Q.Evaluate: ∫e4logx−e3logxe6logx−e5logxdx
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Exponential Logarithmic Simplification
Exponential Logarithmic Simplification
You've probably seen expressions like elogx or log(ex) and wondered whether they just cancel out. The short answer is yes — but only under the right conditions. This is what we call exponential logarithmic simplification.
The Intuition
Think of the exponential function ex and the natural logarithm logx as inverse operations — they "undo" each other.
- Start with a number, take its natural log, then exponentiate the result: you get back where you started, elogx=x.
- Start with a number, exponentiate it, then take the natural log: you also get back, log(ex)=x.
This is exactly like how adding 5 and subtracting 5 cancel out, or how squaring and taking the square root undo each other (for non-negative numbers).
The functions ex and logx are inverses — they reverse each other's effect, just like x and x2 are inverses for x≥0.
The Precise Statement
elogx=xfor all x>0
log(ex)=xfor all real x
The first formula works only when x>0 because logx is only defined for positive inputs. The second works for any real x because ex is always positive.
A common mistake is to write elogx=x for x≤0. This is wrong — logx is undefined for x≤0 in the reals. Always check the domain.
Why This Matters
This simplification lets you solve equations that mix exponentials and logs:
- To solve log(x)=5, exponentiate both sides: elogx=e5⟹x=e5.
- To solve ex=7, take the natural log: log(ex)=log7⟹x=log7.
Without this rule you'd be stuck; with it, you can "peel away" the exponential or the log to isolate the variable.
A Quick Example
Simplify elog(3x+1). The expression is defined only when 3x+1>0; if that holds, then: …
The key idea is to simplify the exponentials using enlogx=xn, then reduce the rational expression.
First, rewrite each term:
e6logx=x6,e5logx=x5,e4logx=x4,e3logx=x3.
So the integral becomes:
∫x4−x3x6−x5dx=∫x3(x−1)x5(x−1)dx. …
Since eklogx=xk, the integrand simplifies to x2, so the integral is 3x3+C.
Rewrite the exponentials. Using eklogx=xk:
∫e4logx−e3logxe6logx−e5logxdx=∫x4−x3x6−x5dx.
Simplify the rational function. Factor numerator and denominator: …
Method: Simplify enlogx before integrating
Use this whenever an integrand hides powers of x inside exponentials of logarithms. The integral looks intimidating but collapses to an elementary one after one simplification.
Steps
Step 1: Apply enlogx=xn.
Because log and exp are inverses, enlogx=(elogx)n=xn. Rewrite every such term.
Step 2: Factor numerator and denominator.
After converting, you get a rational function in x. Factor out common powers, e.g. x4−x3x6−x5=x3(x−1)x5(x−1).
Step 3: Cancel common factors. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Not converting enlogx to xn.
Why it's wrong: leaving the exponentials in place makes the integral look non-elementary, and students give up or misuse exponential rules. Correct approach: apply enlogx=xn first.
Mistake 2: Cancelling incorrectly across the fraction. …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=1−cosxx(ax−1) and g(x)=ax(1−x2−1+x2)x(1−ax), then limx→0(f(x)−g(x))= (A) 3loga (B) ea (C) 2loga (D) loga
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit simplifies to 2loga by expanding both f(x) and g(x) as series near x=0 and subtracting; the correct choice is (C).
We are asked to compute
limx→0(f(x)−g(x))
where
f(x)=1−cosxx(ax−1),g(x)=ax(1−x2−1+x2)x(1−ax).
The key idea: both numerator and denominator vanish as x→0, so we need series expansions (or L’Hôpital’s rule) to find the leading behavior. Since the difference may cancel lower-order terms, we expand each function up to the constant term.
- Expand f(x) near x=0
- ax=exloga=1+xloga+2x2(loga)2+O(x3).
- So ax−1=xloga+2x2(loga)2+O(x3).
- Numerator: x(ax−1)=x2loga+2x3(loga)2+O(x4).
- Denominator: 1−cosx=2x2−24x4+O(x6).
- Hence
f(x)=2x2−24x4+⋯x2loga+2x3(loga)2+⋯=21−24x2+⋯loga+2x(loga)2+⋯.
- For small x, the denominator tends to 1/2, so
f(x)=2loga+x(loga)2+O(x2).
- Expand g(x) near x=0
- First, the denominator factor:
1−x2=1−2x2−8x4+O(x6),
1+x2=1+2x2−8x4+O(x6).
So1−x2−1+x2=(1−2x2−8x4+⋯)−(1+2x2−8x4+⋯)=−x2+O(x4).
- Also ax=1+xloga+2x2(loga)2+O(x3), so 1−ax=−xloga−2x2(loga)2+O(x3).
- The numerator of g: x(1−ax)=−x2loga−2x3(loga)2+O(x4).
- The denominator of g: ax(1−x2−1+x2)=(1+xloga+⋯)(−x2+O(x4))=−x2−x3loga+O(x4).
- Therefore g(x)=−x2−x3loga+⋯−x2loga−2x3(loga)2+⋯…
- Expand f(x) near x=0
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.limn→∞[n21(e1/n+2e2/n+3e3/n+…+2ne2)]= (A) e2−1 (B) e2+1 (C) 2e2−2 (D) 2e2+1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The sum resembles a Riemann sum for ∫02xexdx, which evaluates to e2+1, so the limit equals e2+1, corresponding to option (B).
The key insight is that the expression inside the limit is a disguised Riemann sum. When you see a sum of the form n1∑f(k/n), you think of an integral. Here, the terms are kek/n but the sum runs up to 2n, not n, so the interval is [0,2]. The factor n21 is actually n1⋅n1, where one n1 is the width of subintervals and the other n1 is part of the function value k/n times ek/n. Let's unpack this carefully.
- Rewrite the sum in Riemann-sum form. The general term is kek/n. Notice that k=n⋅(k/n), so
kek/n=n⋅nkek/n.
Then the whole sum becomes
n21∑k=12nkek/n=n21∑k=12nn⋅nkek/n=n1∑k=12nnkek/n.
-
Identify the Riemann sum.
The expression n1∑k=12nf(nk) with f(x)=xex is a right-endpoint Riemann sum for ∫02f(x)dx, because the points xk=k/n range from 1/n to 2n/n=2, and the subinterval width is Δx=1/n. As n→∞, this sum converges to the integral.
-
Compute the integral.
∫02xexdx.
Use integration by parts: let u=x, dv=exdx, so du=dx, v=ex. Then
∫xexdx=xex−∫exdx=xex−ex+C=ex(x−1)+C.
Evaluate from 0 to 2:
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-AN1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] limn→∞P(1+100nr)tn=
(A) P (B) P(1+100r)t (C) Pe100rt (D) Pe100r›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is the continuous compounding formula: as the number of compounding periods per year grows without bound, the expression approaches Pe100rt. The correct answer is (C).
The question asks what happens when you compound interest infinitely many times per year. The expression P(1+100nr)tn is the familiar compound interest formula where P is principal, r is the annual interest rate in percent, t is the number of years, and n is the number of compounding periods per year. As n→∞, you are compounding every instant — this is called continuous compounding.
The key idea is that the limit limn→∞(1+nx)n=ex is one of the most famous limits in mathematics. Here, the exponent is tn, not just n, so we need to adjust the form to match that standard limit.
Let’s work through it step by step.
-
Rewrite the expression to isolate the standard limit form.
We have P(1+100nr)tn. Let x=100r. Then the expression becomes P(1+nx)tn.
-
Manipulate the exponent.
Write (1+nx)tn=[(1+nx)n]t. This is valid because (am)k=amk. So the limit is P⋅[limn→∞(1+nx)n]t.
-
Apply the standard limit. …
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.