Q.Describe the sequence of events responsible for the establishment of democracy in Nepal.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a)Concept understanding — Democratic Consolidation Comparison
Let’s start with something you already know. Imagine two friends who both say they are “fit.” One runs every morning, eats well, and has been doing so for years. The other just bought a gym membership yesterday. Both can claim to be fit, but only one has actually become fit — the habit is deep, the change is real, and it’s unlikely to vanish overnight.
Democratic consolidation is that same idea, applied to a country’s political system. A democracy is not just a one-time event — not just an election, not just a constitution being signed. It is a process that needs to sink in, become stable, and be accepted by everyone as “the only game in town.” When we compare how different countries achieve this stability, we are doing democratic consolidation comparison.
What the NCERT textbook says
The NCERT Class 12 Political Science textbook (Chapter: Challenges of Nation-Building and later chapters on Democracy) does not use the phrase “democratic consolidation comparison” as a formal term, but it teaches the idea clearly. It contrasts India’s experience with that of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and many other newly independent countries. The core point is: holding elections is not enough. A democracy must survive crises, transfer power peacefully, and have its institutions respected by all major political forces.
Democratic consolidation means democracy has become routinised and internalised — no major group tries to overthrow it, and even conflicts are resolved within democratic rules.
The precise meaning
Democratic consolidation comparison is the study of why some democracies last and become stable, while others break down or remain fragile. It compares countries on several dimensions:
- Institutional strength: Do courts, election commissions, and legislatures function independently and effectively?
- Elite and mass acceptance: Do political leaders, parties, and ordinary citizens believe democracy is the best system — or do they support anti-democratic alternatives?
- Civil-military relations: Is the military under civilian control, or does it intervene in politics?
- Rule of law: Are laws applied equally, or do rulers bend them for personal or party gain?
- Economic and social conditions: Is there enough development and equality to prevent democracy from being seen as a failure?
When you compare India with, say, Pakistan or Myanmar, you are doing exactly this kind of analysis. India has held regular elections, seen multiple peaceful transfers of power between rival parties, and kept the military out of politics. Pakistan, by contrast, has experienced repeated military coups and periods of authoritarian rule. The comparison helps explain why — not just describe what.
Why it matters for a commerce/humanities student
You might think this is only for political science students. But consider:
- If you go into business or law, you need to assess political risk in different countries. A consolidated democracy is more predictable, has stronger property rights, and is less likely to suddenly change the rules. …
Part (b)Concept understanding — Democratic Consolidation Comparison
Let’s start with something you already know. Imagine two friends who both say they are “fit.” One runs every morning, eats well, and has been doing so for years. The other just bought a gym membership yesterday. Both can claim to be fit, but only one has actually become fit — the habit is deep, the change is real, and it’s unlikely to vanish overnight.
Democratic consolidation is that same idea, applied to a country’s political system. A democracy is not just a one-time event — not just an election, not just a constitution being signed. It is a process that needs to sink in, become stable, and be accepted by everyone as “the only game in town.” When we compare how different countries achieve this stability, we are doing democratic consolidation comparison.
What the NCERT textbook says
The NCERT Class 12 Political Science textbook (Chapter: Challenges of Nation-Building and later chapters on Democracy) does not use the phrase “democratic consolidation comparison” as a formal term, but it teaches the idea clearly. It contrasts India’s experience with that of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and many other newly independent countries. The core point is: holding elections is not enough. A democracy must survive crises, transfer power peacefully, and have its institutions respected by all major political forces.
Democratic consolidation means democracy has become routinised and internalised — no major group tries to overthrow it, and even conflicts are resolved within democratic rules.
The precise meaning
Democratic consolidation comparison is the study of why some democracies last and become stable, while others break down or remain fragile. It compares countries on several dimensions:
- Institutional strength: Do courts, election commissions, and legislatures function independently and effectively?
- Elite and mass acceptance: Do political leaders, parties, and ordinary citizens believe democracy is the best system — or do they support anti-democratic alternatives?
- Civil-military relations: Is the military under civilian control, or does it intervene in politics?
- Rule of law: Are laws applied equally, or do rulers bend them for personal or party gain?
- Economic and social conditions: Is there enough development and equality to prevent democracy from being seen as a failure?
When you compare India with, say, Pakistan or Myanmar, you are doing exactly this kind of analysis. India has held regular elections, seen multiple peaceful transfers of power between rival parties, and kept the military out of politics. Pakistan, by contrast, has experienced repeated military coups and periods of authoritarian rule. The comparison helps explain why — not just describe what.
Why it matters for a commerce/humanities student
You might think this is only for political science students. But consider:
- If you go into business or law, you need to assess political risk in different countries. A consolidated democracy is more predictable, has stronger property rights, and is less likely to suddenly change the rules. …
Part (a)
Democracy in Nepal was established through a sequence of popular struggles against the monarchy. A first movement in 1990 forced the king to accept a constitutional monarchy with an elected parliament, but this proved fragile. After the 2001 palace massacre, King Gyanendra took the throne, and in 2005 he dismissed the elected government and assumed direct rule. This provoked the Jana Andolan II (Second People's Movement) of April 2006, in which political parties allied with Maoist rebels led massive protests; on 24 April 2006 the king restored parliament. A Comprehensive Peace Agreement (November 2006) ended the Maoist insurgency, elections to a Constituent Assembly were held in 2008, the monarchy was abolished on 28 May 2008, and a new federal democratic constitution was adopted in 2015. …
Part (a): Nepal's democracy came through the 1990 opening, the 2006 Jana Andolan II that restored parliament, a peace deal with the Maoists, the 2008 abolition of the monarchy, and the 2015 constitution.
Part (b): In Bangladesh, the 1990 pro-democracy movement forced General Ershad to resign; a caretaker government held free elections in 1991 and parliamentary democracy was restored.
Part (a)
Nepal's path to democracy was one of persistent struggle against monarchical absolutism across nearly two decades. A brief democratic opening in 1990 established a constitutional monarchy with an elected parliament, but power still rested largely with the king. In 2001 a palace massacre killed most of the royal family, bringing King Gyanendra to the throne.
In 2005, citing the Maoist insurgency, Gyanendra dismissed the elected government, declared an emergency and assumed direct rule, suspending civil liberties. This overreach united his opponents: the mainstream parties (the Seven Party Alliance) joined the Maoist rebels they had been fighting, agreeing to restore democracy and end the monarchy.
In April 2006 they called the Jana Andolan II (Second People's Movement). For nineteen days hundreds of thousands of Nepalis defied curfews across the country, and on 24 April 2006 the isolated king restored the dissolved parliament. Parliament stripped the king of his powers and, in November 2006, signed the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, under which the Maoists disarmed and joined competitive politics. …
- CBSE 2023Set 59/4/11 markMCQQ.Which one of the following developing countries is the first to successfully control the rate of growth of population ?(a) Bhutan(b) Pakistan(c) Nepal(d) Sri Lanka
›Reveal solutionSolution
Sri Lanka was the first developing country to successfully control its population growth rate through early investments in education, healthcare, and family welfare.
Population control in the developing world has been a story of varied approaches and outcomes, shaped by political will, social reform, and access to healthcare. Among the countries listed, Sri Lanka stands apart as a pioneer. While most developing nations in South Asia struggled with high fertility rates and rapid population growth well into the late twentieth century, Sri Lanka achieved a demographic transition much earlier—one that mirrored patterns seen in developed countries rather than its regional neighbors.
The foundation of Sri Lanka's success was laid in the years following independence in 1948. The government prioritized universal education and made primary schooling free and compulsory. Female literacy rose sharply, and educated women began marrying later and choosing smaller families. At the same time, Sri Lanka invested heavily in public health infrastructure. A network of rural health centers brought maternal and child healthcare within reach of even remote villages. Infant mortality fell dramatically, and as parents grew confident that their children would survive, the incentive to have many children diminished.
Family planning programs were introduced early and integrated into the broader health system. Contraceptives became widely available, and the government promoted family welfare without coercion. Crucially, these efforts were supported by a relatively egalitarian social structure and progressive policies on women's rights. By the 1960s and 1970s, Sri Lanka's fertility rate had begun to decline steadily, a trend that continued in the decades that followed. …
- CBSE 2020Set 59/1/11 markQ.How long did East Pakistan and West Pakistan remain together as one country ?(OR)Which community dominates the politics of Sri Lanka ?
›Reveal solutionSolution
Part (a): East and West Pakistan remained one country for 24 years, from 1947 to 1971.
Part (b): The Sinhala community dominates the politics of Sri Lanka.
Part (a)
The creation of Pakistan in 1947 was a unique experiment in nation-building, for the country was born as two wings — East Pakistan and West Pakistan — separated by more than a thousand miles of Indian territory and bound together mainly by a shared religion. East Pakistan, with its Bengali-speaking majority, was more populous, yet power and wealth were concentrated in the West. The imposition of Urdu, economic exploitation and political marginalisation bred deep resentment. The breaking point came when the Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, won the 1970 elections but was denied power, leading to a military crackdown and a war of independence. With Indian intervention, East Pakistan surrendered on 16 December 1971 and became Bangladesh — ending a union that had lasted 24 years since 1947. …
- CBSE 2020Set 59/1/11 markQ.Identify any one reason for the aspiration of democracy in South Asia.
›Reveal solutionSolution
A primary reason for the aspiration of democracy in South Asia is the historical experience of non-democratic rule, which fostered a deep desire for self-determination, individual rights, and representative governance.
The aspiration for democracy in South Asia is deeply rooted in the region's historical experiences, particularly the long periods of colonial rule and subsequent struggles against various forms of authoritarianism. This collective memory of being governed without consent, coupled with the denial of fundamental freedoms, cultivated a profound longing for a political system that promised self-determination and citizen participation.
During colonial times, the people of South Asia were subjects, not citizens. They had limited or no say in their own governance, and their political, economic, and social lives were largely dictated by an external power. This experience of subjugation, marked by a lack of representation and the suppression of local voices, ignited powerful nationalist movements. These movements, while diverse in their methods and immediate goals, often shared a common vision of an independent future where the people themselves would choose their leaders and shape their destiny. Democracy, with its emphasis on popular sovereignty and individual liberties, became the natural ideal for this post-colonial future.
NoteThe concept of 'self-determination' was a powerful rallying cry during anti-colonial struggles, directly linking the idea of national independence with the right of people to choose their own form of government, which often meant democracy. …
- CBSE 2020Set 59/3/11 markQ.Which event does 9/11 refer to in the context of contemporary world politics ?(OR)Who took over the administration of Pakistan after its first Constitution was framed ?
›Reveal solutionSolution
Part (a): 9/11 is the al-Qaeda terrorist attack on the USA on 11 September 2001.
Part (b): Iskander Mirza took over Pakistan's administration after the 1956 Constitution.
Part (a)
In contemporary world politics, '9/11' is shorthand for 11 September 2001, when the militant group al-Qaeda hijacked four commercial aircraft in the United States. Two were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York, one struck the Pentagon, and a fourth crashed in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 people were killed. The attack triggered the US-led 'War on Terror' and reshaped global security. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.