Q.If a+b+c=0 and abcbcacab=0, then prove that a=b=c.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2: …
Concept: Determinant Evaluation Using Identities (Row/Column Operations and Factorisation)
Step 1: Apply C1→C1+C2+C3 to the given determinant:
abcbcacab=a+b+ca+b+ca+b+cbcacab
Step 2: Factor (a+b+c) from C1 (since a+b+c=0, this factor is non-zero):
=(a+b+c)111bcacab
Step 3: Subtract R1 from R2 and R3:
=(a+b+c)100bc−ba−bca−cb−c
Step 4: Expand along C1:
=(a+b+c)[(c−b)(b−c)−(a−c)(a−b)]
Simplify: (c−b)(b−c)=−(b−c)2 and (a−c)(a−b)=a2−a(b+c)+bc. …
Adding all rows to the first row extracts a factor (a+b+c); since a+b+c=0, the remaining determinant must vanish, which reduces to (a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2=0 and forces a=b=c.
We are given a+b+c=0 and
Δ=abcbcacab=0.
Step 1 — Create a common factor. Apply C1→C1+C2+C3. Every entry of the first column becomes a+b+c:
Δ=a+b+ca+b+ca+b+cbcacab=(a+b+c)111bcacab.
Because a+b+c=0, the condition Δ=0 forces
111bcacab=0.
Step 2 — Reduce. Apply R2→R2−R1 and R3→R3−R1, then expand along the first column: …
Method: Creating a Common Factor via a Row/Column Sum, Then Reducing
Use this method whenever a determinant's rows (or columns) are cyclic rearrangements of the same three quantities, you're given that the determinant equals 0, and asked to derive an algebraic consequence (such as three quantities being equal).
Steps
Step 1: Add all rows (or columns) into one
Apply an operation like C1→C1+C2+C3 (or the row equivalent). When the rows/columns are cyclic permutations of the same three quantities, this sum collapses to the same expression in every entry of that column — typically the sum of the three quantities.
Step 2: Factor the common expression out
Since every entry in that column is now identical, factor it out as a scalar multiplying a simpler determinant (with a column of 1's standing where the common expression used to be).
Step 3: Use the given nonzero condition to cancel that factor
If you're told the extracted factor (e.g. a+b+c) is nonzero, and the original determinant equals 0, then the remaining determinant — after the factor is pulled out — must itself be 0: a nonzero number times something equal to zero forces that something to be zero. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Sign error applying C1→C1+C2+C3
Why it's wrong: this operation must add all three columns into column 1 (not subtract, and not add only two of them); getting it wrong means the entries of column 1 won't come out as the clean, uniform a+b+c, and the whole "factor it out" strategy collapses.
Mistake 2: Cancelling the factor (a+b+c) without stating why it's legal
Why it's wrong: dividing an equation like (a+b+c)⋅X=0 down to X=0 is only valid because the question explicitly gives a+b+c=0. Skipping this justification (or worse, cancelling when a+b+c could be 0) is a logical gap examiners specifically look for in "prove that" questions. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.cos(α+β)sinα−cosα−sin(α+β)cosαsinαcos2βsinβcosβ is independent of (A) β (B) α and β (C) Neither α nor β (D) α
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding along the first row collapses the determinant to 1+cos2β, which contains no α — so it is independent of α: option (D).
Cofactor expansion along row 1
The three minors are
M11=cosαsinαsinβcosβ=cosαcosβ−sinαsinβ=cos(α+β),
M12=sinα−cosαsinβcosβ=sinαcosβ+cosαsinβ=sin(α+β),
M13=sinα−cosαcosαsinα=sin2α+cos2α=1.
With the cofactor sign pattern (+,−,+) and the row-1 entries cos(α+β), −sin(α+β), cos2β: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.The cofactor of the element a21 in the expansion of Δ=1−32451492 is (A) 5 (B) −24 (C) −4 (D) −5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The cofactor of a21 is found by taking (−1)2+1 times the determinant of the submatrix obtained by deleting row 2 and column 1. The result is −4, so the correct option is (C).
The cofactor of an element in a matrix is not just the minor (the determinant of the submatrix left after removing that element’s row and column). It also includes a sign factor (−1)i+j, where i and j are the row and column indices. This sign alternates like a chessboard pattern. For a21 (row 2, column 1), the sign is negative because 2+1=3 is odd. So we compute the minor and then flip its sign.
- Identify the element and its position. The element a21 is in row 2, column 1. In the given matrix
Δ=1−32451492,
a21=−3. But the cofactor depends only on position, not on the value of the element itself.
- Delete row 2 and column 1. Removing row 2 and column 1 leaves the submatrix:
(4142).
- Compute the minor M21. The minor is the determinant of that 2×2 submatrix:
M21=4142=(4)(2)−(4)(1)=8−4=4.
- Apply the sign factor. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.