Skip to content
Exercises · Q9

Q.One limitation is inadequate gender justice attention. What evidence supports this? What provisions would you recommend today?

CBSENCERTSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
69% · 9/13 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The chapter's own evidence for inadequate gender justice is that the Constitution glossed over gender issues within the family — most concretely, it did not secure equal inheritance rights or equal legal standing regarding children as constitutional guarantees. Sensible provisions today would include an explicit constitutional guarantee of equal inheritance and property rights for daughters and sons, equal guardianship rights over children, and stronger reservation for women in legislatures to ensure gender-just laws keep getting made.

The chapter names, as one of its three acknowledged limitations, that the Constitution 'appears to have glossed over some important issues of gender justice, particularly within the family.' The clearest supporting evidence, drawn from this very chapter's own opening exercise, is that a law giving daughters and sons an equal share in family property had to be treated as a separate legislative achievement, connected to the value of equality — it was not something the Constitution itself directly guaranteed at the outset. This shows that within the domestic, family sphere — inheritance, property, and the standing of women relative to their children — the Constitution's promise of equality was left comparatively undeveloped compared to its treatment of, say, political or civic equality (universal franchise, freedom of expression). …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.