Q.Apart from tetrahedral geometry, another possible geometry for is square planar with the four H atoms at the corners of the square and the C atom at its centre. Explain why is not square planar?
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →VSEPR theory predicts that four electron pairs around carbon adopt a tetrahedral arrangement (bond angle ) to minimize repulsion; square planar geometry would force angles between bonding pairs, creating far greater electron–electron repulsion and making the structure unstable.
The question asks us to use fundamental principles of molecular geometry to rule out a square planar structure for methane. The key lies in understanding how electron pairs arrange themselves in space.
Why VSEPR Theory governs molecular shape
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory rests on a simple physical idea: electron pairs—whether bonding or lone pairs—are negatively charged clouds that repel one another. To minimize this repulsion, they spread out as far apart as possible in three-dimensional space. The geometry that maximizes the distance between electron pairs is the one nature adopts.
For a central atom surrounded by four electron pairs, we need to ask: what arrangement in 3D space keeps them maximally separated?
Comparing the two geometries
Let's examine both proposed structures for :
-
Tetrahedral geometry
The carbon atom sits at the center of a regular tetrahedron, with the four hydrogen atoms at the vertices. Every bond angle is . This is the geometry of four points on a sphere that are as far apart as possible—it's the solution to maximizing mutual distances in three dimensions.
-
Square planar geometry
The carbon atom lies at the center of a square, with the four hydrogen atoms at the corners. All atoms are coplanar. The bond angles are between adjacent hydrogens and between opposite hydrogens.
Now compare the electron-pair repulsions:
| Geometry | Bond angles | Electron-pair separation |
|---|---|---|
| Tetrahedral | All | Maximum for 4 pairs in 3D |
| Square planar | and | Four pairs forced into a plane |
In the square planar arrangement, the four bonding pairs are compressed into a single plane. Adjacent bonding pairs are separated by only , which is significantly smaller than the tetrahedral angle of . This means the electron clouds are much closer together, leading to much stronger repulsion.
A common mistake is to think "square planar looks symmetric, so it should be stable." Symmetry alone doesn't minimize energy—three-dimensional separation of electron pairs does. Square planar is symmetric but energetically unfavorable for four equivalent bonds.
- Energy consideration …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.