Q.Evaluate the following integrals:
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Improper Integral Evaluation
Improper Integral Evaluation
The Intuition First
You already know how to integrate over a finite interval: ∫13f(x)dx is the area under the curve from x=1 to x=3. But what if the region stretches to infinity, or the function shoots up to infinity somewhere in the interval?
That is what improper integrals handle — two situations that break the ordinary rules:
- Infinite limits — integrating up to ∞ or down to −∞.
- Infinite discontinuities — the function blows up at some point of the interval.
The core idea is the same in both cases: replace the "bad" point with a limit. Integrate up to a finite value, then let that value approach the trouble spot. If the result approaches a finite number, the integral converges; if it grows without bound, it diverges.
The Precise Definitions
Type 1: Infinite limits
∫a∞f(x)dx=limb→∞∫abf(x)dx
∫−∞bf(x)dx=lima→−∞∫abf(x)dx
For a doubly-infinite integral, split at a convenient point c and require both pieces to converge:
∫−∞∞f(x)dx=∫−∞cf(x)dx+∫c∞f(x)dx
Type 2: Infinite discontinuities
If f has a vertical asymptote at an endpoint, approach it from inside the interval:
If f blows up at x=a: ∫abf(x)dx=t→a+lim∫tbf(x)dx
If f blows up at x=b: ∫abf(x)dx=t→b−lim∫atf(x)dx
If the blow-up is at an interior point c, split at c and treat each side separately.
Worked Examples
Infinite limit. Evaluate ∫1∞x21dx:
limb→∞∫1bx−2dx=limb→∞[−x1]1b=limb→∞(1−b1)=1
So it converges to 1. Contrast ∫1∞x1dx=limb→∞logb=∞, which diverges.
Infinite discontinuity. Evaluate ∫01x1dx, where the integrand blows up at x=0:
limt→0+∫t1x−1/2dx=limt→0+[2x]t1=limt→0+(2−2t)=2
Converges to 2.
Never treat an improper integral as an ordinary one. Blindly applying the Fundamental Theorem across a discontinuity gives wrong answers. Always first check: is the integrand defined and finite on the whole interval? …
Match each integral to its natural tool: the power rule, two substitutions, and one partial-fraction split.
(i) ∫23x2dx=[3x3]23=327−8=319.
(ii) Let u=30−x3/2, so du=−23xdx, i.e. xdx=−32du. Limits: x=4⇒u=22, x=9⇒u=3.
∫223u2−32du=32∫322u−2du=32(31−221)=32⋅6619=9919.
(iii) Partial fractions: (x+1)(x+2)x=x+1−1+x+22, so
[−log∣x+1∣+2log∣x+2∣]12=log316−log29=log2732. …
These are four ordinary definite integrals: power rule for (i), substitution for (ii) and (iv), partial fractions for (iii). The values are 319, 9919, log2732, and 81.
Each part is a proper definite integral (the integrand is finite on the whole interval), so we find an antiderivative and apply F(b)−F(a). The only skill is spotting the right technique for each.
(i) ∫23x2dx
Straight power rule: ∫xndx=n+1xn+1 with n=2.
∫23x2dx=[3x3]23=333−323=327−8=319.
(ii) ∫49(30−x3/2)2xdx
The derivative of the inner expression 30−x3/2 is −23x — a constant multiple of the numerator, which flags a substitution.
- Let u=30−x3/2. Then du=−23xdx, so xdx=−32du.
- New limits: x=4⇒u=30−8=22; x=9⇒u=30−27=3.
- Rewrite and integrate:
∫223u2−32du=32∫322u−2du=32[−u1]322=32(31−221).
- Simplify: 31−221=6622−3=6619, so the value is 32⋅6619=9919.
(iii) ∫12(x+1)(x+2)xdx
A proper rational function with distinct linear factors — use partial fractions.
- Write (x+1)(x+2)x=x+1A+x+2B, so x=A(x+2)+B(x+1).
- Put x=−1: −1=A(1)⇒A=−1. Put x=−2: −2=B(−1)⇒B=2.
- Integrate: ∫12(x+1−1+x+22)dx=[−log∣x+1∣+2log∣x+2∣]12. …
Method: Identify-the-Technique for Each Definite Integral, Then Apply Limits
Use this for a set of definite integrals of different types: choose the antiderivative technique per integrand, then evaluate with the Fundamental Theorem, ∫abf=F(b)−F(a).
Steps
Step 1: Classify each integrand.
Match to a technique: a plain power → power rule; a composite with its derivative present → substitution; a proper rational function → partial fractions.
Step 2: For a substitution, change the limits too. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Keeping the old x-limits after substituting.
Why it's wrong: once you change to u, the limits must become u-values; using the x-limits gives a wrong number. Correct approach: convert limits with u=g(a), u=g(b).
Mistake 2: Writing +C in a definite integral. …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-AN1 markMCQQ.limx→22x3−3x2−3x+2x3−x2−x−2= (A) 0 (B) ∞ (C) 75 (D) 97
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both numerator and denominator vanish at x=2; cancelling (x−2) leaves 2x2+x−1x2+x+1, which at x=2 equals 97.
At x=2: numerator =8−4−2−2=0 and denominator =16−12−6+2=0, so it is 00. Factor out (x−2):
x3−x2−x−2=(x−2)(x2+x+1),
2x3−3x2−3x+2=(x−2)(2x2+x−1).
Hence …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-AN1 markMCQQ.limx→2[(x2−4x+4)cos(x−22)+x3−2x−4x2−4]= (A) 0 (B) ∞ (C) 1 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit splits into two parts: the first term vanishes because (x−2)2 times a bounded cosine tends to 0, and the second term simplifies to a rational limit that evaluates to 52. The final answer is 52.
The key insight here is that the expression is a sum of two separate pieces, each with its own behaviour as x→2. You cannot just plug x=2 into the whole thing — the cosine term oscillates wildly, and the rational part has a removable singularity. The trick is to handle each term independently, using the squeeze theorem for the first and algebraic simplification for the second.
- First term: (x2−4x+4)cos(x−22) Notice x2−4x+4=(x−2)2. So the first term is (x−2)2cos(x−22). As x→2, (x−2)2→0. The cosine factor, no matter how wildly it oscillates, is always between −1 and 1 — it is bounded. By the squeeze theorem:
−(x−2)2≤(x−2)2cos(x−22)≤(x−2)2
Both the left and right bounds go to 0 as x→2, so the first term tends to 0.
Watch outA common mistake is to think cos(2/(x−2)) has no limit — which is true — but that doesn't matter here because it is multiplied by a factor that goes to 0. The product of a bounded function and a function that tends to 0 always tends to 0.
- Second term: x3−2x−4x2−4 This is a rational expression. First, factor the numerator: x2−4=(x−2)(x+2). The denominator is a cubic. Check if x=2 is a root: 23−2(2)−4=8−4−4=0, so x−2 is a factor. Perform polynomial division or factor by grouping: x3−2x−4=(x−2)(x2+2x+2) …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.limθ→2π(3−2tanθ)48tan4θ+4tan2θ+5 (A) −21 (B) 21 (C) −4 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to rewrite the limit in terms of x=tanθ and then analyze the behavior as x→∞ (since tanθ→∞ as θ→π/2−). The limit simplifies to 21, so the correct option is (B).
When θ approaches 2π from the left, tanθ grows without bound — it shoots off to +∞. So instead of worrying about the angle directly, we can let x=tanθ and consider x→∞. This turns a trigonometric limit into a rational function limit, which is much easier to handle.
The expression becomes:
limx→∞(3−2x)48x4+4x2+5.
Now, both numerator and denominator are polynomials. As x→∞, the highest-degree terms dominate. So we compare the leading terms.
-
Expand the denominator
(3−2x)4=(−2x+3)4. The leading term comes from (−2x)4=16x4. The lower-degree terms (like (−2x)3⋅3, etc.) are negligible for large x.
-
Compare leading terms
Numerator leading term: 8x4.
Denominator leading term: 16x4.
So the limit is:
limx→∞16x48x4=168=21.
- Check for sign issues …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-FN1 markMCQQ.limx→32x3−7x2+2x+3x3−3x2−4x+12= (A) 0 (B) ∞ (C) 145 (D) 136
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit is a 00 indeterminate form, so we factor the numerator and denominator, cancel the common factor (x−3), and then evaluate the resulting rational function at x=3. The limit equals 145, which corresponds to option (C).
Concept & Intuition
When you plug x=3 directly into the fraction, both numerator and denominator become zero. That’s a classic 00 indeterminate form — it doesn’t tell us the limit yet. The trick is that x=3 makes both polynomials vanish, so (x−3) must be a factor of each. By factoring and cancelling that common factor, we remove the “hole” and get a simpler expression whose value at x=3 is the limit.
Step-by-step solution
-
Check direct substitution
Let N(x)=x3−3x2−4x+12 and D(x)=2x3−7x2+2x+3.
At x=3:
N(3)=27−27−12+12=0
D(3)=54−63+6+3=0
So we have 00 — proceed to factoring.
-
Factor the numerator
Since x=3 is a root, (x−3) divides N(x). Use synthetic division (or polynomial long division) with root 3:
Coefficients: 1,−3,−4,12
Bring down 1; multiply by 3 → 3, add to −3 → 0; multiply 0 by 3 → 0, add to −4 → −4; multiply −4 by 3 → −12, add to 12 → 0.
The quotient is x2+0x−4=x2−4.
So N(x)=(x−3)(x2−4)=(x−3)(x−2)(x+2).
-
Factor the denominator
Check D(3)=0, so (x−3) is also a factor. Synthetic division with 3 on coefficients 2,−7,2,3:
Bring down 2; 2⋅3=6, add to −7 → −1; −1⋅3=−3, add to 2 → −1; −1⋅3=−3, add to 3 → 0.
The quotient is 2x2−x−1.
Factor 2x2−x−1=(2x+1)(x−1).
So D(x)=(x−3)(2x+1)(x−1).
-
Cancel the common factor
For x=3,
-
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.limx→12x2+x−3(2x−3)(x−1)= (A) 101 (B) −101 (C) 52 (D) −52
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factor the denominator 2x2+x−3=(x−1)(2x+3) and use x−1=x+1x−1; the x−1 cancels and substitution gives −101, option (B).
Direct substitution of x=1 gives 00, so a common factor must cancel.
- Factor the denominator.
2x2+x−3=2x2−2x+3x−3=(x−1)(2x+3).
- Handle the numerator root. For the option list to be finite the vanishing factor must be first order in (x−1), i.e. the numerator carries x−1, and
x−1=x+1(x−1)(x+1)=x+1x−1.
- Cancel and substitute. …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.limx→1(1−x)tan(2πx) (A) 2π (B) π2 (C) 1 (D) 0
›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is a classic 0·∞ indeterminate form. By rewriting the tangent as a cotangent and using the substitution t=1−x, we transform it into a standard limit limt→0tan(πt/2)t, which evaluates to π2. The correct option is (B).
We want
limx→1(1−x)tan(2πx).
As x→1, 1−x→0 and tan(πx/2)→tan(π/2), which blows up to infinity. So we have a 0⋅∞ form — not directly evaluable. The trick is to rewrite the tangent in terms of a cotangent, because near π/2 the tangent behaves like the reciprocal of a small quantity.
Why this works:
Recall tanθ=cot(π/2−θ). When θ is near π/2, the argument π/2−θ is small, and cot of a small angle behaves like 1/(small angle). This turns the product into a ratio, which is a standard limit.
- Rewrite the tangent Let θ=2πx. Then
tan(2πx)=cot(2π−2πx)=cot(2π(1−x)).
So the limit becomes
limx→1(1−x)⋅cot(2π(1−x)).
- Introduce a new variable Set t=1−x. Then as x→1, t→0+. The limit is
limt→0t⋅cot(2πt).
- Express cotangent as cosine over sine
cot(2πt)=sin(πt/2)cos(πt/2).
So the product becomes
t⋅sin(πt/2)cos(πt/2)=sin(πt/2)t⋅cos(2πt).
- Use the small-angle limit We know u→0limusinu=1. Here u=2πt, so sin(πt/2)t=2πt⋅πt/2sin(πt/2)t=2π⋅πt/2sin(πt/2)1. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.limx→0x2sinx2tanx−2sinx=k, then e2k= (A) 1 (B) log2 (C) 2 (D) 21log2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit simplifies using series expansions for tanx and sinx, leading to k=21(log2), so e2k=2. The correct option is (C).
We want
k=limx→0x2sinx2tanx−2sinx.
The numerator is a difference of exponentials with the same base. The key idea: factor out 2sinx and then use the series expansion for eu when u is small. This turns a tricky limit into a simple algebraic comparison of tanx and sinx near zero.
- Factor and rewrite
2tanx−2sinx=2sinx(2tanx−sinx−1).
As x→0, sinx→0, so 2sinx→1. Also, tanx−sinx→0, so we can use 2u−1=eulog2−1∼(ulog2) for small u.
- Approximate the difference For small u, eulog2−1∼ulog2. Hence
2tanx−2sinx∼2sinx⋅(tanx−sinx)log2.
Since 2sinx→1, the leading behavior is
2tanx−2sinx∼(tanx−sinx)log2.
- Expand tanx−sinx Recall:
sinx=x−6x3+O(x5),tanx=x+3x3+O(x5).
Subtract:
tanx−sinx=(x+3x3)−(x−6x3)+O(x5)=2x3+O(x5).
- Plug into the limit …
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-04-FN1 markMCQQ.limx→1(1−x)logx= (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) −21
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit limx→11−xlogx is an indeterminate form 00 that simplifies using the standard limit limt→0tlog(1+t)=1, yielding the value −1.
The core idea here is that as x approaches 1, both the numerator logx and the denominator 1−x approach 0. This gives the 00 indeterminate form, which means we cannot just substitute x=1 — we need to rewrite the expression into a form whose limit is known.
The natural logarithm has a beautiful property near 1: for small t, log(1+t)≈t, and more precisely, limt→0tlog(1+t)=1. This is a standard result derived from the definition of the derivative of logx at x=1, and it is the key to unlocking this problem.
- Substitute to create a small variable. Let t=x−1. Then as x→1, we have t→0. Also, x=1+t, so logx=log(1+t) and 1−x=1−(1+t)=−t. The limit becomes:
limx→11−xlogx=limt→0−tlog(1+t).
- Factor out the constant. The denominator −t can be written as (−1)⋅t, so:
limt→0−tlog(1+t)=−limt→0tlog(1+t).
- Apply the standard limit. We know that limt→0tlog(1+t)=1. This is a fundamental limit — you can prove it using the series expansion log(1+t)=t−2t2+⋯ or by recognizing it as the derivative of logx at x=1:
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.