Q.From the extract, what can you infer about Dr. Sadao and Hana? (The Enemy)

The King's strategy to hunt all the tigers was born out of a desperate attempt to defy a prophecy. From the moment of his birth, astrologers predicted his death would come from a tiger. This deeply ingrained fear and a desire to prove fate wrong became the driving force behind his entire life's mission. His approach was not a nuanced plan, but rather a relentless, all-consuming obsession, where every decision and action was geared towards achieving his target of killing 100 tigers. He believed that by eliminating all tigers, he could eliminate the threat to his life.

Here is how the King pursued his goal:

1. The Vow and Absolute Priority: Upon hearing the prophecy, the King, then a young prince, declared that he would kill 100 tigers. This was not a casual statement but a solemn vow that dictated his entire reign. He made tiger hunting his paramount duty, neglecting state affairs and diverting all resources towards this singular objective. He even issued a proclamation that no one else in his kingdom was allowed to hunt tigers, threatening confiscation of property for any violation.

2. Eliminating Competition and Obstacles: When a high-ranking British officer expressed a desire to hunt a tiger in his kingdom, the King firmly refused, unwilling to share his "privilege." To appease the officer and prevent any political fallout that might jeopardize his mission, he resorted to an expensive bribe, sending fifty diamond rings to the officer's wife. This demonstrated his willingness to go to great lengths, even at significant personal and state cost, to protect his exclusive right to hunt.

3. Resource Acquisition through Matrimony: As the tiger population in his own kingdom dwindled, the King faced a challenge in reaching his target of 100. His solution was pragmatic and ruthless: he decided to marry a princess from a kingdom that boasted a large tiger population. This allowed him to continue his hunt, killing five or six tigers each time he visited his father-in-law. This move highlights how his personal life was entirely subservient to his tiger-hunting mission. …

The question asks you to infer a character trait from the given extract of “The Tiger King” by Kalki Krishnamurthy. In such questions, you are not being tested on memory of the story alone, but on your ability to read between the lines — to see what a character’s actions and words reveal about their personality.

The Maharaja’s entire life revolves around one thing: killing one hundred tigers. Why? Because an astrologer predicted that the hundredth tiger would kill him. Instead of laughing off the prediction or living cautiously, the Maharaja decides to prove the prophecy wrong by personally shooting every tiger in his kingdom. This is not rational behaviour — it is driven by a mix of pride, fear, and an unshakable belief in the prophecy.

Let’s break down what the extract (and the broader context) tells us:

1. Single-minded obsession — The Maharaja bans all tiger hunting by anyone else, even threatening to execute a British officer who hunts a tiger. He spends years hunting tigers, neglecting other duties. This shows he is stubborn — he will not change course no matter what.

2. Superstitious mindset — He takes the astrologer’s words literally and tries to control fate through action. This is not just bravery; it is a superstitious belief that he can outsmart destiny. So he is also superstitious.

3. Pride and arrogance — He believes his royal authority can override even fate. When the hundredth tiger is killed (or so he thinks), he becomes overconfident — which ultimately leads to his ironic death from a wooden tiger’s splinter. …

The question asks us to describe Dr. Sadao as a son based on the story "The Enemy". To answer this, we need to examine Dr. Sadao's actions, decisions, and thoughts that relate to his father, both when his father was alive and after his passing. His relationship with his father is a significant aspect of his character, shaping many of his life choices.

1. Education and Career: Dr. Sadao's father had a clear vision for his son's future. He sent Sadao to America at the age of twenty-two to study surgery and medicine, a decision Sadao dutifully followed. He spent eight years there, returning only after his education was complete and he had become a distinguished surgeon and scientist. This shows his complete adherence to his father's plan for his professional life.

2. Choice of Spouse: Even in a deeply personal matter like marriage, Dr. Sadao was guided by his father's expectations. He met Hana in America but waited to fall in love with her until he was certain she was Japanese. He knew his father would never have approved of him marrying a foreigner. This demonstrates a profound respect for his father's traditional values and a conscious effort to avoid any action that would displease him. …

The Concept and Intuition

This question from The Enemy by Pearl S. Buck tests your ability to infer character traits from actions and decisions, not from direct statements. The key insight is that Dr. Sadao and Hana are placed in an extreme moral dilemma: a wounded American prisoner of war washes up on their shore during World War II. Japan and America are at war. Helping the enemy is treason, punishable by death.

Yet, the extract (typically the scene where they discover the soldier and decide to bring him inside) shows them acting against every instinct of self-preservation and national loyalty. The why behind their choice reveals their true character. They are not driven by politics or fear, but by a deeper, more fundamental code — the Hippocratic oath for Sadao, and simple human compassion for Hana.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

1. The immediate, instinctive reaction — the doctor's core identity.

   When Sadao first sees the wounded man, his first thought is not of the enemy, but of the wound. The text says he "could not put him out into the sea" because the man was bleeding. This is the reflex of a trained surgeon — life before politics. It tells us that Sadao’s professional ethics (the Hippocratic oath to save life) are deeply ingrained, stronger than his fear of the consequences. He does not deliberate; he acts.

2. Hana’s parallel compassion — the human response.

   Hana, though terrified, does not abandon her husband or the soldier. She helps carry the man inside, fetches hot water, and assists in the surgery. Her fear is real — she trembles, she worries about the servants — but she overrides it. This shows Hana’s courage and her deep sense of humanity. She is not a passive wife; she is an active partner in this moral choice. Her compassion is not abstract — it is practical and costly.

3. The calculated risk — they know the danger fully.

   Neither Sadao nor Hana is naive. They discuss the risk explicitly: the servants will talk, the police will be informed, they could be arrested or killed. Yet they proceed. This is crucial — their decision is not impulsive ignorance, but deliberate moral courage. They weigh the cost and choose to pay it. This separates them from mere sentimentality; they are principled people who act despite knowing the consequences.

4. The quiet defiance of social and national norms. …

When we meet Hana in Pearl S. Buck's The Enemy, she is caught in an impossible situation—helping her husband Sadao treat a gravely injured American prisoner of war in their home, knowing full well that harbouring an enemy soldier during wartime is an act of treason. The narrative places enormous physical demands on her. She is not a trained nurse; she is a housewife thrust into the role of medical assistant, cleaning wounds, changing dressings, lifting and turning a grown man who cannot move himself.

The text makes it clear that Hana's pause comes from the toll this labour takes on her body. She has been working without rest, performing tasks that require strength and stamina she isn't accustomed to expending. The story describes her hands trembling, her back aching, her breath coming short—all signs of someone pushed to the edge of their physical capacity. This is not a woman stopping because she is afraid of the consequences (though fear is certainly present in the household), nor because she is sad about the moral dilemma, nor because she suffers from any chronic weakness or illness.