Q.p-Dichlorobenzene has higher m.p. than those of o- and m-isomers. Discuss.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Boiling Point Trends
Boiling Point Trends (Organic Compounds)
A substance's boiling point is set by how much energy is needed to overcome the attractive forces HOLDING its molecules together in the liquid — the stronger those intermolecular forces, the higher the boiling point.
The Forces, Weakest to Strongest
- Van der Waals (London dispersion) forces — present in every molecule, and they grow stronger as the molecule gets bigger (more electrons, larger surface area of contact between neighbouring molecules) and more polarisable.
- Dipole–dipole forces — present in polar molecules, add an extra attraction on top of dispersion forces.
- Hydrogen bonding — present when H is bonded directly to N, O, or F; much stronger than ordinary dipole–dipole attraction, and it raises the boiling point sharply compared to a similarly-sized molecule without it.
Trend 1: Down a Series of Halogens (Same Alkyl Group)
For a fixed R group, boiling point rises as the halogen gets heavier: R−I>R−Br>R−Cl>R−F. This looks surprising at first, since electronegativity (and so bond polarity/dipole moment) actually DECREASES down the group — but boiling point here is dominated by the growing size and polarisability of the halogen atom (stronger dispersion forces), which outweighs the shrinking dipole contribution.
The measured values for the methyl, ethyl and propyl halides show this rise clearly:
Trend 2: Chain Length and Branching
- Longer chains (more carbons) have more surface area for van der Waals contact between neighbouring molecules, so boiling point rises with chain length within a homologous series.
- Branching LOWERS boiling point compared to a straight-chain isomer of the same molecular formula — a more compact, spherical shape has less surface-to-surface contact with neighbouring molecules, weakening the dispersion forces. (E.g. neopentane boils well below n-pentane.)
Trend 3: Hydrogen Bonding Beats Molecular Mass …
Why this formula?
Boiling Point Trends: Why They Happen
Boiling point is the temperature at which a liquid's vapor pressure equals the external atmospheric pressure. To understand why boiling points follow certain trends, we must first understand what determines vapor pressure.
The Core Idea: Intermolecular Forces
A liquid boils when its molecules have enough kinetic energy to overcome the intermolecular forces (IMFs) holding them together in the liquid phase. Stronger IMFs → harder to escape → lower vapor pressure at a given temperature → higher boiling point.
There is no single "formula" for boiling point, but the relationship is captured by the Clausius–Clapeyron equation, which links vapor pressure (P) to temperature (T) and the enthalpy of vaporization (ΔHvap):
lnP=−RΔHvap⋅T1+C
Where:
- P = vapor pressure
- ΔHvap = enthalpy of vaporization (energy needed to vaporize 1 mole)
- R = gas constant
- T = absolute temperature (Kelvin)
- C = constant (depends on substance)
Why this formula makes sense
- ΔHvap is large when IMFs are strong — more energy is needed to separate molecules.
- At boiling point, P=Patm (usually 1 atm). So a substance with larger ΔHvap needs a higher T to reach that pressure.
Thus, boiling point ∝ strength of intermolecular forces.
The Four Key Trends (with Reasoning)
1. Trend across a period (e.g., Period 2: CH₄ → NH₃ → H₂O → HF)
| Molecule | IMFs present | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| CH₄ | London dispersion only | -161 |
| NH₃ | Dispersion + H-bonding | -33 |
| H₂O | Dispersion + H-bonding (2 per molecule) | 100 |
| HF | Dispersion + H-bonding | 19 |
Why?
- CH₄ is nonpolar — only weak London dispersion forces.
- NH₃, H₂O, HF have hydrogen bonding (strongest IMF).
- H₂O forms two H-bonds per molecule (donor + acceptor), while NH₃ forms one and HF forms one — hence H₂O has the highest boiling point.
Key insight: Hydrogen bonding dominates over molecular mass in small molecules.
2. Trend down a group (e.g., Halogens: F₂ → Cl₂ → Br₂ → I₂)
| Molecule | Molar mass (g/mol) | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| F₂ | 38 | -188 |
| Cl₂ | 71 | -34 |
| Br₂ | 160 | 59 |
| I₂ | 254 | 184 |
Why?
- All are nonpolar — only London dispersion forces.
- Dispersion force strength increases with number of electrons (larger molar mass → more polarizable electron cloud → stronger temporary dipoles).
- So boiling point increases down the group.
Key insight: For nonpolar molecules, molar mass (electron count) is the primary factor.
3. Branching in alkanes (e.g., C₅H₁₂ isomers)
| Isomer | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|
| n-pentane (straight chain) | 36 |
| 2-methylbutane (branched) | 28 |
| 2,2-dimethylpropane (highly branched) | 10 |
Why?
- All have same molecular formula — same molar mass. …
The key idea is that melting point trends in isomers depend on molecular symmetry and packing efficiency in the solid state.
Reasoning:
- Melting point is governed by how well molecules pack in a crystal lattice — more symmetrical molecules pack more efficiently, requiring more energy to overcome intermolecular forces.
- p-Dichlorobenzene is highly symmetrical (linear, planar), allowing tight, orderly packing in the crystal. This leads to stronger lattice energy. …
The unusually high melting point of p-dichlorobenzene arises from its perfect molecular symmetry, which allows it to pack more efficiently in the crystal lattice, requiring more energy (higher temperature) to overcome the stronger intermolecular forces.
Why Symmetry Dictates Melting Point
Melting point is not just about the strength of intermolecular forces — it is about how effectively those forces can act across the entire crystal. A molecule that packs neatly into a lattice will have many more stabilizing contacts per molecule than one that fits awkwardly. For substituted benzenes, symmetry is the key to packing efficiency.
All three dichlorobenzene isomers have the same molecular weight and the same functional groups. Their dipole moments differ: the ortho isomer has a significant dipole (~2.5 D), the meta isomer a moderate one (~1.5 D), and the para isomer has zero dipole moment. You might expect the polar isomers to have higher melting points due to dipole-dipole interactions — but the data shows the opposite. The non-polar para isomer melts at ~53 °C (326 K), while ortho melts at –17 °C and meta at –24 °C. Something else dominates.
That something is crystal packing.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
-
Identify the key structural difference.
In p-dichlorobenzene, the two chlorine atoms are directly opposite each other. The molecule is perfectly linear and highly symmetric (it belongs to the D2h point group). In contrast, o-dichlorobenzene has the chlorines adjacent (crowded, bent shape), and m-dichlorobenzene has them at 120° (asymmetric, bent shape). Neither ortho nor meta isomer has a centre of symmetry or a mirror plane that makes the molecule "fit" into a lattice as neatly.
-
Connect symmetry to packing efficiency.
A symmetric molecule like p-dichlorobenzene can stack like bricks — each molecule fits snugly against its neighbours, maximizing van der Waals contacts. The crystal lattice is more ordered and compact. More intermolecular contacts per molecule means more total van der Waals energy holding the crystal together. To melt the crystal, you must supply enough thermal energy to break all these contacts simultaneously. That requires a higher temperature.
-
Contrast with the unsymmetric isomers.
The ortho and meta isomers have irregular shapes. They cannot pack as tightly; there are gaps and mismatches in the lattice. Fewer stabilizing contacts per molecule means the crystal is held together more weakly. Less thermal energy is needed to disrupt the lattice, so the melting point is much lower — in fact, both are liquids at room temperature.
-
Consider the role of dipole moments — a common trap. …
Method: Symmetry & Packing Effect in Melting Point Trends
This is a crystal packing argument — melting point depends on how well molecules fit together in the solid state, not just on intermolecular forces.
Step 1: Identify the molecular shapes
- p-Dichlorobenzene: Two Cl atoms are opposite each other → molecule is highly symmetric (linear, planar).
- o-Dichlorobenzene: Cl atoms are adjacent → molecule is bent/angular.
- m-Dichlorobenzene: Cl atoms are meta → molecule is asymmetric (bent but less compact than ortho).
Step 2: Relate shape to crystal packing
- In the solid state, molecules pack into a crystal lattice.
- More symmetric molecules fit together more neatly — like stacking identical bricks.
- Less symmetric molecules leave gaps or require more space — packing is less efficient.
Step 3: Connect packing to melting point
- Better packing → stronger lattice energy (energy holding the crystal together).
- Higher lattice energy → more heat needed to break the crystal → higher melting point.
Step 4: Apply to the given isomers
| Isomer | Shape | Packing efficiency | Melting point |
|---|---|---|---|
| p- | Highly symmetric | Very good | Highest |
Here is a breakdown of the common mistakes students make when analyzing the melting point trend of dichlorobenzene isomers, and how to avoid them.
The Core Concept (The "Why")
First, let's establish the correct reasoning. The question asks why p-dichlorobenzene has a higher melting point than its ortho and meta isomers.
- The Key Factor: Melting point depends on how efficiently molecules pack in a crystal lattice. The more symmetrical the molecule, the better it packs, and the stronger the intermolecular forces (dipole-dipole and London dispersion forces) become in the solid state.
- The Winner: p-Dichlorobenzene is highly symmetrical. It fits neatly into a crystal lattice like a perfect brick. This requires more energy (higher temperature) to break apart.
- The Losers: o- and m-Dichlorobenzene are less symmetrical. They have a net dipole moment and an irregular shape. They cannot pack as efficiently, so their lattice is weaker, leading to a lower melting point.
Common Mistake #1: Confusing Melting Point with Boiling Point
The Error: Students often apply the logic for boiling point (which depends on dipole moment and molecular weight) to melting point (which depends on symmetry and packing).
- Boiling Point Logic: "o-Dichlorobenzene has a higher dipole moment, so it should have stronger intermolecular forces and a higher melting point."
- Why it's wrong: While dipole moment does affect boiling point (o-isomer has the highest boiling point), it is not the dominant factor for melting point. Symmetry trumps dipole moment in the solid state.
How to Avoid:
- Memorize the rule: For melting point: Symmetry > Dipole Moment.
- Visualize the solid: Imagine trying to stack bricks. A perfect rectangular brick (p-isomer) stacks easily. A bent or L-shaped brick (o- or m-isomer) leaves gaps and is unstable.
- Quick check: If the question asks about boiling point, the real order is ortho > para > meta (o-DCB ~180C is highest due to its dipole; p-DCB ~175C edges out m-DCB ~173C despite zero net dipole, because of its more efficient packing/dispersion forces even in the liquid state). If it asks about melting point, the real order is para > ortho > meta (p-DCB ~53C, o-DCB ~-17C, m-DCB ~-24C) -- notice melting point does NOT track dipole moment either: ortho has the largest dipole of the three yet still out-melts meta. Don't assume boiling point mirrors melting point, and don't assume the isomer with the smaller dipole always wins on melting point.
Common Mistake #2: Ignoring the Role of Crystal Lattice Packing
The Error: Students only think about "intermolecular forces" in a general sense (dipole-dipole, London forces) without considering how the shape of the molecule affects the efficiency of those forces in a solid.
- Why it's wrong: A molecule with a strong dipole but a weird shape might not be able to get close enough to its neighbors to use that dipole effectively. The p-isomer, despite having zero net dipole, allows for very close, tight packing, maximizing London dispersion forces (which are significant for large molecules).
How to Avoid:
- Draw the molecules: Sketch the three isomers. Notice how the p-isomer is a straight, rod-like molecule. The o- and m-isomers are bent.
- Think "jigsaw puzzle": The p-isomer is a perfect puzzle piece. The others are misshapen pieces that don't fit well.
- Key phrase: "Crystal lattice packing efficiency" is the deciding factor.
Common Mistake #3: Assuming the Meta Isomer Beats Ortho for Melting Point …
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.Match the following List – I (Compound) / List – II (b.p / K) A. n−C4H9OH / I. 310.5 B. (C2H5)2NH / II. 350.8 C. n−C4H9NH2 / III. 390.3 D. C2H5N(CH3)2 / IV. 329.3 The correct answer is (A) A-IV, B-II, C-I, D-III (B) A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II (C) A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I (D) A-II, B-III, C-IV, D-I
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the classic boiling-point trend among an alcohol, a 1° amine, a 2° amine, and a 3° amine of comparable molecular weight, driven by hydrogen-bonding capacity. The match is A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I.
Concept and Intuition
For molecules of similar size, boiling point tracks how strongly molecules can hydrogen-bond to each other:
- Alcohols (O–H) hydrogen-bond most strongly (O is more electronegative than N, and the O–H bond is highly polarized), so they have the highest boiling points among comparably-sized compounds.
- Primary amines have two N–H bonds per molecule available for intermolecular hydrogen bonding — next highest.
- Secondary amines have only one N–H bond — weaker hydrogen bonding, lower boiling point than primary amines.
- Tertiary amines have no N–H bond at all (nitrogen's lone pair can still accept a hydrogen bond from something else, but the molecule itself cannot donate one), so they rely mainly on weaker dipole–dipole and dispersion forces — lowest boiling point of the four.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A. n-C4H9OH (n-butanol): a primary alcohol — strongest H-bonding → highest boiling point among the four, 390.3 K → list item III. A-III.
- C. n-C4H9NH2 (n-butylamine): a primary amine, two N–H bonds → next highest, 350.8 K → list item II. C-II.
- B. (C2H5)2NH (diethylamine): a secondary amine, one N–H bond → lower still, 329.3 K → list item IV. B-IV. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.Among the hydrides of group 15 elements, the hydride with highest boiling point is A and the hydride with lowest boiling point is B. What are A and B respectively? (A) BiH3, NH3 (B) BiH3, PH3 (C) NH3, PH3 (D) NH3, SbH3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling points of group 15 hydrides dip after ammonia (loss of H-bonding) then rise with increasing molar mass; highest is BiH3, lowest is PH3.
Concept and Intuition
NH3 has strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding (N is small and highly electronegative), giving it an unusually high boiling point for its size. Once H-bonding is lost going to PH3, boiling point drops sharply because only weak van der Waals (London dispersion) forces operate. As you continue down the group (AsH3→SbH3→BiH3), molecular size and mass increase steadily, so van der Waals forces strengthen again and boiling point rises — eventually exceeding even NH3.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Approximate boiling points: NH3≈−33°C, PH3≈−87.7°C, AsH3≈−55°C, SbH3≈−17°C, BiH3≈+17°C.
- Lowest of these is PH3 (the H-bonding of NH3 is gone, and molecular mass is still small). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.The correct order of boiling points of the compounds given below is A) Methoxy ethane B) Propan-1-ol C) Propanal D) Propanone (A) C > B > A > D (B) B > D > C > A (C) B > C > D > A (D) C > A > B > D
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests ranking boiling points by intermolecular forces: H-bonding alcohol > dipolar ketone > dipolar aldehyde > weakly-polar ether.
Concept and Intuition
For molecules of similar molar mass, boiling point is set by the strength of intermolecular forces. An –OH group enables strong hydrogen bonding (raising b.p. sharply above similarly-sized non-alcohols). A C=O group gives a fairly strong permanent dipole (ketones/aldehydes), but weaker than H-bonding. An ether has a weaker net dipole (bond dipoles partly oppose) and no H-bond donor, so it boils at the lowest temperature of the four functional classes here.
Step-by-Step Solution
- B) Propan-1-ol, CH3CH2CH2OH: extensive intermolecular H-bonding via −OH gives it the highest boiling point of the four.
- D) Propanone (acetone), CH3COCH3: a symmetric ketone with a strong dipole from C=O but no H-bond donor — boils next highest.
- C) Propanal, CH3CH2CHO: also has a polar C=O, but the aldehyde's dipole/packing gives it a slightly lower boiling point than the ketone of the same carbon count. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.Observe the following substances. Ethanol, acetic acid, ethylamine, trimethylamine, salicylic acid, ethanal. In the above list, the number of substances with H-bonding is (A) 4 (B) 3 (C) 5 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests recognizing which functional groups (O–H, N–H) enable hydrogen bonding; 4 of the 6 substances qualify.
Concept and Intuition
Hydrogen bonding needs a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a small, highly electronegative atom — O, N, or F — so that the H carries a strong partial positive charge able to interact with a lone pair on a neighbouring electronegative atom. A carbonyl oxygen (as in an aldehyde) or a nitrogen with no attached H (as in a fully substituted tertiary amine) cannot act as an H-bond donor themselves.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Ethanol (C2H5OH): has an O–H group → capable of H-bonding.
- Acetic acid (CH3COOH): has a carboxylic O–H group → capable of H-bonding.
- Ethylamine (C2H5NH2): a primary amine with N–H bonds → capable of H-bonding.
- Trimethylamine (N(CH3)3): a tertiary amine — nitrogen has no attached H, so it cannot donate a hydrogen bond → excluded.
- Salicylic acid: has both a carboxylic O–H and a phenolic O–H → capable of H-bonding. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.What is the correct boiling point order of the following haloalkanes? i) 2-chloro 2-methylpropane ii) 1-Cholobutane iii) 2-Chlorobutane (A) i > ii > iii (B) ii > iii > i (C) i < ii < iii (D) i > iii > ii
›Reveal solutionSolution
Among isomeric C₄H₉Cl haloalkanes, the straight-chain isomer boils highest and the most branched (tertiary) isomer boils lowest, giving the order ii > iii > i.
Concept and Intuition
For a set of structural isomers with the same molecular formula, boiling point is governed mainly by the strength of intermolecular van der Waals (London dispersion) forces, which depend on the surface area available for molecules to contact each other. A straight (unbranched) chain packs closely and has more surface contact, giving stronger dispersion forces and a higher boiling point. Branching makes the molecule more compact/spherical, reducing surface area and intermolecular contact, and hence lowering the boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the three isomers, all of formula C4H9Cl: (i) 2-chloro-2-methylpropane (tert-butyl chloride) — most branched, chlorine on a tertiary carbon; (ii) 1-chlorobutane — straight (unbranched) chain, chlorine on a primary carbon; (iii) 2-chlorobutane — chlorine on a secondary carbon, slightly branched.
- Rank by branching (least to most): (ii) unbranched < (iii) one branch point < (i) most branched (quaternary-like carbon skeleton around the C–Cl carbon). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.Para-nitro phenol has higher boiling point than ortho-nitrophenol. This is due to (A) The presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between Para-nitro phenol molecules (B) The presence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in Para-nitro phenol molecules (C) The presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between ortho-nitro phenol molecules (D) The absence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding between ortho-nitro phenol molecules
›Reveal solutionSolution
Para-nitrophenol boils higher than ortho because ortho forms intramolecular H-bonding (chelation) while para is forced into intermolecular H-bonding, which needs more energy to break.
Concept and Intuition
Boiling point depends on the strength of the forces holding molecules together in the liquid. Ortho-nitrophenol's −OH and −NO2 are adjacent, so they hydrogen-bond to each other within the same molecule (a six-membered ring "chelate"). This uses up the −OH's hydrogen-bonding capacity internally, so ortho-nitrophenol molecules interact with each other only weakly (via van der Waals forces) — it boils low and is even steam-volatile. In para-nitrophenol the groups are on opposite ends of the ring and cannot reach each other, so the −OH of one molecule instead hydrogen-bonds to the −NO2/−OH of a neighbouring molecule — building an extended, harder-to-break intermolecular network, hence a higher boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the substitution pattern: ortho places −OH and −NO2 next to each other; para places them across the ring.
- Ortho: intramolecular H-bond forms a stable ring — no need for the molecule to H-bond with neighbours. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.Arrange the following in increasing order of their boiling points N-Ethylethanamine - I Butanamine - II N,N-dimethylethanamine - III (A) III > II > I (B) III > I > II (C) II > III > I (D) II > I > III
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point of amines of the same formula falls as 1° > 2° > 3°, because more N–H bonds mean stronger intermolecular hydrogen bonding.
Concept and Intuition
All three compounds share the molecular formula C4H11N, so molecular weight/dispersion forces are essentially comparable; the boiling-point differences are governed by hydrogen bonding capacity. A primary amine (−NH2) has two N–H bonds and can form the most extensive intermolecular hydrogen-bond network, giving it the highest boiling point among the three classes for a given carbon count. A secondary amine (−NH−) has only one N–H bond, so it hydrogen-bonds less extensively (lower bp than the primary isomer). A tertiary amine has no N–H bond at all, so it cannot hydrogen-bond with itself, relying only on weaker dipole–dipole and dispersion forces, giving it the lowest boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Classify each compound: Butanamine (II) = CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2, a primary amine (2 N–H bonds).
- N-Ethylethanamine (I) = diethylamine, (C2H5)2NH, a secondary amine (1 N–H bond).
- N,N-Dimethylethanamine (III) = CH3CH2N(CH3)2, a tertiary amine (0 N–H bonds). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.The correct order of boiling points of following molecules is(i) n – Hexane(ii) 2-methylpentane(iii) 2,3 – dimethylbutane (A) i > ii > iii (B) iii > ii > i (C) iii > i > ii (D) i > iii > ii
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point falls as branching increases among isomeric alkanes, so n-hexane > 2-methylpentane > 2,3-dimethylbutane.
Concept and Intuition
All three compounds are isomers of hexane (C6H14), so they have identical molecular formula and hence similar total van der Waals attraction potential — but the shape of the molecule matters. A straight, extended chain (n-hexane) has more surface-to-surface contact with neighbouring molecules, maximizing van der Waals (London dispersion) forces. Branching makes the molecule more compact and spherical, reducing effective surface contact and hence the strength of intermolecular attractions, which lowers the boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- n-Hexane: a straight, unbranched 6-carbon chain — largest surface area for intermolecular contact — highest boiling point among the three.
- 2-Methylpentane: one methyl branch — somewhat more compact than n-hexane — intermediate boiling point.
- 2,3-Dimethylbutane: two methyl branches, the most compact/spherical of the three — smallest surface area for contact — lowest boiling point. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.At 298 K, if the vapour pressure of pure liquids toluene, benzene, chloroform and dichloromethane are 60, 160, 200 and 415 torr respectively. Then which liquid is having high boiling point? (A) Toluene (B) Benzene (C) Chloroform (D) Dichloromethane
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point and vapour pressure (at fixed T) are inversely related; toluene's lowest vapour pressure (60 torr) means it has the highest boiling point.
Concept and Intuition
Vapour pressure measures how readily a liquid's molecules escape into the gas phase at a given temperature — it is a direct measure of volatility. Boiling point is the temperature at which vapour pressure equals atmospheric pressure. A liquid that already has a low vapour pressure at a reference temperature needs to be heated more to reach atmospheric pressure, so lower vapour pressure at a fixed T corresponds to a higher boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- List the vapour pressures at 298 K: toluene 60 torr, benzene 160 torr, chloroform 200 torr, dichloromethane 415 torr.
- Rank from lowest to highest vapour pressure: toluene < benzene < chloroform < dichloromethane. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.Arrange the hydrides NH3, HF, H2O, HCl in the increasing order of their boiling points (A) HF<NH3<HCl<H2O (B) H2O<HF<HCl<NH3 (C) NH3<HCl<H2O<HF (D) HCl<NH3<HF<H2O
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling points of these hydrides are governed mainly by hydrogen bonding strength/extent, giving the increasing order HCl<NH3<HF<H2O.
Concept and Intuition
Among simple hydrides, boiling point is strongly influenced by hydrogen bonding, which occurs when H is bonded to a small, highly electronegative atom (N, O, F). HCl's Cl is not electronegative/small enough to hydrogen bond significantly, so it relies only on weaker dipole-dipole/dispersion forces and has the lowest boiling point among these four. Among the hydrogen-bonded species, H2O forms an extensive 3-D hydrogen-bonded network (2 lone pairs and 2 H atoms per molecule, ideal for a 3-D network) giving it the highest boiling point, while HF and NH3 form more limited (chain-like or less networked) hydrogen bonding.
Step-by-Step Solution
- HCl: negligible hydrogen bonding (Cl is not electronegative/small enough) — lowest boiling point among the four (≈−85∘C).
- NH3: hydrogen bonds via N, but only one lone pair per molecule to hydrogen bond with ⇒ boiling point ≈−33∘C.
- HF: strong hydrogen bonding via a highly electronegative F, but limited to one H and three lone pairs (only one bond forms per molecule in the chain) ⇒ boiling point ≈19.5∘C. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set ap-2022-07-11-AN1 markMCQQ.Which among the following will have the highest boiling point ? (A) Butan-2-ol (CH3CH(OH)CH2CH3) (B) Butan-2-one (CH3COCH2CH3) (C) n-Butane (CH3CH2CH2CH3) (D) Ethyl propyl ether (CH3CH2−O−CH2CH2CH3)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Among an alcohol, a ketone, an alkane, and an ether of comparable size, the alcohol has the highest boiling point because only it can hydrogen-bond between its own molecules.
Concept and Intuition
Boiling point depends on the strength of intermolecular forces that must be overcome to vaporise the liquid. Alcohols (-OH group) can form hydrogen bonds with each other, a strong, directional intermolecular force. Ketones and ethers only have permanent dipole-dipole interactions (no O-H or N-H to hydrogen-bond with each other), which are weaker than hydrogen bonding. Alkanes have only weak, non-polar van der Waals (London dispersion) forces, the weakest of all.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Butan-2-ol: contains -OH, capable of strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding ⇒ highest boiling point among these four.
- Butan-2-one: a ketone, polar C=O but no H-bond donor ⇒ moderate boiling point (dipole-dipole), lower than the alcohol.
- Ethyl propyl ether: polar C-O-C but no H-bond donor either ⇒ boiling point similar to or slightly below the ketone. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.Arrange the following in decreasing order of their boiling points(a) CH3CH2CH2CH2OH (butan-1-ol)(b) CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2 (butan-1-amine, a primary amine)(c) a tertiary amine, (CH2CH3) chain with an N bearing two other alkyl branches (drawn as a small N with two branches, i.e. a trialkylamine)(d) a secondary amine with an N-H, drawn as two ethyl-type chains joined through an N-H (a secondary amine) (A) a > b > d > c (B) a > c > d > b (C) b > c > d > a (D) c > a > b > d
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point here tracks hydrogen-bonding ability: the alcohol (strongest H-bonding) is highest, then primary amine (two N–H), then secondary amine (one N–H), then tertiary amine (no N–H, weakest): a > b > d > c.
Concept and Intuition
For molecules of comparable molecular weight, boiling point is governed largely by the strength and extent of intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Oxygen is more electronegative than nitrogen, so O–H···O hydrogen bonds are stronger than N–H···N hydrogen bonds — alcohols therefore boil higher than amines of similar size. Among amines themselves, hydrogen bonding requires an N–H bond to donate; a primary amine has two N–H bonds (most extensive hydrogen-bonded network), a secondary amine has only one N–H bond (less association), and a tertiary amine has none (cannot hydrogen-bond to itself at all, only weaker dipole-dipole/van der Waals forces), giving it the lowest boiling point of the three.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Butan-1-ol (a): −OH group, strongest hydrogen bonding of the four compounds → highest boiling point.
- Butan-1-amine (b), a primary amine: two N–H bonds, extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonding → next highest. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.