Q.If x+y+z=0, prove that xayczbybzaxczcxbya=xyzacbbaccba.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2: …
Concept — expand, then use x+y+z=0. Expanding the left determinant along the first row,
xayczbybzaxczcxbya=xyz(a3+b3+c3)−abc(x3+y3+z3).
Since x+y+z=0, the identity x3+y3+z3−3xyz=(x+y+z)(x2+y2+z2−xy−yz−zx) gives x3+y3+z3=3xyz. Hence
Δ=xyz(a3+b3+c3)−abc(3xyz)=xyz(a3+b3+c3−3abc). …
The left determinant expands to xyz(a3+b3+c3)−abc(x3+y3+z3); with x+y+z=0 we have x3+y3+z3=3xyz, leaving xyz(a3+b3+c3−3abc), which is xyz times the target determinant.
The idea
Expand the messy determinant into symmetric pieces. Everything collapses once x+y+z=0 is used through the identity x3+y3+z3−3xyz=(x+y+z)(x2+y2+z2−xy−yz−zx).
Step 1 — Expand the left side
Let Δ=xayczbybzaxczcxbya. Expanding along the first row and grouping terms,
Δ=xyza3+xyzb3+xyzc3−abcx3−abcy3−abcz3=xyz(a3+b3+c3)−abc(x3+y3+z3).
Step 2 — Apply x+y+z=0
From x3+y3+z3−3xyz=(x+y+z)(x2+y2+z2−xy−yz−zx) and x+y+z=0,
x3+y3+z3=3xyz.
Therefore
Δ=xyz(a3+b3+c3)−abc(3xyz)=xyz(a3+b3+c3−3abc). …
Method: Expanding a Determinant Identity and Applying a Symmetric-Function Constraint
Use this method whenever you must prove one determinant equals a scalar multiple of another, given an algebraic constraint (like x+y+z=0) on some of the variables involved.
Steps
Step 1: Expand the more complicated determinant fully
Expand the left-hand determinant by cofactor expansion and collect the result into natural groups — typically one group multiplying an expression like a3+b3+c3 and another multiplying an expression like x3+y3+z3, since the entries mix two sets of variables.
Step 2: Bring in the given constraint via a symmetric-function identity
Recall the standard identity
x3+y3+z3−3xyz=(x+y+z)(x2+y2+z2−xy−yz−zx).
When the problem states x+y+z=0, the right side vanishes, so this identity immediately gives x3+y3+z3=3xyz — substitute this simplification into the expansion from Step 1.
Step 3: Simplify to a single product
After substituting, the expression should collapse into a single product of a simple factor (like xyz) and a symmetric expression in the remaining variables (like a3+b3+c3−3abc).
Step 4: Evaluate the target determinant on the right-hand side independently …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Expanding the left determinant directly instead of grouping symmetric terms
Why it's wrong: brute-force cofactor expansion of a determinant whose nine entries are all products (like xa, yc, zb) generates many cross terms; without deliberately grouping into xyz(a3+b3+c3) and abc(x3+y3+z3), it's very easy to mis-collect terms and lose the clean structure the identity depends on.
Mistake 2: Using x3+y3+z3=3xyz as if it were always true
Why it's wrong: this simplification only holds because x+y+z=0 is given (from the identity x3+y3+z3−3xyz=(x+y+z)(x2+y2+z2−xy−yz−zx)); quoting it as a general algebraic fact without tying it to the given condition is a reasoning gap, and forgetting the condition entirely would make the whole proof invalid. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.cos(α+β)sinα−cosα−sin(α+β)cosαsinαcos2βsinβcosβ is independent of (A) β (B) α and β (C) Neither α nor β (D) α
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding along the first row collapses the determinant to 1+cos2β, which contains no α — so it is independent of α: option (D).
Cofactor expansion along row 1
The three minors are
M11=cosαsinαsinβcosβ=cosαcosβ−sinαsinβ=cos(α+β),
M12=sinα−cosαsinβcosβ=sinαcosβ+cosαsinβ=sin(α+β),
M13=sinα−cosαcosαsinα=sin2α+cos2α=1.
With the cofactor sign pattern (+,−,+) and the row-1 entries cos(α+β), −sin(α+β), cos2β: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.The cofactor of the element a21 in the expansion of Δ=1−32451492 is (A) 5 (B) −24 (C) −4 (D) −5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The cofactor of a21 is found by taking (−1)2+1 times the determinant of the submatrix obtained by deleting row 2 and column 1. The result is −4, so the correct option is (C).
The cofactor of an element in a matrix is not just the minor (the determinant of the submatrix left after removing that element’s row and column). It also includes a sign factor (−1)i+j, where i and j are the row and column indices. This sign alternates like a chessboard pattern. For a21 (row 2, column 1), the sign is negative because 2+1=3 is odd. So we compute the minor and then flip its sign.
- Identify the element and its position. The element a21 is in row 2, column 1. In the given matrix
Δ=1−32451492,
a21=−3. But the cofactor depends only on position, not on the value of the element itself.
- Delete row 2 and column 1. Removing row 2 and column 1 leaves the submatrix:
(4142).
- Compute the minor M21. The minor is the determinant of that 2×2 submatrix:
M21=4142=(4)(2)−(4)(1)=8−4=4.
- Apply the sign factor. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.