Worked Examples · Example 6
Q.Let and . Verify that . Then, using and , show that the converse — — is not always true.
West Bengal WbchseTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
100% · 12/12 Questions
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part 1 — for , .
Every element of (namely and ) is in , so holds. Also, has the extra element that lacks, so ; combined with , this gives . Since is true and we've just shown is also true, this confirms in this case — as it must always be, since "proper subset" is defined as "subset, and not equal," so it can never fail the plain subset condition.
Part 2 — Testing the converse with , .
Every element of is in (they are the same two elements), so holds. But (both are exactly ), so is not a proper subset of — is false. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.