At high pressure the following reaction is zero order. $2NH_3(g) \xrightarrow[\text{Platinum catalyst}]{1130\ K} N_2(g) + 3H_2(g)$ Which of the following options are correct for this reaction? (Two or more than two options may be correct.) (i) Rate of reaction = Rate constant. (ii) Rate of the reaction depends on concentration of ammonia. (iii) Rate of decomposition of ammonia will remain constant until ammonia disappears completely. (iv) Further increase in pressure will change the rate of reaction.

At high pressure the following reaction is zero order. 2NH₃(g) xrightarrow[Platinum catalyst]1130K N₂(g) + 3H₂

NCERT Exemplar · Q50

2NH_3(g) \xrightarrow[\text{Platinum catalyst}]{1130\ K} N_2(g) + 3H_2(g)

(i) Rate of reaction = Rate constant.

(ii) Rate of the reaction depends on concentration of ammonia.

(iii) Rate of decomposition of ammonia will remain constant until ammonia disappears completely.

(iv) Further increase in pressure will change the rate of reaction.

Karnataka PUCMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

85% · 99/117 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Zero Order Kinetics

Zero Order Kinetics: The Drug That Doesn't Care How Much You Give It

Imagine you're filling a bathtub. You turn the tap to a fixed flow rate — say, 5 litres per minute. The amount of water in the tub increases by exactly 5 litres every minute, regardless of whether the tub is empty or already half full. That's the core intuition behind zero order kinetics: a constant amount disappears per unit time, no matter how much is left.

Now contrast this with what you probably expect. Most processes in nature follow first order kinetics: the rate depends on how much is present. If you have 100 molecules, 10 might react per second; if you have 10 molecules, only 1 reacts per second. The fraction lost is constant, but the amount lost per second shrinks as the quantity shrinks. Zero order is the opposite — the amount lost per second is fixed, so the fraction lost actually increases as the quantity drops.

The Precise Statement

-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_0

Where $[A]$ is the concentration of the substance (or amount, depending on context), $t$ is time, and $k_0$ is the zero order rate constant with units of concentration per time (e.g., mg/L per hour, or simply mg/hour if we're talking about total amount).

The negative sign indicates the substance is being removed. The key point: the rate does not depend on $[A]$ . It's a flat, constant rate.

The Integrated Form and Half-Life

If you integrate the differential equation, you get a straight line:

[A]_t = [A]_0 - k_0 t

This is the equation of a line with slope $-k_0$ and intercept $[A]_0$ . Plot concentration vs. time, and you get a straight line sloping downward until it hits zero.

The half-life — the time for the concentration to fall to half its initial value — is:

t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k_0}

Notice something crucial: the half-life depends on the initial concentration. Double the starting amount, and the half-life doubles. This is completely different from first order kinetics, where half-life is constant regardless of starting concentration.

Watch out

A common mistake: students assume half-life is always constant. For zero order, it is not. The half-life changes with the starting amount. If you start with 100 mg, half-life might be 5 hours; start with 200 mg, half-life becomes 10 hours.

Where Does Zero Order Kinetics Actually Happen?

In pharmacology, zero order kinetics is most famously seen with ethanol (alcohol) and aspirin at high doses. The reason is saturation of enzymes.

Your body metabolises alcohol using an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase. At low alcohol levels, the enzyme works efficiently and the rate depends on how much alcohol is present (first order). But at higher concentrations — say, after a few drinks — the enzyme becomes saturated. It's working at maximum speed, like a factory running at full capacity. Adding more raw material (alcohol) doesn't make it work faster. The rate becomes constant: a fixed amount of alcohol is metabolised per hour, regardless of how much is in your blood.

This is why alcohol elimination follows a straight line when you plot blood alcohol concentration vs. time. A typical person eliminates about 0.015 g/dL per hour — a fixed amount, not a fixed fraction.

Note

The same saturation principle applies to some drug transporters in the kidneys. When the transport proteins are working at maximum capacity, drug excretion becomes zero order. This is why high doses of certain drugs (like phenytoin) can lead to unexpectedly long elimination times — the system is overwhelmed.

A Quick Comparison Table

Property	Zero Order	First Order
Rate depends on	Nothing (constant)	Concentration
Rate equation	$-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_0$	$-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_1[A]$

Why this formula?

Zero Order Kinetics: Why the Formula Holds

Let's build this from the ground up — understanding the why before the what.

The Core Idea

Zero order kinetics describes a process where the rate is constant — it does not depend on the concentration of the reactant.

This is the definition, but why would that ever happen?

Why the Rate is Constant

Imagine a reaction happening on a solid surface (like a catalyst or a tablet dissolving). The reactant molecules must first adsorb onto the surface before reacting.

If the surface is saturated with reactant molecules, adding more reactant in solution doesn't help — the surface is already full.
The reaction proceeds at a fixed speed determined by how fast the surface can process the adsorbed molecules.

Key insight: The rate is limited by the surface, not by how much reactant is floating around.

Deriving the Zero Order Rate Law

Step 1: Write the rate definition

For a reaction $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ , the rate of disappearance of $A$ is:

-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k

where $k$ is the zero order rate constant (units: concentration/time, e.g., $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ).

Notice: No $[A]$ term on the right side — that's the signature of zero order.

Step 2: Separate variables and integrate

-d[A] = k \, dt

Integrate from initial time $t=0$ (concentration $[A]_0$ ) to time $t$ (concentration $[A]_t$ ):

-\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} d[A] = k \int_0^t dt

-[A]_t + [A]_0 = kt

Step 3: Rearrange to the familiar form

\boxed{[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt}

This is the integrated rate law for zero order kinetics.

What This Formula Tells Us

Linear decrease: Concentration falls linearly with time (not exponentially like first order).
Slope = $-k$ : A plot of $[A]_t$ vs. $t$ gives a straight line with slope $-k$ .
Half-life depends on initial concentration:

Set $[A]_t = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$ :

\frac{[A]_0}{2} = [A]_0 - k t_{1/2}

\boxed{t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k}}

Critical exam point: Unlike first order (where $t_{1/2}$ is constant), zero order half-life increases with higher initial concentration.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

For a zero-order reaction, the rate is constant and independent of reactant concentration — so the rate equals the rate constant, and decomposition proceeds at a steady pace until the reactant is exhausted. Options (i) and (iii) are correct.

This is a classic zero-order kinetics problem, but it’s wrapped in a high-pressure context that can confuse students. Let’s unpack why.

The core idea: What does “zero order” actually mean?

A zero-order reaction has a rate that does not depend on the concentration of the reactant. The rate law is:

\text{Rate} = k[\text{NH}_3]^0 = k

That’s it — the rate is just the rate constant $k$ , a fixed number at a given temperature. No matter how much ammonia is left, the reaction chugs along at the same speed until the ammonia runs out.

Why would a reaction be zero order? At very high pressure, the platinum catalyst surface gets completely covered with ammonia molecules. Adding more ammonia gas can’t increase the number of molecules reacting per second — the surface is already saturated. So the rate is limited by the catalyst’s capacity, not by how much ammonia is floating around.

Now let’s test each option.

Option (i): Rate of reaction = Rate constant.

From the rate law above, this is literally true for a zero-order reaction. The rate is $k$ , and $k$ is the rate constant. So (i) is correct.
Option (ii): Rate depends on concentration of ammonia.

For zero order, the rate is independent of $[\text{NH}_3]$ . The exponent is zero — concentration doesn’t appear in the rate expression. So (ii) is wrong.
Option (iii): Rate of decomposition of ammonia will remain constant until ammonia disappears completely.

Yes — that’s the hallmark of zero-order kinetics. The rate is constant, so the concentration decreases linearly with time. The reaction keeps going at the same speed until the last molecule is gone. (iii) is correct.
Option (iv): Further increase in pressure will change the rate of reaction. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes in Zero Order Kinetics (NH₃ Decomposition)

Mistake 1: Confusing "Rate = k" with "Rate is constant"

The error: Students think (i) is wrong because they believe rate always depends on concentration.

Why it happens: They memorise "rate depends on concentration" without understanding the zero order exception.

The correct understanding:

For zero order: $\text{Rate} = k[\text{NH}_3]^0 = k$
This means rate = rate constant numerically (option A is correct)
The rate does not change as [NH₃] decreases

How to avoid: Remember the order = exponent rule:

Zero order → exponent 0 → concentration term = 1 → Rate = k

Mistake 2: Selecting option (ii) — "Rate depends on concentration"

The error: Students apply first-order thinking to a zero-order reaction.

Why it happens: They don't check that "high pressure" means surface of catalyst is saturated — all active sites are occupied.

The correct understanding:

At high pressure, catalyst surface is fully covered with NH₃ molecules
Adding more NH₃ (higher concentration) cannot increase the reaction rate
Rate depends only on how fast the surface reaction occurs → constant rate

How to avoid: For heterogeneous catalysis:

Low pressure → rate ∝ concentration (first order)
High pressure → rate independent of concentration (zero order)

Mistake 3: Rejecting option (iii) — "Rate remains constant until NH₃ disappears"

The error: Students think rate must slow down as reactant is used up.

Why it happens: They apply homogeneous kinetics logic to a surface reaction.

The correct understanding:

In zero order: $-\frac{d[\text{NH}_3]}{dt} = k$
This means constant slope on a concentration vs. time graph
Rate stays constant as long as the condition (high pressure) holds
When NH₃ becomes very low, pressure drops → reaction may shift from zero order

How to avoid: Draw the concentration-time graph:

Zero order → straight line with constant negative slope
First order → curved line with decreasing slope

Mistake 4: Selecting option (iv) — "Further increase in pressure changes rate"

The error: Students think "more pressure always means faster reaction." …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQ
$Q. When the initial concentration of a zero order reaction is doubled, the half-life of the reaction is: (A) doubled (B) not changed (C) tripled (D) halved$
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a zero‑order reaction, the half‑life is directly proportional to the initial concentration. Doubling the initial concentration therefore doubles the half‑life. The correct option is (A).

Concept and Intuition

In chemical kinetics, the half‑life $t_{1/2}$ is the time required for the concentration of a reactant to fall to half its initial value. For a zero‑order reaction, the rate is constant — it does not depend on the concentration of the reactant. That means the reactant disappears at a steady, unchanging speed.

Think of it like draining a tank of water at a constant rate: if you start with twice as much water, it will take twice as long to drain half of it. Similarly, for a zero‑order reaction, doubling the starting amount doubles the time needed to consume half of it. This is fundamentally different from first‑order reactions (where half‑life is constant) or second‑order reactions (where half‑life is inversely proportional to initial concentration).

Step‑by‑Step Derivation

Write the integrated rate law for a zero‑order reaction. For a reaction $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ with rate law $\text{rate} = k$ (where $k$ is the rate constant), the concentration of $A$ at time $t$ is:

$[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt$
This is a straight line with slope $-k$ .

Define the half‑life condition. At $t = t_{1/2}$ , the concentration is half the initial:

$[A]_{t_{1/2}} = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$

Substitute into the integrated law.

$\frac{[A]_0}{2} = [A]_0 - k t_{1/2}$

Solve for $t_{1/2}$ . Rearranging:

$k t_{1/2} = [A]_0 - \frac{[A]_0}{2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$ $t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k}$

Interpret the result. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{A} \rightarrow \mathrm{B}+\mathrm{C}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a zero‑order reaction, the concentration decreases linearly with time: $[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt$ .

Using the given values, the time taken is $t = \frac{0.2 - 0.024}{6.0 \times 10^{-3}} = 29.33\ \text{s}$ , so the correct option is (D).

Concept & Intuition

In a zero‑order reaction, the rate does not depend on the concentration of the reactant. That means the reactant disappears at a constant speed — like water draining from a tank at a fixed rate. The concentration vs. time graph is a straight line with slope $-k$ . So if you know how much concentration has dropped and the constant rate, you can directly find the time by dividing the change in concentration by the rate constant.

Step‑by‑Step Solution

Recall the zero‑order integrated rate law For a reaction $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ that is zero order in $A$ :

$[A]_t = [A]_0 - k t$
where $[A]_0$ is the initial concentration, $[A]_t$ is the concentration at time $t$ , and $k$ is the rate constant (with units $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ).

Identify the given quantities

Initial concentration: $[A]_0 = 0.2\ \text{M}$

Final concentration: $[A]_t = 0.024\ \text{M}$

Rate constant: $k = 6.0 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$

Rearrange the equation to solve for time

From $[A]_t = [A]_0 - k t$ , we get:

$k t = [A]_0 - [A]_t \quad \Rightarrow \quad t = \frac{[A]_0 - [A]_t}{k}$

Plug in the numbers
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQ
$Q. The half-life for a zero order reaction is (A) Inversely proportional to the initial concentration and directly proportional to the rate constant (B) Directly proportional to the initial concentration and inversely proportional to the rate constant (C) Independent of rate constant, but depends on the initial concentration (D) Independent of initial concentration$
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a zero‑order reaction, the half‑life is directly proportional to the initial concentration and inversely proportional to the rate constant. The correct option is (B).

Concept & Intuition

Half‑life ( $t_{1/2}$ ) is the time required for the concentration of a reactant to fall to half its initial value. For a zero‑order reaction, the rate is constant — it does not depend on concentration. That means the reactant is consumed at a steady pace, so the more you start with, the longer it takes to reach half that amount. Also, a larger rate constant means faster consumption, so the half‑life gets shorter. Hence $t_{1/2}$ should be proportional to $[A]_0$ and inversely proportional to $k$ .

Step‑by‑step derivation

Write the integrated rate law for a zero‑order reaction For a reaction $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ with rate $-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k$ , integration gives:

$[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt$
where $[A]_0$ is the initial concentration and $[A]_t$ is the concentration at time $t$ .

Define the half‑life condition

At $t = t_{1/2}$ , the concentration is half the initial: $[A]_{t_{1/2}} = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$ .

Substitute into the integrated law

$\frac{[A]_0}{2} = [A]_0 - k\,t_{1/2}$

Solve for $t_{1/2}$ Rearranging:

$k\,t_{1/2} = [A]_0 - \frac{[A]_0}{2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$ $t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k}$

Interpret the relationship …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQ
$Q. Given below are 4 graphs [A], [B], [C] and [D] Identify the 2 graphs that represent a Zero order reaction? (A) [A] and [D] (B) [A] and [B] (C) [B] and [C] (D) [C] and [D]$
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a zero‑order reaction, concentration decreases linearly with time and the rate is independent of concentration. Graph [C] shows $[R]$ vs. time as a straight line with negative slope, and graph [D] shows rate constant vs. $[R]$ as a horizontal line. Thus the correct pair is [C] and [D].

The key idea is that a zero‑order reaction has a constant rate that does not depend on the concentration of the reactant. This leads to two characteristic plots:

Concentration vs. time: $[R] = [R]_0 - kt$ → a straight line with slope $-k$ .

Rate vs. concentration: $\text{Rate} = k$ → a horizontal line.

Let’s examine each graph in turn.

Graph [A] – vertical axis is $\ln[R]$ , horizontal is time.

For a first‑order reaction, $\ln[R] = \ln[R]_0 - kt$ , which gives a straight line with slope $-k$ .

This is not zero‑order; it’s first‑order decay.

Graph [B] – vertical axis is $[R]$ , horizontal is time.

The curve starts high, falls steeply, then flattens asymptotically.

This is the exponential decay of a first‑order reaction ( $[R] = [R]_0 e^{-kt}$ ).

Not zero‑order.

Graph [C] – vertical axis is $[R]$ , horizontal is time.

The plot is a straight line with constant negative slope, annotated $K = -\text{Slope}$ .

This matches $[R] = [R]_0 - kt$ exactly.

✓ Zero‑order.

Graph [D] – vertical axis is Rate, horizontal is $[R]$ .

The plot is a horizontal line – rate does not change as $[R]$ increases. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQ
$300 \mathrm{~K}$
›Reveal solutionSolution

$t_{1/2}$ is directly proportional to the initial pressure, which is the signature of a zero-order reaction.

For an $n^{\text{th}}$ -order reaction the half-life depends on the initial concentration (here pressure) as
$t_{1/2} \propto [A]_0^{\,1-n}.$
Given data:
$\frac{t_{1/2,1}}{t_{1/2,2}} = \frac{350}{175} = 2, \qquad \frac{P_1}{P_2} = \frac{40}{20} = 2.$
So …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQ
$\mathrm{CH_3COOC_2H_5 + NaOH \rightarrow CH_3COONa + C_2H_5OH}$
›Reveal solutionSolution

The reaction is second order overall, so rearranging Rate $= k[A][B]$ for $k$ leaves units of $\mathrm{L\,mol^{-1}\,s^{-1}}$ .

Step 1 — Determine the overall order.

The rate law is given experimentally as
$\text{Rate} = k\,[\mathrm{CH_3COOC_2H_5}]^1[\mathrm{NaOH}]^1$
Order $=$ sum of the exponents $= 1 + 1 = \mathbf{2}$ . The reaction (saponification of ethyl acetate) is second order overall, first order in each reactant.

Step 2 — Do the algebra on the units.

Rearrange the rate law:
$k = \frac{\text{Rate}}{[\mathrm{CH_3COOC_2H_5}][\mathrm{NaOH}]}$
Now substitute the units. Rate is always a concentration change per unit time, $\mathrm{mol\,L^{-1}\,s^{-1}}$ , and each concentration is $\mathrm{mol\,L^{-1}}$ :
$[k] = \frac{\mathrm{mol\,L^{-1}\,s^{-1}}}{(\mathrm{mol\,L^{-1}})(\mathrm{mol\,L^{-1}})} = \frac{\mathrm{mol\,L^{-1}\,s^{-1}}}{\mathrm{mol^2\,L^{-2}}}$
Step 3 — Simplify.
$[k] = \mathrm{mol}^{1-2}\,\mathrm{L}^{-1+2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1} = \mathrm{mol^{-1}\,L\,s^{-1}}$ $\boxed{[k] = \mathrm{L\,mol^{-1}\,s^{-1}}}$
Step 4 — The general rule (learn this once, use it always). …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQ
$k =$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to test each statement against the Arrhenius equation and the definition of activation energy. The wrong statement is (D), because a catalyst does alter the activation energy $E_a$ by providing an alternative path with a lower value.

The Relevant Concept

The Arrhenius equation is the backbone of chemical kinetics for temperature dependence:
$k = A e^{-E_a / RT}$
Here:

$k$ is the rate constant.

$A$ is the Arrhenius constant (or pre-exponential factor), related to collision frequency and orientation.

$E_a$ is the activation energy — the minimum energy reactant molecules must have for a reaction to occur.

$R$ is the gas constant.

$T$ is the absolute temperature.

The fraction of molecules with energy at least $E_a$ is given by the Boltzmann factor $e^{-E_a / RT}$ . Taking natural logs gives a linear form:
$\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{R} \cdot \frac{1}{T}$
A catalyst works by providing a different reaction pathway with a lower activation energy, which directly changes $E_a$ . Let's check each statement.

Step-by-Step Analysis

1. Statement (A): "Rate constant $k =$ Arrhenius constant $A$ : if $E_a = 0$ "

If $E_a = 0$ , then $e^{-E_a / RT} = e^0 = 1$ . The Arrhenius equation becomes $k = A \cdot 1 = A$ . This is mathematically correct. A reaction with zero activation energy would proceed at every collision, so the rate constant equals the collision-frequency factor. This statement is true.

2. Statement (B): " $\ln k$ vs $\frac{1}{T}$ plot is a straight line."

From $\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{R} \cdot \frac{1}{T}$ , this is of the form $y = c + mx$ (with $y = \ln k$ , $x = 1/T$ , slope $m = -E_a/R$ , intercept $c = \ln A$ ). Over the temperature ranges where $E_a$ and $A$ are constant, this is indeed a straight line. This statement is true.

3. Statement (C): " $e^{-E_a/RT}$ gives the fraction of reactant molecules that are activated at the given temp" …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ49 — For a complex reaction _______. (Two or more than two options may be c…→Next questionQ51 — During decomposition of an activated complex (Two or more than two opt…

Q.At high pressure the following reaction is zero order.
$2NH_3(g) \xrightarrow[\text{Platinum catalyst}]{1130\ K} N_2(g) + 3H_2(g)$
Which of the following options are correct for this reaction? (Two or more than two options may be correct.)

Concept understanding — Zero Order Kinetics

Zero Order Kinetics: The Drug That Doesn't Care How Much You Give It

The Precise Statement

The Integrated Form and Half-Life

Where Does Zero Order Kinetics Actually Happen?

A Quick Comparison Table

Why this formula?

Zero Order Kinetics: Why the Formula Holds

The Core Idea

Why the Rate is Constant

Deriving the Zero Order Rate Law

Step 1: Write the rate definition

Step 2: Separate variables and integrate

Step 3: Rearrange to the familiar form

What This Formula Tells Us

The core idea: What does “zero order” actually mean?

Method: Zero Order Kinetics — Definition & Direct Application

Step 1 — Recall the defining equation of zero order kinetics

Step 2 — Apply to the given reaction

Step 3 — Interpret "constant rate until disappearance"

Common Mistakes in Zero Order Kinetics (NH₃ Decomposition)

Mistake 1: Confusing "Rate = k" with "Rate is constant"

Mistake 2: Selecting option (ii) — "Rate depends on concentration"

Mistake 3: Rejecting option (iii) — "Rate remains constant until NH₃ disappears"

Mistake 4: Selecting option (iv) — "Further increase in pressure changes rate"

Concept and Intuition

Step‑by‑Step Derivation

The Relevant Concept

Step-by-Step Analysis

The core idea: What does “zero order” actually mean?

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days