Q.List three challenges to democracy in Nepal.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Nepal’s democratic consolidation has faced three persistent challenges: political instability from frequent government changes, deep social divisions rooted in caste and ethnicity, and the unresolved tension between civilian rule and military influence.
To understand these challenges, it helps to compare Nepal’s democratic journey with that of other new democracies. After the 1990 People’s Movement ended the absolute monarchy, Nepal adopted a constitutional monarchy and multiparty system. But unlike India, which had decades of stable Congress rule after independence, Nepal saw a rapid churn of governments — no prime minister completed a full five-year term between 1990 and 2002. This instability is the first major challenge.
Political instability arose because no single party could secure a lasting majority, and coalition governments were fragile. Frequent floor crossings, defections, and the monarchy’s occasional interference (like King Gyanendra’s direct rule in 2005) meant that elected governments could not focus on long-term policy. For example, between 1990 and 2002, Nepal had 13 prime ministers. This constant turnover eroded public trust in democratic institutions and made it hard to implement land reforms, infrastructure projects, or poverty alleviation programmes.
The 2006 Loktantra Andolan (Democracy Movement) restored parliament and curtailed the king’s powers, but the pattern of short-lived governments continued even after the 2008 abolition of the monarchy.
The second challenge is deep social divisions based on caste, ethnicity, region, and language. Nepal’s population is a mosaic of over 100 ethnic groups and castes, with the hill Brahmin-Chhetri elite historically dominating politics, bureaucracy, and the army. Marginalised groups — Madhesis, Dalits, Janajatis (indigenous nationalities), and Tharus — have long demanded proportional representation, federalism, and recognition of their languages. The 2015 constitution was drafted after years of protest, but it failed to satisfy all groups. The Madhesi parties, for instance, boycotted the constitution’s promulgation, leading to a border blockade and violent protests. This social fragmentation makes it difficult to build a national consensus on key issues like federal boundaries, citizenship rights, and affirmative action.
The 2015 constitution created seven provinces, but the boundaries were drawn in a way that many Madhesis and Tharus felt diluted their political power. This remains a live issue. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.