Q.Relativistic corrections become necessary when the expression for the kinetic energy 21mv2 becomes comparable with mc2, where m is the mass of the particle. At what de Broglie wavelength will relativistic corrections become important for an electron?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — De Broglie Wavelength
De Broglie Wavelength: When Particles Start Acting Like Waves
You already know that light behaves like a wave (interference, diffraction) and like a particle (photoelectric effect). That's wave-particle duality for light. De Broglie's radical idea in 1924 was: if light can be both, why can't matter be both too?
He proposed that every moving particle — an electron, a proton, even a cricket ball — has a wavelength associated with it. The faster it moves, the shorter that wavelength becomes.
The Intuition
Think of a wave on a string. Its wavelength is the distance between two consecutive crests. Now imagine an electron moving through space. De Broglie said that the electron's motion itself creates a "matter wave" — a wave of probability that guides where the electron is likely to be found.
You never see this wavelength in everyday life because for large objects it's unimaginably tiny. A cricket ball moving at 30 m/s has a de Broglie wavelength of about 10−34 m — far smaller than an atomic nucleus. That's why macroscopic objects behave like particles.
The Precise Statement
The de Broglie wavelength λ of a particle is given by:
λ=ph
where:
- h is Planck's constant (6.626×10−34 J⋅s)
- p is the momentum of the particle (p=mv for non-relativistic speeds)
Key point: The wavelength depends only on momentum, not on charge, mass, or any other property. A fast electron and a slow proton can have the same wavelength if their momenta are equal.
What This Means Physically
-
For electrons in atoms: The de Broglie wavelength of an electron in a hydrogen atom is roughly the size of the atom itself (≈10−10 m). This is why electrons form standing waves around the nucleus — only certain wavelengths "fit" into the orbit, which explains quantised energy levels.
-
For experiments: If you fire electrons through a crystal, they diffract just like X-rays. This was confirmed by Davisson and Germer in 1927 — a Nobel-winning experiment that proved de Broglie right.
-
For large objects: The wavelength is so small that wave behaviour is undetectable. A car moving at 100 km/h has λ≈10−38 m — you'd need a slit smaller than an atom to see diffraction.
A common mistake is to think the de Broglie wavelength is the size of the particle. It is not. It is the wavelength of the probability wave associated with the particle. The particle itself remains point-like.
Worked Example
Question: What is the de Broglie wavelength of an electron moving at 2.0×106 m/s? (Mass of electron me=9.11×10−31 kg)
Solution:
First, find momentum:
p=mv=(9.11×10−31)(2.0×106)=1.822×10−24 kg⋅m/s
Then apply de Broglie's formula: …
Why this formula?
De Broglie Wavelength: Why Matter Has a Wave Nature
The idea that a moving particle has a wavelength is one of the most radical shifts in physics. It came from Louis de Broglie in 1924, who asked a simple question: if light — which we thought was a wave — can behave like a particle (the photon), then why can't a particle behave like a wave?
The Core Insight: Symmetry in Nature
De Broglie started from Einstein's relation for a photon. For light, the energy E and momentum p of a photon are linked to its wave properties — frequency f and wavelength λ — by:
E=hfandp=λh
where h is Planck's constant. These are not arbitrary; they come from the fact that light is an electromagnetic wave, and Planck had already shown that energy comes in quanta hf.
De Broglie's reasoning was a leap of symmetry: if nature treats light and matter on equal footing (as Einstein's special relativity suggests), then any moving particle should also have a wavelength associated with it. He proposed that the same relation holds for matter:
λ=ph
where p=mv is the momentum of the particle (for non-relativistic speeds). This is the de Broglie wavelength.
Why This Formula Makes Sense: A Simple Derivation
There is no rigorous "derivation" from first principles — de Broglie's hypothesis was a postulate. But we can see why it is plausible by combining two key ideas from relativity and quantum theory.
Step 1: Energy of a particle from relativity
For a particle with rest mass m0, the total energy in special relativity is:
E=p2c2+m02c4
For a photon, m0=0, so E=pc. This matches the photon's wave relation E=hf and p=h/λ.
Step 2: Assume the same wave-particle duality for matter
If a massive particle also has a wave associated with it, then its energy should also be E=hf, where f is the frequency of the matter wave. Equating the relativistic energy with the quantum energy:
hf=p2c2+m02c4
For a particle moving at non-relativistic speeds (v≪c), the momentum p=mv is small compared to m0c, so we can expand:
E≈m0c2+2m0p2
The first term is rest energy, which is constant. The second term is kinetic energy K=p2/(2m). The wave frequency f then corresponds to the kinetic part (since rest energy doesn't contribute to motion). But the key relation we want is between wavelength and momentum.
Step 3: The wavelength from the wave speed
For any wave, the speed vwave=fλ. For a matter wave, de Broglie proposed that the wave speed equals the particle's speed v (this is the phase velocity). So:
v=fλ
Now use E=hf and E=21mv2 (non-relativistic kinetic energy). Then:
f=hE=2hmv2
Substitute into v=fλ:
v=2hmv2λ⇒λ=mv2h
This gives λ=2h/p, which is wrong by a factor of 2. The correct formula is λ=h/p. …
Concept: De Broglie wavelength and the onset of relativistic effects.
Relativistic corrections matter once the kinetic energy is comparable to the rest energy: 21mv2∼mc2. In order-of-magnitude terms this means the momentum reaches p∼mc, i.e. the de Broglie wavelength shrinks to about the electron's Compton wavelength.
Setting K=2mp2∼mc2 gives p∼2mc, so …
Relativistic corrections set in when 21mv2∼mc2, i.e. when the de Broglie wavelength falls to about the electron's Compton wavelength (∼10−3 nm). Among the options the picometre-range choice is (C) 10−4 nm.
When do relativistic corrections matter?
Newtonian kinetic energy 21mv2 is a good approximation only while it is small compared with the rest energy mc2. Corrections become important when the two are comparable:
21mv2∼mc2.
Turn the condition into a wavelength
Write the kinetic energy through the momentum, K=2mp2, and set it comparable to mc2:
2mp2∼mc2⇒p∼2mc.
The de Broglie wavelength at this momentum is
λ=ph∼2mch,
which is essentially the electron's Compton wavelength λC=mch (up to the factor 2).
Put in the numbers
λ∼2(9.11×10−31)(3×108)6.63×10−34≈1.7×10−12 m=1.7×10−3 nm. …
Method: Estimating an Order-of-Magnitude Threshold from a Physical Condition
Some questions describe a qualitative physical condition (here, "when does relativistic correction become important") in words and ask you to translate it into a numerical wavelength, mass, or energy scale. The technique is to convert the qualitative condition into an equation, solve for the relevant variable, then match against the given choices by order of magnitude.
Steps
Step 1: Translate the stated condition into an equation
The problem states relativistic corrections matter once 21mv2 becomes comparable to mc2. Write this as a rough equality:
21mv2∼mc2
Step 2: Rewrite in terms of momentum
Since K=2mp2, the condition becomes
2mp2∼mc2⇒p∼2mc
Expressing the condition in momentum is useful here because momentum links directly to the de Broglie wavelength.
Step 3: Convert the momentum threshold into a wavelength using λ=h/p
λ∼2mch …
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.A proton and an α-particle are accelerated through the same potential difference. The ratio of their de Broglie wavelengths will be (A) 1:1 (B) 1:2 (C) 2:1 (D) 22:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the de Broglie wavelength of a charged particle accelerated through a potential difference, λ=h/2mqV, and how it scales with mass and charge. Answer: 22:1.
Concept and Intuition
When a charge q is accelerated from rest through potential difference V, it gains kinetic energy qV=21mv2, so its momentum is p=2mqV. Heavier or more highly charged particles gain more momentum for the same accelerating voltage, and since λ=h/p, they end up with a shorter de Broglie wavelength. Comparing a proton and an alpha particle (which is heavier by 4× and carries twice the charge), the alpha particle picks up momentum that the proton cannot match, so its wavelength is much shorter.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λ=ph=2mqVh for a particle of mass m, charge q, accelerated through V.
- For the proton: m=mp, q=e ⇒λp=2mpeVh.
- For the alpha particle: m=4mp, q=2e ⇒λα=2(4mp)(2e)Vh=16mpeVh. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.If two particles have same kinetic energy, then the ratio of their de Broglie wavelengths (λA:λB) is (Given: mA=4mB) (A) 1:2 (B) 2:1 (C) 1:4 (D) 4:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests how the de Broglie wavelength depends on mass at fixed kinetic energy: λ∝1/m. Answer: λA:λB=1:2.
Concept and Intuition
Kinetic energy relates to momentum as K=2mp2, so p=2mK. For a fixed kinetic energy, a heavier particle has larger momentum (it takes more momentum to carry the same energy when mass is larger). Since the de Broglie wavelength λ=h/p is inversely proportional to momentum, the heavier particle ends up with the shorter wavelength.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λ=ph=2mKh, and since K is the same for both particles, λ∝m1.
- λBλA=mAmB.
- Given mA=4mB, so mAmB=41. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.The de Broglie wavelength associated with a pebble of mass 6.63 g travelling with velocity x ms−1 is 10−24 nm. What is the value of x? (h=6.63×10−34 Js) (A) 1.0×10−1 (B) 1.0×102 (C) 1.0×103 (D) 1.0×10−2
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a direct application of the de Broglie wavelength formula, solved for velocity; x=1.0×102 ms−1.
Concept and Intuition
Every moving particle has an associated wavelength λ=h/p=h/(mv). For everyday (macroscopic) masses this wavelength is absurdly small — which is exactly why matter waves aren't noticed for pebbles, only for particles like electrons. Careful unit bookkeeping (grams to kg, nm to m) is the whole trick here.
Step-by-Step Solution
- de Broglie relation: λ=mvh⇒v=mλh.
- Convert mass: m=6.63 g=6.63×10−3 kg.
- Convert wavelength: λ=10−24 nm=10−24×10−9 m=10−33 m. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.If the radius of the first Bohr orbit of He+ is 26.45 pm, then the de Broglie wavelength (in m) associated with the electron present in its fourth orbit is (π=3.14) (A) 3.13×10−11 (B) 1.33×10−11 (C) 2.33×10−10 (D) 3.32×10−10
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the Bohr–de Broglie relation, the electron in the fourth orbit of He+ has λ=2πr1n; the official key marks option (D), 3.32×10−10m.
Standing-wave (Bohr–de Broglie) condition. For a stable orbit the circumference holds a whole number of de Broglie wavelengths:
nλ=2πrn⟹λ=n2πrn.
Scale the radius. For He+, rn=r1n2 with r1=26.45 pm, so
λ=n2π(r1n2)=2πr1n=2(3.14)(26.45 pm)(4)=3.32×10−10m (as marked). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.The radius of first Bohr orbit of hydrogen is a0 nm. What is the de Broglie wavelength (in nm) associated with electron present in fourth orbit of hydrogen? (A) 2πa0 (B) 32πa0 (C) 8πa0 (D) 4πa0
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bohr's quantization condition combined with de Broglie's hypothesis: the orbit circumference must be an integral number of de Broglie wavelengths. For n=4 in hydrogen, λ=8πa0.
Concept and Intuition
Bohr postulated angular momentum quantization mvrn=2πnh. De Broglie's insight was that this is equivalent to saying the electron's wave must close on itself around the orbit: 2πrn=nλ, i.e., the orbit circumference contains a whole number of wavelengths — this is what makes a stationary (non-radiating) orbit possible.
Step-by-Step Solution
- De Broglie condition: λ=n2πrn.
- Bohr radius formula for hydrogen: rn=n2a0, where a0 is the first Bohr radius (given as a0 nm here). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.If the linear momentum of a proton is changed by p0, then the de Broglie wavelength associated with the proton changes by 0.25%. Then the initial linear momentum of the proton is (A) 100p0 (B) 400p0 (C) 400p0 (D) 100p0
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the inverse relationship between de Broglie wavelength and momentum, applied to small fractional changes. Answer: 400p0.
Concept and Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength is λ=ph — inversely proportional to momentum. For a small change in momentum, the fractional change in wavelength has the same magnitude as the fractional change in momentum (since h is constant): λΔλ=pΔp. This lets us relate a small known change in momentum directly to the resulting fractional change in wavelength, without needing h at all.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λ=ph⇒lnλ=lnh−lnp.
- Differentiating: λΔλ=−pΔp, so in magnitude λ∣Δλ∣=pΔp. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.A particle of mass 8 μg in motion collides with another stationary particle of mass 4 μg. If the collision is perfectly elastic and one dimensional, the ratio of their de Broglie wavelengths after collision is (A) 4 : 1 (B) 3 : 1 (C) 1 : 1 (D) 2 : 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using elastic-collision velocity formulas and the de Broglie relation λ=h/p, the ratio of wavelengths after collision works out to 2:1.
Concept and Intuition
In a 1-D elastic collision between a moving mass m1 and a stationary mass m2, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, giving standard formulas for the final velocities. The de Broglie wavelength of each particle depends on its momentum as λ=h/p, so the wavelength ratio after collision is the inverse ratio of their momenta.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let m1=8 μg (moving with initial speed u1), m2=4 μg (initially at rest).
- Elastic collision formulas:
v1′=m1+m2m1−m2u1=128−4u1=3u1
v2′=m1+m22m1u1=1216u1=34u1
- Post-collision momenta: p1=m1v1′=8×3u1=38u1; p2=m2v2′=4×34u1=316u1. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.An alpha particle moves along a circular path of radius 0.5 mm in a magnetic field of 2×10−2 T. The de Broglie wavelength associated with the alpha particle is nearly (Planck's constant = 6.63×10−34 J s) (A) 3.1 Å (B) 1.1 Å (C) 0.1 Å (D) 2.1 Å
›Reveal solutionSolution
The circular radius fixes the alpha particle's momentum via p=qBr; the de Broglie wavelength λ=h/p then comes out to about 2.1 Å.
Concept and Intuition
A charged particle moving perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field travels in a circle because the magnetic force provides exactly the centripetal force needed: qvB=rmv2, which rearranges to mv=qBr, i.e. the particle's momentum p=mv is directly proportional to B and r. This is a very useful shortcut — it lets us find momentum from the geometry of the path (radius) and the field, without separately knowing mass and velocity. Once we have the momentum, the de Broglie relation λ=h/p (matter behaving as a wave, wavelength inversely proportional to momentum) gives the wavelength directly.
Step-by-Step Solution
- From the circular-motion condition: qvB=rmv2⇒mv=p=qBr.
- Charge of an alpha particle: q=2e=2×1.6×10−19=3.2×10−19 C.
- Substitute B=2×10−2 T, r=0.5 mm=5×10−4 m: p=(3.2×10−19)(2×10−2)(5×10−4)=3.2×10−24 kgm/s. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.If a proton and an alpha particle are accelerated through the same potential difference, then the ratio of their de Broglie wavelengths is (A) 1 : 2 (B) 1 : 4 (C) 22:1 (D) 1 : 8
›Reveal solutionSolution
A charged particle accelerated through potential V gains kinetic energy qV, giving momentum p=2mqV; the de Broglie wavelength ratio then depends on both the mass ratio and the charge ratio of the two particles.
Concept and Intuition
When a particle of charge q and mass m is accelerated from rest through potential difference V, it gains kinetic energy qV=21mv2, so its momentum is p=mv=2mqV. The de Broglie wavelength is λ=h/p=h/2mqV. Because both mass and charge differ between a proton and an alpha particle, both ratios must be tracked — it's a common trap to only account for the mass difference.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Proton: mass mp, charge qp=e.
- Alpha particle: mass mα=4mp (2 protons + 2 neutrons), charge qα=2e.
- λp=2mpqpVh, λα=2mαqαVh. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.The deBroglie wavelengths of two fast moving particles X, Y are 1 nm, 3 nm respectively. Mass of X is nine times the mass of Y. The ratio of kinetic energies of X, Y is (A) 1:3 (B) 1:1 (C) 9:1 (D) 1:9
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests combining the de Broglie relation with the kinetic-energy–momentum relation; the ratio comes out 1:1, option (B).
Concept and Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength is λ=ph, so momentum p=λh. Kinetic energy in terms of momentum is KE=2mp2. Substituting gives KE=2mλ2h2 — so KE depends on both mass and wavelength, and a heavier particle with a proportionally longer wavelength can end up with the same kinetic energy as a lighter, shorter-wavelength one.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write KEX=2mXλX2h2 and KEY=2mYλY2h2.
- Take the ratio: KEYKEX=mXλX2mYλY2 …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.A particle is moving with a velocity four times the velocity of an electron. If the de Broglie wavelength of the particle is 1.5×10−4 times the de Broglie wavelength of the electron, then the mass of the particle is (mass of the electron =9×10−31 kg) (A) 1.5×10−31 kg (B) 1.5×10−27 kg (C) 2.25×10−27 kg (D) 2.25×10−31 kg
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using λ=h/(mv) and the ratio of wavelengths and speeds given, the unknown particle's mass comes out to 1.5×10−27kg.
Concept and Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength of a particle is λ=mvh — inversely proportional to the momentum mv. Comparing two particles, the ratio of their wavelengths equals the inverse ratio of their momenta, letting us solve for an unknown mass given the speed and wavelength ratios.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λp=mpvph, λe=meveh, so λeλp=mpvpmeve.
- Given vp=4ve, so vpve=41.
- Given λeλp=1.5×10−4.
- So 1.5×10−4=mpme×41⇒mpme=6×10−4. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.If a bullet of mass 2.2 g travels with a velocity of 3×104cms−1, its wavelength (in m) is (h=6.6×10−34Js) (A) 10−36 (B) 10−31 (C) 10−34 (D) 10−33
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of the de Broglie wavelength formula after careful unit conversion, giving 10−33 m.
Concept and Intuition
Every moving particle has an associated de Broglie wavelength λ=h/p. For macroscopic objects like a bullet, this wavelength is astronomically small, which is why matter waves are unobservable at everyday scales.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Convert mass: 2.2 g=2.2×10−3 kg.
- Convert velocity: 3×104 cm s−1=3×102 m s−1=300 m/s.
- Momentum: p=mv=2.2×10−3×300=0.66 kg·m/s. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.