Q.Class debated bicameral system merits: Neha (no purpose), Shama (nominate experts to 2nd chamber), Tridib (non-federation needs no 2nd chamber). Agree/disagree with each, giving reasons.
Neha is wrong that bicameralism serves no purpose; Shama has a genuine point about nominated expertise, though it comes with a real trade-off; and Tridib overstates the case that only a federation needs a second chamber.
Neha — "bicameral legislature does not serve any purpose." Disagree. A second House gives every bill and policy a genuine double-check: because a decision made by one House still has to be considered separately by the other, a hasty or ill-considered decision in one House can be caught and reconsidered in the other before it becomes final. A bicameral legislature can also represent diversity that a single House, elected purely on population, might miss — different regions, social groups, or types of expertise. Neha's claim ignores both of these real functions.
Shama — "experts should be nominated to the second chamber." Partly agree. This is exactly the logic behind the Rajya Sabha's twelve nominated members, chosen by the President from people distinguished in literature, science, art, and social service — people who may never contest an election but whose expertise genuinely adds to the House's ability to deliberate on complex issues. That said, this is a real trade-off rather than an unqualified good: because these members are not elected, questions are sometimes raised (as the textbook itself notes) about how far they actually represent anyone, or how much they truly contribute to the House's regular proceedings.
Tridib — "a non-federation doesn't need a second chamber." Disagree, at least as a general rule. Protecting the interests of States in a federation is one classic reason for a second chamber (it is the Rajya Sabha's central purpose), but it is not the only reason. A second chamber can also serve simply as a revising body — offering a considered second opinion on legislation, regardless of whether the country is a federation. This is precisely why several of India's own States — which are not themselves federations — have chosen to keep a bicameral legislature.
Disagree with Neha; partly agree with Shama; disagree with Tridib. Bicameralism's core purpose — a double-check through reconsideration, and space for expertise or representation a single House might miss — holds regardless of whether a country is a federation, though nominated members do raise fair questions about representativeness.
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.