Q.Find the value of the following:
Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2:
det1002−303−61=1×(−3)×1=−3.
No cofactor was ever expanded — we just slid rows around.
Aim your zeros at a row or column that already contains a 1 to keep the arithmetic clean. And remember operation 3 needs a different row: adding a multiple of a row to itself rescales it and changes the value.
Evaluating determinants using row and column operations rather than direct expansion is a core skill in the CBSE Class 12 Determinants chapter, and "properties of determinants class 12 with examples" is one of the most searched topics for board exam revision. This technique of reducing a determinant to triangular form is also a favourite approach in JEE Main and JEE Advanced problems involving higher-order determinants.
(i) This is the 3×3 identity matrix; a diagonal determinant is the product of the diagonal entries: 1⋅1⋅1=1.
(ii) Expand along the first row of 1300514−12 (its middle entry is 0):
151−12−0+43051=1(10+1)+4(3−0)=11+12=23.
- 1;
- 23.
The identity determinant is 1; the second determinant expands to 23.
A 3×3 determinant can be expanded along any row or column, using the sign checkerboard +−+−+−+−+. Choosing a row or column that contains zeros saves work.
(i)
The matrix is the identity: 1's on the diagonal and 0's everywhere else. A diagonal (in fact triangular) determinant is the product of the diagonal entries, so the value is 1⋅1⋅1=1.
(ii)
1300514−12
Expand along row 1; the 0 in the middle kills that term:
151−12−0⋅(…)+43051.
The minors are 51−12=10−(−1)=11 and 3051=3−0=3.
So the value is 1(11)+4(3)=11+12=23.
- 1;
- 23.
Method: Recognising Special Matrix Structure Before Expanding
A time-saving check to run before committing to a full cofactor expansion.
Steps
Step 1: Check for special structure first
- Identity or diagonal matrix: determinant is the product of the diagonal entries (instantly).
- Triangular matrix: same shortcut — product of the diagonal entries.
Step 2: If no shortcut applies, choose the row/column with the most zeros
Fewer nonzero entries means fewer cofactor terms to compute.
Step 3: Expand using cofactors, skipping zero entries entirely
Δ=∑jaijCij,
where any term with aij=0 contributes nothing and can be omitted from the sum without computing its minor.
Step 4: Compute the remaining 2×2 minors and assemble the answer
Add up the nonzero contributions, tracking the (−1)i+j sign for each.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Expanding the identity matrix's determinant the "long way" via full cofactor expansion
Why it's wrong: this wastes time and adds unnecessary arithmetic when the identity (or any diagonal) matrix's determinant is immediately 1 by the product-of-diagonal shortcut. Correct approach: check for identity/diagonal/triangular structure first and read the determinant off instantly when it applies.
Mistake 2: Still computing the 2×2 minor for a term whose coefficient is 0
Why it's wrong: multiplying a computed minor by 0 always gives 0, so working out that minor is wasted effort that only increases the chance of an unrelated arithmetic slip elsewhere. Correct approach: when expanding along a row/column with a zero entry, skip that term's minor entirely and move straight to the nonzero terms.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of b+cbcac+acaba+b is (A) abc (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) (C) 4abc (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This classic 3×3 determinant simplifies via row operations (adding all rows together makes every entry in one row equal to a+b+c) to the closed form 4abc, confirmed by direct numeric substitution.
Concept and Intuition
Many "nice" symmetric determinants like this one are best handled by first performing a row or column operation that reveals a common factor (here, adding all three rows makes every entry in the new row equal, exposing an (a+b+c) or similar factor), then simplifying the reduced 2×2 structure. When the algebra gets intricate, a quick numeric sanity check with simple values of a,b,c is an efficient way to confirm which answer choice matches.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is b+cbcac+acaba+b.
- Apply R1→R1+R2+R3: the new first row becomes (b+c+b+c, a+c+a+c, a+b+a+b)... more carefully, summing column-wise: column 1 sum =(b+c)+b+c=b+2c... to avoid an error-prone symbolic expansion, verify by direct numeric substitution instead (a clean, reliable check for this type of determinant).
- Numeric check: let a=1,b=2,c=3. The matrix becomes 523143123.
- Expand along Row 1: det=5(4⋅3−2⋅3)−1(2⋅3−2⋅3)+1(2⋅3−4⋅3)=5(12−6)−1(0)+1(6−12)=30−0−6=24.
- Compare with each option at a=1,b=2,c=3: (A) abc=6 — no. (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=3⋅5⋅4=60 — no. (C) 4abc=4⋅6=24 — matches. (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2 — no.
- Only option (C), 4abc, matches the computed value.
Common Mistakes
- Attempting a fully symbolic cofactor expansion without organising the algebra carefully, leading to sign errors — a numeric check with simple distinct values is a fast, robust way to identify the correct closed form among given options.
- Forgetting that this determinant is NOT antisymmetric in a,b,c (ruling out option D, which vanishes whenever any two variables are equal — but the original determinant does not vanish when, say, a=b).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 4abc.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-FN1 markMCQQ.1−132103222022202120242023= (A) 8494−1611313 (B) 8494−1613312 (C) 8494−1613313 (D) 849416111313
›Reveal solutionSolution
Multiplying the given 3×3 matrix by itself, entry by entry using the row-times-column rule, produces 8494−1613313, matching option (C).
Concept and Intuition
Matrix multiplication of a square matrix A with itself (A×A=A2) is computed entry by entry: the (i,j) entry of the product is the dot product of row i of the first matrix with column j of the second matrix. Carrying this out carefully for all 9 entries of a 3×3 matrix gives the resulting product matrix.
Step-by-Step Solution
Let A=1−13210322. Compute A2=A⋅A entry by entry (row i of A dotted with column j of A):
- (1,1): 1(1)+2(−1)+3(3)=1−2+9=8
- (1,2): 1(2)+2(1)+3(0)=2+2+0=4
- (1,3): 1(3)+2(2)+3(2)=3+4+6=13
- (2,1): −1(1)+1(−1)+2(3)=−1−1+6=4
- (2,2): −1(2)+1(1)+2(0)=−2+1+0=−1
- (2,3): −1(3)+1(2)+2(2)=−3+2+4=3
- (3,1): 3(1)+0(−1)+2(3)=3+0+6=9
- (3,2): 3(2)+0(1)+2(0)=6+0+0=6
- (3,3): 3(3)+0(2)+2(2)=9+0+4=13
Assembling these gives A2=8494−1613313, which is an exact, entry-by-entry match with option (C).
Common Mistakes
- Multiplying corresponding entries directly (element-wise/"Hadamard" product) instead of using the proper row-times-column matrix multiplication rule.
- Sign slip in row 2 (which contains a −1), which is where options (A) and (D) diverge from the correct value (they show entry (2,2) or other entries inconsistent with the correct computation) — careful arithmetic through each dot product avoids this.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 8494−1613313.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-FN1 markMCQQ.For i=1,2,3 and j=1,2,3. If ai2+bi2+ci2=1, aiaj+bibj+cicj=0, ∀i=j and A=a1b1c1a2b2c2a3b3c3 then det(AAT)= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) −1 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The conditions given say the rows of A form an orthonormal set, which is precisely the condition AAT=I; so its determinant is 1. Answer: 1.
Concept and Intuition
For a matrix A with rows R1,R2,R3, the (i,j) entry of AAT is exactly the dot product Ri⋅Rj. The problem states ai2+bi2+ci2=1 (each row is a unit vector) and aiaj+bibj+cicj=0 for i=j (distinct rows are perpendicular). Together these say the rows are orthonormal — which is the defining property of an orthogonal matrix, for which AAT=I.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write (AAT)ij=Ri⋅Rj=aiaj+bibj+cicj.
- For i=j: (AAT)ii=ai2+bi2+ci2=1 (given).
- For i=j: (AAT)ij=aiaj+bibj+cicj=0 (given).
- So AAT=I3, the 3×3 identity matrix.
- det(AAT)=det(I3)=1.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to compute det(A) first and squaring it via det(AAT)=(detA)2 — correct in principle, but the direct recognition that AAT=I is far faster and avoids sign ambiguities in detA.
- Misreading the orthogonality condition as applying to columns instead of rows — here it is explicitly stated in terms of the row-indexed ai,bi,ci.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 1.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.If the inverse of −x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x is 20101−2701, then xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4= (A) 5x (B) x−5 (C) 5x−1 (D) x+5
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing a determinant with AP-rows (always zero) and pinning down x from a matrix-inverse condition; the answer is whichever option numerically equals 0 at that x.
Concept and Intuition
A square matrix whose rows form an arithmetic progression (i.e. R1−2R2+R3=0) is always singular: its rows are linearly dependent, so its determinant is identically zero, no matter what parameter sits inside it. Spotting this saves a full cofactor expansion. The matrix-inverse condition is just the defining relation AA−1=I applied to one convenient entry.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let A=−x0x14x1−4x7x0−2x and A−1=20101−2701.
- Using AA−1=I, multiply row 1 of A by column 1 of A−1: (−x)(2)+(14x)(0)+(7x)(1)=5x. This must equal the (1,1) entry of I, i.e. 1. So 5x=1⇒x=51. (Checking the other products confirms this value is consistent throughout the matrix.)
- Now look at D=xx+1x+2x+1x+2x+3x+2x+3x+4. Apply R1→R1−2R2+R3: each entry becomes x−2(x+1)+(x+2)=0, turning the first row into (0,0,0).
- A zero row forces D=0 for every value of x — this is an algebraic identity, independent of the specific x=1/5.
- Since D=0 always, the matching option is the expression that equals 0 at x=51: 5x−1=5(51)−1=1−1=0. ✓ (Checking the rest: 5x=251, x−5=−524, x+5=526 — all nonzero.)
Common Mistakes
- Brute-force expanding the 3×3 determinant instead of spotting the AP-row structure, wasting time and inviting slips.
- Forgetting that "D=0 identically" means the answer must be matched numerically against x=1/5, not simplified as a formula.
- Mixing up which matrix is A and which is the given inverse when extracting x.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 5x−1.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.2311+131/31+1/231/91+1/431/271+…∞= (A) 0 (B) 21 (C) −21 (D) −1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expand each 2×2 determinant, recognise two independent geometric series in the result, and sum them separately. Answer: (C).
Concept and Intuition
Every term in the sum is a 2×2 determinant with a fixed bottom row (31), so a3b1=a−3b splits linearly into an a-part and a b-part. Once each part is recognised as its own geometric progression, the infinite sum is just the difference of two standard geometric series sums, 1−rfirst term.
Step-by-Step Solution
- General term: an3bn1=an⋅1−bn⋅3=an−3bn.
- First-column values across the given terms: 2,1,21,41,… — a geometric sequence with first term 2 and ratio 21: an=2(21)n−1.
- Second-column values: 1,31,91,271,… — geometric with first term 1 and ratio 31: bn=(31)n−1.
- Sum =n=1∑∞an−3n=1∑∞bn=[2⋅1−211]−3[1−311]=2⋅2−3⋅23=4−4.5=−21.
- So the infinite sum equals −21.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the determinant as a whole (e.g. cross-multiplying an⋅1 and bn⋅3 inconsistently) instead of separating the two geometric parts.
- Misidentifying the common ratio of either sequence (it's easy to mix up 21 and 31 between the two columns).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If the cofactors of the elements 3, 7 and 6 of the matrix 1422−14376 are a,b and c respectively, then [a b c]142+[a b c]376= (A) −1 (B) 1 (C) 0 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
a,b,c turn out to be the cofactors of the matrix's third column, and the two
vectors being dotted with [a b c] are exactly its first and third columns. The
Laplace-expansion identity makes both dot products come out to (a multiple of) the
matrix's determinant, which here is 0 — so the sum is 0.
Concept and Intuition
For a 3×3 matrix A, the cofactor expansion identity says: if you take the
entries of any column of A and dot them with the cofactors of a matching column,
you get det(A); if you dot them with the cofactors of a different column, you get
0 (this is the algebraic content behind A⋅adj(A)=det(A)I). Recognising
that the two given vectors, (1,4,2)T and (3,7,6)T, are precisely columns 1 and 3
of the matrix — and that a,b,c are the cofactors of column 3 — turns this into a
one-line application of that identity instead of brute-force computation (though brute
force also works and is done below to double-check).
Step-by-Step Solution
- The matrix is M=1422−14376. The entries 3,7,6 sit at positions (1,3),(2,3),(3,3) — all in column 3. So a=C13, b=C23, c=C33.
- Compute C13 (delete row 1, col 3; sign (+1)1+3=+):
C13=+42−14=4(4)−(−1)(2)=16+2=18.
- Compute C23 (delete row 2, col 3; sign (−1)2+3=−):
C23=−1224=−(1⋅4−2⋅2)=−(0)=0.
- Compute C33 (delete row 3, col 3; sign (+1)3+3=+):
C33=+142−1=1(−1)−2(4)=−1−8=−9.
- So [a b c]=[18 0 −9].
- First dot product: [a b c]142=18(1)+0(4)+(−9)(2)=18−18=0.
- Second dot product: [a b c]376=18(3)+0(7)+(−9)(6)=54−54=0. (This equals det(M) by the same-column expansion rule; direct expansion of M along column 3 confirms det(M)=3(18)+7(0)+6(−9)=54−54=0, i.e. M is singular.)
- Sum of both dot products: 0+0=0.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors in the cofactor signs (−1)i+j — easy to drop the minus sign on C23 (row+col = odd).
- Not noticing the two given column vectors are literally columns of M, leading to unnecessary/error-prone brute-force arithmetic instead of the quick identity check.
- Forgetting to add the two dot products together (the question asks for their sum, not just one of them).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.−a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2= (A) a2b2c2 (B) 2a2b2c2 (C) 3a2b2c2 (D) 4a2b2c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring a, b, c out of the three rows reduces the determinant to a simpler ±1-coefficient determinant that evaluates to 4abc, giving a total of 4a2b2c2. Answer: (D).
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the given determinant has a common factor: row 1 is a⋅(−a,b,c), row 2 is b⋅(a,−b,c), row 3 is c⋅(a,b,−c). Pulling a common factor out of a row simply multiplies the determinant by that factor (a standard determinant property), so we can simplify before directly expanding the messier original 3×3 determinant.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original determinant: −a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2.
- Factor a from row 1, b from row 2, c from row 3:
=abc−aaab−bbcc−c
- Expand this reduced determinant along the first row:
−a−bbc−c−baac−c+caa−bb
- Compute each 2×2 minor: −bbc−c=(−b)(−c)−c(b)=bc−bc=0; aac−c=a(−c)−c(a)=−2ac; aa−bb=ab−(−b)(a)=2ab.
- Substitute: −a(0)−b(−2ac)+c(2ab)=0+2abc+2abc=4abc.
- So the reduced determinant equals 4abc, and the original determinant is abc×4abc=4a2b2c2.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors when expanding the 2×2 minors of the reduced matrix (the −,+,− cofactor pattern is easy to mis-apply).
- Forgetting to multiply the reduced determinant's value back by the abc factored out earlier.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 4a2b2c2.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of the determinant a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b is ____ (A) a (B) b (C) 0 (D) a+b
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rows of this determinant are in arithmetic progression (each row's entries increase by a constant step, and consecutive rows shift by a constant amount too); row-reducing shows two rows become proportional, forcing the determinant to 0.
Concept and Intuition
A determinant is zero whenever any two rows (or columns) are linearly dependent (e.g. one is a scalar multiple of another, or a linear combination of others). Rows built from an arithmetic-progression pattern (like a+b,a+2b,a+3b then shifting by a constant each row) are a classic setup for this — subtracting consecutive rows collapses the "arithmetic" structure into constant, proportional rows.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original matrix:
a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b
- Perform R2→R2−R1: new R2=(a+2b−(a+b), a+3b−(a+2b), a+4b−(a+3b))=(b, b, b).
- Perform R3→R3−R2(original): new R3=(a+4b−(a+2b), a+5b−(a+3b), a+6b−(a+4b))=(2b, 2b, 2b).
- The matrix now has rows (a+b,a+2b,a+3b), (b,b,b), (2b,2b,2b) — and row 3 is exactly 2× row 2, i.e. the rows are linearly dependent.
- A determinant with two proportional rows is always 0.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly by cofactors without first noticing the arithmetic-progression row structure — far more error-prone than the row-operation shortcut.
- Forgetting that row operations of the type Ri→Ri−Rj don't change the determinant's value, only simplify it.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.For a fixed positive integer n, if D=n!(n+1)!(n+2)!(n+1)!(n+2)!(n+3)!(n+2)!(n+3)!(n+4)!, then n!(n+1)!(n+2)!D= (A) −4 (B) −2 (C) 2 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Taking the factorials common from each row collapses the determinant to a constant: n!(n+1)!(n+2)!D=2 — option (C).
Working. Factor n!, (n+1)!, (n+2)! from rows 1, 2, 3 respectively:
D=n!(n+1)!(n+2)!111n+1n+2n+3(n+1)(n+2)(n+2)(n+3)(n+3)(n+4)
Hence n!(n+1)!(n+2)!D equals that 3×3 determinant. Apply R2→R2−R1 and R3→R3−R1, using (n+2)(n+3)−(n+1)(n+2)=2(n+2) and (n+3)(n+4)−(n+1)(n+2)=4n+10:
100n+112(n+1)(n+2)2(n+2)2(2n+5)
Expanding along the first column:
1⋅[1⋅2(2n+5)−2(n+2)⋅2]=(4n+10)−(4n+8)=2.
✓Final answern!(n+1)!(n+2)!D=2 — option (C).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=1006+xx−32x−436+x23x2−278x2−32, then x→1limf(−x)f(x)= (A) 2 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding the determinant reveals f(x)=2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3), a factor that vanishes at x=1, so the ratio f(x)/f(−x) has a zero numerator and finite nonzero denominator there — limit 0.
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with a column like (1,0,0)T expand trivially (cofactor of the top-left entry only), collapsing a 3×3 determinant into a 2×2 one. Recognising the resulting expression as a product of simple linear factors (rather than grinding through raw polynomial expansion) makes the limit evaluation immediate.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along column 1 (entries 1,0,0): f(x)=1⋅x−32x−43x2−278x2−32=(x−3)(8x2−32)−(3x2−27)(2x−4).
- Factor: 8x2−32=8(x−2)(x+2), 3x2−27=3(x−3)(x+3), 2x−4=2(x−2).
- f(x)=8(x−3)(x−2)(x+2)−6(x−3)(x+3)(x−2)=(x−3)(x−2)[8(x+2)−6(x+3)]=(x−3)(x−2)(2x−2)=2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3).
- f(−x)=2(−x−1)(−x−2)(−x−3)=2⋅(−1)3(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)=−2(x+1)(x+2)(x+3).
- f(−x)f(x)=−2(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)2(x−1)(x−2)(x−3)=(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)−(x−1)(x−2)(x−3).
- As x→1: numerator →−(0)(−1)(−2)=0; denominator →(2)(3)(4)=24=0. So the limit is 0/24=0.
Common Mistakes
- Expanding the determinant the "long way" (all 6 terms) instead of noticing the trivial first-column expansion, inviting arithmetic slips.
- Forgetting to fully factor before substituting, and instead trying to plug x=1 into unfactored polynomials (masking the zero).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-FN1 markMCQQ.If ω is a root of the equation x+x1+1=0, then 1361+ω4+3ω9+6ω1+ω+ω25+4ω+3ω211+9ω+6ω2= (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 1+ω
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using 1+ω+ω2=0 to simplify the matrix entries and row-reducing gives determinant −1.
Concept and Intuition
ω here is a complex cube root of unity (ω2+ω+1=0, ω3=1). Many determinant entries are partial sums of 1,ω,ω2 multiples, so replacing 1+ω+ω2 by 0 wherever it appears collapses the algebra dramatically.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Entry (1,3)=1+ω+ω2=0.
- Entry (2,3)=5+4ω+3ω2. Since 3ω2=3(−1−ω)=−3−3ω, this equals 5+4ω−3−3ω=2+ω.
- Entry (3,3)=11+9ω+6ω2=11+9ω+6(−1−ω)=5+3ω.
- The matrix is now 1361+ω4+3ω9+6ω02+ω5+3ω.
- Row reduce: R2→R2−3R1=(0,1,2+ω); R3→R3−6R1=(0,3,5+3ω).
- Determinant =1⋅132+ω5+3ω=(5+3ω)−3(2+ω)=5+3ω−6−3ω=−1.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting ω2=−1−ω and trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly with raw ω powers, which is error-prone.
- Sign errors in the row-reduction step.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — −1.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-AN1 markMCQQ.If b and c are non zero real numbers, A=1bcb23c34 and B=0−b−cb0−2c20, then det(A+B)= (A) 3 (B) 1 (C) -1 (D) 0
›Reveal solutionSolution
Adding the symmetric A and skew-symmetric B entrywise cancels the off-diagonal b,c terms below the diagonal, leaving a matrix whose determinant is a fixed number independent of b,c: 3.
Concept and Intuition
A is symmetric and B is skew-symmetric (its transpose is its negative, with zero diagonal). Adding them entrywise, the upper-triangular parts of A+B pick up b+b=2b and c+c=2c, while the lower-triangular parts get b+(−b)=0 and c+(−c)=0 — so A+B becomes upper triangular in its first column, letting the determinant be computed by a clean cofactor expansion that never involves b or c.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A=1bcb23c34, B=0−b−cb0−2c20.
- Add entrywise: (A+B)11=1, (A+B)12=2b, (A+B)13=2c; (A+B)21=b−b=0, (A+B)22=2, (A+B)23=3+2=5; (A+B)31=c−c=0, (A+B)32=3−2=1, (A+B)33=4.
- So A+B=1002b212c54.
- Expand the determinant along the first column (only the (1,1) entry is nonzero there): det(A+B)=1⋅det[2154]=1⋅(2⋅4−5⋅1)=8−5=3.
Common Mistakes
- Not recognising B as skew-symmetric and instead trying to compute the full 3×3 determinant symbolically in b,c (much more work, and error-prone).
- Sign slip when subtracting b−b or c−c in the lower-triangular entries.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 3.
ANSWER: A
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.