Q.A particle is dropped from a height H. The de Broglie wavelength of the particle as a function of height is proportional to
Concept understanding — De Broglie Wavelength
De Broglie Wavelength: When Particles Start Acting Like Waves
Imagine you're holding a cricket ball. You know exactly where it is, and if you throw it, you can predict its path. That's a particle — localised, definite, following Newton's laws. Now think of light. You can't "hold" a beam of light; it spreads out, bends around corners, creates interference patterns. That's a wave — spread out, not localised.
For centuries, physics kept these two worlds separate. Particles were particles. Waves were waves. Never the twain shall meet.
Then came a young French physicist, Louis de Broglie, in 1924. He asked a question that seemed almost absurd: If light — which we thought was a wave — can behave like a particle (the photoelectric effect), then why can't a particle — say, an electron — behave like a wave?
That question turned physics upside down.
The Core Idea
De Broglie proposed that every moving particle has a wave associated with it. The wavelength of that wave depends on the particle's momentum. The faster or heavier the particle, the shorter the wavelength.
λ=ph=mvh
Where:
- λ = de Broglie wavelength (in metres)
- h = Planck's constant (6.626×10−34 J⋅s)
- p = momentum of the particle (mv for non-relativistic speeds)
This is not a mathematical trick. It's a physical reality. An electron moving through a crystal actually behaves like a wave of this wavelength — it can diffract, interfere, and form patterns just like light does.
Why You Don't See It in Daily Life
Here's the crucial point: the de Broglie wavelength is incredibly tiny for everyday objects.
Take a cricket ball of mass 0.16 kg moving at 30 m/s. Its de Broglie wavelength is:
λ=0.16×306.626×10−34≈1.38×10−34 m
That's about a hundred trillion trillion times smaller than the nucleus of an atom. No experiment can detect such a wave — it's effectively zero for all practical purposes.
Now take an electron (mass 9.1×10−31 kg) accelerated through 100 volts. Its speed is about 5.9×106 m/s. Its de Broglie wavelength:
λ=9.1×10−31×5.9×1066.626×10−34≈1.23×10−10 m
That's about 0.12 nanometres — comparable to the spacing between atoms in a crystal. This is measurable. And indeed, in 1927, Davisson and Germer fired electrons at a nickel crystal and observed diffraction — the unmistakable signature of a wave.
The de Broglie wavelength is only observable when it is comparable to the size of objects the particle interacts with. For macroscopic objects, it's far too small to matter. For subatomic particles, it's the key to understanding their behaviour.
What This Means Physically
The wave is not a physical wave in space like a water wave. It's a probability wave — its amplitude at any point tells you the probability of finding the particle there. Where the wave amplitude is large, you're likely to find the particle; where it's zero, you won't.
This wave-particle duality is not a compromise. It's the actual nature of reality. An electron is neither a pure particle nor a pure wave — it's something that shows particle-like behaviour in some experiments (like hitting a screen at a point) and wave-like behaviour in others (like passing through two slits and interfering with itself).
De Broglie's hypothesis is not just a clever idea — it's the foundation of quantum mechanics. Every particle has a wavelength, and that wavelength determines how it moves, where it can be found, and even why electrons in atoms occupy only certain discrete energy levels (standing waves around the nucleus).
A Quick Way to Remember
For an exam, you'll often need to compute the de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated through a potential difference V volts. The kinetic energy gained is eV, so:
21mv2=eV⇒v=m2eV
Substituting into λ=h/(mv) gives:
λ=2meVh
Plug in the numbers (h, me, e) and you get a handy formula:
For an electron accelerated through V volts:
λ(in A˚)=V12.27
So a 100 V electron has λ≈1.23 A˚ — right in the X-ray range.
The Bottom Line
De Broglie wavelength is the bridge between the particle and wave pictures of matter. It tells you that momentum and wavelength are two sides of the same coin. For large objects, the wavelength is negligible — Newtonian physics works fine. For tiny particles, the wavelength dominates — and you must use quantum mechanics.
When you see λ=h/p, remember: that's nature saying that everything — from electrons to planets — has a wave nature. It's just that for most things, the wave is too small to notice.
Searches like "de Broglie wavelength formula and examples" and "dual nature of matter class 12 physics" are very common, since this concept is central to the Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter chapter of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Physics curriculum. The handy λ=12.27/V shortcut for accelerated electrons is a frequent JEE Main and NEET numerical question.
Why this formula?
De Broglie Wavelength: Why the Formula Holds
Let's build this from the ground up — understanding why matter has a wavelength, not just memorizing λ=ph.
The Core Insight: Nature's Symmetry
Before de Broglie, physics had two separate worlds:
- Light — showed wave behaviour (diffraction, interference) but also particle behaviour (photoelectric effect)
- Matter — showed particle behaviour (momentum, collisions) but no wave behaviour yet
De Broglie asked a daring question in his 1924 PhD thesis:
If light (a wave) can behave like a particle, why can't a particle (like an electron) behave like a wave?
Nature should be symmetric — what applies to one should apply to the other.
Step 1: Start with Light (What We Already Knew)
For a photon, Einstein had given us two key relations:
- Energy: E=hf (Planck's relation)
- Momentum: p=λh (from E=pc for light, combined with c=fλ)
So for light:
λ=ph
This was experimentally verified for photons.
Step 2: De Broglie's Bold Hypothesis
De Broglie said: This relation is not special to light. It is universal.
For any particle with momentum p:
λ=ph
Where:
- λ = de Broglie wavelength
- h = Planck's constant (6.626×10−34 J⋅s)
- p = momentum of the particle
Step 3: Why Momentum and Not Velocity?
This is crucial. The formula uses momentum (p=mv), not just velocity.
For a non-relativistic particle (slow compared to light):
λ=mvh
For a relativistic particle (like an electron at high speed):
p=γmvwhereγ=1−v2/c21
λ=γmvh
Why momentum? Because momentum is the more fundamental quantity — it's conserved, it's frame-independent in a deeper sense, and it connects directly to the wave's phase.
Step 4: The Deeper Reasoning — Wave-Particle Duality
De Broglie didn't just guess. He reasoned:
- Every moving particle has an associated wave — called the "matter wave" or "pilot wave"
- The frequency of this wave comes from energy: f=hE
- The wavelength comes from momentum: λ=ph
These two relations are linked by the phase velocity of the wave:
vphase=fλ=hE⋅ph=pE
For a free particle with kinetic energy E=2mp2:
vphase=2mp=2v
This is half the particle's speed — a strange but mathematically consistent result.
Step 5: Experimental Confirmation (Why We Believe It)
De Broglie's idea was confirmed when electrons showed wave behaviour:
- Davisson-Germer experiment (1927): Electrons scattered off a nickel crystal produced diffraction patterns — exactly like X-rays (waves!)
- The measured wavelength matched λ=h/p perfectly
This was Nobel Prize material — de Broglie won in 1929.
Key Takeaways for Exams
| Concept | Formula | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| De Broglie wavelength | λ=ph | Always — fundamental definition |
| Non-relativistic | λ=mvh | For v≪c (most exam problems) |
| Relativistic | λ=γmvh | For v≈c (rare in school exams) |
| For an electron accelerated through V volts | λ=2meVh | Derive from p=2mEk |
The Deeper "Why" — One Sentence
De Broglie wavelength exists because nature is symmetric: just as light has both wave and particle aspects, so must matter — and the bridge between them is Planck's constant h.
The formula λ=h/p is not derived from deeper principles — it is the fundamental postulate that connects the particle's momentum to its wave's wavelength. Its validity comes from experiment, not from pure mathematics.
Concept: de Broglie wavelength λ=ph=mvh, where h is Planck's constant.
Reasoning:
- The particle falls freely from height H, starting from rest. By the time it reaches the ground it has fallen through the entire height H, so its speed there is v=2gH.
- Momentum at the ground: p=mv=m2gH.
- de Broglie wavelength: λ=m2gHh∝H−1/2.
λ∝H−1/2, so option (D) is correct.
A particle dropped from height H reaches speed v=2gH once it has fallen through the full height H; since λ=h/p and p=mv, the de Broglie wavelength is proportional to H−1/2 — option (D).
The de Broglie wavelength of any moving particle is λ=h/p, where h is Planck's constant and p is the particle's linear momentum. So the problem reduces to finding how the particle's momentum depends on the drop height H.
- Set up the free fall. The particle starts at rest and falls under gravity through the full height H. Using v2=u2+2gs with u=0 and s=H (the distance covered once it has fallen the whole way):
v=2gH.
- Find the momentum.
p=mv=m2gH.
- Find the de Broglie wavelength.
λ=ph=m2gHh.
Holding the mass m and g fixed, this gives
λ∝H1=H−1/2.
Don't confuse Planck's constant h with the particle's height — here always called H. Keeping them as distinct symbols throughout avoids the derivation collapsing into an ambiguous h-vs-h mix-up.
- Check the other options.
- (A) H: would mean λ grows with drop height — wrong, since a bigger drop gives a bigger speed and hence a shorter wavelength.
- (B) H1/2: the opposite dependence to the correct one.
- (C) H0: constant — only true if speed didn't depend on H at all, which is false since v=2gH.
- (D) H−1/2: matches the derivation above.
λ∝H−1/2, so the correct option is (D).
Method: Finding How de Broglie Wavelength Depends on a Changing Parameter
This method applies whenever a particle's speed changes due to some physical process (falling under gravity, acceleration by a field, etc.) and you're asked how its de Broglie wavelength depends on a variable describing that process.
Steps
Step 1: Identify the physical process that fixes the momentum
Before touching λ=h/p, work out what mechanics principle governs the particle's speed at the point of interest — energy conservation (e.g. free fall, 21mv2=mg×(height fallen)), Newton's second law with a constant force, or a given kinetic energy. This is the step most students skip, and it's the one that actually determines the answer.
Step 2: Express momentum as a function of the given variable
Use the mechanics relation from Step 1 to write speed (and hence momentum p=mv) purely in terms of the variable the question asks about — here, a height. Keep the constants (m, g) symbolic; you only need their combination, not their values.
p=mv=m2g(height fallen)
Step 3: Substitute into λ=h/p and reduce to a proportionality
λ=ph ∝ height fallen1
Since only the proportionality is asked (not a numeric value), drop every constant (h, m, g) and keep only how λ scales with the variable.
Step 4: Read the question's variable carefully before matching an option
Exam questions like this often use two different heights in the same sentence (the drop height and the instantaneous height) — check exactly which one the option is asking about, since λ∝(drop height)−1/2 is the same power-law shape you'd get with any variable that momentum scales as its square root, so a careless reading can pick the wrong option letter even with all the algebra done right.
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.When two electrons A and B are accelerated through potential difference VA and VB respectively, their deBrogli wave lengths are in the ratio of 2:3, then the ratio of potential differences VBVA is (A) 3:2 (B) 2:3 (C) 4:9 (D) 9:4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since λ∝1/V for an accelerated electron, a wavelength ratio of 2:3 inverts and squares to give a potential-difference ratio of 9:4.
Concept and Intuition
An electron accelerated through a potential difference V gains kinetic energy eV=2mp2, so its momentum is p=2meV, and its deBroglie wavelength is λ=ph=2meVh. Wavelength is thus inversely proportional to the square root of the accelerating voltage.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λ∝V1 (same charge and mass for both electrons).
- λBλA=VAVB=32 (given).
- Squaring: VAVB=94.
- Inverting: VBVA=49.
Common Mistakes
- Treating λ∝1/V (forgetting the square root), which would give the wrong ratio 4:9 or its inverse directly without the necessary squaring step.
- Mixing up which electron (A or B) has the larger wavelength/smaller potential.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 9:4.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If the potential difference used to accelerate electrons at rest is increased from 150 V to 600 V, then the percentage decrease in the de-Broglie wavelength associated with the electron is (A) 25 (B) 75 (C) 50 (D) 40
›Reveal solutionSolution
The de Broglie wavelength scales as 1/V; quadrupling the accelerating voltage halves the wavelength, i.e. a 50% decrease.
Concept and Intuition
An electron accelerated from rest through a potential difference V gains kinetic energy eV=2mp2, so its momentum is p=2meV, and its de Broglie wavelength is λ=ph=2meVh∝V1.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λ1λ2=V2V1=600150=41=21.
- So the new wavelength is half the original: λ2=0.5λ1.
- Percentage decrease =λ1λ1−λ2×100=λ1λ1−0.5λ1×100=50%.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming wavelength scales inversely with V itself (not V), which would wrongly give a 75% decrease.
- Confusing "decreased to half" with "decreased by half of some other baseline."
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 50.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.Two identical parallel metal plates A and B, having fine holes at their centers are connected to a power supply as shown in the figure. An electron having energy 200 eV is directed to pass through these holes from A to B. The de Broglie wavelength of the electron when it comes out of plate B is [FIGURE] (two parallel metal plates A and B, each with a small central hole, connected across a 100 V power supply; an electron travels horizontally through the aligned holes from A to B) (A) 0.713 Å (B) 2.012 Å (C) 1.754 Å (D) 1.227 Å
›Reveal solutionSolution
The electron's kinetic energy changes by exactly the 100 eV set by the plate-to-plate potential difference; working out its final energy (100 eV) and applying λ=h/p gives 1.227 Å.
Concept and Intuition
An electron's de Broglie wavelength is λ=ph=2mEh, where E is its kinetic energy. When an electron of charge −e moves through a region with potential difference V, its kinetic energy changes by eV (gaining energy if accelerated, losing energy if decelerated by the field). Here, an electron already carrying 200 eV of kinetic energy passes between two plates connected across a 100 V supply; crossing this potential difference changes its energy by exactly 100 eV=eV.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Initial kinetic energy of the electron: E1=200 eV.
- The field between A and B (100 V across the plates) does work eV=100 eV on the electron as it crosses from A to B; here it acts to decelerate the electron, so the final kinetic energy is E2=E1−eV=200−100=100 eV.
- Use the standard relation for an electron's de Broglie wavelength in terms of its kinetic energy expressed as an equivalent accelerating voltage Veq (numerically equal to the energy in eV): λ(A˚)=Veq12.27.
- Substitute Veq=100: λ=10012.27=1012.27=1.227 Å.
- This matches option (D) exactly.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the electron already has 200 eV before entering the field, and instead computing the wavelength for 100 eV or 300 eV without correctly accounting for whether the field accelerates or decelerates it.
- Misremembering the constant in λ=12.27/VA˚ (derived from h/2meV with standard values of h, me, e).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 1.227 Å.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.Two particles of masses 'm' and '2m' are falling from same height. Then the ratio of the de Broglie wavelengths on reaching ground is (A) 1 : 2 (B) 2 : 1 (C) 1 : 4 (D) 4 : 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Free-fall speed is mass-independent, so momentum (and hence de Broglie wavelength) scales directly with mass, giving a 2:1 wavelength ratio.
Concept and Intuition
A classic point of free-fall kinematics: acceleration due to gravity is the same for all masses, so both particles hit the ground with identical speed v=2gh. But momentum p=mv does depend on mass, so the heavier particle has twice the momentum — and since de Broglie wavelength λ=h/p is inversely proportional to momentum, the lighter particle has the longer wavelength.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Both fall through height h: v=2gh for each, independent of mass.
- Momentum of mass m: p1=mv. Momentum of mass 2m: p2=2mv.
- λ1=h/p1, λ2=h/p2.
- λ2λ1=p1p2=mv2mv=2.
- So λ1:λ2=2:1.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming heavier objects fall faster (they don't, in the absence of air resistance) and trying to bring mass into the speed calculation.
- Inverting the final ratio (writing 1:2 instead of 2:1) by forgetting λ∝1/p.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 2:1.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The kinetic energy of a sub atomic particle is increased by 8 times. The de Broglie wavelength of it becomes x times the initial wavelength. The value of x is (A) 81 (B) 41 (C) 221 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
De Broglie wavelength varies as 1/KE; an 8-fold increase in kinetic energy shrinks wavelength to 1/(22) of its original value.
Concept and Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength is λ=h/p, and kinetic energy relates to momentum via KE=p2/(2m), so p=2mKE. This means λ is inversely proportional to the square root of kinetic energy — doubling KE doesn't halve the wavelength, it divides it by 2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λ=2mKEh.
- If KE′=8KE: λ′=2m(8KE)h=82mKEh=8λ.
- 8=22, so λ′=22λ, i.e. x=221.
Common Mistakes
- Treating λ as inversely proportional to KE directly (linear), instead of to KE.
- Simplifying 8 incorrectly instead of as 22.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 221.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.The de Broglie wavelength of an electron in the third Bohr orbit of H-atom is (A) 3π×5.29 pm (B) 4π×52.9 pm (C) 6π×52.9 pm (D) 2π×5.29 pm
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bohr's quantization condition connecting orbit circumference to the de Broglie wavelength. For the third orbit of hydrogen, λ=6π×52.9 pm.
Concept and Intuition
Bohr's postulate that angular momentum is quantized, mvr=2πnh, is equivalent (via the de Broglie relation λ=h/mv) to saying that exactly n de Broglie wavelengths fit around the orbit's circumference: 2πrn=nλ. So once the orbit radius rn is known, the electron's wavelength in that orbit follows directly from the circumference divided into n equal parts.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Bohr quantization ⇒ standing-wave condition: 2πrn=nλ ⇒ λ=n2πrn.
- Bohr radius of H-atom: rn=52.9n2 pm (since Z=1).
- Substitute:
λ=n2π(52.9n2)=2π(52.9)n
- For the third orbit, n=3:
λ=2π(52.9)(3)=6π×52.9 pm
Common Mistakes
- Using r3 numerically (476.1 pm) and computing λ=2π(476.1)/3 without simplifying it back into the 6π×52.9 form the options expect — the arithmetic is identical, just check it reduces to the same value.
- Forgetting the standing-wave condition and instead trying to use the electron's momentum from energy formulas (unnecessary detour, though it would give the same numeric answer).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 6π×52.9 pm.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.If A, B and C represent Planck's constant, mass and velocity respectively, then the dimensional formula of BCA is (A) [M0L0T1] (B) [M1L0T0] (C) [M0L1T0] (D) [M1L1T−1]
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests dimensional analysis of Planck's constant combined with mass and velocity. The answer is (C) [M0L1T0].
Concept and Intuition
Dimensional formulas let us combine physical quantities symbolically without worrying about units, by tracking powers of mass [M], length [L], and time [T]. Planck's constant appears in E=hν, so its dimension is energy divided by frequency. Since energy has dimension [ML2T−2] and frequency has dimension [T−1], Planck's constant h has dimension [ML2T−1]. Dividing this by mass times velocity systematically cancels out mass and one power of length-per-time, leaving a pure length dimension.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Dimension of Planck's constant A=h: from E=hν, [h]=[ν][E]=T−1ML2T−2=[ML2T−1].
- Dimension of mass B=[M].
- Dimension of velocity C=[LT−1].
- Compute BC=[M][LT−1]=[MLT−1].
- Compute BCA=[MLT−1][ML2T−1]=[L2−1]=[L]=[M0L1T0].
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting a power of L or T while cancelling; always subtract exponents carefully.
- Misremembering the dimension of Planck's constant as [ML2T−2] (that is energy, not h).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — [M0L1T0].
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.An electron of specific charge me enters an electric field, E=−E0i^ at a time t = 0 with an initial velocity vi^. If λ0 is its initial de Broglie wavelength, then its de Broglie wavelength at a time 't' is (A) (1+mveE0t)λ0 (B) λ0[1+mveE0t] (C) (1−mveE0t)λ0 (D) mvλ0E0
›Reveal solutionSolution
The electric field accelerates the electron in the same direction it is already moving, so its speed and hence its de Broglie wavelength change as λ=λ0/(1+eE0t/mv).
Concept and Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength is λ=h/(mv) — inversely proportional to speed. To find λ(t) we need v(t), which requires knowing whether the field speeds up or slows down the electron. The electron carries charge −e (with e>0 the elementary charge), and the field is E=−E0i^. The force is F=qE=(−e)(−E0i^)=+eE0i^ — pointing along +i^, the same direction as the initial velocity vi^. So the electron accelerates (speeds up), and its wavelength must shrink.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Initial wavelength: λ0=mvh.
- Force on electron: F=(−e)E=(−e)(−E0i^)=eE0i^, so acceleration a=meE0 along +i^.
- Velocity at time t (uniform acceleration, initial velocity v along +i^):
v(t)=v+meE0t=v(1+mveE0t)
- New wavelength:
λ(t)=mv(t)h=mv(1+mveE0t)h=1+mveE0tλ0
- This matches option (A). Since the bracket is >1, λ(t)<λ0, consistent with the electron speeding up.
Common Mistakes
- Getting the sign of the force wrong (forgetting the electron's charge is negative, which flips the direction of qE relative to E itself).
- Assuming the electron decelerates (which would instead give option (C)'s form) without checking the actual direction of the force relative to the velocity.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — (1+mveE0t)λ0.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.If the kinetic energy of a particle having wavelength x Å is increased to three times, its de Broglie wavelength (in Å) is : (A) 3x (B) 3x (C) 3x (D) 3x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since λ∝1/KE, tripling the kinetic energy shrinks the de Broglie wavelength by a factor 3.
Concept and Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength of a particle is λ=h/p, and kinetic energy relates to momentum via KE=p2/2m, so p=2m⋅KE. Hence
λ=2mKEh∝KE1
Larger kinetic energy means larger momentum, and larger momentum always means a shorter wavelength.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Initially λ1=x at kinetic energy KE1.
- New kinetic energy KE2=3KE1.
- λ1λ2=KE2KE1=31=31.
- So λ2=3x.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the KE-dependence of λ with the (different) velocity-dependence λ=h/mv and using a linear relation instead of 1/KE.
- Inverting the ratio and getting 3x instead of x/3 (forgetting that more energy means shorter wavelength).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 3x.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.The ratio of de Broglie wavelengths associated with thermal neutrons at temperatures 127°C and 352°C is (A) 5:3 (B) 3:2 (C) 3:4 (D) 5:4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The de Broglie wavelength of a thermal particle scales as 1/T; converting to Kelvin and taking the ratio gives 5:4.
Concept and Intuition
A 'thermal' neutron's kinetic energy comes from thermal agitation, so on average E∝kBT. Since the de Broglie wavelength is λ=h/p=h/2mE, and E∝T, we get λ∝1/T — hotter neutrons move faster and so have shorter wavelengths.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Convert both temperatures to Kelvin: T1=127+273=400 K, T2=352+273=625 K.
- Since λ∝1/T: λ2λ1=T1T2=400625.
- 400625=1.5625, and 1.5625=1.25=45.
- So λ1:λ2=5:4.
Common Mistakes
- Using the Celsius values directly instead of converting to Kelvin.
- Inverting the ratio (forgetting that higher T means shorter λ).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 5:4.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.The de Broglie wavelength associated with an electron accelerated through a potential difference of 3200 V is nearly (A) 25 A∘ (B) 2.5 A∘ (C) 15 A∘ (D) 1.5 A∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the de Broglie wavelength formula for an electron accelerated through a potential difference; the answer is about 1.5 Å.
Concept and Intuition
An electron accelerated through potential V gains kinetic energy eV=2mp2, giving momentum p=2meV. Its de Broglie wavelength is λ=h/p. Substituting the constants gives the handy numerical formula λ(A∘)=V12.27 when V is in volts — this is the standard shortcut used for electron-diffraction-type problems.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Accelerating potential: V=3200≈66.67V.
- V=66.67≈8.165.
- λ=8.16512.27≈1.503A∘.
- This is closest to 1.5A∘.
Common Mistakes
- Using V=200 directly instead of 200/3.
- Misremembering the constant (12.27, not 12.3 or another rounding) and drifting to the wrong order of magnitude.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 1.5 A∘.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-FN1 markMCQQ.An electron of mass 'm' with initial velocity vˉ=v0i^ (v0>0) enters in an electric field Eˉ=−E0i^ [E0 is constant > 0] at t = 0. If λ is its de-Brogli wavelength initially, then the de-Brogli wavelength after time 't' is (A) 1+mv0eE0tλ (B) (1−mv0eE0t)2λ (C) (1+mv0eE0t)λ (D) (1+mv0eE0t)2λ
›Reveal solutionSolution
The field accelerates the electron in the direction it's already moving, increasing its speed
(and hence decreasing its de Broglie wavelength) by a linear factor in time.
Concept and Intuition
The electron carries charge −e. In a field Eˉ=−E0i^, the force is Fˉ=qEˉ=(−e)(−E0i^)=+eE0i^ — pointing in the +i^ direction, which is the same
direction as the electron's initial velocity v0i^. So the electron is accelerated forward
(sped up), not decelerated.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Acceleration: a=F/m=eE0/m, directed along +i^ (same as v0).
- Velocity at time t: v(t)=v0+at=v0+meE0t=v0(1+mv0eE0t).
- De Broglie wavelength λ=h/(mv), so λ∝1/v.
- Initially λ=h/(mv0). At time t: λ(t)=mv(t)h=1+mv0eE0th/(mv0)=1+mv0eE0tλ.
Common Mistakes
- Getting the sign of the force wrong (thinking the electron's negative charge in a −i^ field must decelerate it) — two negatives (electron's charge and the field direction) make a positive, forward-accelerating force.
- Forgetting λ∝1/v, so an increasing speed means a decreasing wavelength, i.e. the denominator factor must be >1, matching option (A) exactly (not options C/D which would correspond to a wavelength that increases).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 1+mv0eE0tλ.
ANSWER: A
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.