Skip to content
Examples A.1 · Example 8

Q.For each nn,  22n+1\ 2^{2^{n}} + 1 is a prime (n∈N)(n \in \mathbf{N}). Examine whether this generalisation is true.

Yanam CbseNCERTSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★est
93% · 175/188 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The claim is false; a single counterexample at n=5n = 5 (a composite Fermat number) disproves it.

The numbers Fn=22n+1F_n = 2^{2^{n}} + 1 are the Fermat numbers. The generalisation looks plausible because the first few are indeed prime.

Step 1 — Check the small cases (the tempting evidence).

221+1=22+1=5 (prime),2^{2^{1}} + 1 = 2^{2} + 1 = 5 \ (\text{prime}),

222+1=24+1=17 (prime),2^{2^{2}} + 1 = 2^{4} + 1 = 17 \ (\text{prime}),

223+1=28+1=257 (prime).2^{2^{3}} + 1 = 2^{8} + 1 = 257 \ (\text{prime}).

At first sight the pattern suggests the claim is always true.

Step 2 — Produce a counterexample.

To disprove a universal statement p⇒qp \Rightarrow q it suffices to prove ∼(p⇒q)\sim(p \Rightarrow q), i.e. exhibit one case where it fails. Take n=5n = 5:

225+1=232+1=4294967297.2^{2^{5}} + 1 = 2^{32} + 1 = 4294967297.

Step 3 — Show this value is composite.

This number is not prime, because it factors as …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.