Which of the two structures (A) and (B) given below is more stabilised by resonance? Explain. (A) CH3COOH and

NCERT Exemplar · Q49

Q. Which of the two structures (A) and (B) given below is more stabilised by resonance? Explain. (A) CH3COOH and (B) CH3COO^-

Tripura TbseShort· 2mImportance★★★★★

87% · 113/130 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Inductive Effect

Inductive Effect on Acidity – From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you are holding a rope tied to a heavy box. If you pull the rope, the box moves toward you. Now imagine the rope is made of rubber bands — the pull still reaches the box, but it gets weaker the farther away you are. That is exactly how the inductive effect works inside a molecule.

The Core Intuition

An acid donates a proton ( $H^+$ ). After it does, the remaining part (the conjugate base) carries a negative charge. The stability of that negative charge determines how willing the molecule is to give up the proton. More stable conjugate base → stronger acid.

Now, some atoms or groups are electron-withdrawing — they pull electron density toward themselves through the sigma bonds. If such a group is attached near the acidic proton, it pulls some electron density away from the negative charge on the conjugate base. That spreads out (delocalises) the negative charge, making the conjugate base more stable. The acid becomes stronger.

Conversely, electron-donating groups push electron density toward the negative charge, concentrating it and making the conjugate base less stable. The acid becomes weaker.

Note

The inductive effect operates through sigma bonds only. It does not involve pi bonds or resonance. It is a permanent, through-bond polarisation.

The Precise Statement

Inductive effect on acidity: The acidity of a compound increases with the presence of electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) near the acidic site, and decreases with electron-donating groups (EDGs). The effect is strongest when the group is closest to the acidic proton, and diminishes rapidly with distance.

Mathematically, for a series of substituted carboxylic acids:

\text{R-COOH} \quad \text{where R = substituent}

The acid dissociation constant $K_a$ changes as:

If R is electron-withdrawing (e.g., $-\text{Cl}$ , $-\text{NO}_2$ , $-\text{CF}_3$ ): $K_a$ increases → stronger acid.
If R is electron-donating (e.g., $-\text{CH}_3$ , $-\text{C}_2\text{H}_5$ ): $K_a$ decreases → weaker acid.

Why Distance Matters

The inductive effect falls off with distance because sigma bonds are localised. Each bond attenuates the effect by roughly a factor of 2–3. For example, compare:

Compound	$pK_a$	Explanation
$\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}$	4.76	Reference (no EWG)
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{COOH}$	2.86	Cl withdraws through one bond
$\text{Cl}_2\text{CHCOOH}$	1.29	Two Cl atoms, stronger withdrawal
$\text{Cl}_3\text{CCOOH}$	0.65	Three Cl atoms, strongest withdrawal
$\text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.87	Ethyl group is electron-donating (slightly weaker acid)

Notice: $\text{ClCH}_2\text{COOH}$ is about 100 times stronger than acetic acid ( $\Delta pK_a \approx 1.9$ ). But if the Cl is moved further away:

Compound	$pK_a$
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.08
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.52

The effect fades as the chlorine moves farther from the carboxyl group. …

Why this formula?

Inductive Effect: Why the Key Ideas Hold

The inductive effect is a fundamental concept in organic chemistry that explains how electron density shifts along a sigma ( $\sigma$ ) bond due to differences in electronegativity. Let's break down why the key principles work — not just what they are.

1. The Core Idea: Polarization of $\sigma$ Bonds

What happens?

When two atoms with different electronegativities form a $\sigma$ bond, the bonding electrons are not shared equally. The more electronegative atom pulls electron density toward itself.

Why does this happen?

Electronegativity is a measure of an atom's ability to attract shared electrons.
The $\sigma$ bond is a region of high electron density between the nuclei.
The more electronegative atom's nucleus exerts a stronger electrostatic pull on these electrons.
Result: The bond becomes polarized — one end becomes slightly negative ( $\delta^-$ ), the other slightly positive ( $\delta^+$ ).

Key formula (conceptual):

$\delta^- \leftarrow \text{Atom A} \rightarrow \delta^+$

where A is more electronegative than B.

2. Why the Effect Transmits Along a Chain

The puzzle:

If the inductive effect is about a single bond, how does it affect atoms several bonds away?

The reasoning:

The $\delta^+$ on the less electronegative atom creates a partial positive charge.
This partial charge polarizes the next $\sigma$ bond in the chain.
The effect is relayed through successive bonds, like a chain of dominoes.

Why does it weaken with distance?

Each bond acts as a dielectric medium — it partially screens the charge.
The electrostatic influence falls off with distance according to Coulomb's law:

F \propto \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}

In a molecular chain, the effective distance $r$ increases, so the induced dipole in each subsequent bond is smaller.

Key result: Inductive effect is significant only up to 3–4 bonds away.

3. The Quantitative Measure: Inductive Effect Constant ( $\sigma_I$ )

What is $\sigma_I$ ?

It's a Hammett-type constant that quantifies the electron-withdrawing or electron-donating power of a substituent through sigma bonds only.

Why does it have this form?

The inductive effect is additive — each substituent contributes independently.
For a substituent X attached to a carbon chain:

\sigma_I = \log \left( \frac{K_a(\text{X-CH}_2\text{COOH})}{K_a(\text{CH}_3\text{COOH})} \right)

where $K_a$ is the acid dissociation constant.

Why use acid dissociation?

The carboxyl group ( $-\text{COOH}$ ) is a sensitive probe.
An electron-withdrawing group (EWG) stabilizes the conjugate base ( $\text{R-COO}^-$ ) by dispersing its negative charge.
This increases $K_a$ (stronger acid).
An electron-donating group (EDG) destabilizes the conjugate base, decreasing $K_a$ .

Key formula:

$\sigma_I > 0$ for EWGs (e.g., $-\text{Cl}$ , $-\text{NO}_2$ )

$\sigma_I < 0$ for EDGs (e.g., $-\text{CH}_3$ , $-\text{C(CH}_3)_3$ )

4. Why Inductive Effect is Not Resonance

Common confusion:

Students often mix inductive and resonance effects.

The critical difference:

Property	Inductive Effect	Resonance Effect
Electron movement	Through $\sigma$ bonds only	Through $\pi$ bonds or lone pairs
Distance dependence	Dies off after 3–4 bonds	Can transmit over long distances in conjugated systems
Permanent or temporary	Permanent polarization	Can be temporary (delocalization)

Why this matters for exam problems:

In alkyl halides, the inductive effect of $-\text{Cl}$ explains the $\delta^+$ on carbon.
In benzene derivatives, the combined inductive and resonance effects determine reactivity.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Resonance stabilisation is measured by the number and quality of equivalent contributing structures. The acetate ion (B) has two identical resonance forms, giving it far greater stabilisation than neutral acetic acid (A), where the contributing structures are unequal in energy.

Resonance stabilisation is not about how many structures you can draw — it is about how much those structures lower the energy of the real molecule. The key idea is equivalence. When two or more resonance contributors are identical in energy, the actual molecule sits exactly halfway between them, and that delocalisation gives maximum stabilisation. When the contributors are unequal, the real structure leans heavily toward the more stable one, and the stabilisation is much smaller.

Let us apply this to the two species.

Structure (A): CH₃COOH (acetic acid) Draw its resonance. The carbonyl group ( $\ce{C=O}$ ) can push a lone pair from the adjacent hydroxyl oxygen toward the carbonyl carbon, forming a structure with a $\ce{C-O^-}$ single bond and a $\ce{C=OH^+}$ double bond.

\ce{CH3-C(=O)-OH \longleftrightarrow CH3-C(-O^-)=OH^+}

These two forms are not equivalent. The left (major) contributor has a neutral $\ce{C=O}$ and an $\ce{O-H}$ ; the right (minor) contributor has a positive charge on oxygen and a negative charge on the other oxygen — a high-energy separation of charge. The real molecule is mostly the left form, with only a tiny contribution from the right. Resonance stabilisation exists, but it is modest.

Structure (B): CH₃COO⁻ (acetate ion) Now draw its resonance. The negative charge on one oxygen can be delocalised onto the other oxygen through the $\pi$ system:

\ce{CH3-C(=O)-O^- \longleftrightarrow CH3-C(-O^-)=O}

These two structures are perfectly equivalent — same atoms, same bond orders, same charge distribution, just swapped. The real acetate ion is a hybrid with both $\ce{C-O}$ bonds identical (bond order 1.5) and the negative charge shared equally between the two oxygens. This is textbook maximum resonance stabilisation. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ48 — By mistake, an alcohol (boiling point 97°C) was mixed with a hydrocarb…→Next questionQ50 — Match the type of mixture of compounds in Column I with the technique …

Q.Which of the two structures (A) and (B) given below is more stabilised by resonance? Explain. (A) CH3COOH and (B) CH3COO^-

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.Which of the two structures (A) and (B) given below is more stabilised by resonance? Explain.
(A) CH3COOH and (B) CH3COO^-

Unlock everything free for 14 days