Q.(a) “Cities played a key role in the economic system of empires.” Elucidate the statement with the help of suitable examples.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a): Cities were central to imperial economies because they concentrated surplus, trade, craft and administration — e.g., Mughal capitals drawing in rural surplus, and colonial ports (Bombay, Calcutta, Madras) linking India to global imperial trade.
Part (b): Colonial laws favoured tea planters by criminalising breach of contract, allowing arrest of runaways without warrant, restricting workers' movement, and binding them through penal indenture — denying them the protections British workers had at home.
Part (a)
Cities have always been crucial to the economic system of empires, functioning as the nodes that concentrate and control the flow of surplus, trade and power. An empire needs points where the wealth produced across a vast territory can be gathered, exchanged and administered — and cities perform exactly this role.
In pre-modern empires, the great imperial capitals — for example Mughal Delhi and Agra — drew in the agricultural surplus and revenue (taxes) extracted from the surrounding countryside, and were simultaneously centres of luxury craft production, long-distance trade and imperial administration. The city consumed the countryside's surplus and, in turn, organised the empire's economy and governance. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.