, giving two carbonyl compounds. For a terminal alkene ($\mathrm{RCH=CH_2}$), the products are an aldehyde ($\mathrm{RCHO}$) and formaldehyde ($\mathrm{HCHO}$). For an internal alkene ($\mathrm{RCH=CHR'}$), the products are two aldehydes (or ketones if the carbon is disubstituted).

      So:

      • Option (A): $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2CH_2CHO}$ (butanal) + $\mathrm{HCO_2H}$ (formic acid). Formic acid comes from ozonolysis of a terminal alkene only if the terminal carbon is $\mathrm{=CH_2}$? No, formic acid would come from $\mathrm{=CHOH}$ or something — not standard. Actually, ozonolysis with reductive workup (Zn/H₂O) gives aldehydes, not acids. So (A) is unlikely.
      • Option (B): $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_3}$ (acetone) + $\mathrm{CH_3CHO}$ (acetaldehyde). This comes from an alkene with a gem-dimethyl group at one end and a methyl at the other: $\mathrm{(CH_3)_2C=CHCH_3}$ (2-methylbut-2-ene). That alkene would come from dehydration of 2-methylbutan-2-ol (tert-pentanol) or 3-methylbutan-2-ol.
      • Option (C): $\mathrm{CH_3CH_2CHO}$ (propanal) + $\mathrm{CH_3CHO}$ (acetaldehyde). This comes from pent-2-ene ($\mathrm{CH_3CH=CHCH_2CH_3}$). That alkene would come from pentan-2-ol or pentan-3-ol.
      • Option (D): $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO}$ (4-oxopentanal) + $\mathrm{HCHO}$ (formaldehyde). This is a 5-carbon dialdehyde plus formaldehyde — that would come from a pentene with a terminal double bond and a carbonyl already present? No, that’s impossible from a simple alkene. Wait, $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO}$ is actually a 5-carbon compound with two carbonyls — that would require the alkene to have had a double bond between C2 and C3 and also a methyl branch? Let’s see: if the alkene is $\mathrm{CH_3C(=CH_2)CH_2CH_3}$ (2-methylbut-1-ene), ozonolysis gives $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CH_3}$ (butanone) and $\mathrm{HCHO}$ — not that. If the alkene is $\mathrm{CH_3CH=C(CH_3)CH_3}$ (2-methylbut-2-ene), we already got acetone + acetaldehyde. So (D) seems odd. But note: $\mathrm{CH_3COCH_2CHO}$ is actually 4-oxopentanal, which has 5 carbons. That could come from ozonolysis of a cyclic alkene? No, the starting material is acyclic. So (D) is likely a distractor.

   3. Match the alcohol to the alkene. …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
6. TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-AN1 markMCQ
   Q.The sequence of reagents required to convert benzoic acid to n-propyl benzene is (A) SOCl$_2$, (C$_2$H$_5$)$_2$Cd, LiAlH$_4$ (B) SOCl$_2$, (C$_2$H$_5$)$_2$Cd, Zn-Hg,HCl (C) SOCl$_2$, C$_2$H$_5$MgBr, Zn|H$^+$ (D) HCl, C$_2$H$_5$MgBr, LiAlH$_4$

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   The conversion of benzoic acid to n‑propyl benzene requires three functional-group transformations: acid → acid chloride → ketone → alkane. The only sequence that achieves this cleanly is SOCl₂, (C₂H₅)₂Cd, then Zn‑Hg/HCl — option (B).

   The problem asks for a sequence of reagents that turns benzoic acid (C₆H₅COOH) into n‑propyl benzene (C₆H₅CH₂CH₂CH₃). The carbon skeleton must increase by two carbons, and the carboxylic acid group must be reduced all the way to an alkyl group. That means we need to add two carbons and then remove the oxygen entirely.

   The classic route is: first convert the acid to a more reactive derivative (an acid chloride), then use a dialkylcadmium reagent to add exactly one alkyl group (forming a ketone without over‑alkylation), and finally reduce the carbonyl to a methylene group using Clemmensen reduction (Zn‑Hg/HCl). Let’s check each option against this logic.

   1. Convert benzoic acid to benzoyl chloride.

      SOCl₂ (thionyl chloride) is the standard reagent for this — it gives clean conversion to the acid chloride with gaseous by‑products (SO₂ and HCl). Options (A), (B), and (C) all start with SOCl₂, which is correct. Option (D) starts with HCl, which would not form the acid chloride efficiently, so (D) is out.

   2. Add two carbons to form a ketone.

      The acid chloride must react with an organometallic that adds one alkyl group and stops at the ketone stage.

      • (C₂H₅)₂Cd (diethylcadmium) is ideal: it is less reactive than Grignard reagents, so it adds only one ethyl group to the acid chloride, giving propiophenone (C₆H₅COCH₂CH₃).
      • C₂H₅MgBr (ethylmagnesium bromide) is too reactive — it would add two ethyl groups, giving a tertiary alcohol (C₆H₅C(OH)(C₂H₅)₂) after work‑up, not a ketone. So options (C) and (D), which use the Grignard reagent, are wrong.
      • Option (A) uses (C₂H₅)₂Cd, which is correct for this step.

   3. Reduce the ketone to an alkane.

      Propiophenone (C₆H₅COCH₂CH₃) must be reduced to n‑propyl benzene (C₆H₅CH₂CH₂CH₃). …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
7. TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-08-FN1 markMCQ
   Q.The iodine oxide which is used in the estimation of carbon monoxide is (A) $\mathrm{I_2O_4}$ (B) $\mathrm{I_2O_5}$ (C) $\mathrm{I_2O_7}$ (D) $\mathrm{I_2O}$

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Diiodine pentoxide ($\mathrm{I_2O_5}$) is the specific iodine oxide used to estimate carbon monoxide (CO) because it quantitatively oxidizes CO to $\mathrm{CO_2}$ while being reduced to iodine ($\mathrm{I_2}$), which can then be measured. The correct option is (B).

   The estimation of carbon monoxide (CO) relies on its reducing properties. To quantify CO, we need a strong oxidizing agent that reacts specifically and quantitatively with it. The reaction should produce a measurable product, allowing us to determine the initial amount of CO.

   1. Identifying the suitable iodine oxide:

      Among the various oxides of iodine, diiodine pentoxide ($\mathrm{I_2O_5}$) is a well-known and stable compound that acts as a powerful oxidizing agent, especially when heated. It is specifically employed for the quantitative estimation of carbon monoxide. The other options listed are either less stable, not commonly used for this purpose, or do not exist as stable, well-characterized compounds in the context of this application.

   2. The chemical reaction:

      When carbon monoxide gas is passed over heated diiodine pentoxide, a redox reaction occurs. Carbon monoxide is oxidized to carbon dioxide ($\mathrm{CO_2}$), and diiodine pentoxide is reduced to elemental iodine ($\mathrm{I_2}$). The balanced chemical equation for this reaction is:

   $\mathrm{I_2O_5(s) + 5CO(g) \xrightarrow{\text{heat}} I_2(s) + 5CO_2(g)}$

   In this reaction, the oxidation state of iodine changes from $+5$ in $\mathrm{I_2O_5}$ to $0$ in $\mathrm{I_2}$, while the oxidation state of carbon changes from $+2$ in $\mathrm{CO}$ to $+4$ in $\mathrm{CO_2}$.
   

   3. Mechanism of estimation: …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
8. TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-08-FN1 markMCQ
   Q.Which of the following is used as substitute for sucrose? (A) Benzene ring fused to a $-\mathrm{CO-NH-CO}-$ ring (phthalimide) (B) Benzene ring fused to a $-\mathrm{SO_2-NH-SO_2}-$ ring (C) Benzene ring fused to a $-\mathrm{CO-NH-SO_2}-$ ring (saccharin) (D) Benzene ring fused to a $-\mathrm{CH_2-NH-CO}-$ ring

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   The sugar substitute is saccharin — a benzene ring ortho-fused to a ring containing $-\mathrm{CO{-}NH{-}SO_2}-$. Only option (C) shows one carbonyl and one sulphonyl bridged by NH, so (C) is correct.

   The concept first: artificial sweeteners

   An artificial sweetening agent is a compound that stimulates the sweet-taste receptors intensely but supplies no (or negligible) calories and is not metabolised — so it can replace sucrose (cane sugar) for diabetics and for people watching their calorie intake. The standard family is:

   Sweetener	Sweetness vs sucrose	Note
   Saccharin (o-sulphobenzimide)	$\approx 550\times$	the first artificial sweetener; excreted unchanged; safe
   Aspartame	$\approx 100\times$	a methyl ester of an Asp–Phe dipeptide; unstable to cooking
   Alitame	$\approx 2000\times$	high potency, sweetness hard to control
   Sucralose	$\approx 600\times$	a trichloro-derivative of sucrose; stable to cooking

   The one whose structure is examined most often is saccharin.

   The structure of saccharin, built up logically

   Start from benzene. Put two substituents on adjacent (ortho) carbons:

   • on one carbon a carbonyl, $-\mathrm{C{=}O}$;
   • on the neighbouring carbon a sulphonyl, $-\mathrm{SO_2}-$.

   Now bridge those two groups through a single NH. The result is a five-membered ring fused to the benzene:

   $\text{benzene}\!-\!\mathrm{C(=O)}\!-\!\mathrm{NH}\!-\!\mathrm{SO_2}\!-\!\text{benzene}$ …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
9. TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-FN1 markMCQ
   Q.Among the following the incorrect statement about chloramphenicol is (A) It is a bacteriostatic drug (B) It is a broad spectrum antibiotic (C) It is a bactericidal drug (D) It is used to treat typhoid

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Chloramphenicol is primarily bacteriostatic, not bactericidal, so the incorrect statement is the one claiming it is bactericidal. The answer is option (C).

   Chloramphenicol is a classic antibiotic that works by binding to the bacterial ribosome (specifically the 50S subunit) and inhibiting protein synthesis. This mechanism stops bacterial growth but does not directly kill the bacteria — that is the hallmark of a bacteriostatic drug. A bactericidal drug, by contrast, actively kills bacteria (e.g., by disrupting cell walls or DNA replication). The key distinction is that bacteriostatic drugs rely on the host’s immune system to clear the inhibited bacteria, while bactericidal drugs do the killing themselves.

   Now, let’s examine each statement:

   1. Statement (A): "It is a bacteriostatic drug"

      This is correct. Chloramphenicol reversibly binds to the 50S ribosomal subunit, blocking peptide bond formation. Bacteria cannot multiply, but they remain alive until the immune system removes them. This is the textbook definition of bacteriostatic action.

   2. Statement (B): "It is a broad spectrum antibiotic"

      This is correct. Chloramphenicol is effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as rickettsiae and chlamydiae. Its broad spectrum is one reason it was historically used for serious infections like typhoid and meningitis.

   3. Statement (C): "It is a bactericidal drug"

      This is incorrect. As explained, chloramphenicol is bacteriostatic. At very high concentrations, it can sometimes show weak bactericidal activity against certain organisms, but this is not its primary or clinically relevant action. The standard classification remains bacteriostatic. …

   🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
10. TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-FN1 markMCQ
    Q.Identify the set of molecules which act as bleaching agents only by oxidation (A) $\mathrm{SO_2,\, O_3}$ (B) $\mathrm{O_3,\, NO}$ (C) $\mathrm{Cl_2,\, O_3}$ (D) $\mathrm{SO_2,\, O_3,\, Cl_2}$

    ›Reveal solutionSolution

    Bleaching by oxidation involves gaining oxygen or losing electrons; the question asks for the set where both molecules bleach only by oxidation. The correct set is $\mathrm{Cl_2}$ and $\mathrm{O_3}$, which corresponds to option (C).

    Concept & Intuition

    Bleaching agents work by destroying colored compounds. They can do this in two main ways:

    • Oxidation (the agent gains electrons, the colored substance loses electrons or gains oxygen).
    • Reduction (the agent loses electrons, the colored substance gains electrons or loses oxygen).

    The key is that some substances (like $\mathrm{SO_2}$) bleach by reduction, not oxidation. So we must identify which molecules in each option are exclusively oxidizing bleaches.

    Step-by-step reasoning

    1. Recall the bleaching mechanisms of common agents

       • Ozone ($\mathrm{O_3}$): A powerful oxidizer. It releases an oxygen atom that oxidizes colored compounds. Only oxidation.
       • Chlorine ($\mathrm{Cl_2}$): In water, forms $\mathrm{HOCl}$ which oxidizes dyes. Only oxidation.
       • Sulfur dioxide ($\mathrm{SO_2}$): Acts as a reducing agent. It bleaches by adding hydrogen (reduction), e.g., turning colored organic dyes into colorless leuco compounds. Only reduction.
       • Nitric oxide ($\mathrm{NO}$): Can act as both an oxidizer and reducer, but its bleaching action (e.g., on wool or silk) is typically via oxidation. However, it is not a common bleaching agent and is often considered an oxidizing bleach in specific contexts. But here we must check the options carefully.

    2. Evaluate each option

       • (A) $\mathrm{SO_2,\, O_3}$: $\mathrm{SO_2}$ bleaches by reduction, so this set contains a non-oxidizing bleach. Eliminate. …

    🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
11. TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-10-FN1 markMCQ
    Q.Identify X and Y in the following reactions CaO + C \xrightarrow{\Delta} X + CO X + H_2O \rightarrow Y + Ca(OH)_2 (A) CaC_2, C_2H_2 (B) CaC_2, C_2H_4 (C) CaCO_3, C_2H_4 (D) CaCO_3, C_2H_2

    ›Reveal solutionSolution

    The first reaction is the industrial production of calcium carbide ($\ce{CaC2}$), which then reacts with water to give acetylene ($\ce{C2H2}$). So X is $\ce{CaC2}$ and Y is $\ce{C2H2}$, matching option (A).

    The key here is recognising a classic two-step sequence from inorganic chemistry. The first reaction — heating calcium oxide with carbon — is the standard way to make calcium carbide. This is an endothermic reduction carried out in an electric arc furnace at very high temperatures (around 2000 °C). The carbon (coke) reduces the oxide, and the calcium combines with the remaining carbon to form the carbide.

    Once you have calcium carbide, its reaction with water is famously vigorous: it produces acetylene gas, which burns with a sooty flame and is used in welding. That second step is a hydrolysis reaction.

    Let’s walk through it step by step.

    1. Identify X from the first reaction.

       $\ce{CaO + C ->[\Delta] X + CO}$

       Calcium oxide is being reduced by carbon. The oxygen from CaO combines with carbon to form CO, leaving behind calcium and the remaining carbon. The product is calcium carbide: $\ce{CaC2}$.

       Balanced equation:

       $\ce{CaO + 3C -> CaC2 + CO}$

       So X = $\ce{CaC2}$.

    2. Identify Y from the second reaction.

       $\ce{X + H2O -> Y + Ca(OH)2}$

       With X = $\ce{CaC2}$, this is the hydrolysis of calcium carbide. Water attacks the carbide ion ($\ce{C2^{2-}}$), producing acetylene gas and calcium hydroxide.

       Balanced equation:

       $\ce{CaC2 + 2H2O -> C2H2 + Ca(OH)2}$ …

    🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
12. TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-10-FN1 markMCQ
    Q.Assertion (A): With dry slaked lime chlorine gives bleaching powder Reason (R): Bleaching action of chlorine is due to oxidation The correct option among the following is (A) (A) and (R) are true. (R) is the correct explanation for (A) (B) (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation for (A) (C) (A) is true but (R) is false (D) (A) is false but (R) is true

    ›Reveal solutionSolution

    The reaction of dry slaked lime with chlorine produces bleaching powder, and the bleaching action of chlorine is indeed due to oxidation. However, the reason does not explain the assertion — it describes a separate property of chlorine, not the formation of bleaching powder. So both are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation for (A).

    The question tests two separate ideas: the preparation of bleaching powder, and the mechanism of chlorine’s bleaching action. Many students mix them up, thinking that because bleaching powder contains chlorine, its bleaching action must be the same as chlorine’s. That’s the trap.

    Let’s break it down.

    1. Assertion (A): Dry slaked lime with chlorine gives bleaching powder. This is a standard industrial preparation. Slaked lime is calcium hydroxide, $\ce{Ca(OH)2}$. When dry slaked lime is treated with chlorine gas, the reaction is:

    $\ce{Ca(OH)2 + Cl2 -> CaOCl2 + H2O}$

    The product, $\ce{CaOCl2}$, is bleaching powder (calcium hypochlorite-chloride). This is a fact — the assertion is true.

    2. Reason (R): Bleaching action of chlorine is due to oxidation. Chlorine bleaches by reacting with water to form nascent oxygen:

    $\ce{Cl2 + H2O -> HCl + HOCl}$

    The hypochlorous acid ($\ce{HOCl}$) decomposes to give nascent oxygen, which oxidises coloured substances to colourless ones. So the bleaching action of chlorine is indeed an oxidation reaction. This statement is also true.

    3. Now the critical link: Does (R) explain (A)? …

    🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →