Skip to content
Worked Examples · Example 2.7

Q.Calculate Λm0\Lambda^0_m for CaCl2CaCl_2 and MgSO4MgSO_4 from the data given in Table 3.4.
(The relevant limiting molar conductivities are: λ0(Ca2+)=119.0\lambda^0(Ca^{2+}) = 119.0, λ0(Cl−)=76.3\lambda^0(Cl^-) = 76.3, λ0(Mg2+)=106.0\lambda^0(Mg^{2+}) = 106.0 and λ0(SO42−)=160.0 S cm2 mol−1\lambda^0(SO_4^{2-}) = 160.0\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1}.)

Uttar Pradesh UpmspTextbookSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★
6% · 7/115 Questions
✓ Free question

Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions lets us add the limiting molar conductivities of the individual ions, weighted by their stoichiometric coefficients, to get the limiting molar conductivity of the whole salt. For CaCl2CaCl_2: Λm0=119.0+2(76.3)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1\Lambda^0_m = 119.0 + 2(76.3) = 271.6\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1}. For MgSO4MgSO_4: Λm0=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1\Lambda^0_m = 106.0 + 160.0 = 266.0\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1}.

Note

The printed question cites "Table 3.4" — a leftover from NCERT's pre-rationalization numbering, when Electrochemistry was Unit 3; it refers to the same ionic limiting molar conductivities as today's Table 2.4 in the current textbook, which the values below are taken from.

The key idea is that at infinite dilution, ions behave completely independently — they don't interact with each other. So the total conductivity of a salt solution is simply the sum of the contributions from each type of ion, each multiplied by how many of that ion appear in the formula unit.

This is Kohlrausch's law of independent migration. It's a powerful shortcut: you don't need to measure every salt directly. Once you know the limiting molar conductivity of a few key ions, you can predict Λm0\Lambda^0_m for any salt made from them.

Let's apply it.


  1. For CaCl2CaCl_2 One formula unit gives one Ca2+Ca^{2+} ion and two Cl−Cl^- ions. So:

Λm0(CaCl2)=λ0(Ca2+)+2⋅λ0(Cl−)\Lambda^0_m(CaCl_2) = \lambda^0(Ca^{2+}) + 2 \cdot \lambda^0(Cl^-)

Plug in the numbers:

Λm0=119.0+2(76.3)=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1\Lambda^0_m = 119.0 + 2(76.3) = 119.0 + 152.6 = 271.6\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1}

  1. For MgSO4MgSO_4 One formula unit gives one Mg2+Mg^{2+} and one SO42−SO_4^{2-} ion. So:

Λm0(MgSO4)=λ0(Mg2+)+λ0(SO42−)\Lambda^0_m(MgSO_4) = \lambda^0(Mg^{2+}) + \lambda^0(SO_4^{2-})

Substituting:

Λm0=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1\Lambda^0_m = 106.0 + 160.0 = 266.0\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1}

Watch out

A common mistake is to forget the stoichiometric coefficient. For CaCl2CaCl_2, students sometimes add only one Cl−Cl^- contribution. Always check the formula: CaCl2CaCl_2 means two chlorides per calcium.

Tip

Notice that MgSO4MgSO_4 has a lower Λm0\Lambda^0_m than CaCl2CaCl_2 even though SO42−SO_4^{2-} has a much higher λ0\lambda^0 than Cl−Cl^-. Why? Because CaCl2CaCl_2 has three ions per formula unit, while MgSO4MgSO_4 has only two. The number of charge carriers matters.

✓Final answer

The limiting molar conductivities are Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1\Lambda^0_m(CaCl_2) = 271.6\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1} and Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1\Lambda^0_m(MgSO_4) = 266.0\ S\ cm^2\ mol^{-1}.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.