During a total solar eclipse the moon almost entirely covers the sphere of the sun. Write the relation between

NCERT Exemplar · Q29

Q. During a total solar eclipse the moon almost entirely covers the sphere of the sun. Write the relation between the distances and sizes of the sun and moon.

CBSEShort· 2mImportance★★★★★est

77% · 51/66 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Atomic Volume Calculation

Atomic Volume: Meaning and Calculation

Atoms are mostly empty space — a tiny dense nucleus wrapped in a fuzzy electron cloud. So "atomic volume" does not mean the volume of a solid ball; it means the average space one atom occupies when many atoms are packed together in a solid or liquid.

Think of a crowded hall: to find the space per person you divide the hall's volume by the number of people. Atomic volume does exactly that for atoms.

Definition

Atomic volume is the volume occupied by one mole of atoms of an element in its solid or liquid state. It is found from the element's molar mass and density:

V_{\text{atomic}} = \frac{M}{\rho}

$V_{\text{atomic}}$ = atomic volume (cm³/mol)
$M$ = molar mass (g/mol)
$\rho$ = density (g/cm³)

This gives the volume per mole. Dividing by Avogadro's number gives the space per single atom:

V_{\text{one atom}} = \frac{V_{\text{atomic}}}{N_A}, \qquad N_A = 6.022\times10^{23}\ \text{mol}^{-1}

Worked example — aluminium

Molar mass $M = 26.98$ g/mol, density $\rho = 2.70$ g/cm³:

V_{\text{atomic}} = \frac{26.98}{2.70} = 9.99\ \text{cm}^3/\text{mol}

So one mole of Al atoms occupies about 10 cm³. Per atom:

V_{\text{one Al atom}} = \frac{9.99}{6.022\times10^{23}} = 1.66\times10^{-23}\ \text{cm}^3

Periodic trends

Down a group: atomic volume increases — more electron shells make atoms larger.
Across a period: it generally decreases — rising nuclear charge pulls the electrons in tighter.
Allotropes differ: diamond is denser than graphite, so diamond's atomic volume is smaller, though both are carbon.

These trends help explain why alkali metals (large atomic volume) are soft and reactive, while transition metals (smaller atomic volume) are hard and dense. …

Why this formula?

Atomic Volume Calculation: Understanding the "Why" Behind the Formula

What Is Atomic Volume?

Atomic volume is not the volume of a single atom — it's the volume occupied by one mole of atoms of an element in its solid state. This is a macroscopic quantity that helps us understand how tightly atoms pack together.

The key formula is:

\text{Atomic Volume} = \frac{\text{Atomic Mass}}{\text{Density}}

Let's break down why this works.

The Core Reasoning: From Mass to Volume

Step 1: What does density tell us?

Density ( $\rho$ ) is defined as:

\rho = \frac{\text{Mass}}{\text{Volume}}

For a pure solid element, if we take one mole of atoms:

Mass of one mole = Atomic mass (in g/mol)
Volume of one mole = Atomic volume (in cm³/mol)

So:

\rho = \frac{\text{Atomic mass}}{\text{Atomic volume}}

Step 2: Rearranging to find atomic volume

\text{Volume} = \frac{\text{Mass}}{\text{Density}}

Therefore:

\boxed{\text{Atomic Volume} = \frac{\text{Atomic Mass}}{\text{Density}}}

Why This Makes Physical Sense

Atomic mass tells you how heavy one mole of atoms is; density tells you how much mass fits in a given space. Dividing mass by density gives the space that mass occupies.

Example intuition: If iron has atomic mass ≈ 56 g/mol and density 7.87 g/cm³, then:

\text{Atomic volume} = \frac{56}{7.87} \approx 7.1 \text{ cm}^3/\text{mol}

This means one mole of iron atoms (about $6.022 \times 10^{23}$ atoms) occupies roughly 7.1 cm³ of space.

Important Exam Points

Concept	Why It Matters
Units	Atomic mass in g/mol, density in g/cm³ → atomic volume in cm³/mol
Solid state only	The formula assumes atoms are closely packed; gases/liquids have different packing

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The key idea is that during a total solar eclipse, the Moon and Sun subtend nearly the same angle at the Earth, so the ratio of their diameters equals the ratio of their distances from Earth: $\frac{D_{\text{moon}}}{D_{\text{sun}}} = \frac{d_{\text{moon}}}{d_{\text{sun}}}$ .

Why This Works: The Geometry of an Eclipse

A total solar eclipse is a beautiful alignment: the Moon passes directly between the Earth and the Sun, and from Earth’s surface, the Moon’s disc just covers the Sun’s disc. This means the two objects appear to be the same size in the sky — they subtend the same angular diameter.

Think of holding a coin at arm’s length to block a distant streetlamp. If the coin exactly hides the lamp, the coin’s diameter and its distance from your eye are in the same proportion as the lamp’s diameter and its distance. That’s the core idea here.

Angular diameter $\theta$ (in radians) for a small angle is given by:

\theta \approx \frac{\text{diameter}}{\text{distance}}

For the Sun and Moon to appear equal in size, their angular diameters must be equal:

\theta_{\text{moon}} = \theta_{\text{sun}}

This gives the direct relation we need.

Step-by-Step Derivation

Define the variables.

Let:
- $D_{\text{moon}}$ = diameter of the Moon
- $D_{\text{sun}}$ = diameter of the Sun
- $d_{\text{moon}}$ = distance from Earth to the Moon
- $d_{\text{sun}}$ = distance from Earth to the Sun
Write the angular diameter for each.

For the Moon:

\theta_{\text{moon}} \approx \frac{D_{\text{moon}}}{d_{\text{moon}}}

For the Sun:

\theta_{\text{sun}} \approx \frac{D_{\text{sun}}}{d_{\text{sun}}}

This approximation holds because the angles are small (about $0.5^\circ$ ).

Set them equal for a total eclipse. During totality, the Moon just covers the Sun:

\frac{D_{\text{moon}}}{d_{\text{moon}}} = \frac{D_{\text{sun}}}{d_{\text{sun}}}

Rearrange to get the relation. Cross-multiplying gives: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here’s a breakdown of the common mistakes students make when deriving the relation between distances and sizes of the sun and moon during a total solar eclipse, and how to avoid each.

✗ Mistake 1: Confusing Angular Diameter with Actual Diameter

What students do wrong:

They try to directly equate the actual diameters of the Sun and Moon ( $D_s$ and $D_m$ ) without considering the distances ( $d_s$ and $d_m$ ). For example, writing $D_s = D_m$ or $D_s \approx D_m$ .

Why it’s wrong:

The Sun is much larger than the Moon. During a total solar eclipse, it’s their apparent sizes (angular diameters) that are nearly equal — not their actual sizes.

How to avoid:

Always remember:

For a total solar eclipse, the angular diameter of the Moon ≈ angular diameter of the Sun.

Angular diameter $\theta$ is given by:

\theta = \frac{\text{actual diameter}}{\text{distance}}

So the correct relation is:

\frac{D_s}{d_s} \approx \frac{D_m}{d_m}

Key takeaway: Write the ratio, not the raw diameters.

✗ Mistake 2: Forgetting the “Almost” or Approximation

What students do wrong:

They write an exact equality:

\frac{D_s}{d_s} = \frac{D_m}{d_m}

Why it’s wrong:

The Moon’s orbit is elliptical, and the Sun-Earth distance varies slightly. The coverage is “almost” total — not perfectly exact. The problem statement says “almost entirely covers.”

How to avoid:

Use the approximation symbol ( $\approx$ ) instead of $=$ . In exam answers, this small detail shows you understand the real-world nature of the event.

Correct form:

\frac{D_s}{d_s} \approx \frac{D_m}{d_m}

✗ Mistake 3: Mixing Up Which Distance Goes Where

What students do wrong:

Writing $\frac{D_s}{d_m} \approx \frac{D_m}{d_s}$ or swapping the distances.

Why it’s wrong:

The angular diameter of the Sun uses the Sun-Earth distance ( $d_s$ ), and the angular diameter of the Moon uses the Moon-Earth distance ( $d_m$ ). Swapping them gives a physically meaningless relation.

How to avoid:

Draw a simple diagram:

Sun at far left, Earth at right, Moon in between.
Label $d_s$ = distance from Earth to Sun.
Label $d_m$ = distance from Earth to Moon.
Then write: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

KCET 2024Set D-21 markMCQ
$^{27}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The ratio of volume to surface area for any spherical nucleus is $R/3$ , where $R = R_0 A^{1/3}$ . For Al $^{27}$ , $A=27$ , so $R = 1.2 \times 10^{-15} \times 3 = 3.6 \times 10^{-15}$ m, giving a ratio of $1.2 \times 10^{-15}$ m. The correct option is (D).

The key idea here is that a nucleus is modeled as a uniform sphere. For any sphere, the ratio of volume to surface area is simply $R/3$ — a clean geometric fact. Once you know the nuclear radius formula, the rest is arithmetic.

The nuclear radius is given by $R = R_0 A^{1/3}$ , where $R_0 = 1.2 \times 10^{-15}$ m and $A$ is the mass number. For Al $^{27}$ , $A = 27$ , so $A^{1/3} = 3$ . That gives $R = 1.2 \times 10^{-15} \times 3 = 3.6 \times 10^{-15}$ m.

Now, for a sphere:

Volume $V = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3$

Surface area $S = 4\pi R^2$

The ratio $\frac{V}{S} = \frac{\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3}{4\pi R^2} = \frac{R}{3}$ .

So the ratio is simply $\frac{3.6 \times 10^{-15}}{3} = 1.2 \times 10^{-15}$ m. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-10-AN1 markMCQ
$\left(P + \dfrac{a}{V^2}\right)(V-b) = RT$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to find the dimensions of $a$ and $b$ separately from the Van der Waals equation, then combine them with $RT$ to get the dimensions of $\frac{ab}{RT}$ . The result is $\left[M^0L^6T^0\right]$ , which is option (D).

The Van der Waals equation corrects the ideal gas law for real gas behaviour. The term $\frac{a}{V^2}$ accounts for intermolecular attraction, and $b$ accounts for the finite volume of molecules. Because the equation is dimensionally consistent, we can extract the dimensions of $a$ and $b$ by looking at how they appear.

Find the dimensions of $b$ .

In the term $(V - b)$ , we subtract $b$ from $V$ . Only quantities with the same dimensions can be added or subtracted. So $b$ must have the same dimensions as volume $V$ .

Volume has dimensions $[L^3]$ .

Hence, $[b] = [L^3]$ .

Find the dimensions of $a$ .

Look at the term $\left(P + \frac{a}{V^2}\right)$ . Again, $P$ and $\frac{a}{V^2}$ must have the same dimensions because they are added.

Pressure $P$ has dimensions $[ML^{-1}T^{-2}]$ (force per unit area).

So $\left[\frac{a}{V^2}\right] = [ML^{-1}T^{-2}]$ .

Since $[V^2] = [L^6]$ , we get $[a] = [ML^{-1}T^{-2}] \times [L^6] = [ML^5T^{-2}]$ .

Find the dimensions of $RT$ .

From the ideal gas law $PV = nRT$ , for one mole ( $n=1$ ) we have $PV = RT$ .

So $[RT] = [P][V] = [ML^{-1}T^{-2}] \times [L^3] = [ML^2T^{-2}]$ .

This is the same as energy (work), which makes sense — $RT$ is energy per mole.

Combine to get $\frac{ab}{RT}$ .

Now put the dimensions together:

$[ab] = [a][b] = [ML^5T^{-2}] \times [L^3] = [ML^8T^{-2}]$ . …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-11-AN1 markMCQ
$\log_e 10 = 2.303$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Radioactive decay follows an exponential law governed by the half-life. Using the relation between activity and time, we find that reducing to 1% of initial activity requires approximately 66.5 days.

The activity of a radioactive substance measures how many nuclei decay per unit time. Because decay is a random process governed by probability, the activity decreases exponentially with a characteristic time scale set by the half-life.

The key insight is that after each half-life period, exactly half of the remaining active nuclei have decayed. So if we want the activity to drop to some small fraction like 1%, we need to count how many half-lives fit into that reduction.

The mathematical relationship is:
$A(t) = A_0 \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t/T_{1/2}}$
where $A(t)$ is the activity at time $t$ , $A_0$ is the initial activity, and $T_{1/2}$ is the half-life.

Alternatively, using the decay constant $\lambda = \frac{\ln 2}{T_{1/2}}$ :
$A(t) = A_0 e^{-\lambda t}$
Let me work through this step by step:

Set up the equation for 1% activity We want $A(t) = 0.01 \, A_0$ , so:

$0.01 \, A_0 = A_0 e^{-\lambda t}$
Dividing both sides by $A_0$ :
$0.01 = e^{-\lambda t}$

Take the natural logarithm

$\ln(0.01) = -\lambda t$
Since $0.01 = \frac{1}{100} = 10^{-2}$ :
$\ln(10^{-2}) = -\lambda t$ $-2 \ln 10 = -\lambda t$ $2 \ln 10 = \lambda t$

Express the decay constant in terms of half-life …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-FN1 markMCQ
$C$
›Reveal solutionSolution
We treat density as a product of powers of $C$ , $G$ , and $h$ , solve the system of dimensional equations, and find that density has dimensions $C^5 G^{-2} h^{-1}$ , which corresponds to option (B).

The key idea here is dimensional analysis — a powerful tool that lets us express any physical quantity in terms of chosen fundamental units. When we pick $C$ (velocity), $G$ (gravitational constant), and $h$ (Planck’s constant) as base units, we need to find how density $\rho$ (mass per volume) relates to them. The trick is to write density as $[ \rho ] = C^a G^b h^c$ and solve for $a$ , $b$ , $c$ using the known dimensions of each quantity.

Let’s recall the dimensions in the standard MLT (mass, length, time) system:

Velocity $C$ : $[C] = L T^{-1}$

Gravitational constant $G$ : from Newton’s law $F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}$ , we get $[G] = M^{-1} L^3 T^{-2}$

Planck’s constant $h$ : from $E = h \nu$ , we have $[h] = M L^2 T^{-1}$

Density $\rho$ : $[\rho] = M L^{-3}$

Now we set up the equation:

Write the dimensional equation We assume $[\rho] = [C]^a [G]^b [h]^c$ . Substituting dimensions:

$M^1 L^{-3} T^0 = (L T^{-1})^a \cdot (M^{-1} L^3 T^{-2})^b \cdot (M L^2 T^{-1})^c$

Expand and collect powers Right side becomes:

$M^{-b + c} \cdot L^{a + 3b + 2c} \cdot T^{-a - 2b - c}$

Equate exponents for M, L, T

For mass: $1 = -b + c$

For length: $-3 = a + 3b + 2c$

For time: $0 = -a - 2b - c$

Solve the system

From the mass equation: $c = 1 + b$

From the time equation: $a = -2b - c = -2b - (1 + b) = -3b - 1$

Substitute into the length equation:

$-3 = (-3b - 1) + 3b + 2(1 + b)$
Simplify: $-3 = -3b - 1 + 3b + 2 + 2b$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQ
$\alpha$
›Reveal solutionSolution
In a head-on collision, the $\alpha$ -particle is aimed directly at the nucleus, so the perpendicular distance between the initial velocity line and the nucleus — the impact parameter — is exactly zero.

The key idea here is the definition of impact parameter in Rutherford's scattering experiment. The impact parameter $b$ is the perpendicular distance between the initial velocity vector of the $\alpha$ -particle and the centre of the target nucleus. It tells you how "off-centre" the collision is.

For a head-on collision, the $\alpha$ -particle is aimed straight at the nucleus. That means the line of the initial velocity passes directly through the centre of the nucleus. The perpendicular distance from that line to the centre is therefore zero.

Recall the definition: Impact parameter $b$ = distance of closest approach if the nucleus were not there — it's the miss distance. Mathematically, if the initial velocity is along a line, $b$ is the perpendicular distance from the nucleus centre to that line.

Head-on means zero miss distance: When the $\alpha$ -particle is fired straight at the nucleus, there is no "miss" — it's coming right at it. So $b = 0$ .

Consequences: For $b = 0$ , the $\alpha$ -particle experiences the maximum repulsive force (Coulomb force) and comes to rest momentarily at the distance of closest approach before being repelled back. This is the case that gives the largest scattering angle ( $180^\circ$ ). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ28 — The vernier scale of a travelling microscope has 50 divisions which co…→Next questionQ30 — If the unit of force is 100 N, unit of length is 10 m and unit of time…

Q.During a total solar eclipse the moon almost entirely covers the sphere of the sun. Write the relation between the distances and sizes of the sun and moon.

Concept understanding — Atomic Volume Calculation

Atomic Volume: Meaning and Calculation

Definition

Worked example — aluminium

Periodic trends

Why this formula?

Atomic Volume Calculation: Understanding the "Why" Behind the Formula

What Is Atomic Volume?

The Core Reasoning: From Mass to Volume

Step 1: What does density tell us?

Step 2: Rearranging to find atomic volume

Why This Makes Physical Sense

Important Exam Points

Why This Works: The Geometry of an Eclipse

Step-by-Step Derivation

Concept: Angular Diameter & Similar Triangles

Method: Angular Diameter Comparison

✗ Mistake 1: Confusing Angular Diameter with Actual Diameter

✗ Mistake 2: Forgetting the “Almost” or Approximation

✗ Mistake 3: Mixing Up Which Distance Goes Where

Q.During a total solar eclipse the moon almost entirely covers the sphere of the sun. Write the relation between the distances and sizes of the sun and moon.

Why This Works: The Geometry of an Eclipse

Step-by-Step Derivation

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days