Q.Integrate the following function: ∫x2(1−x21)dx
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Integration By Expansion
Integration by Expansion
The idea
Some integrands look forbidding only because they are written as a product or a power. If you first multiply them out — expand them — into a plain sum of standard terms, you can then integrate the sum term by term using the basic formulas you already know. Expansion is not a new rule of integration; it is a rewriting step that turns the integrand into something the sum rule and the power rule can finish.
This works because integration is linear: ∫(f±g)dx=∫fdx±∫gdx. Once the integrand is a sum, each piece is handled separately.
Algebraic expansion
Products and powers of polynomials are expanded first:
∫(x+2)2dx=∫(x2+4x+4)dx=3x3+2x2+4x+C.
Similarly, split a fraction into separate terms before integrating:
∫xx2+3x−1dx=∫(x+3−x1)dx=2x2+3x−log∣x∣+C.
Trigonometric expansion
Many trigonometric integrands have no direct formula in the form given, but do have one after a standard identity is used to expand them into a sum:
sin2x=21−cos2x,cos2x=21+cos2x
So, for example,
∫sin2xdx=∫21−cos2xdx=2x−4sin2x+C.
Product-to-sum identities do the same job for products such as sin3xcos5x, and sin3x, cos3x can be expanded using their triple-angle forms.
How to use it
- Look at the integrand — is it a product, a power, or a single fraction over x?
- Expand it (multiply out, or apply a trig identity) into a sum of standard terms. …
The key idea is to expand the integrand first, turning the product into simpler power terms that can be integrated term-by-term.
Step 1: Expand the bracket:
x2(1−x21)=x2⋅1−x2⋅x21=x2−1
Step 2: Integrate each term separately:
∫(x2−1)dx=∫x2dx−∫1dx …
The key idea is to first expand the integrand by multiplying through, then integrate term‑by‑term using the power rule. The result is 3x3−x+C.
Why “Integration by Expansion” works here
When you see a product like x2 times a bracket, your first instinct might be to look for a substitution. But look closely: the bracket itself is a simple polynomial in 1/x2. Multiplying through turns the whole thing into a sum of power functions — and integrating powers is the most straightforward operation in calculus. No chain rule, no substitution, no integration by parts. Just expand, then apply ∫xndx=n+1xn+1 for each term.
This is a classic “simplify before you differentiate (or integrate)” move. Many students rush to integrate a product without checking whether it can be expanded first. Here, expansion reduces the problem to two trivial integrals.
- Expand the integrand Multiply x2 into the bracket:
x2(1−x21)=x2⋅1−x2⋅x21=x2−1.
The x2 cancels with the 1/x2, leaving a constant −1. So the integral becomes
∫(x2−1)dx.
- Integrate term by term Use the power rule for x2:
∫x2dx=3x3.
For the constant −1, recall that ∫−1dx=−x (since ∫kdx=kx for any constant k).
- Add the constant of integration Every indefinite integral must include +C: …
Method: Simplify a product or fraction before integrating
Always check whether an integrand simplifies algebraically — a product like x2(1−x21) collapses to a polynomial.
Steps
Step 1: Multiply out / simplify.
Distribute: x2⋅1−x2⋅x21=x2−1; the awkward term cancels.
Step 2: Integrate term by term. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Trying substitution or parts on x2(1−x21).
Why it's wrong: a substitution like u=1−x21 is needlessly messy. Correct approach: distribute first — it simplifies to x2−1, then integrate to 3x3−x+C. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.∫9x2−12x+13xsec29x2−12x+1−2sec2(3x−2)2−3dx= (A) 9x2−12x+1+c (B) 31cos9x2−12x+1+c (C) 29x2−12x+11+c (D) 31tan9x2−12x+1+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral simplifies by noticing that the numerator is exactly the derivative of the argument inside the sec² term, leading to a simple substitution. The result is 31tan9x2−12x+1+c, so the correct option is (D).
The key insight here is that the integrand looks messy, but the structure hints at a chain-rule derivative in reverse. When you see sec2(something) multiplied by something that looks like the derivative of that "something," you should immediately think of the derivative of tan(something). The trick is to check whether the numerator is exactly the derivative of the expression inside the square root.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Simplify the expression under the square root. Notice that 9x2−12x+1 can be rewritten by completing the square:
9x2−12x+1=9(x2−34x)+1=9[(x−32)2−94]+1=9(x−32)2−4+1=(3x−2)2−3.
So 9x2−12x+1=(3x−2)2−3. This confirms the two square-root expressions in the problem are identical. Let’s denote
u=9x2−12x+1.
- Find the derivative of u with respect to x.
u=(9x2−12x+1)1/2⇒dxdu=21(9x2−12x+1)−1/2⋅(18x−12)=9x2−12x+19x−6.
Factor a 3:
dxdu=9x2−12x+13(3x−2).
- Compare with the numerator of the integrand. The integrand is
9x2−12x+13xsec2u−2sec2u=9x2−12x+1(3x−2)sec2u.
We have (3x−2) in the numerator, but dxdu contains 3(3x−2). So the numerator is exactly 31⋅dxdu⋅9x2−12x+1? Wait, let’s check carefully:
dxdu=9x2−12x+13(3x−2)⇒(3x−2)=31⋅dxdu⋅9x2−12x+1.
Substituting this into the integrand:
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-06-AN1 markMCQQ.∫x2+x+1dx×∫x2+x+11dx= (A) x+C (B) (42x+1x2+x+1+83sinh−132x+1)sinh−1(32x+1)+C (C) 22x+1sinh−1(x2+x+1)+(83sinh−132x+1)2+C (D) 22x+1(sinh−132x+1)2+C
›Reveal solutionSolution
The product of the two integrals is not a simple closed form; the given options are distractors. The correct approach is to recognise that the product of an indefinite integral and another indefinite integral is not a single constant or simple function — the problem is ill-posed as written. None of the options are correct.
The question presents a product of two indefinite integrals: ∫x2+x+1dx multiplied by ∫x2+x+11dx. This is a trap. Indefinite integrals are families of functions differing by a constant. Their product is not a well-defined function — it depends on the arbitrary constants of integration. The options try to make you think you can compute each integral separately and multiply, but that ignores the constants.
Let’s see why this is a conceptual dead end.
-
Each integral is a family, not a single function.
∫f(x)dx=F(x)+C1 and ∫g(x)dx=G(x)+C2. Their product is (F(x)+C1)(G(x)+C2), which expands to F(x)G(x)+C1G(x)+C2F(x)+C1C2. This is not a single expression — it depends on two arbitrary constants. No option includes two independent constants, so none can represent the general product.
-
Even if we set both constants to zero (the “particular” antiderivatives), the product is not among the options.
Let’s compute the two integrals with zero constants. Complete the square:
x2+x+1=(x+21)2+43.
Let u=x+21, so du=dx. Then:
- ∫u2+43du
- ∫u2+431du
-
Standard forms.
Recall:
∫u2+a2du=2uu2+a2+2a2sinh−1au+C
∫u2+a21du=sinh−1au+C
Here a2=43, so a=23.
-
Compute each integral (constants zero).
-
I1=∫u2+43du=2uu2+43+83sinh−132u
Back-substitute u=x+21:
I1=2x+21x2+x+1+83sinh−132x+1
=42x+1x2+x+1+83sinh−132x+1
-
I2=∫u2+431du=sinh−132u=sinh−132x+1
-
-
Their product (with zero constants) is: …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.limn→∞n(2n(2n−1)…(n+2)(n+1))1/n= (A) ∫01logxdx (B) ∫01xlogxdx (C) ∫01(x+1)log(x+1)dx (D) ∫01log(1+x)dx
›Reveal solutionSolution
Taking the natural log turns the expression into a Riemann sum for ∫01log(1+x)dx. Correct option: (D).
Setting up. The numerator is the product of the n integers from n+1 to 2n:
(2n)(2n−1)⋯(n+1)=∏k=1n(n+k).
Divide inside the n-th root by n (there are n factors, so n powers of n):
n(∏k=1n(n+k))1/n=(∏k=1nnn+k)1/n=(∏k=1n(1+nk))1/n.
Take logarithms. Writing L for the limit,
logL=limn→∞n1∑k=1nlog(1+nk).
This is exactly the Riemann sum (with xk=k/n, Δx=1/n) for the definite integral …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following Assertion (A): ∫x−3(sin−1(logx)+cos−1(logx))dx=3π(x−3)23+c Reason (R): sin−1(f(x))+cos−1(f(x))=2π,∣f(x)∣<1 (A) Both (A) and (R) are true, (R) is the correct explanation of (A) (B) Both (A) and (R) are true, (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) (C) (A) is true, but (R) is false (D) (A) is false, but (R) is true
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Reason (the inverse-trig identity) is true, but the Assertion's integral is defined on an empty domain, so it is false.
The Reason states the standard identity sin⁻¹(f(x))+cos⁻¹(f(x))=π/2 for |f(x)|≤1 — true. For the Assertion, the factor sin⁻¹(log x)+cos⁻¹(log x) requires |log x|≤1, i.e. x∈[1/e, e]. But √(x−3) requires x≥3. The intersection of [1/e, e] and [3, ∞) is empty, so the integrand exists …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following Assertion (A): ∫x−3(sin−1(logx)+cos−1(logx))dx=3π(x−3)23+c Reason (R): sin−1(f(x))+cos−1(f(x))=2π, ∣f(x)∣<1 (A) is false, but (R) is true (B) (A) is true, but (R) is false (C) Both (A) and (R) are true, (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) (D) Both (A) and (R) are true, (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that sin−1(logx)+cos−1(logx)=2π only when ∣logx∣<1, which is not true for all x in the domain of the integrand. The integration in (A) incorrectly assumes this identity holds universally, so (A) is false, while (R) is a true statement about the identity's condition.
The problem tests two things: the domain restrictions on inverse trigonometric identities, and whether you blindly apply a formula without checking where it works. The identity sin−1t+cos−1t=2π is valid only for t∈[−1,1]. Here t=logx, so the identity holds only when ∣logx∣≤1, i.e., x∈[1/e,e]. But the integrand x−3 requires x≥3 for real values. Since 3>e, there is no x where both conditions overlap — the identity never applies in the domain of integration. So (A) is built on a false premise.
-
Check the domain of the integrand.
The square root x−3 is real only when x≥3. So the integration in (A) is meant over x≥3.
-
Check where the identity in (R) holds.
sin−1(f(x))+cos−1(f(x))=2π is true only if ∣f(x)∣≤1. Here f(x)=logx, so we need ∣logx∣≤1, which means 1/e≤x≤e.
-
Compare the two domains.
The integration domain is x≥3, but the identity works only for x∈[1/e,e]. Since 3>e, there is no overlap. For every x≥3, logx>1, so sin−1(logx) is not even defined (its argument exceeds 1). The integrand itself is undefined for x≥3 because sin−1(logx) has no real value there.
-
Consequence for Assertion (A). …
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.If ∫cos(2x)cos(27x)dx=asinx+bsin2x+csin3x−dx+k, then a+b+c+d= (A) 1 (B) −32 (C) 34 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to rewrite the integrand using sum‑to‑product identities, integrate term by term, match coefficients to the given form, and sum them. The result is a+b+c+d=34, so option (C) is correct.
We start with the integral
∫cos(2x)cos(27x)dx.
The presence of half‑angles suggests using a product‑to‑sum identity to simplify the ratio. The trick: express the numerator as a sum of cosines whose arguments are multiples of x, so that division by cos(x/2) becomes straightforward.
1. Use the identity
Recall:
cosA+cosB=2cos2A+Bcos2A−B.
We want to write cos(7x/2) as something times cos(x/2). Notice that if we set A+B=7x and A−B=x, then A=4x, B=3x. Then
cos4x+cos3x=2cos27xcos2x.
Hence
cos27x=2cos(x/2)cos4x+cos3x.
But we have cos(7x/2) divided by cos(x/2), so
cos(x/2)cos(7x/2)=2cos2(x/2)cos4x+cos3x.
That still has a cos2(x/2) in the denominator — not ideal. Let’s try a different pairing.
2. A better pairing
We want the denominator cos(x/2) to cancel directly. Write
cos27x=cos(4x−2x)=cos4xcos2x+sin4xsin2x.
Then
cos(x/2)cos(7x/2)=cos4x+sin4xtan2x.
That introduces a tangent — not simpler.
3. Use sum‑to‑product in reverse
Instead, consider writing cos(7x/2) as a sum of cosines of multiples of x times cos(x/2). We can use the identity:
cosnθ=2cos((n−1)θ)cosθ−cos((n−2)θ).
Let θ=x/2, then cos(7x/2)=cos7θ. Applying the recurrence:
cos7θ=2cos6θcosθ−cos5θ.
But cos6θ=cos3x, cos5θ=cos(5x/2) — still half‑angles. This path gets messy.
4. The clean approach: use the identity
cosA=cos(2A+B+2A−B)
and sum with a cleverly chosen term. Actually, the classic trick is:
cos(x/2)cos(7x/2)=cos(x/2)cos(4x+3x/2)no.
Better: Write
cos27x=cos(3x+2x)=cos3xcos2x−sin3xsin2x.
Then
cos(x/2)cos(7x/2)=cos3x−sin3xtan2x.
Still not a polynomial in sines and cosines of x.
5. The winning identity
Use:
cos27x=cos(4x−2x)=cos4xcos2x+sin4xsin2x.
Divide by cos(x/2):
cos(x/2)cos(7x/2)=cos4x+sin4xtan2x.
Now use tan(x/2)=1+cosxsinx or better: express sin4x in terms of sinx and cosx and use the half‑angle tangent identity. But there’s a more direct route.
6. Use the identity
cos(x/2)cos(7x/2)=2cos2(x/2)2cos(7x/2)cos(x/2)=1+cosxcos4x+cos3x
since 2cos2(x/2)=1+cosx. So
I=∫1+cosxcos4x+cos3xdx.
Now use cos4x=2cos22x−1 and cos3x=4cos3x−3cosx, but denominator 1+cosx suggests using the substitution t=tan(x/2) or expressing everything in terms of cosx.
7. Express numerator in terms of cosx
We have:
cos4x=8cos4x−8cos2x+1,
cos3x=4cos3x−3cosx.
So numerator = 8cos4x+4cos3x−8cos2x−3cosx+1.
Denominator = 1+cosx. Perform polynomial division in cosx:
Divide 8u4+4u3−8u2−3u+1 by u+1 (where u=cosx).
Synthetic division with root −1:
- Bring down 8.
- 8×(−1)=−8, add to 4 → −4. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.Term independent of x in the expansion of (5x+x6)4(1−2x1) is (A) (201)63 (B) (27)64 (C) (157)54 (D) (27)56
›Reveal solutionSolution
Collect terms of (5x+6/x)4 with non-positive power, weight each by 2n from 1−2x1=∑2nxn: total =5400+17280+20736=43416=(201)63.
General term of (5x+x6)4: (r4)54−r6rx4−2r.
r power coefficient 1 2 3000 2 0 5400 3 −2 4320 4 −4 1296 - TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-06-FN1 markMCQQ.The term independent of x in the expansion of (x−x2)21 is (A) 21C15(−2)15 (B) 21C14214 (C) −21C7(2)7 (D) −21C7214
›Reveal solutionSolution
The general term has power x21−23k; independence needs k=14, giving 21C14214 — option (B).
General term of (x−x2)21:
Tk+1=21Ckx21−k(−x2)k=21Ck(−2)kx21−k−2k=21Ck(−2)kx21−23k.
Term independent of x: set the exponent to zero, …
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-06-FN1 markMCQQ.The coefficient of x3 in the expansion of (1−43x)21 is (A) 102427 (B) −102427 (C) 102481 (D) −102481
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using (1+u)1/2 with u=−43x, the x3 coefficient is (31/2)(−43)3=−102427 — option (B).
Binomial (general index) expansion. For (1−43x)1/2 the coefficient of x3 is
(31/2)(−43)3.
Evaluate the binomial coefficient. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.Coefficient of x3 in the expansion of (2+x)1/2(1−2x2)1/3 is (A) 384172 (B) 768172 (C) 768492 (D) 384492
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use the binomial expansion for rational exponents on each factor separately, then multiply the series and collect the x3 term. The coefficient is 768492, which is option (C).
The problem asks for the coefficient of x3 in a product of two expressions, each raised to a fractional power. The direct approach — expanding each factor as a series using the general binomial theorem — is the natural path. For (1+u)n where n is any rational number, the expansion is an infinite series, and we only need terms up to x3 from the product.
Let’s write the expression as:
(2+x)1/2(1−2x2)1/3=(1−2x2)1/3⋅(2+x)−1/2.
We handle each factor separately.
1. Expand (1−2x2)1/3
The general binomial series for ∣u∣<1 is:
(1+u)n=1+nu+2!n(n−1)u2+3!n(n−1)(n−2)u3+⋯
Here n=31 and u=−2x2. So:
(1−2x2)1/3=1+31(−2x2)+231(31−1)(−2x2)2+631(31−1)(31−2)(−2x2)3+⋯
Compute term by term:
- Constant term: 1.
- x2 term: 31(−2x2)=−32x2.
- x4 term: 231(−32)⋅4x4=2−92⋅4x4=−91⋅4x4=−94x4.
- x6 term: 631(−32)(−35)⋅(−8x6)=62710⋅(−8x6)=16210⋅(−8x6)=815⋅(−8x6)=−8140x6.
We only need up to x3 from the product, so terms of degree x4 and higher from this factor will combine with negative powers from the other factor to produce x3 — so we must keep them. In fact, we need all terms up to x6 from this factor because the other factor will contribute x−1, x−2, etc. Let’s see.
2. Expand (2+x)−1/2
Rewrite as:
(2+x)−1/2=2−1/2(1+2x)−1/2=21(1+2x)−1/2.
Now expand (1+2x)−1/2 with n=−21 and u=2x:
(1+2x)−1/2=1+(−21)2x+2(−21)(−23)(2x)2+6(−21)(−23)(−25)(2x)3+⋯
Compute:
- Constant: 1.
- x term: −21⋅2x=−4x.
- x2 term: 243⋅4x2=83⋅4x2=323x2.
- x3 term: 6(−21)(−23)(−25)⋅8x3=6−815⋅8x3=−4815⋅8x3=−165⋅8x3=−1285x3.
So:
(2+x)−1/2=21(1−4x+323x2−1285x3+⋯).
3. Multiply the two series
We need the coefficient of x3 in:
(1−32x2−94x4−8140x6+⋯)⋅21(1−4x+323x2−1285x3+⋯)
Multiply term by term, collecting only x3 contributions. Let’s list all pairs whose exponents sum to 3: …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.sinh(log(3+8))= (A) 323 (B) 223 (C) 832 (D) 321
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to rewrite sinh(logx) as 2x−1/x, then simplify with x=3+8 using its reciprocal property. The final value is 2.
The problem asks for sinh(log(3+8)). The direct approach — plugging into the definition of sinh — is the cleanest path. Recall that for any real number t,
sinht=2et−e−t.
Here t=log(3+8), so et=3+8 and e−t=3+81. The expression becomes
2(3+8)−3+81.
The trick is to simplify 3+81. Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate 3−8:
3+81⋅3−83−8=9−83−8=3−8.
So the reciprocal is simply 3−8 — a neat symmetry.
Now the numerator becomes (3+8)−(3−8)=28. Therefore
sinh(log(3+8))=228=8.
But 8=22=23/2. That matches one of the options directly. …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.If the coefficient of x4 in the expansion of (x−1)2(x−2)x is nm and ∣m∣,∣n∣ are coprimes, then ∣m+n∣= (A) 9 (B) 33 (C) 7 (D) 62
›Reveal solutionSolution
Partial fractions give the x4 coefficient =−1649, so ∣m∣=49, ∣n∣=16, ∣m+n∣=33 and ∣m+n∣=33.
Resolve into partial fractions:
(x−1)2(x−2)x=x−1A+(x−1)2B+x−2C.
From x=A(x−1)(x−2)+B(x−2)+C(x−1)2: at x=1, B=−1; at x=2, C=2; matching x2, A+C=0⇒A=−2.
So f(x)=−x−12−(x−1)21+x−22. Expand each about x=0:
−x−12=2∑n≥0xn ⇒ [x4]=2,
−(x−1)21=−∑n≥0(n+1)xn ⇒ [x4]=−5, …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.