Can absolute electrode potential of an electrode be measured?

NCERT Exemplar · Q18

Q. Can absolute electrode potential of an electrode be measured?

CBSEShort· 2mImportance★★★★★

53% · 61/115 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Cell Representation Nernst Equation

Cell Representation and the Nernst Equation: From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you have a Daniell cell — a zinc rod in zinc sulphate solution connected by a salt bridge to a copper rod in copper sulphate solution. You know it produces a voltage. But what happens if you dilute the copper sulphate solution? Or if you change the temperature? The voltage changes. The Nernst equation is the tool that tells you exactly how much it changes.

The Intuition First

A battery works because the two half-cells "want" to react — zinc wants to lose electrons, copper ions want to gain them. This "want" is measured as a tendency, or potential. But the strength of that tendency depends on how crowded the ions are.

Think of it like this: If you have a room full of people who all want to leave (like zinc ions wanting to form), the push to get out is stronger when the room is packed. If the room is nearly empty, the push is weaker. Similarly, for copper ions wanting to enter the metal (gain electrons), the pull is stronger when there are many copper ions around, and weaker when there are few.

The Nernst equation quantifies this: the actual cell potential depends on the concentrations (or activities) of the ions involved.

The Precise Statement

For a general cell reaction:

aA + bB \rightarrow cC + dD

The cell potential $E$ under non-standard conditions is given by:

E = E^\circ - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q

Where:

$E$ = cell potential under the given conditions (in volts)
$E^\circ$ = standard cell potential (when all reactants/products are at 1 M, 1 atm, 25°C)
$R$ = universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K)
$T$ = temperature in Kelvin
$n$ = number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced half-reactions
$F$ = Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol)
$Q$ = reaction quotient = $\frac{[C]^c [D]^d}{[A]^a [B]^b}$ (using concentrations for dilute solutions)

At 25°C (298 K), the equation simplifies to a very practical form:

E = E^\circ - \frac{0.0591}{n} \log_{10} Q

The 0.0591 comes from $\frac{2.303RT}{F}$ at 298 K. Notice it uses $\log_{10}$ (common log), not natural log.

Cell Representation: How We Write It

In electrochemistry, we represent a cell with a shorthand notation. For the Daniell cell:

\text{Zn(s)} \mid \text{Zn}^{2+}(\text{aq}) \parallel \text{Cu}^{2+}(\text{aq}) \mid \text{Cu(s)}

The single vertical line $\mid$ represents a phase boundary (solid electrode | solution). The double line $\parallel$ represents the salt bridge.

The anode (oxidation) is written on the left, the cathode (reduction) on the right. Electrons flow from left to right in the external circuit.

Applying the Nernst Equation to a Cell Representation

For the Daniell cell, the half-reactions are:

Anode (oxidation): $\text{Zn(s)} \rightarrow \text{Zn}^{2+}(\text{aq}) + 2e^-$
Cathode (reduction): $\text{Cu}^{2+}(\text{aq}) + 2e^- \rightarrow \text{Cu(s)}$

Overall: $\text{Zn(s)} + \text{Cu}^{2+}(\text{aq}) \rightarrow \text{Zn}^{2+}(\text{aq}) + \text{Cu(s)}$

Here $n = 2$ (two electrons transferred). The reaction quotient is:

Q = \frac{[\text{Zn}^{2+}]}{[\text{Cu}^{2+}]}

So the Nernst equation becomes:

E = E^\circ - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log_{10} \frac{[\text{Zn}^{2+}]}{[\text{Cu}^{2+}]}

Note

Solids (Zn, Cu) do not appear in $Q$ because their concentrations are constant (activity = 1).

A Worked Example

Suppose you have a Daniell cell where $[\text{Zn}^{2+}] = 0.1$ M and $[\text{Cu}^{2+}] = 1.0$ M at 25°C. $E^\circ$ for the cell is 1.10 V.

$E = 1.10 - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log_{10} \frac{0.1}{1.0}$ …

Why this formula?

Cell Representation & the Nernst Equation: Why It Works

The Core Question

Why does a cell's voltage change when concentrations change? The Nernst equation answers this — but the reason lies in the link between chemical free energy and electrical work.

1. The Fundamental Link: Gibbs Free Energy & Cell Potential

A galvanic cell does electrical work. The maximum useful work a cell can do equals the change in Gibbs free energy ( $\Delta G$ ):

\Delta G = -nFE_{\text{cell}}

Where:

$n$ = moles of electrons transferred
$F$ = Faraday constant ( $96,485 \, \text{C mol}^{-1}$ )
$E_{\text{cell}}$ = cell potential (volts)

Why negative? A spontaneous reaction has $\Delta G < 0$ and $E_{\text{cell}} > 0$ — the negative sign makes this consistent.

2. The Chemical Side: $\Delta G$ Depends on Concentration

For a general redox reaction:

aA + bB \rightarrow cC + dD

The Gibbs free energy under non-standard conditions is:

\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT \ln Q

Where $Q$ is the reaction quotient:

Q = \frac{[C]^c [D]^d}{[A]^a [B]^b}

Why this form? It comes from the relationship between chemical potential and concentration — the entropy of mixing drives concentration dependence.

3. Combining Both Sides: The Derivation

Set the electrical work equal to the chemical free energy change:

-nFE_{\text{cell}} = -nFE^\circ_{\text{cell}} + RT \ln Q

Divide both sides by $-nF$ :

E_{\text{cell}} = E^\circ_{\text{cell}} - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q

This is the Nernst equation.

4. The "Why" in Plain Terms

Concept	Physical Meaning
$E^\circ_{\text{cell}}$	Voltage when all species are at 1 M (standard state)
$-\frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q$	Correction factor — adjusts voltage for real concentrations
$Q$	Tells you how far the reaction is from equilibrium

Key insight: When $Q = K$ (equilibrium), $E_{\text{cell}} = 0$ — the battery is dead because no net reaction occurs.

5. The Common Form (log base 10)

At $25^\circ \text{C}$ ( $298 \, \text{K}$ ):

\frac{RT}{F} \ln 10 \approx 0.0592 \, \text{V}

So:

E_{\text{cell}} = E^\circ_{\text{cell}} - \frac{0.0592}{n} \log_{10} Q

Why convert to log? Exam convenience — most concentration values are powers of 10.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The absolute electrode potential of a single electrode cannot be measured because no experimental setup can isolate the potential difference at one electrode–electrolyte interface without introducing a second interface. Only the relative potential difference between two electrodes (the cell potential) is measurable.

Why this question matters

This is one of those questions that separates surface-level memorisation from real understanding. Many students see the Nernst equation and standard reduction potentials in tables and assume those numbers are absolute properties of a single electrode — like its mass or density. They are not. Every number you have ever seen in an electrochemistry table is a relative value, measured against a reference electrode (usually the standard hydrogen electrode, SHE).

The core issue is fundamental: you cannot connect a voltmeter to a single electrode and get a reading. A voltmeter measures the difference in electrical potential between its two terminals. To measure the potential of one electrode, you must connect the other terminal to something — and that something becomes the second half of a cell.

The conceptual foundation

Think about what "electrode potential" actually means. When a metal rod is dipped into a solution of its ions, a potential difference develops across the metal–solution interface. This arises from the tendency of metal atoms to either lose electrons (go into solution as ions) or gain electrons (plate out of solution). The resulting charge separation creates an electric double layer at the interface.

The potential difference across this single interface is the absolute electrode potential. It is a real physical quantity — it exists. But here is the catch: there is no way to measure it directly.

Watch out

The common pitfall

Students often think that a voltmeter connected between an electrode and the solution itself would give the absolute potential. But the voltmeter's other lead must make contact with the solution through another conductor — and that conductor–solution interface creates its own potential difference. You are back to measuring a difference between two interfaces.

Step-by-step reasoning

1. The measurement problem

Any electrical measurement requires a complete circuit. To measure the potential of a single electrode, you would need to connect one terminal of a voltmeter to the electrode and the other terminal to the solution. But how do you connect to the solution? You need a second conductor (another metal wire) dipped into the solution. That second conductor–solution interface immediately creates its own potential difference.

The voltmeter reading is therefore:

E_{\text{measured}} = \phi_{\text{electrode}} - \phi_{\text{solution}} + \phi_{\text{solution}} - \phi_{\text{reference wire}} = \phi_{\text{electrode}} - \phi_{\text{reference wire}}

This is the difference between two metal–solution interface potentials — not the absolute potential of either one.

2. The thermodynamic argument

From thermodynamics, the absolute electrode potential is related to the work required to move an electron from the metal to a point just outside the solution (the "outer potential" of the solution). This quantity involves:

The work function of the metal (energy to remove an electron from the metal to vacuum)
The surface potential of the solution (the dipole layer at the solution–vacuum interface)
The ionic solvation energy

These are individually measurable in principle, but their combination for a working electrode in solution is experimentally inaccessible without introducing a second interface.

3. The standard hydrogen electrode convention

The entire edifice of electrochemistry rests on a convention: we assign the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) an arbitrary potential of exactly 0 V at all temperatures. Every tabulated reduction potential is then the cell potential measured against SHE.

E^{\circ}_{\text{electrode}} = E_{\text{cell}} \text{ (measured against SHE)}

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes: Absolute Electrode Potential Measurement

✗ Mistake 1: Thinking Absolute Potential Can Be Measured Directly

Why students get this wrong:

They see voltmeters giving a reading and assume that reading is the "potential of one electrode." They forget that a voltmeter always measures a difference between two points.

The correct understanding:

No, absolute electrode potential cannot be measured. Every measurement requires a complete circuit with two electrodes. The voltmeter reading is always:

E_{\text{cell}} = E_{\text{cathode}} - E_{\text{anode}}

How to avoid:

Remember: "You cannot measure one electrode alone — you always need a reference."
Think of potential like height: you can only measure height difference between two points, not the absolute height of one point.

✗ Mistake 2: Confusing Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) with Absolute Zero

Why students get this wrong:

They assume SHE has $E^\circ = 0\ \text{V}$ absolutely, so they think measuring against SHE gives the absolute potential.

The correct understanding:

SHE is assigned $E^\circ = 0\ \text{V}$ by convention — it is a relative reference, not an absolute zero. The actual absolute potential of SHE is estimated to be about 4.44 V (at 298 K) relative to vacuum.

How to avoid:

Write clearly: "SHE potential = 0 V by definition, not by measurement."
Distinguish between relative scale (used in electrochemistry) and absolute scale (relative to vacuum).

✗ Mistake 3: Misapplying the Nernst Equation to "Find Absolute Potential"

Why students get this wrong:

They plug values into the Nernst equation:

E = E^\circ - \frac{0.0591}{n} \log Q

and think the $E$ they calculate is the absolute potential of that electrode.

The correct understanding:

The Nernst equation gives the electrode potential relative to SHE (since $E^\circ$ is defined relative to SHE). It is still a relative value.

How to avoid:

Always add the phrase: "...relative to SHE" after any Nernst equation result.
Remember: $E^\circ$ values in tables are all on the SHE scale — a relative scale.

✗ Mistake 4: Confusing "Absolute Potential" with "Standard Potential"

Why students get this wrong:

They think "absolute" means "standard" (i.e., under 1 M, 1 atm, 298 K conditions). …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.

CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 mark
$Q. What is the potential difference between the two electrodes of the galvanic cell called?$
›Reveal solutionSolution

The potential difference between the two electrodes of a galvanic cell (measured when no current is drawn) is called the electromotive force (EMF) or cell potential, $E_{\text{cell}}$ .

Concept. In a galvanic (voltaic) cell, the two half-cells are at different electrode potentials. The difference between the cathode and anode potentials is what pushes electrons through the external circuit:

$E_{\text{cell}} = E_{\text{cathode}} - E_{\text{anode}}$

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 mark
$Zn(s)+Cu^{2+}(aq) \rightarrow Zn^{2+}(aq)+Cu(s)$
›Reveal solutionSolution
An external potential exactly equal and opposite to the cell's own EMF brings the system to balance, so no net current flows in either direction — this is the basis of potentiometric EMF measurement.

The Daniell-type cell $Zn(s)|Zn^{2+}(aq)\|Cu^{2+}(aq)|Cu(s)$ spontaneously drives current in the galvanic direction (electrons flow from Zn anode to Cu cathode through the external circuit) with an EMF of 1.1 V under standard conditions.

If an external opposing potential is applied, it works against this spontaneous cell reaction:

If the external potential is less than 1.1 V, the cell's own EMF still dominates, and current continues to flow in the original (galvanic) direction, though at a reduced magnitude.

If the external potential is greater than 1.1 V, it overpowers the cell's own EMF, and current is forced to flow in the reverse direction (the cell now behaves as an electrolytic cell, being charged/driven backward). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. The correct statement in a cell of zinc and copper is$
(a) zinc acts as cathode and copper as anode
(b) zinc acts as anode and copper as cathode
(c) the standard reduction potential of zinc is more than that of copper
(d) the flow of electrons is from copper to zinc
›Reveal solutionSolution

Zinc has a lower (more negative) standard reduction potential than copper, so it is oxidized (anode) while copper is reduced (cathode).

In a Daniell-type zinc–copper cell, E°(Zn²⁺/Zn) = −0.76 V is lower than E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.34 V. The electrode with the lower (more negative) reduction potential is oxidized — zinc loses electrons and acts as the anode (Zn → Zn²⁺ + 2e⁻) — while the electrode with the higher reduction potential is reduced — copper gains electrons and acts as the cathode (Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Cu). Electrons flow …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2024Set D1 markMCQ
$Q. The electromotive force of the cell Zn | ZnSO4 || CuSO4 | Cu is 1.1 volt. Its cathode is$
(a) Zn
(b) Cu
(c) ZnSO4
(d) CuSO4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Reduction happens at the cathode; Cu2+ is reduced to Cu, so Cu is the cathode.

In the Daniell cell Zn | ZnSO4 || CuSO4 | Cu:

Anode (oxidation, left): Zn -> Zn2+ + 2e-

Cathode (reduction, right): Cu2+ + 2e- -> Cu …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. An electrochemical cell can behave like an electrolytic cell when _______.$
(a) Ecell = 0
(b) Ecell > Eext
(c) Eext > Ecell
(d) Ecell = Eext
›Reveal solutionSolution
A galvanic (electrochemical) cell starts behaving like an electrolytic cell when an external potential greater than the cell's own emf is applied against it, reversing the direction of current flow.

Consider a Daniell cell: Zn(s) | Zn2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(s), which normally works as a galvanic cell producing a cell potential Ecell, with electrons flowing from Zn (anode) to Cu (cathode) through the external circuit.

If an external opposing emf (Eext) is applied to this cell:

When Eext < Ecell, the cell continues to work as a galvanic cell, but the current decreases.

When Eext = Ecell, no current flows through the cell (this is used to measure the cell's emf accurately, e.g. using a potentiometer). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 mark
$Q. Write True/False: A hydrogen bridge is used to maintain continuity of ion flow in a Daniell cell.$
›Reveal solutionSolution

This statement is FALSE. A Daniell cell uses a salt bridge (e.g. containing KCl or KNO3 in agar-agar gel), not any "hydrogen bridge", to complete the internal circuit.

A Daniell cell consists of a Zn electrode dipped in ZnSO4 solution (anode) and a Cu electrode dipped in CuSO4 solution (cathode), connected externally by a wire and internally by a salt bridge. The salt bridge allows ions to migrate between the two half-cells, maintaining electrical neutrality in each compartment as the cell reaction proceeds, and completes the internal circuit …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2023Set 56/1/11 markMCQ
$Zn + 2Ag^+ \rightarrow Zn^{2+} + 2Ag$
›Reveal solutionSolution
By convention the anode (oxidation) is written on the left and the cathode (reduction) on the right. Zinc is oxidised and silver ions are reduced, so the cell is $Zn \mid Zn^{2+} \parallel Ag^+ \mid Ag$ — option (D).

A cell diagram is written anode (left) $\parallel$ cathode (right), with each half-cell running from the electrode metal outward and the double bar $\parallel$ marking the salt bridge.

For the reaction
$Zn + 2Ag^+ \rightarrow Zn^{2+} + 2Ag$

Zinc loses electrons: $Zn \rightarrow Zn^{2+} + 2e^-$ (oxidation, anode, left).

Silver ions gain electrons: $Ag^+ + e^- \rightarrow Ag$ (reduction, cathode, right).

Writing the anode as metal $\mid$ ion and the cathode as ion $\mid$ metal gives
$Zn \mid Zn^{2+} \parallel Ag^+ \mid Ag$
Checking the options: …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2022Set E1 markMCQ
$Q. The standard electrode potentials for the following reactions are given ( At 25°C ): Ag+(aq) + e- -> Ag(s), E° Ag+/Ag = +0.80 V ; Sn2+(aq) + 2e -> Sn(s), E° Sn2+/Sn = -0.14 V. The electromotive force (EMF) of the given cell Sn | Sn2+ (1M) || Ag+ (1M) | Ag is$
(a) 0.66 V
(b) 0.80 V
(c) 1.08 V
(d) 0.94 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
For Sn | Sn2+ || Ag+ | Ag, EMF = E°(Ag+/Ag) - E°(Sn2+/Sn) = 0.80 - (-0.14) = 0.94 V.

In the cell notation the left electrode is the anode (oxidation) and the right is the cathode (reduction):

Cathode (reduction): Ag+ + e- -> Ag, E° = +0.80 V

Anode (oxidation): Sn -> Sn2+ + 2e-, E°(Sn2+/Sn) = -0.14 V

E°cell = E°cathode - E°anode = (+0.80) - (-0.14) = +0.94 V.

…
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2022Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect for a voltaic cell ?$
(a) It converts chemical energy to electrical energy.
(b) It uses electrical energy to carry out chemical changes.
(c) It is based on a redox reaction.
(d) It has $-\Delta G$ .
›Reveal solutionSolution
A voltaic cell produces electricity from a spontaneous redox reaction — it does not consume electrical energy, so statement (b) describes an electrolytic cell instead.

Checking each option against what a voltaic (galvanic) cell actually does:

(a) True — a voltaic cell converts chemical energy into electrical energy.

(b) False — this describes an electrolytic cell, which uses externally supplied electrical energy to force a non-spontaneous chemical change. A voltaic cell does the opposite. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2022Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Mg\,|\,Mg^{2+}\,||\,Cu^{2+}\,|\,Cu$
(a) $Mg$ as cathode
(b) $Cu$ as cathode
(c) $Cu$ is oxidizing agent
(d) None of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
By IUPAC convention the electrode written on the LEFT of a cell is the anode and the one on the RIGHT is the cathode. Here Mg is the anode and Cu is the cathode. Option (B).

The cell is written as $Mg\,|\,Mg^{2+}\,||\,Cu^{2+}\,|\,Cu$ .

Convention: anode (negative, oxidation) is written on the left; cathode (positive, reduction) is written on the right.

The electrode reactions are:

Anode (Mg, oxidation): $Mg \rightarrow Mg^{2+} + 2e^-$

Cathode (Cu, reduction): $Cu^{2+} + 2e^- \rightarrow Cu$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2021Set A1 markMCQ
$Q. Zn(s) | Zn2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(s) is$
(a) Weston cell
(b) Daniel cell
(c) Calomel cell
(d) None of these
›Reveal solutionSolution
A zinc-copper galvanic cell with this notation is the Daniell cell.

The cell Zn(s) | Zn2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(s) is the Daniell cell, a galvanic (voltaic) cell.

At the anode (LHS): Zn(s) → Zn2+ + 2e- (oxidation).

At the cathode (RHS): Cu2+ + 2e- → Cu(s) (reduction). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2018Set ANNUAL1 mark
$Q. What is salt bridge?$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The salt bridge completes the electrical circuit of a galvanic cell by letting ions migrate between the two half-cells (maintaining charge neutrality) while physically keeping the two electrolyte solutions from mixing.

A salt bridge is typically a U-shaped glass tube filled with a gel (agar-agar or gelatin) containing a concentrated solution of an inert electrolyte (one whose ions do not react with the cell's other ions and are not involved in the electrode reactions), commonly KCl, KNO $_3$ or NH $_4$ NO $_3$ . Its two functions:

It completes the internal electrical circuit of the cell, allowing ions to flow between the two half-cells, so that current continues to flow through the external circuit.

As oxidation at the anode generates excess positive ions and reduction at the cathode depletes positive ions (or vice-versa), the salt bridge's ions migrate to maintain electrical neutrality in both half-cell solutions (anions flow toward the anode compartment, cations toward the cathode compartment) — without this, charge would build up and stop the current flow almost immediately. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ17 — In the electrolysis of aqueous sodium chloride solution which of the h…→Next questionQ19 — Can E^°Cell or Δr G^° for cell reaction ever be equal to zero?

Q.Can absolute electrode potential of an electrode be measured?

Concept understanding — Cell Representation Nernst Equation

Cell Representation and the Nernst Equation: From Intuition to Precision

The Intuition First

The Precise Statement

Cell Representation: How We Write It

Applying the Nernst Equation to a Cell Representation

A Worked Example

Why this formula?

Cell Representation & the Nernst Equation: Why It Works

The Core Question

1. The Fundamental Link: Gibbs Free Energy & Cell Potential

2. The Chemical Side: $\Delta G$ Depends on Concentration

3. Combining Both Sides: The Derivation

4. The "Why" in Plain Terms

5. The Common Form (log base 10)

Why this question matters

The conceptual foundation

Step-by-step reasoning

Method: Absolute Electrode Potential Cannot Be Measured Directly

Why This Is True (The Concept)

Step-by-Step Reasoning

Common Mistakes: Absolute Electrode Potential Measurement

✗ Mistake 1: Thinking Absolute Potential Can Be Measured Directly

✗ Mistake 2: Confusing Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) with Absolute Zero

✗ Mistake 3: Misapplying the Nernst Equation to "Find Absolute Potential"

✗ Mistake 4: Confusing "Absolute Potential" with "Standard Potential"

Q.Can absolute electrode potential of an electrode be measured?

Why this question matters

The conceptual foundation

Step-by-step reasoning

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days