Q.If f(x)=0x+ax+bx−a0x+cx−bx−c0, then
(A) f(a)=0
(B) f(b)=0
(C) f(0)=0
(D) f(1)=0
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2: …
Concept: Determinant Evaluation Using Identities — notice the skew-symmetric pattern on the diagonal (all zeros).
Step 1: Write f(x) and observe that each row has a mix of x± constants.
Step 2: Substitute x=a:
f(a)=02aa+b00a+ca−ba−c0
The first row has two zeros, so expanding along row 1:
f(a)=0⋅(…)−0⋅(…)+(a−b)⋅2aa+b0a+c=(a−b)(2a(a+c)−0)=2a(a−b)(a+c)
This is zero only if a=0 or a=b or a=−c — not identically zero.
Step 3: Substitute x=b:
f(b)=0b+a2bb−a0b+c0b−c0
First row has zeros at columns 1 and 3, expand along row 1: …
Expanding the determinant gives f(x)=2x(x2+ac−ab−bc), so f(0)=0. Correct option: (C).
Expand along the first row (the (1,1) entry is 0):
f(x)=(x−a)(x−c)(x+b)+(x−b)(x+a)(x+c).
Multiplying out and collecting powers of x, the x2 terms and the constant terms cancel:
f(x)=2x3+2(ac−ab−bc)x=2x(x2+ac−ab−bc). …
Method: Testing Specific Substitutions in a Determinant Function
When a question asks which value of x makes a determinant function f(x) vanish, it is usually far faster to substitute each candidate value directly and look for a structural pattern that forces zero, rather than expanding f(x) symbolically in full.
Steps
Step 1: Substitute each candidate value one at a time
Plug each option's value of x into the determinant separately, rewriting the matrix's entries with that specific substitution.
Step 2: Look for a structural pattern that forces the determinant to zero
Check for a row of zeros, two identical rows/columns, or — critically — a skew-symmetric pattern: a zero diagonal with off-diagonal entries in mirrored +/− pairs, aij=−aji.
Step 3: Apply the odd-order skew-symmetric determinant rule
det(A)=0 whenever AT=−A and A has odd order …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Fully expanding f(x) symbolically instead of substituting candidate values directly
Why it's wrong: Expanding f(x) as a general cubic in x with three extra parameters a,b,c is long and highly error-prone; the question only asks which specific substitution gives zero, which is far faster to test directly. Correct approach: substitute each option's value of x into the determinant and look for a structural reason (zero row, repeated row, or skew-symmetry) that forces it to vanish.
Mistake 2: Not recognizing that f(0)'s matrix is skew-symmetric of odd order …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.cos(α+β)sinα−cosα−sin(α+β)cosαsinαcos2βsinβcosβ is independent of (A) β (B) α and β (C) Neither α nor β (D) α
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding along the first row collapses the determinant to 1+cos2β, which contains no α — so it is independent of α: option (D).
Cofactor expansion along row 1
The three minors are
M11=cosαsinαsinβcosβ=cosαcosβ−sinαsinβ=cos(α+β),
M12=sinα−cosαsinβcosβ=sinαcosβ+cosαsinβ=sin(α+β),
M13=sinα−cosαcosαsinα=sin2α+cos2α=1.
With the cofactor sign pattern (+,−,+) and the row-1 entries cos(α+β), −sin(α+β), cos2β: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.The cofactor of the element a21 in the expansion of Δ=1−32451492 is (A) 5 (B) −24 (C) −4 (D) −5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The cofactor of a21 is found by taking (−1)2+1 times the determinant of the submatrix obtained by deleting row 2 and column 1. The result is −4, so the correct option is (C).
The cofactor of an element in a matrix is not just the minor (the determinant of the submatrix left after removing that element’s row and column). It also includes a sign factor (−1)i+j, where i and j are the row and column indices. This sign alternates like a chessboard pattern. For a21 (row 2, column 1), the sign is negative because 2+1=3 is odd. So we compute the minor and then flip its sign.
- Identify the element and its position. The element a21 is in row 2, column 1. In the given matrix
Δ=1−32451492,
a21=−3. But the cofactor depends only on position, not on the value of the element itself.
- Delete row 2 and column 1. Removing row 2 and column 1 leaves the submatrix:
(4142).
- Compute the minor M21. The minor is the determinant of that 2×2 submatrix:
M21=4142=(4)(2)−(4)(1)=8−4=4.
- Apply the sign factor. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.