Skip to content
Conceptual Questions · Q3

Q.Distinguish between the nature of India's conflicts with Pakistan and the kinds of differences India has had with its smaller neighbours such as Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka.

CBSENCERTSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★
100% · 13/13 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

India’s conflicts with Pakistan are rooted in unresolved territorial and ideological disputes from Partition, while differences with smaller neighbours like Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka arise from asymmetrical power relations, resource sharing, and ethnic ties — not existential hostility.

India’s relationship with Pakistan is fundamentally different from its ties with Bangladesh, Nepal, or Sri Lanka. The conflict with Pakistan is deep, structural, and often existential — born from the trauma of Partition in 1947 and sustained by competing claims over Kashmir, cross-border terrorism, and divergent national identities. Pakistan has consistently challenged India’s legitimacy as a secular state, and the two countries have fought three major wars (1947-48, 1965, 1971) and a limited conflict in Kargil (1999). The Kashmir dispute remains the core irritant, with both sides claiming the region in full. Additionally, Pakistan’s support for militant groups operating in Indian-administered Kashmir and elsewhere has turned the conflict into a low-intensity, proxy war. This is not a disagreement over a dam or a trade route — it is a clash of foundational narratives.

In contrast, India’s differences with Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka are not about territorial integrity or ideological rejection. They are typical of relations between a large, powerful neighbour and smaller states — marked by asymmetry, but not by a desire to undo each other’s existence.

Take Bangladesh. The relationship began warmly after India’s crucial role in its 1971 liberation from Pakistan. But disputes soon emerged: over sharing of the Ganga waters at Farakka, the demarcation of land and maritime boundaries, and the influx of illegal migrants into India. These are serious issues, but they are negotiable. Bangladesh does not sponsor terrorism against India as a state policy, and both countries have resolved many of their border disputes through dialogue and treaties (e.g., the Land Boundary Agreement of 2015). The tone is of a working partnership, not a permanent rivalry.

With Nepal, the friction is different again. The two countries share an open border, deep cultural and religious ties, and a history of close cooperation. Yet tensions arise over Nepal’s perception of Indian interference in its internal affairs, the exact location of the border at Kalapani and Limpiyadhura, and the terms of trade and transit. Nepal’s 2015 constitution triggered a brief blockade-like crisis, but again, these are disputes between sovereign neighbours — not a conflict over national survival. Nepal has never used armed force against India, and the relationship, though prickly, is fundamentally friendly. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.