Q.Show that if x2−5x+6=0, then x=3 or x=2.
Concept understanding — Methods of Proof
In mathematics, a "proof" is a rigorous, logical argument that establishes the truth of a statement. Unlike scientific theories, which are supported by evidence and can be disproven by new observations, mathematical theorems, once proven, are considered absolutely true within the given system of axioms and definitions.
Why Do We Need Proofs?
Imagine you observe that the sum of two odd numbers is always an even number:
- 1+3=4 (even)
- 5+7=12 (even)
- 11+9=20 (even)
You could test many pairs of odd numbers, and each time you'd find their sum is even. This might make you believe the statement is true. However, no matter how many examples you check, you can never check all possible pairs of odd numbers. There's always a chance that the very next pair you haven't checked might break the pattern.
This is where proofs come in. A proof doesn't just show that a statement is true for some examples; it shows that it must be true for all cases that fit the description, based on fundamental definitions and logical rules. It provides absolute certainty.
What is a Proof?
A proof is a sequence of logical deductions, starting from known facts (like definitions, axioms, or previously proven theorems) and leading step-by-step to the conclusion you want to establish. Each step must be justified by a rule of logic or a known mathematical truth.
We use different "methods of proof" depending on the nature of the statement we want to prove. These methods are strategies for constructing a valid logical argument.
Common Methods of Proof
Here are some of the most common methods of proof:
1. Direct Proof
This is the most straightforward method. To prove a statement of the form "If P, then Q" (denoted P⟹Q), you assume that P is true and then use definitions, axioms, and logical deductions to show that Q must also be true.
Example: Prove that the sum of two even integers is an even integer.
Proof:
Let a and b be two even integers.
By the definition of an even integer, an integer is even if it can be written in the form 2k for some integer k.
So, we can write a=2m for some integer m, and b=2n for some integer n.
Now, consider their sum:
a+b=2m+2n
a+b=2(m+n)
Since m and n are integers, their sum (m+n) is also an integer. Let k=m+n.
Then a+b=2k, where k is an integer.
By the definition of an even integer, 2k is an even integer.
Therefore, the sum of two even integers is an even integer.
2. Proof by Contrapositive
The contrapositive of the statement "If P, then Q" (P⟹Q) is the statement "If not Q, then not P" (¬Q⟹¬P). These two statements are logically equivalent, meaning if one is true, the other must also be true, and vice versa.
Sometimes, it's easier to prove the contrapositive than the original statement directly.
Example: Prove that if n2 is an even integer, then n is an even integer.
Proof:
Let the original statement be P⟹Q, where P is "n2 is even" and Q is "n is even".
The contrapositive statement is ¬Q⟹¬P, which means "If n is not even, then n2 is not even".
In other words, "If n is odd, then n2 is odd".
Let's prove the contrapositive:
Assume n is an odd integer.
By the definition of an odd integer, n can be written in the form 2k+1 for some integer k.
Now, consider n2:
n2=(2k+1)2
n2=(2k)2+2(2k)(1)+12
n2=4k2+4k+1
n2=2(2k2+2k)+1
Let m=2k2+2k. Since k is an integer, m is also an integer.
So, n2=2m+1.
By the definition of an odd integer, 2m+1 is an odd integer.
Thus, if n is odd, then n2 is odd.
Since the contrapositive statement is true, the original statement "If n2 is an even integer, then n is an even integer" is also true.
3. Proof by Contradiction (Reductio ad Absurdum)
This method involves assuming that the statement you want to prove is false. Then, you show that this assumption leads to a logical contradiction (something that is impossible or contradicts a known truth). Since a false assumption led to a contradiction, the initial assumption must be wrong, meaning the original statement must be true.
Example: Prove that 2 is an irrational number.
Proof:
Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that 2 is a rational number.
By the definition of a rational number, if 2 is rational, it can be expressed as a fraction ba, where a and b are integers, b=0, and the fraction is in its simplest form (meaning a and b have no common factors other than 1, i.e., gcd(a,b)=1).
So, 2=ba.
Squaring both sides:
2=b2a2
2b2=a2
This equation implies that a2 is an even number (since it's 2 times an integer b2).
From our previous example (proof by contrapositive), if a2 is even, then a must also be an even number.
So, we can write a=2k for some integer k.
Substitute a=2k back into the equation 2b2=a2:
2b2=(2k)2
2b2=4k2
Divide both sides by 2:
b2=2k2
This equation implies that b2 is an even number.
Again, if b2 is even, then b must also be an even number.
So, we have found that both a and b are even numbers.
This means that a and b have a common factor of 2.
However, we initially assumed that the fraction ba was in its simplest form, meaning a and b have no common factors other than 1.
The conclusion that a and b both have a common factor of 2 contradicts our initial assumption that gcd(a,b)=1.
Since our assumption that 2 is rational led to a contradiction, the assumption must be false.
Therefore, 2 must be an irrational number.
4. Proof by Mathematical Induction
This method is used to prove statements about natural numbers (positive integers). It's like setting up a chain reaction or a line of dominoes. If you can show the first domino falls, and that if any domino falls, the next one will also fall, then all dominoes will fall.
A proof by mathematical induction consists of three steps:
- Base Case: Show that the statement is true for the initial value (usually n=1 or n=0).
- Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that the statement is true for an arbitrary positive integer k (i.e., assume P(k) is true).
- Inductive Step: Show that if the statement is true for k, it must also be true for k+1 (i.e., prove P(k)⟹P(k+1)).
Example: Prove that the sum of the first n positive integers is given by the formula 1+2+⋯+n=2n(n+1) for all positive integers n.
Proof:
Let P(n) be the statement 1+2+⋯+n=2n(n+1).
-
Base Case (n=1):
For n=1, the left side is 1.
The right side is 21(1+1)=21×2=1.
Since 1=1, P(1) is true.
-
Inductive Hypothesis:
Assume that P(k) is true for some arbitrary positive integer k.
That is, assume 1+2+⋯+k=2k(k+1).
-
Inductive Step:
We need to show that P(k+1) is true, i.e., 1+2+⋯+k+(k+1)=2(k+1)((k+1)+1)=2(k+1)(k+2).
Start with the left side of P(k+1):
1+2+⋯+k+(k+1)
By the inductive hypothesis, we know that 1+2+⋯+k=2k(k+1).
So, substitute this into the expression:
2k(k+1)+(k+1)
Factor out (k+1):
(k+1)(2k+1)
(k+1)(2k+2)
2(k+1)(k+2)
This is the right side of P(k+1).
Thus, if P(k) is true, then P(k+1) is also true.
By the principle of mathematical induction, the statement P(n) is true for all positive integers n.
5. Proof by Cases
This method is used when the statement you want to prove can be broken down into a finite number of distinct scenarios or cases. If you can prove the statement is true for each case, and these cases cover all possibilities, then the statement is true in general.
Example: Prove that for any integer n, the expression n2+n is an even integer.
Proof:
We can consider two exhaustive cases for any integer n:
Case 1: n is an even integer.
If n is even, then by definition, n=2k for some integer k.
Substitute this into the expression n2+n:
n2+n=(2k)2+(2k)
n2+n=4k2+2k
n2+n=2(2k2+k)
Since k is an integer, 2k2+k is also an integer. Let m=2k2+k.
Then n2+n=2m.
By definition, 2m is an even integer. So, n2+n is even when n is even.
Case 2: n is an odd integer.
If n is odd, then by definition, n=2k+1 for some integer k.
Substitute this into the expression n2+n:
n2+n=(2k+1)2+(2k+1)
n2+n=(4k2+4k+1)+(2k+1)
n2+n=4k2+6k+2
n2+n=2(2k2+3k+1)
Since k is an integer, 2k2+3k+1 is also an integer. Let p=2k2+3k+1.
Then n2+n=2p.
By definition, 2p is an even integer. So, n2+n is even when n is odd.
Since n2+n is even in both cases (when n is even and when n is odd), and these two cases cover all possible integers n, we conclude that for any integer n, n2+n is an even integer.
These methods form the foundation of mathematical reasoning and are essential tools for proving theorems in all branches of mathematics.
Factorise, then use the zero-product rule.
From x2−5x+6=0, factorise the left side:
x2−5x+6=(x−3)(x−2),
so (x−3)(x−2)=0. Since a product is zero only when a factor is zero,
x−3=0orx−2=0,
hence x=3 or x=2.
If x2−5x+6=0, then x=3 or x=2.
Factorise the quadratic and use the zero-product rule: a product is zero only when one of its factors is zero.
This is a direct proof (straightforward approach): we begin with the given equation and reach the conclusion through a chain of justified steps.
Step 1 — Start from what is given.
x2−5x+6=0
Step 2 — Replace the left side by an equal expression (factorise).
Since x2−5x+6=x2−3x−2x+6=x(x−3)−2(x−3)=(x−3)(x−2), the equation becomes
(x−3)(x−2)=0.
Step 3 — Apply the zero-product property.
For real numbers, if ab=0 then a=0 or b=0. Taking a=x−3 and b=x−2,
x−3=0orx−2=0.
Step 4 — Solve each equation.
Adding equal quantities to both sides (a valid operation that preserves the equation),
x=3orx=2.
Each step is justified by a definition, an established theorem, or a rule of logic, so the implication (x2−5x+6=0)⇒(x=3 or x=2) is proved.
If x2−5x+6=0, then x=3 or x=2.
Method: Direct Proof by Factorisation and the Zero-Product Rule
This method applies to any "if [polynomial equation] = 0, then x= [specific values]" statement — you are not just solving an equation, you are proving an implication.
Steps
Step 1: Recognise the implication to be proved
The statement has the form "If P, then Q" — here P is "x2−5x+6=0" and Q is "x=3 or x=2". A direct proof starts by assuming P is true and derives Q through justified algebraic steps, rather than working backwards from the answer.
Step 2: Rewrite the given expression as a product
Factorise the quadratic into two linear factors:
x2−bx+c=(x−r1)(x−r2)
where r1,r2 are chosen so that r1+r2=b and r1r2=c. This turns the equation into (x−r1)(x−r2)=0.
Step 3: Apply the zero-product property
State the property explicitly: for real numbers, a product is zero only if at least one factor is zero, i.e. ab=0⇒a=0 or b=0. This is the logical step that justifies splitting into two cases.
Step 4: Solve each linear factor and conclude
Set each factor equal to zero and solve for x, then state the "or" conclusion explicitly — both possibilities are valid solutions, not a single combined answer.
Applying to this problem: factorise x2−5x+6 as (x−3)(x−2), apply the zero-product property to get x−3=0 or x−2=0, and conclude x=3 or x=2.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Solving the quadratic without stating the zero-product justification
Why it's wrong: Since this is a proof question (Methods of Proof), simply writing down the two roots without explaining why (x−3)(x−2)=0 forces x=3 or x=2 skips the logical step the question is actually testing — the zero-product property. Correct approach: explicitly state that a product of real numbers is zero only when one factor is zero, before solving each factor.
Mistake 2: A sign error while factorising
Why it's wrong: Factorising x2−5x+6 incorrectly (e.g. as (x−6)(x+1) or (x+3)(x+2)) gives the wrong roots. The two numbers must multiply to +6 and add to −5, which is only satisfied by −3 and −2. Correct approach: check both conditions (product and sum) before writing the factorisation, and verify by expanding it back.
Mistake 3: Writing "and" instead of "or"
Why it's wrong: x cannot simultaneously equal both 3 and 2 — the two solutions are alternatives, not a joint condition. Writing "x=3 and x=2" misstates the logical conclusion. Correct approach: since the zero-product property gives a disjunction ("x−3=0 or x−2=0"), the conclusion must also use "or".
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.