Skip to content
Exercise 5.1 · Q1

Q.Solve 24x<10024x < 100, when

(i) xx is a natural number.
(ii) xx is an integer.
Uttarakhand UbseTextbookSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★
1% · 1/94 Questions
✓ Free question

The inequality 24x<10024x < 100 simplifies to x<256≈4.1667x < \frac{25}{6} \approx 4.1667. For natural numbers, the solution set is {1,2,3,4}\{1, 2, 3, 4\}; for integers, it is {…,−3,−2,−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{ \dots, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}.

Why this works

A linear inequality like 24x<10024x < 100 is solved almost exactly like a linear equation — the only extra care is when multiplying or dividing by a negative number (which flips the inequality sign). Here, we divide by a positive 24, so the direction stays the same. The twist comes when we interpret the solution for different number systems: natural numbers start at 1, while integers include negatives and zero.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Isolate xx. Divide both sides by 24 (positive, so inequality unchanged):

x<10024x < \frac{100}{24}

Simplify the fraction:

x<256x < \frac{25}{6}

  1. Convert to a decimal for clarity.

256=4.1666…\frac{25}{6} = 4.1666\ldots

So the inequality means:

x<4.1666…x < 4.1666\ldots

  1. Case (i): xx is a natural number.

    Natural numbers are {1,2,3,4,5,… }\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, \dots\}.

    We need all natural numbers strictly less than 4.1666…4.1666\ldots.

    That gives 1,2,3,41, 2, 3, 4.

    (Note: 5 is not allowed because 5>4.1666…5 > 4.1666\ldots.)

    Watch out

    Some textbooks define natural numbers starting from 0. If that were the case, 0 would also be included. But in the NCERT/Indian exam context, natural numbers are {1,2,3,… }\{1, 2, 3, \dots\} unless stated otherwise.

  2. Case (ii): xx is an integer.

    Integers are {…,−3,−2,−1,0,1,2,3,4,5,… }\{ \dots, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, \dots\}.

    We need all integers strictly less than 4.1666…4.1666\ldots.

    That includes every integer from 44 downwards — all negative numbers, zero, 1, 2, 3, and 4.

    So the set is {…,−3,−2,−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{ \dots, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}.

    Tip

    There is no lower bound here — the inequality only gives an upper bound. So the integer solution set is infinite in the negative direction.

✓Final answer

For natural numbers, the solution is {1,2,3,4}\{1, 2, 3, 4\}; for integers, it is {…,−3,−2,−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{ \dots, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.