Q.Find minors and cofactors of all the elements of the determinant 14−23.
Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2:
det1002−303−61=1×(−3)×1=−3.
No cofactor was ever expanded — we just slid rows around.
Aim your zeros at a row or column that already contains a 1 to keep the arithmetic clean. And remember operation 3 needs a different row: adding a multiple of a row to itself rescales it and changes the value.
Evaluating determinants using row and column operations rather than direct expansion is a core skill in the CBSE Class 12 Determinants chapter, and "properties of determinants class 12 with examples" is one of the most searched topics for board exam revision. This technique of reducing a determinant to triangular form is also a favourite approach in JEE Main and JEE Advanced problems involving higher-order determinants.
Concept: Minor and Cofactor definitions for a 2×2 determinant.
Step 1 — Minors
For element aij, the minor Mij is the determinant of the submatrix after removing row i and column j.
- M11=∣3∣=3
- M12=∣4∣=4
- M21=∣−2∣=−2
- M22=∣1∣=1
Step 2 — Cofactors
Cofactor Cij=(−1)i+jMij.
- C11=(−1)2⋅3=3
- C12=(−1)3⋅4=−4
- C21=(−1)3⋅(−2)=2
- C22=(−1)4⋅1=1
Minors: 3,4,−2,1; Cofactors: 3,−4,2,1 (in row-major order).
For a 2×2 determinant, the minor of an element is the other element on the opposite diagonal, and the cofactor is the minor multiplied by (−1)i+j. Here, the minors are 3,4,−2,1 and the cofactors are 3,−4,2,1 respectively.
The idea is simple: a minor is the determinant you get by deleting the row and column of that element. For a 2×2 matrix, that means each minor is just a single number — the element that remains. The cofactor then adds a sign based on the position: (−1)i+j times the minor.
Let’s label the determinant as:
Δ=a11a21a12a22=14−23
We’ll go element by element.
-
Element a11=1 (row 1, column 1)
Delete row 1 and column 1. What’s left? The element at row 2, column 2, which is 3.
So the minor M11=3.
The cofactor C11=(−1)1+1⋅M11=(+1)⋅3=3.
-
Element a12=−2 (row 1, column 2)
Delete row 1 and column 2. The remaining element is a21=4.
So M12=4.
Cofactor: C12=(−1)1+2⋅4=(−1)⋅4=−4.
-
Element a21=4 (row 2, column 1)
Delete row 2 and column 1. The leftover is a12=−2.
So M21=−2.
Cofactor: C21=(−1)2+1⋅(−2)=(−1)⋅(−2)=2.
-
Element a22=3 (row 2, column 2)
Delete row 2 and column 2. The leftover is a11=1.
So M22=1.
Cofactor: C22=(−1)2+2⋅1=(+1)⋅1=1.
For a 2×2 matrix (acbd), the pattern is:
- Minors: M11=d, M12=c, M21=b, M22=a.
- Cofactors: C11=d, C12=−c, C21=−b, C22=a. This is a quick check — but always derive it to avoid sign errors.
A common mistake: forgetting that the minor of a12 is a21, not a22. The row and column you delete are the element’s own row and column — so for a12, you delete row 1 and column 2, leaving the element at the intersection of row 2 and column 1.
The minors are 3,4,−2,1 and the cofactors are 3,−4,2,1 for the elements 1,−2,4,3 respectively.
Method: Finding All Minors and Cofactors of a Small Determinant
This method systematically computes the minor and cofactor of every element in a determinant — the standard first step before building an adjoint matrix.
Steps
Step 1: Go through the elements one at a time, in position order
Work through a11,a12,a21,a22 (and onward for larger matrices) in a fixed order so none is skipped.
Step 2: For each element, delete its row and column to get the minor
Mij=determinant of the submatrix left after deleting row i and column j
For a 2×2 matrix, deleting one row and one column leaves a single number — the opposite-diagonal entry.
Step 3: Attach the sign to get the cofactor
Cij=(−1)i+jMij
Use the checkerboard pattern to get the sign quickly: (1,1) and (2,2) positions are +; (1,2) and (2,1) are −.
Step 4: Tabulate all results together
List minors and cofactors side by side for each element — this makes it easy to spot a sign error, since minors and cofactors should only ever differ by a ±1 factor.
Step 5: Use the quick 2×2 pattern as a cross-check
For A=(acbd): minors are M11=d, M12=c, M21=b, M22=a, and cofactors are C11=d, C12=−c, C21=−b, C22=a — a fast way to check your row-by-row work.
This element-by-element method scales directly to 3×3 and larger determinants — only the size of each minor changes.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Confusing the minor of a12 with a22 instead of a21
Why it's wrong: deleting row 1 and column 2 (for the minor of a12) leaves the element at the intersection of row 2 and column 1, i.e. a21 — mistakenly picking a22 gives the wrong minor. Correct approach: physically cross out the row and column of the element in question and read off whatever single entry remains, rather than guessing from the diagonal pattern.
Mistake 2: Forgetting the sign when converting a minor to a cofactor
Why it's wrong: leaving C12=+4 instead of C12=(−1)1+2⋅4=−4 silently drops the required sign flip for odd i+j positions. Correct approach: always compute (−1)i+j explicitly for each position before finalizing a cofactor — never assume the minor's own sign carries over.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If the cofactors of the elements 3, 7 and 6 of the matrix 1422−14376 are a,b and c respectively, then [a b c]142+[a b c]376= (A) −1 (B) 1 (C) 0 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
a,b,c turn out to be the cofactors of the matrix's third column, and the two
vectors being dotted with [a b c] are exactly its first and third columns. The
Laplace-expansion identity makes both dot products come out to (a multiple of) the
matrix's determinant, which here is 0 — so the sum is 0.
Concept and Intuition
For a 3×3 matrix A, the cofactor expansion identity says: if you take the
entries of any column of A and dot them with the cofactors of a matching column,
you get det(A); if you dot them with the cofactors of a different column, you get
0 (this is the algebraic content behind A⋅adj(A)=det(A)I). Recognising
that the two given vectors, (1,4,2)T and (3,7,6)T, are precisely columns 1 and 3
of the matrix — and that a,b,c are the cofactors of column 3 — turns this into a
one-line application of that identity instead of brute-force computation (though brute
force also works and is done below to double-check).
Step-by-Step Solution
- The matrix is M=1422−14376. The entries 3,7,6 sit at positions (1,3),(2,3),(3,3) — all in column 3. So a=C13, b=C23, c=C33.
- Compute C13 (delete row 1, col 3; sign (+1)1+3=+):
C13=+42−14=4(4)−(−1)(2)=16+2=18.
- Compute C23 (delete row 2, col 3; sign (−1)2+3=−):
C23=−1224=−(1⋅4−2⋅2)=−(0)=0.
- Compute C33 (delete row 3, col 3; sign (+1)3+3=+):
C33=+142−1=1(−1)−2(4)=−1−8=−9.
- So [a b c]=[18 0 −9].
- First dot product: [a b c]142=18(1)+0(4)+(−9)(2)=18−18=0.
- Second dot product: [a b c]376=18(3)+0(7)+(−9)(6)=54−54=0. (This equals det(M) by the same-column expansion rule; direct expansion of M along column 3 confirms det(M)=3(18)+7(0)+6(−9)=54−54=0, i.e. M is singular.)
- Sum of both dot products: 0+0=0.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors in the cofactor signs (−1)i+j — easy to drop the minus sign on C23 (row+col = odd).
- Not noticing the two given column vectors are literally columns of M, leading to unnecessary/error-prone brute-force arithmetic instead of the quick identity check.
- Forgetting to add the two dot products together (the question asks for their sum, not just one of them).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of b+cbcac+acaba+b is (A) abc (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) (C) 4abc (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This classic 3×3 determinant simplifies via row operations (adding all rows together makes every entry in one row equal to a+b+c) to the closed form 4abc, confirmed by direct numeric substitution.
Concept and Intuition
Many "nice" symmetric determinants like this one are best handled by first performing a row or column operation that reveals a common factor (here, adding all three rows makes every entry in the new row equal, exposing an (a+b+c) or similar factor), then simplifying the reduced 2×2 structure. When the algebra gets intricate, a quick numeric sanity check with simple values of a,b,c is an efficient way to confirm which answer choice matches.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is b+cbcac+acaba+b.
- Apply R1→R1+R2+R3: the new first row becomes (b+c+b+c, a+c+a+c, a+b+a+b)... more carefully, summing column-wise: column 1 sum =(b+c)+b+c=b+2c... to avoid an error-prone symbolic expansion, verify by direct numeric substitution instead (a clean, reliable check for this type of determinant).
- Numeric check: let a=1,b=2,c=3. The matrix becomes 523143123.
- Expand along Row 1: det=5(4⋅3−2⋅3)−1(2⋅3−2⋅3)+1(2⋅3−4⋅3)=5(12−6)−1(0)+1(6−12)=30−0−6=24.
- Compare with each option at a=1,b=2,c=3: (A) abc=6 — no. (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=3⋅5⋅4=60 — no. (C) 4abc=4⋅6=24 — matches. (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2 — no.
- Only option (C), 4abc, matches the computed value.
Common Mistakes
- Attempting a fully symbolic cofactor expansion without organising the algebra carefully, leading to sign errors — a numeric check with simple distinct values is a fast, robust way to identify the correct closed form among given options.
- Forgetting that this determinant is NOT antisymmetric in a,b,c (ruling out option D, which vanishes whenever any two variables are equal — but the original determinant does not vanish when, say, a=b).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 4abc.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-FN1 markMCQQ.1−132103222022202120242023= (A) 8494−1611313 (B) 8494−1613312 (C) 8494−1613313 (D) 849416111313
›Reveal solutionSolution
Multiplying the given 3×3 matrix by itself, entry by entry using the row-times-column rule, produces 8494−1613313, matching option (C).
Concept and Intuition
Matrix multiplication of a square matrix A with itself (A×A=A2) is computed entry by entry: the (i,j) entry of the product is the dot product of row i of the first matrix with column j of the second matrix. Carrying this out carefully for all 9 entries of a 3×3 matrix gives the resulting product matrix.
Step-by-Step Solution
Let A=1−13210322. Compute A2=A⋅A entry by entry (row i of A dotted with column j of A):
- (1,1): 1(1)+2(−1)+3(3)=1−2+9=8
- (1,2): 1(2)+2(1)+3(0)=2+2+0=4
- (1,3): 1(3)+2(2)+3(2)=3+4+6=13
- (2,1): −1(1)+1(−1)+2(3)=−1−1+6=4
- (2,2): −1(2)+1(1)+2(0)=−2+1+0=−1
- (2,3): −1(3)+1(2)+2(2)=−3+2+4=3
- (3,1): 3(1)+0(−1)+2(3)=3+0+6=9
- (3,2): 3(2)+0(1)+2(0)=6+0+0=6
- (3,3): 3(3)+0(2)+2(2)=9+0+4=13
Assembling these gives A2=8494−1613313, which is an exact, entry-by-entry match with option (C).
Common Mistakes
- Multiplying corresponding entries directly (element-wise/"Hadamard" product) instead of using the proper row-times-column matrix multiplication rule.
- Sign slip in row 2 (which contains a −1), which is where options (A) and (D) diverge from the correct value (they show entry (2,2) or other entries inconsistent with the correct computation) — careful arithmetic through each dot product avoids this.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 8494−1613313.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.−a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2= (A) a2b2c2 (B) 2a2b2c2 (C) 3a2b2c2 (D) 4a2b2c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring a, b, c out of the three rows reduces the determinant to a simpler ±1-coefficient determinant that evaluates to 4abc, giving a total of 4a2b2c2. Answer: (D).
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the given determinant has a common factor: row 1 is a⋅(−a,b,c), row 2 is b⋅(a,−b,c), row 3 is c⋅(a,b,−c). Pulling a common factor out of a row simply multiplies the determinant by that factor (a standard determinant property), so we can simplify before directly expanding the messier original 3×3 determinant.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original determinant: −a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2.
- Factor a from row 1, b from row 2, c from row 3:
=abc−aaab−bbcc−c
- Expand this reduced determinant along the first row:
−a−bbc−c−baac−c+caa−bb
- Compute each 2×2 minor: −bbc−c=(−b)(−c)−c(b)=bc−bc=0; aac−c=a(−c)−c(a)=−2ac; aa−bb=ab−(−b)(a)=2ab.
- Substitute: −a(0)−b(−2ac)+c(2ab)=0+2abc+2abc=4abc.
- So the reduced determinant equals 4abc, and the original determinant is abc×4abc=4a2b2c2.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors when expanding the 2×2 minors of the reduced matrix (the −,+,− cofactor pattern is easy to mis-apply).
- Forgetting to multiply the reduced determinant's value back by the abc factored out earlier.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 4a2b2c2.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.For a fixed positive integer n, if D=n!(n+1)!(n+2)!(n+1)!(n+2)!(n+3)!(n+2)!(n+3)!(n+4)!, then n!(n+1)!(n+2)!D= (A) −4 (B) −2 (C) 2 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Taking the factorials common from each row collapses the determinant to a constant: n!(n+1)!(n+2)!D=2 — option (C).
Working. Factor n!, (n+1)!, (n+2)! from rows 1, 2, 3 respectively:
D=n!(n+1)!(n+2)!111n+1n+2n+3(n+1)(n+2)(n+2)(n+3)(n+3)(n+4)
Hence n!(n+1)!(n+2)!D equals that 3×3 determinant. Apply R2→R2−R1 and R3→R3−R1, using (n+2)(n+3)−(n+1)(n+2)=2(n+2) and (n+3)(n+4)−(n+1)(n+2)=4n+10:
100n+112(n+1)(n+2)2(n+2)2(2n+5)
Expanding along the first column:
1⋅[1⋅2(2n+5)−2(n+2)⋅2]=(4n+10)−(4n+8)=2.
✓Final answern!(n+1)!(n+2)!D=2 — option (C).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.1a2a31b2b31c2c3= (A) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c) (B) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a) (C) (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca) (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This determinant is a known generalised-Vandermonde identity that factors as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) — verified numerically, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with rows 1,x,x2 (Vandermonde) factor neatly as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a). When the exponent pattern is not consecutive (here 0,2,3 instead of 0,1,2), the determinant still factors into the Vandermonde piece times an extra symmetric-polynomial factor — here that extra factor turns out to be e2=ab+bc+ca (the second elementary symmetric polynomial), since the exponent set {0,2,3} is the base set {0,1,2} shifted up by the partition (0,1,1), whose associated Schur polynomial is exactly e2.
Rather than rely purely on this identity from memory, verifying with actual numbers is the safest exam technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand the determinant along the first row (all entries 1): D=(b2c3−b3c2)−(a2c3−a3c2)+(a2b3−a3b2) =b2c2(c−b)+a2c2(a−c)+a2b2(b−a).
- Rather than fully factor symbolically, test with concrete numbers: let a=1,b=2,c=3.
- Direct determinant: rows (1,1,1), (1,4,9), (1,8,27). D=1(4⋅27−9⋅8)−1(1⋅27−9⋅1)+1(1⋅8−4⋅1)=1(108−72)−1(27−9)+1(8−4)=36−18+4=22.
- Test option (D): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) with these values: (1−2)(2−3)(3−1)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2; ab+bc+ca=2+6+3=11; product =2×11=22. Matches D=22.
- Test option (A): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c)=2×6=12=22 — rejected.
- Test option (C): (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca): note (a−c)=1−3=−2 (opposite sign convention to (c−a)=2), giving (−1)(−1)(−2)(11)=−22=22 — rejected (sign mismatch).
- Option (D) is confirmed as the correct general factorisation.
Common Mistakes
- Sign confusion between (c−a) and (a−c) when comparing to option (C) — a single sign flip changes the whole product's sign.
- Trying to factor the expression fully symbolically under time pressure instead of the much faster numeric-substitution check.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca).
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, then a+b+c+d+e+f= (A) 23 (B) 25 (C) 21 (D) 20
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluating the determinant-polynomial at x=1 gives the sum of ALL coefficients (including the constant g); evaluating at x=0 isolates g alone. Subtracting removes g, leaving a+b+c+d+e+f=25.
Concept and Intuition
If P(x)=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, a classic trick to get the sum of coefficients excluding the constant term is: P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g gives the sum of all coefficients (since every power of 1 is 1), while P(0)=g isolates just the constant term. So P(1)−P(0)=a+b+c+d+e+f. Here P(x) is defined as the given 2×2 determinant, so we just need to evaluate that determinant at x=1 and x=0 directly — no need to expand the full degree-6 polynomial.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2.
- At x=1: top-left =1+2+3−2=4; top-right =1+2+4=7; bottom-left =1−1−2−1=−3; bottom-right =3−2+4−2=3. Determinant =4(3)−7(−3)=12+21=33=P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g.
- At x=0: top-left =−2; top-right =4; bottom-left =−1; bottom-right =−2. Determinant =(−2)(−2)−(4)(−1)=4+4=8=P(0)=g.
- So a+b+c+d+e+f=P(1)−P(0)=33−8=25.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to fully expand the product of the two cubic polynomials into a degree-6 polynomial to read off coefficients individually — far more error-prone than the substitution trick.
- Forgetting to subtract g (i.e. reporting 33, the sum of ALL seven coefficients, instead of the first six).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 25.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.If the determinant cos2xsin2xcos2xsin2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2x is expanded in powers of cosx, then the constant term in the expansion is (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The constant term of a polynomial in cosx is exactly the value obtained by setting cosx=0. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
If a determinant's entries are polynomials in c=cosx, expanding it produces a polynomial in c. Its constant term (the c0 coefficient) equals the value of the whole expression when c=0 — a shortcut that avoids expanding the full polynomial in cosx.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write each entry in terms of c=cosx: cos2x=2c2−1, sin2x=1−c2, cos2x=c2.
- Set c=0: cos2x→−1, sin2x→1, cos2x→0.
- The matrix becomes −11−11−10−10−1.
- Expand: −1[(−1)(−1)−(0)(0)]−1[(1)(−1)−(0)(−1)]+(−1)[(1)(0)−(−1)(−1)] =−1(1)−1(−1)+(−1)(−1)=−1+1+1=1.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to fully expand the determinant symbolically in cosx (needlessly long) instead of using the c=0 substitution shortcut for the constant term.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 1.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.a+b+2cccab+c+2aabbc+a+2b= (A) (a+b+c)3 (B) 2(a+b+c)3 (C) 3(a+b+c)3 (D) (a+b+c)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing each diagonal entry as s+(off-diagonal-like term) where s=a+b+c reveals the matrix as sI plus a rank-1 correction, whose determinant works out cleanly to 2(a+b+c)3 using the determinant lemma (or row operations).
Concept and Intuition
Many "cyclic-symmetric" determinants like this one simplify beautifully once you notice a+b+2c=(a+b+c)+c, etc. — subtracting off the common sum s=a+b+c from every diagonal entry turns the matrix into sI (a multiple of the identity) plus a very simple rank-1 matrix whose every row is identical. Determinants of sI+rank-1 matrices have a clean closed form.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=a+b+c. Rewrite diagonal entries: a+b+2c=s+c, b+c+2a=s+a, c+a+2b=s+b.
- The matrix becomes:
M=s+cccas+aabbs+b
- Subtract sI: M−sI=cccaaabbb — every row is the same vector (c,a,b), so M−sI has rank 1: M−sI=1vT where 1=(1,1,1)T and v=(c,a,b)T.
- So M=sI+1vT. The determinant lemma (matrix determinant lemma) gives:
det(sI+1vT)=s3+s2(vT1)
(since det(sI)=s3 and adj(sI)=s2I for a 3×3 matrix).
5. vT1=c+a+b=s. So det(M)=s3+s2⋅s=2s3.
6. Substituting back s=a+b+c: det=2(a+b+c)3.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly by cofactors without the s-substitution — it's algebraically messy and error-prone; the "subtract the common sum" trick is much cleaner and standard for this whole family of problems.
- Forgetting the factor of s2 multiplying (vT1) and just adding s3+vT1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 2(a+b+c)3.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the value of aa−bb+cbb−cc+acc−aa+b=? (A) a3+b3+c3+3abc (B) a3+b3+c3−3abc (C) a3+b3+c3−6abc (D) a3+b3+c3+6abc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct cofactor expansion of the determinant shows all cross terms cancel, leaving the
classical identity a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Concept and Intuition
This is a disguised version of the well-known factorisation
a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca), packaged as a determinant. Expanding carefully
term by term (rather than guessing) confirms which of the four sign variants is correct.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along the first row: D=a[(b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)]−b[(a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)]+c[(a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)].
- Compute each bracket:
- (b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)=ab+b2−ac−bc−c2+a2
- (a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)=a2−b2−bc−c2+ab+ac
- (a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)=ac+a2−bc−ab−b2+c2
- Multiply through by a, −b, c respectively and add. All the mixed quadratic-times-linear terms (a2b,ab2,a2c,ac2,b2c,bc2) cancel in pairs, leaving only a3+b3+c3 from the cubic terms and −3abc from the three abc contributions (one from each bracket).
- Verify with a quick numeric check (a=1,b=0,c=0): the matrix becomes 1100010−11, whose determinant is 1; and 13+0+0−0=1 — matches.
- So D=a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Common Mistakes
- Sign error on the 3abc term (getting +3abc instead of −3abc, or ±6abc) from mis-tracking how many times the abc term appears across the three bracket expansions.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — a3+b3+c3−3abc.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-AN1 markMCQQ.If b and c are non zero real numbers, A=1bcb23c34 and B=0−b−cb0−2c20, then det(A+B)= (A) 3 (B) 1 (C) -1 (D) 0
›Reveal solutionSolution
Adding the symmetric A and skew-symmetric B entrywise cancels the off-diagonal b,c terms below the diagonal, leaving a matrix whose determinant is a fixed number independent of b,c: 3.
Concept and Intuition
A is symmetric and B is skew-symmetric (its transpose is its negative, with zero diagonal). Adding them entrywise, the upper-triangular parts of A+B pick up b+b=2b and c+c=2c, while the lower-triangular parts get b+(−b)=0 and c+(−c)=0 — so A+B becomes upper triangular in its first column, letting the determinant be computed by a clean cofactor expansion that never involves b or c.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A=1bcb23c34, B=0−b−cb0−2c20.
- Add entrywise: (A+B)11=1, (A+B)12=2b, (A+B)13=2c; (A+B)21=b−b=0, (A+B)22=2, (A+B)23=3+2=5; (A+B)31=c−c=0, (A+B)32=3−2=1, (A+B)33=4.
- So A+B=1002b212c54.
- Expand the determinant along the first column (only the (1,1) entry is nonzero there): det(A+B)=1⋅det[2154]=1⋅(2⋅4−5⋅1)=8−5=3.
Common Mistakes
- Not recognising B as skew-symmetric and instead trying to compute the full 3×3 determinant symbolically in b,c (much more work, and error-prone).
- Sign slip when subtracting b−b or c−c in the lower-triangular entries.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 3.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.If the inverse of −x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x is 20101−2701, then xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4= (A) 5x (B) x−5 (C) 5x−1 (D) x+5
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing a determinant with AP-rows (always zero) and pinning down x from a matrix-inverse condition; the answer is whichever option numerically equals 0 at that x.
Concept and Intuition
A square matrix whose rows form an arithmetic progression (i.e. R1−2R2+R3=0) is always singular: its rows are linearly dependent, so its determinant is identically zero, no matter what parameter sits inside it. Spotting this saves a full cofactor expansion. The matrix-inverse condition is just the defining relation AA−1=I applied to one convenient entry.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let A=−x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x and A−1=20101−2701.
- Using AA−1=I, multiply row 1 of A by column 1 of A−1: (−x)(2)+(14x)(0)+(7x)(1)=5x. This must equal the (1,1) entry of I, i.e. 1. So 5x=1⇒x=51. (Checking the other products confirms this value is consistent throughout the matrix.)
- Now look at D=xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4. Apply R1→R1−2R2+R3: each entry becomes x−2(x+1)+(x+2)=0, turning the first row into (0,0,0).
- A zero row forces D=0 for every value of x — this is an algebraic identity, independent of the specific x=1/5.
- Since D=0 always, the matching option is the expression that equals 0 at x=51: 5x−1=5(51)−1=1−1=0. ✓ (Checking the rest: 5x=251, x−5=−524, x+5=526 — all nonzero.)
Common Mistakes
- Brute-force expanding the 3×3 determinant instead of spotting the AP-row structure, wasting time and inviting slips.
- Forgetting that "D=0 identically" means the answer must be matched numerically against x=1/5, not simplified as a formula.
- Mixing up which matrix is A and which is the given inverse when extracting x.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 5x−1.
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.